{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T20:18:05Z","timestamp":1785442685446,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Akademiai Kiado Zrt.","issue":"26","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,27]],"date-time":"2021-06-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1624752000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["akjournals.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["OH"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,27]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>\u00d6sszefoglal\u00f3.<\/jats:bold>\n                    <jats:italic>Bevezet\u00e9s:<\/jats:italic> A magyarorsz\u00e1gi vesetranszplant\u00e1ci\u00f3 2013 \u00f3ta az\n                    Eurotransplant (ET) keretein bel\u00fcl zajlik. A debreceni vesetranszplant\u00e1ci\u00f3s\n                    centrumhoz \u00e9vente kb. 200 kad\u00e1verdonorvese-felaj\u00e1nl\u00e1s \u00e9rkezik, melyek 37%-a\n                    ker\u00fcl a megismert adatok alapj\u00e1n elfogad\u00e1sra. Nem minden elfogadott vese ker\u00fcl\n                    be\u00fcltet\u00e9sre, aminek sz\u00e1mos oka lehet. <jats:italic>C\u00e9lkit\u0171z\u00e9s:<\/jats:italic> A debreceni\n                    szakmai gyakorlat elemz\u00e9se \u00e9s bemutat\u00e1sa reprezentat\u00edv mint\u00e1n.\n                        <jats:italic>M\u00f3dszer:<\/jats:italic> A debreceni centrumhoz 2016. november \u00e9s 2020.\n                    m\u00e1rcius k\u00f6z\u00f6tt 624 vesefelaj\u00e1nl\u00e1s \u00e9rkezett. A felaj\u00e1nlott ves\u00e9k 37%-a (n = 229)\n                    ker\u00fclt el\u0151zetesen elfogad\u00e1sra, k\u00e9s\u0151bb az elfogadott ves\u00e9k 63%-a (n = 144) ker\u00fclt\n                    be\u00fcltet\u00e9sre. Centrumunkban az \u00fan. <jats:italic>\u2019standard criteria\u2019,<\/jats:italic> azaz\n                    t\u00f6k\u00e9letes min\u0151s\u00e9g\u0171 donorves\u00e9k szignifik\u00e1nsan magasabb ar\u00e1nyban ker\u00fcltek\n                    elfogad\u00e1sra, majd be\u00fcltet\u00e9sre, mint az <jats:italic>\u2019extended criteria\u2019,<\/jats:italic>\n                    azaz kompromisszummal v\u00e1llalhat\u00f3k. Az elfogadott \u00e9s nem elfogadott ves\u00e9ket\n                    vizsg\u00e1lva a KDPI (kidney donor profile index) \u00e9s a KDRI (kidney donor risk\n                    index) \u00e9rt\u00e9ke szignifik\u00e1nsan magasabb volt az elutas\u00edtott donorok eset\u00e9ben\n                    (p&lt;0,001). <jats:italic>Eredm\u00e9nyek:<\/jats:italic> Elemezt\u00fck, hogy a felaj\u00e1nlott, de a\n                    centrum \u00e1ltal nem be\u00fcltetett donorves\u00e9ket m\u00e1s ET-centrumban elfogadt\u00e1k-e.\n                    L\u00e1that\u00f3, hogy a felaj\u00e1nlott 624 donorvese k\u00f6z\u00fcl 144 Debrecenben, 313 pedig m\u00e1s\n                    ET-centrumban ker\u00fclt be\u00fcltet\u00e9sre, viszont 167 vese be\u00fcltet\u00e9se egyik\n                    ET-centrumban sem t\u00f6rt\u00e9nt meg (discarded organ). A 36\u201385 KDPI-\u00e9rt\u00e9kkel\n                    rendelkez\u0151 csoportb\u00f3l ker\u00fclt be\u00fcltet\u00e9sre a legt\u00f6bb donorvese (180 vese) m\u00e1s\n                    ET-centrumban. A Debrecenben be\u00fcltetett kad\u00e1verdonor-ves\u00e9k KDPI- \u00e9s KDRI-\u00e9rt\u00e9ke\n                    szignifik\u00e1nsan alacsonyabb volt a nek\u00fcnk felaj\u00e1nlott, majd m\u00e1shol be\u00fcltetett\n                    ves\u00e9khez k\u00e9pest. <jats:italic>K\u00f6vetkeztet\u00e9s:<\/jats:italic> \u00d6sszess\u00e9g\u00e9ben elmondhat\u00f3, hogy\n                    a debreceni centrumban a magas rizik\u00f3csoportba tartoz\u00f3 donorszervek elutas\u00edt\u00e1sra\n                    ker\u00fcltek, mik\u00f6zben m\u00e1s centrumban a nagy r\u00e9sz\u00fcket be\u00fcltett\u00e9k. Ez alapj\u00e1n a 36\u201385\n                    KDPI-\u00e9rt\u00e9k\u0171 csoport a transzplant\u00e1ci\u00f3s esetsz\u00e1m b\u0151v\u00edt\u00e9s\u00e9nek lehets\u00e9ges forr\u00e1sa a\n                    recipiens ismeret\u00e9ben. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(26): 1022\u20131028.<\/jats:p>\n                <jats:p><jats:bold>Summary.<\/jats:bold>\n                    <jats:italic>Introduction:<\/jats:italic> Kidney transplantation in Hungary is carried out\n                        <jats:italic>via<\/jats:italic> Eurotransplant (ET). Our centre in Debrecen receives\n                    around 200 kidney offers a year, of which 37% are accepted. Not all accepted\n                    kidneys are transplanted, which can be a result of a number of causes.\n                        <jats:italic>Obejctive:<\/jats:italic> A debreceni szakmai gyakorlat elemz\u00e9se \u00e9s\n                    bemutat\u00e1sa reprezentat\u00edv mint\u00e1n. <jats:italic>Method:<\/jats:italic> Between November 2016\n                    and March 2020, the centre of Debrecen received 624 kidney offers. 37% (n\u00a0=\u00a0229)\n                    of the offered kidneys got preliminarily accepted, of which 63% (n = 144) were\n                    transplanted later. In our centre, <jats:italic>standard criteria<\/jats:italic> donor\n                    kidneys were accepted and transplanted in significantly higher rate, than\n                        <jats:italic>extended criteria<\/jats:italic> donor kidneys. Looking at accepted and\n                    rejected kidneys, KDPI and KDRI values were significantly higher in the case of\n                    the refused ones (p&lt;0.001). <jats:italic>Results:<\/jats:italic> Part of our assessment\n                    is to analyze whether kidneys offered to and refused by us got accepted in other\n                    transplant centres. In the examined period, of the 624 kidneys offered to our\n                    centre 144 were transplanted in Debrecen, 313 were transplanted in other ET\n                    centres, while 167 were not transplanted at all (discarded organ). The majority\n                    of transplanted kidneys in other ET centres had KDPI values between 36 and 85\n                    (180 kidneys.) KDPI and KDRI values of kidneys transplanted in our centre were\n                    significantly lower than those that were offered to us, but got transplanted\n                    elsewhere. <jats:italic>Conclusion:<\/jats:italic> To summarize, we can say that high-risk\n                    donor organs are refused in the transplant centre of Debrecen, while the\n                    majority of them are being transplanted in other centres. Based on this, kidneys\n                    of KDPI value between 36 and 85 are a possible source of expanding the number of\n                    transplantations, with regards to the recipient. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(26):\n                    1022\u20131028.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1556\/650.2021.32253","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,31]],"date-time":"2021-08-31T10:03:55Z","timestamp":1630404235000},"page":"1022-1028","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/policypage.crossmark.crossref.1","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A kad\u00e1verdonor-ves\u00e9k elfogad\u00e1si gyakorlat\u00e1nak vizsg\u00e1lata a debreceni transzplant\u00e1ci\u00f3s centrumban"],"prefix":"10.1556","volume":"162","author":[{"given":"Ildik\u00f3","family":"Nagy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"1 Debreceni Egyetem, \u00c1ltal\u00e1nos Orvostudom\u00e1nyi Kar, Seb\u00e9szeti Int\u00e9zet, Szervtranszplant\u00e1ci\u00f3s Nem \u00d6n\u00e1ll\u00f3 Tansz\u00e9k, Debrecen, M\u00f3ricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anita Katalin","family":"Varga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1 Debreceni Egyetem, \u00c1ltal\u00e1nos Orvostudom\u00e1nyi Kar, Seb\u00e9szeti Int\u00e9zet, Szervtranszplant\u00e1ci\u00f3s Nem \u00d6n\u00e1ll\u00f3 Tansz\u00e9k, Debrecen, M\u00f3ricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norbert","family":"Bal\u00e1zsfalvi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1 Debreceni Egyetem, \u00c1ltal\u00e1nos Orvostudom\u00e1nyi Kar, Seb\u00e9szeti Int\u00e9zet, Szervtranszplant\u00e1ci\u00f3s Nem \u00d6n\u00e1ll\u00f3 Tansz\u00e9k, Debrecen, M\u00f3ricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bal\u00e1zs","family":"Nemes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1 Debreceni Egyetem, \u00c1ltal\u00e1nos Orvostudom\u00e1nyi Kar, Seb\u00e9szeti Int\u00e9zet, Szervtranszplant\u00e1ci\u00f3s Nem \u00d6n\u00e1ll\u00f3 Tansz\u00e9k, Debrecen, M\u00f3ricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"425","reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"1 Wettstein D, Hamar M, Cseprek\u00e1l O, et al. Machine perfusion: new opportunities in abdominal organ transplantation. [Szervkonzerv\u00e1l\u00e1s g\u00e9pi perf\u00fazi\u00f3val: \u00faj lehet\u0151s\u00e9gek a hasi szervek transzplant\u00e1ci\u00f3j\u00e1ban.] Orv Hetil. 2018; 159: 1882-1890. [Hungarian]","DOI":"10.1556\/650.2018.31282"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"2 Z\u00e1dori G, Tarj\u00e1nyi VP, Szab\u00f3 R, et al. Analysis of donor scoring systems in a single Hungarian transplant centre. [Donorszelekci\u00f3s krit\u00e9riumok vizsg\u00e1lata a debreceni vese\u00e1t\u00fcltet\u00e9si programban.] Orv Hetil. 2016; 157: 946-955. [Hungarian]","DOI":"10.1556\/650.2016.30497"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-141-2-200407200-00007","article-title":"The incidence of end-stage renal disease is increasing faster than the prevalence of chronic renal insufficiency","volume":"141","author":"3 Hsu","year":"2004","unstructured":"3 Hsu CY, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, et al. The incidence of end-stage renal disease is increasing faster than the prevalence of chronic renal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 95-101.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"4 Lee AP, Abramowicz D. Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a step forward in the assessment of deceased donor kidney quality? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015; 30: 1285-1290.","DOI":"10.1093\/ndt\/gfu304"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1111\/ajt.13886","article-title":"Efficacy and safety outcomes of extended criteria donor kidneys by subtype: subgroup analysis of BENEFIT-EXT at 7 years after transplant","volume":"17","author":"5 Florman","year":"2017","unstructured":"5 Florman S, Becker T, Bresnahan B, et al. Efficacy and safety outcomes of extended criteria donor kidneys by subtype: subgroup analysis of BENEFIT-EXT at 7 years after transplant. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17: 180-190.","journal-title":"Am J Transplant"},{"key":"ref5","unstructured":"6 Palkoci B, Vojtko M, Fialov\u00e1 J, et al. Results of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors: a single-center experience. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2018; 9: 1-9."},{"key":"ref6","unstructured":"7 OPTN. A Guide to calculating and interpreting the Kidney Donor Profle Index (KDPI). Available from: https:\/\/optn.transplant.hrsa.gov\/media\/1512\/guide_to_calculating_interpreting_kdpi.pdf [accessed: March 1, 2021]."},{"key":"ref7","unstructured":"8 Eurotransplant. Statistics Report Library. Available from: https:\/\/statistics.eurotransplant.org\/ [accessed: March 2, 2021]."},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1097\/TP.0b013e3181ac620b","article-title":"A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index","volume":"88","author":"9 Rao","year":"2009","unstructured":"9 Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index. Transplantation 2009; 88: 231-236.","journal-title":"Transplantation"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.transproceed.2019.02.075","article-title":"Crucial role of extended criteria donors in deceased donor single kidney transplantation to face chronic shortage in the heart of the Mediterranean basin: a single-center experience","volume":"51","author":"10 Bonsignorea","year":"2019","unstructured":"10 Bonsignorea P, Pagano D, Piazza S, et al. Crucial role of extended criteria donors in deceased donor single kidney transplantation to face chronic shortage in the heart of the Mediterranean basin: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2019; 51: 2868-2872.","journal-title":"Transplant Proc"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"11 Stratta RJ, Rohr MS, Sundberg AK, et al. Intermediate term outcomes with expanded criteria deceased donors in kidney transplantation: a spectrum or specter of quality? Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 594-601.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000216302.43776.1a"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"688","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000124296.46712.67","article-title":"Increased kidney transplantation utilizing expanded criteria deceased organ donors with results comparable to standard criteria donor transplant","volume":"239","author":"12 Stratta","year":"2004","unstructured":"12 Stratta RJ, Rohr MS, Sundberg AK, et al. Increased kidney transplantation utilizing expanded criteria deceased organ donors with results comparable to standard criteria donor transplant. Ann Surg. 2004; 239: 688-695.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1681\/ASN.V123589","article-title":"Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates","volume":"12","author":"13 Ojo","year":"2001","unstructured":"13 Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche HU, et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12: 589-597.","journal-title":"Am Soc Nephrol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.ki.5000102","article-title":"Retrospective follow-up of transplantation of kidneys from 'marginal' donors","volume":"69","author":"14 Dahmane","year":"2006","unstructured":"14 Dahmane D, Audard V, Hiesse C, et al. Retrospective follow-up of transplantation of kidneys from 'marginal' donors. Kidney Int. 2006; 69: 546-552.","journal-title":"Kidney Int"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"15 De Rosa P, Muscogiuri G, Sarno G. Expanded criteria donors in kidney transplantation: the role of older donors in a setting of older recipients. ISRN Transplant. 2013; 2013: 301025.","DOI":"10.5402\/2013\/301025"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"16 Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, et al. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003; 3(Suppl 4): 114-225.","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-6143.3.s4.11.x"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2898","DOI":"10.1097\/TP.0000000000001824","article-title":"Accept or decline? An analytics-based decision tool for kidney offer evaluation","volume":"101","author":"17 Bertsimas","year":"2017","unstructured":"17 Bertsimas D, Kung J, Trichakis N, et al. Accept or decline? An analytics-based decision tool for kidney offer evaluation. Transplantation 2017; 101: 2898-2904.","journal-title":"Transplantation"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1499","DOI":"10.1093\/ndt\/13.6.1499","article-title":"Pre-operative echocardiographic abnormalities and adverse outcome following renal transplantation","volume":"13","author":"18 McGregor","year":"1998","unstructured":"18 McGregor E, Jardine AG, Murray LS, et al. Pre-operative echocardiographic abnormalities and adverse outcome following renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998; 13: 1499-1505.","journal-title":"Nephrol Dial Transplant"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/S0272-6386(99)70118-6","article-title":"Left ventricular mass index increase in early renal disease: impact of decline in hemoglobin","volume":"34","author":"19 Levin","year":"1999","unstructured":"19 Levin A, Thompson CR, Ethier J, et al. Left ventricular mass index increase in early renal disease: impact of decline in hemoglobin. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 34: 125-134.","journal-title":"Am J Kidney Dis"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1580","DOI":"10.1097\/00007890-200212150-00016","article-title":"Cardiovascular effects of successful renal transplantation: a 1-year sequential study of left ventricular morphology and function, and 24-hour blood pressure profile","volume":"74","author":"20 Ferreira","year":"2002","unstructured":"20 Ferreira SR, Moises VA, Tavares A, et al. Cardiovascular effects of successful renal transplantation: a 1-year sequential study of left ventricular morphology and function, and 24-hour blood pressure profile. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1580-1587.","journal-title":"Transplantation"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1093\/ndt\/gfz053","article-title":"Cardiovascular disease in the kidney transplant recipient: epidemiology, diagnosis and management strategies","volume":"34","author":"21 Rangaswami","year":"2019","unstructured":"21 Rangaswami J, Mathew RO, Parasuraman R, et al. Cardiovascular disease in the kidney transplant recipient: epidemiology, diagnosis and management strategies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019; 34: 760-773.","journal-title":"Nephrol Dial Transplant"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"22 Zens TJ, Danobeitia JS, Leverson G, et al. The impact of kidney donor profile index on delayed graft function and transplant outcomes: a single-center analysis. Clin Transpl. 2018; 32: e13190.","DOI":"10.1111\/ctr.13190"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2515","DOI":"10.1111\/ajt.12928","article-title":"The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of marginal donors allocated by standardized pre-transplant donor biopsy assessment: distribution and association with graft outcomes","volume":"14","author":"23 Gandolfini","year":"2014","unstructured":"23 Gandolfini I, Buzio C, Zanelli P, et al. The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of marginal donors allocated by standardized pre-transplant donor biopsy assessment: distribution and association with graft outcomes. Am J Transpl. 2014; 14: 2515-2525.","journal-title":"Am J Transpl"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nefro.2018.03.003","article-title":"Usefulness of the KDPI in Spain: a comparison with donor age and definition of standard\/expanded criteria donor","volume":"38","author":"24 Arias-Cabrales","year":"2018","unstructured":"24 Arias-Cabrales C, P\u00e9rez-S\u00e1ez MJ, Redondo-Pach\u00f3n D, et al. Usefulness of the KDPI in Spain: a comparison with donor age and definition of standard\/expanded criteria donor. Nefrologia 2018; 38: 503-513.","journal-title":"Nefrologia"}],"container-title":["Orvosi Hetilap"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/view\/journals\/650\/162\/26\/article-p1022.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/650\/162\/26\/article-p1022.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,30]],"date-time":"2023-10-30T15:38:07Z","timestamp":1698680287000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/view\/journals\/650\/162\/26\/article-p1022.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,27]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"26"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/650.2021.32253","relation":{},"ISSN":["0030-6002","1788-6120"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0030-6002","type":"print"},{"value":"1788-6120","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,27]]}}}