{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T13:06:43Z","timestamp":1776863203728,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":103,"publisher":"Akademiai Kiado Zrt.","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,2]],"date-time":"2025-03-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740873600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["akjournals.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["OH"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>A magzati sorvad\u00e1s (fetal growth restriction \u2013 FGR) gyakori sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti\n                    sz\u00f6v\u0151dm\u00e9ny, amelyr\u0151l akkor besz\u00e9l\u00fcnk, ha a m\u00e9hlep\u00e9ny diszfunkci\u00f3ja miatt a\n                    magzat nem k\u00e9pes teljes\u00edteni a genetikailag determin\u00e1lt teljes n\u00f6veked\u00e9si\n                    potenci\u00e1lj\u00e1t. A korai kiindul\u00e1s\u00fa (&lt;32. gestati\u00f3s h\u00e9t) sorvad\u00e1s jelent\u0151s\n                    m\u00e9rt\u00e9kben t\u00e1rsul k\u00f3ros trophoblastinv\u00e1zi\u00f3val \u00e9s k\u00f6vetkezm\u00e9nyes lep\u00e9nyi\n                    el\u00e9gtelens\u00e9ggel. A magzati sorvad\u00e1shoz vezet\u0151 \u00e1llapotok a fetoplacentomaternalis\n                    egys\u00e9g betegs\u00e9gei, a magzati malnutritio, amely a halvasz\u00fclet\u00e9s, a neonatalis\n                    morbidit\u00e1s \u00e9s mortalit\u00e1s, valamint a feln\u0151ttkorban manifeszt\u00e1l\u00f3d\u00f3 metabolikus\n                    betegs\u00e9gek kock\u00e1zat\u00e1nak szignifik\u00e1ns emelked\u00e9s\u00e9vel j\u00e1r. Ha a magzat m\u00e9rete a\n                    becs\u00fclt magzati s\u00falyt \u00e9s a hask\u00f6rfogatot m\u00e9rve a gestati\u00f3s kori\n                    referenciastandardok 10. percentilise al\u00e1 esik, t\u00f6bb modalit\u00e1s\u00fa kivizsg\u00e1l\u00e1s (a\n                    Doppler-\u00e1raml\u00e1s m\u00e9r\u00e9se az a. umbilicalis \u00e9s a. cerebri media erekben,\n                    kardiotokogr\u00e1fia \u00e9s biofizikai profil) aj\u00e1nlott. A korai (&lt;32. gestati\u00f3s h\u00e9t)\n                    \u00e9s a k\u00e9s\u0151i (\u226532. gestati\u00f3s h\u00e9t) kiindul\u00e1s\u00fa sorvad\u00e1s legjelent\u0151sebb\n                    jellegzetess\u00e9geit a nemzetk\u00f6zi Delphi-konszenzus tartalmazza. A korai diagn\u00f3zis,\n                    a szoros k\u00f6vet\u00e9s \u00e9s az id\u0151z\u00edtett sz\u00fcl\u00e9s alapvet\u0151 jelent\u0151s\u00e9g\u0171 a magzati sorvad\u00e1s\n                    r\u00f6vid \u00e9s hossz\u00fa t\u00e1v\u00fa kedvez\u0151tlen perinatalis kimenetel\u00e9nek megel\u0151z\u00e9s\u00e9ben. A\n                    kor\u00e1hoz k\u00e9pest kis s\u00faly\u00fa (small for gestational age \u2013 SGA), de egy\u00e9bk\u00e9nt\n                    eg\u00e9szs\u00e9ges magzat\/\u00fajsz\u00fcl\u00f6tt \u00e9s a sorvadt, n\u00f6veked\u00e9sben visszamaradt magzat\n                    k\u00f6z\u00f6tt az a k\u00fcl\u00f6nbs\u00e9g, hogy az SGA magzatot\/\u00fajsz\u00fcl\u00f6ttet nem fenyegeti lep\u00e9nyi\n                    diszfunkci\u00f3 \u00e9s kedvez\u0151tlen perinatalis, valamint hossz\u00fa t\u00e1v\u00fa k\u00f6vetkezm\u00e9ny,\n                    ellent\u00e9tben az FGR-magzattal. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(9): 331\u2013340.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1556\/650.2025.33254","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,3]],"date-time":"2025-03-03T11:16:39Z","timestamp":1741000599000},"page":"331-340","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/policypage.crossmark.crossref.2","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A magzati sorvad\u00e1s mint a m\u00e9hlep\u00e9ny betegs\u00e9ge"],"prefix":"10.1556","volume":"166","author":[{"given":"Bal\u00e1zs","family":"G\u00e9recz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternity Sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti \u00e9s N\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szati Mag\u00e1nklinika Budapest, Kir\u00e1lyh\u00e1g\u00f3 t\u00e9r 8\u20139., 1126 Magyarorsz\u00e1g"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zor\u00e1n","family":"Belics","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternity Sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti \u00e9s N\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szati Mag\u00e1nklinika Budapest, Kir\u00e1lyh\u00e1g\u00f3 t\u00e9r 8\u20139., 1126 Magyarorsz\u00e1g"},{"name":"Sz\u00e9chenyi Istv\u00e1n Egyetem, Eg\u00e9szs\u00e9g- \u00e9s Sporttudom\u00e1nyi Kar, Sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti \u00e9s N\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szati Tansz\u00e9k Gy\u0151r Magyarorsz\u00e1g"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gizella","family":"Moln\u00e1r","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternity Sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti \u00e9s N\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szati Mag\u00e1nklinika Budapest, Kir\u00e1lyh\u00e1g\u00f3 t\u00e9r 8\u20139., 1126 Magyarorsz\u00e1g"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Petronella","family":"Hupuczi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternity Sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti \u00e9s N\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szati Mag\u00e1nklinika Budapest, Kir\u00e1lyh\u00e1g\u00f3 t\u00e9r 8\u20139., 1126 Magyarorsz\u00e1g"},{"name":"Semmelweis Egyetem, \u00c1ltal\u00e1nos Orvostudom\u00e1nyi Kar, Intenz\u00edv Ter\u00e1pi\u00e1s Klinika, Aneszteziol\u00f3giai \u00e9s Intenz\u00edv Ter\u00e1pi\u00e1s Tansz\u00e9k Budapest Magyarorsz\u00e1g"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"425","reference":[{"key":"ref0","unstructured":"1 Papp Z. Textbook of obstetrics and gynecology. Seventh updated edition. [A sz\u00fcl\u00e9szet-n\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szat tank\u00f6nyve. Hetedik, friss\u00edtett kiad\u00e1s.] Semmelweis Kiad\u00f3, Budapest, 2023. [Hungarian]"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.019","article-title":"Familial aggregation of small-for-gestational-age births: the importance of fetal genetic effects","volume":"194","author":"2 Svensson","year":"2006","unstructured":"2 Svensson AC, Pawitan Y, Cnattingius S, et al. Familial aggregation of small-for-gestational-age births: the importance of fetal genetic effects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 475-479.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwk107","article-title":"Genetic and environmental influences on birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and gestational age by use of population-based parent-offspring data","volume":"165","author":"3 Lunde","year":"2007","unstructured":"3 Lunde A, Melve KK, Gjessing HK, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and gestational age by use of population-based parent-offspring data. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165: 734-741.","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"4 Resnik R. Intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 490-496.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01780-X"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.32.5.793","article-title":"Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation","volume":"32","author":"5 Lubchenco","year":"1963","unstructured":"5 Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, et al. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 1963; 32: 793-800.","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"ref5","unstructured":"6 Manning FA. Intrauterine growth retardation. Fetal medicine: principal and practice. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1995; p. 317."},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1159\/000240173","article-title":"A comparison of normal fetal growth and its variation by the birth weight percentiles from different populations","volume":"14","author":"7 Bazs\u00f3","year":"1969","unstructured":"7 Bazs\u00f3 J. A comparison of normal fetal growth and its variation by the birth weight percentiles from different populations. Biol Neonat. 1969; 14: 80-89.","journal-title":"Biol Neonat"},{"key":"ref7","unstructured":"8 Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Hunter SH. Intrauterine growth restriction: identification and management. Am Fam Physician 1998; 58: 453-460.; 466-467."},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12205","article-title":"Perinatal mortality by birthweight centile","volume":"54","author":"9 Francis","year":"2014","unstructured":"9 Francis JH, Permezel M, Davey MA. Perinatal mortality by birthweight centile. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 54: 354-359.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"10 Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet 2016; 387: 691-702. Erratum: Lancet 2021; 398(10306): 1132.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)02094-8"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1113\/JP271402","article-title":"The consequences of fetal growth restriction on brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome","volume":"594","author":"11 Miller","year":"2016","unstructured":"11 Miller SL, Huppi PS, Mallard C. The consequences of fetal growth restriction on brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome. J Physiol. 2016; 594: 807-823.","journal-title":"J Physiol"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"12 Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2162-2172. Erratum: Lancet. 2015; 385(9983): 2152.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1802","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa044160","article-title":"Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary events as adults","volume":"353","author":"13 Barker","year":"2005","unstructured":"13 Barker DJ, Osmond C, Fors\u00e9n TJ, et al. Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary events as adults. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1802-1809.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"14 Van Wyk L, Boers KE, van der Post JA, et al. and DIGITAT Study Group. Effects on (neuro)developmental and behavioral outcome at 2 years of age of induced labor compared with expectant management in intrauterine growth-restricted infants: long-term outcomes of the DIGITAT trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 406.e1-406.e7.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.02.003"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"15 Boers KE, van Wyk L, van der Post JA, et al. and DIGITAT Study Group. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 344.e1-344.e7.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.015"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1226-7","article-title":"EVERREST prospective study: a 6-year prospective study to define the clinical and biological characteristics of pregnancies affected by severe early onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"17","author":"16 Spencer","year":"2017","unstructured":"16 Spencer R, Ambler G, Brodszki J, et al. and EVERREST Consortium. EVERREST prospective study: a 6-year prospective study to define the clinical and biological characteristics of pregnancies affected by severe early onset fetal growth restriction. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17: 43.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20282","article-title":"Prenatal identification of small-for-gestational-age and risk of neonatal morbidity and stillbirth","volume":"55","author":"17 Nohuz","year":"2020","unstructured":"17 Nohuz E, Rivi\u00e8re O, Coste K, et al. Prenatal identification of small-for-gestational-age and risk of neonatal morbidity and stillbirth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55: 621-628.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17287","article-title":"Birth weight in live births and stillbirths","volume":"48","author":"18 Poon","year":"2016","unstructured":"18 Poon LC, Tan MY, Yerlikaya G, et al. Birth weight in live births and stillbirths. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 602-606.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.06.026","article-title":"Reduced growth velocity at term is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in non-small for gestational age infants","volume":"240","author":"19 Bligh","year":"2019","unstructured":"19 Bligh LN, Flatley CJ, Kumar S. Reduced growth velocity at term is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in non-small for gestational age infants. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 240: 125-129.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13319","article-title":"Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term","volume":"43","author":"20 Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2014","unstructured":"20 Morales-Rosell\u00f3 J, Khalil A, Morlando M, et al. Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 303-310.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"21 Prior T, Paramasivam G, Bennett P, et al. Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46: 460-464.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14758"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"22 Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, et al. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2015; 386: 2089-2097. Erratum: Lancet 2015; 386: 2058.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"23 Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GC, et al. Customised and noncustomised birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland. PLoS Med. 2017; 14: e1002228.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002228"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000388","article-title":"Birth weight percentile and the risk of term perinatal death","volume":"124","author":"24 Moraitis","year":"2014","unstructured":"24 Moraitis AA, Wood AM, Fleming M, et al. Birth weight percentile and the risk of term perinatal death. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 274-283.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14644","article-title":"Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival","volume":"45","author":"25 Vasak","year":"2015","unstructured":"25 Vasak B, Koenen SV, Koster MP, et al. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45: 162-167.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref25","unstructured":"26 Berk\u0151 P, Joubert K. Intrauterine growth restriction and obstetrical management of IUGR. [Az intrauterin n\u00f6veked\u00e9si retard\u00e1ci\u00f3 \u00e9s annak sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti ell\u00e1t\u00e1sa.] Magy N\u0151orv L. 2015; 78: 134-145. [Hungarian]"},{"key":"ref26","unstructured":"27 Belics Z. The fetal growth restriction: diagnosis and management. [A magzati n\u00f6veked\u00e9si restrikci\u00f3: k\u00f3rism\u00e9z\u00e9s \u00e9s ell\u00e1t\u00e1s.] Magy N\u0151orv L. 2020; 83: 70-79. [Hungarian]"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2011.01406.x","article-title":"Antenatal care, identification of suboptimal fetal growth and risk of late stillbirth: findings from the Auckland Stillbirth Study","volume":"52","author":"28 Stacey","year":"2012","unstructured":"28 Stacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, et al. Antenatal care, identification of suboptimal fetal growth and risk of late stillbirth: findings from the Auckland Stillbirth Study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 52: 242-247.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"29 Lindqvist PG, Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25: 258-264.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1806"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1159\/000359969","article-title":"Placental pathology in early-onset and late-onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"36","author":"Mifsud W","year":"2014","unstructured":"30 Mifsud W, Sebire NJ. Placental pathology in early-onset and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014; 36: 117-128.","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction","volume":"56","author":"31 Lees","year":"2020","unstructured":"31 Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56: 298-312.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"32 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins - Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicin. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133: e97-e109.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003070"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12371","article-title":"ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics","volume":"41","author":"33 Bhide","year":"2013","unstructured":"33 Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 233-239.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"34 Salomon","year":"2019","unstructured":"34 Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Da Silva Costa F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 715-723.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"193","author":"35 Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2015","unstructured":"35 Vayssi\u00e8re C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, et al. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 193: 10-18.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref35","unstructured":"36 New Zealand Maternal Fetal Medicine Network. Guideline for the management of suspected small for gestational age singleton pregnancies and infants after 34 weeks' gestation. New Zealand Maternal Fetal Medicine Network, Auckland, 2014."},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000001203","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction: a comprehensive review of major guidelines","volume":"78","author":"37 Giouleka","year":"2023","unstructured":"37 Giouleka S, Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, et al. Fetal growth restriction: a comprehensive review of major guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2023; 78: 690-708.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5160","article-title":"Risk for chromosomal aberrations in apparently isolated intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review","volume":"37","author":"38 Sagi-Dain","year":"2017","unstructured":"38 Sagi-Dain L, Peleg A, Sagi S. Risk for chromosomal aberrations in apparently isolated intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2017; 37: 1061-1066.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"39 Walker DM, Marlow N, Upstone L, et al. The Growth Restriction Intervention Trial: long-term outcomes in a randomized trial of timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 34.e1-34.e9.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.09.019"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)33212-4","article-title":"Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial","volume":"393","author":"40 Duhig","year":"2019","unstructured":"40 Duhig KE, Myers J, Seed PT, et al. PARROT trial group. Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 393: 1807-1818.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"41 Gordijn","year":"2016","unstructured":"41 Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 333-339.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20854","article-title":"Validation of Delphi procedure consensus criteria for defining fetal growth restriction","volume":"56","author":"42 Molina","year":"2020","unstructured":"42 Molina LC, Odibo L, Zientara S, et al. Validation of Delphi procedure consensus criteria for defining fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56: 61-66.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"43 Levytska K, Higgins M, Keating S, et al. Placental pathology in relation to uterine artery Doppler findings in pregnancies with severe intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler changes. Am J Perinatol. 2017; 34: 451-457.","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1592347"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"44 McCowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S855-S868.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.004"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"45 Ogge G, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, et al. Placental lesions associated with maternal underperfusion are more frequent in early-onset than in late-onset preeclampsia. J Perinat Med. 2011; 39: 641-652.","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2011.098"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00882.x","article-title":"Morphometric placental villous and vascular abnormalities in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia with and without fetal growth restriction","volume":"113","author":"46 Egbor","year":"2006","unstructured":"46 Egbor M, Ansari T, Morris N, et al. Morphometric placental villous and vascular abnormalities in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia with and without fetal growth restriction. BJOG 2006; 113: 580-589.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1947","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13607","article-title":"Brain sparing effect in growth-restricted fetuses is associated with decreased cardiac acceleration and deceleration capacities: a case-control study","volume":"123","author":"47 Stampalija","year":"2016","unstructured":"47 Stampalija T, Casati D, Monasta L, et al. Brain sparing effect in growth-restricted fetuses is associated with decreased cardiac acceleration and deceleration capacities: a case-control study. BJOG 2016; 123: 1947-1954.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75","article-title":"Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction","volume":"109","author":"48 Baschat","year":"2007","unstructured":"48 Baschat AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 253-261.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2002.00627.x","article-title":"Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus","volume":"19","author":"49 Ferrazzi","year":"2002","unstructured":"49 Ferrazzi E, Bozzo M, Rigano S, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 19: 140-146.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"50 Mateus J, Newman RB, Zhang C. Fetal growth patterns in pregnancy associated hypertensive disorders: NICHD fetal growth studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221: 635.e1-635.e16.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.028"},{"key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6265","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1520356113","article-title":"Pravastatin ameliorates placental vascular defects, fetal growth, and cardiac function in a model of glucocorticoid excess","volume":"113","author":"51 Wyrwoll","year":"2016","unstructured":"51 Wyrwoll CS, Noble J, Thomson A, et al. Pravastatin ameliorates placental vascular defects, fetal growth, and cardiac function in a model of glucocorticoid excess. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113: 6265-6270.","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci USA"},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.09.005","article-title":"Association of smoking during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction: subgroups of higher susceptibility","volume":"138","author":"52 Figueras","year":"2008","unstructured":"52 Figueras F, Meler E, Eixarch E, et al. Association of smoking during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction: subgroups of higher susceptibility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008; 138: 171-175.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1240","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000187540.37795.3a","article-title":"Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"106","author":"53 Cosmi","year":"2005","unstructured":"53 Cosmi E, Ambrosini G, D'Antona D, et al. Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 1240-1245.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"54 Crimmins S, Desai A, Block-Abraham D, et al. A comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211: 669.e1-669.e10.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.022"},{"key":"ref54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"55 Ting JY, Kingdom JC, Shah PS. Antenatal glucocorticoids, magnesium sulfate, and mode of birth in preterm fetal small for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S818-S828.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.227"},{"key":"ref55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13104","article-title":"Use of antenatal corticosteroids in special circumstances: a comprehensive review","volume":"96","author":"56 Magann","year":"2017","unstructured":"56 Magann EF, Haram K, Ounpraseuth S, et al. Use of antenatal corticosteroids in special circumstances: a comprehensive review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96: 395-409.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"57 Stockley EL, Ting JY, Kingdom JC, et al. Canadian Neonatal Network; Canadian Neonatal Follow-up Network; Canadian Preterm Birth Network Investigators. Intrapartum magnesium sulfate is associated with neuroprotection in growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 606.e1-606.e8.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.010"},{"key":"ref57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18815","article-title":"Severe fetal growth restriction at 26-32 weeks: key messages from the TRUFFLE study","volume":"50","author":"58 Bilardo","year":"2017","unstructured":"58 Bilardo CM, Hecher K, Visser GH, et al. Severe fetal growth restriction at 26-32 weeks: key messages from the TRUFFLE study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50: 285-290.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4101","article-title":"Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"30","author":"59 Turan","year":"2007","unstructured":"59 Turan S, Turan OM, Berg C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30: 750-756.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"60 Parra-Saavedra M, Crovetto F, Triunfo S, Placental findings in late-onset SGA births without Doppler signs of placental insufficiency. Placenta 2013; 34: 1136-1141.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2013.09.018"},{"key":"ref60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12380","article-title":"Added value of umbilical vein flow as a predictor of perinatal outcome in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"42","author":"61 Parra-Saavedra","year":"2013","unstructured":"61 Parra-Saavedra M, Crovetto F, Triunfo S, et al. Added value of umbilical vein flow as a predictor of perinatal outcome in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42: 189-195.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1159\/000355525","article-title":"Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"36","author":"62 Savchev","year":"2014","unstructured":"62 Savchev S, Figueras F, Sanz-Cortes M, et al. Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014; 36: 99-105.","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"ref62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","article-title":"Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"117","author":"63 Cruz-Mart\u00ednez","year":"2011","unstructured":"63 Cruz-Mart\u00ednez R, Figueras F, Hernandez-Andrade E, et al. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 618-626.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00652.x","article-title":"Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"19","author":"64 Severi","year":"2002","unstructured":"64 Severi FM, Bocchi C, Visentin A, et al. Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 19: 225-228.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00079.x","article-title":"Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"15","author":"65 Hershkovitz","year":"2000","unstructured":"65 Hershkovitz R, Kingdom JC, Geary M, et al. Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 15: 209-212.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.07.032","article-title":"Comparison between cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome at term","volume":"252","author":"Mascio D","year":"2020","unstructured":"66 Di Mascio D, Rizzo G, Buca D, et al. Comparison between cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 252: 439-443.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref66","unstructured":"67 Robson SC, Martin WL, Morris RK. The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Green-top guideline No. 31. Guidelines Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London. 2nd edition February 2013. Minor revisions - January 2014."},{"key":"ref67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22125","article-title":"Fetal cerebral Doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study","volume":"56","author":"68 Stampalija","year":"2020","unstructured":"68 Stampalija T, Thornton J, Marlow N, et al., on behalf of the TRUFFLE-2 Group. Fetal cerebral Doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56: 173-181.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.11.1357","article-title":"The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach","volume":"226","author":"69 Lees","year":"2022","unstructured":"69 Lees CC, Romero R, Stampalija T, et al. Clinical opinion. The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 226: 366-378.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"70 Caradeux J, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Peguero A, et al. Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220: 449-459.e19.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.043"},{"key":"ref70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1072","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14511","article-title":"The association of neonatal morbidity with long-term neurological outcome in infants who were growth restricted and preterm at birth: secondary analyses from TRUFFLE (Trial of Randomized Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe)","volume":"124","author":"71 Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis","year":"2017","unstructured":"71 Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, Marlow N, Lees C, et al. and TRUFFLE investigators. The association of neonatal morbidity with long-term neurological outcome in infants who were growth restricted and preterm at birth: secondary analyses from TRUFFLE (Trial of Randomized Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe). BJOG 2017; 124: 1072-1078.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13727","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age status by symphysis-fundus height: a registry-based population cohort study","volume":"123","author":"72 Pay","year":"2016","unstructured":"72 Pay A, Fr\u00f8en JF, Staff AC, et al. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age status by symphysis-fundus height: a registry-based population cohort study. BJOG 2016; 123: 1167-1173.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"73 Chauhan SP, Rouse DJ, Ananth CV. Screening for intrauterine growth restriction in uncomplicated pregnancies: time for action. Am J Perinatol. 2013; 30: 33-39.","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1321497"},{"key":"ref73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"74 De Reu PA, Oosterbaan HP, Smits LJ, et al. Avoidable mortality in small-for-gestational-age children in the Netherlands. J Perinat Med. 2010; 38: 311-318.","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2010.027"},{"key":"ref74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"75 Bricker L, Medley N, Pratt JJ. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2015: CD001451.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001451.pub4"},{"key":"ref75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"76 Kaur S, Picconi JL, Chadha R, et al. Biophysical profile in the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses who weigh <1000 g. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 264.e1-264.e4.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.074"},{"key":"ref76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1159\/000106354","article-title":"Doppler cerebro-umbilical ratio and fetal biophysical profile in the assessment of peripartal cardiotocography in growth-retarded fetuses","volume":"22","author":"77 Habek","year":"2007","unstructured":"77 Habek D, Salihagi\u0107 A, Jug\u00f3iv\u00e1 D, et al. Doppler cerebro-umbilical ratio and fetal biophysical profile in the assessment of peripartal cardiotocography in growth-retarded fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007; 22: 452-456.","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"ref77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1125","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm12071125","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction: comparison of biometric parameters","volume":"12","author":"78 Marchand","year":"2022","unstructured":"78 Marchand C, K\u00f6ppe J, K\u00f6ster HA, et al. Fetal growth restriction: comparison of biometric parameters. J Pers Med. 2022; 12: 1125.","journal-title":"J Pers Med"},{"key":"ref78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1452","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.068","article-title":"Association of extreme first-trimester free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and nuchal translucency with intrauterine growth restriction and other adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"191","author":"79 Krantz","year":"2004","unstructured":"79 Krantz D, Goetzl L, Simpson JL, et al. Association of extreme first-trimester free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and nuchal translucency with intrauterine growth restriction and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 1452-1458.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8808","article-title":"Early fetal growth, PAPP-A and free \u03b2-hCG in relation to risk of delivering a small-for-gestational age infant","volume":"37","author":"80 Kirkegaard","year":"2011","unstructured":"80 Kirkegaard I, Henriksen TB, Uldbjerg N. Early fetal growth, PAPP-A and free \u03b2-hCG in relation to risk of delivering a small-for-gestational age infant. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 341-347.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"81 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee; Berkley E, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad A. Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 300-308. Erratum: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 508. Erratum: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: 246.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.022"},{"key":"ref81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"82 Grantz KL, Kim S, Grobman WA, et al. Fetal growth velocity: the NICHD fetal growth studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 285.e1-285.e36.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.05.016"},{"key":"ref82","unstructured":"83 Resnik R, Mari G. Fetal growth restriction: evaluation. UpToDate 2020. Available from: https:\/\/www.uptodate.com\/contents\/fetal-growth-restriction-evaluation [accessed: January 06, 2020]."},{"key":"ref83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"84 Stampalija T, Arabin B, Wolf H, et al. TRUFFLE investigators. Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216: 521.e1-521.e13.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.001"},{"key":"ref84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","article-title":"Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"85 Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","unstructured":"85 Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, De Boer MA, Heymans MW, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51: 313-322.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"86 Akolekar R, Ciobanu A, Zingler E, et al. Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221: 65.e1-65.e18.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002"},{"key":"ref86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20102","article-title":"Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review","volume":"53","author":"87 Oros","year":"2019","unstructured":"87 Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 454-464.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19117","article-title":"Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"52","author":"88 Conde-Agudelo","year":"2018","unstructured":"88 Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Kennedy SH, et al. Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52: 430-441.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9011","article-title":"Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction","volume":"38","author":"89 Turan","year":"2011","unstructured":"89 Turan OM, Turan S, Berg C, et al. Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38: 295-302.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2933","DOI":"10.1172\/JCI86957","article-title":"Pravastatin improves pregnancy outcomes in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome refractory to antithrombotic therapy","volume":"126","author":"90 Lefkou","year":"2016","unstructured":"90 Lefkou E, Mamopoulos A, Dagklis T, et al. Pravastatin improves pregnancy outcomes in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome refractory to antithrombotic therapy. J Clin Invest. 2016; 126: 2933-2940.","journal-title":"J Clin Invest"},{"key":"ref90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"91 McLaughlin K, Nadeem L, Wat J, et al. Low molecular weight heparin promotes transcription and release of placental growth factor from endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020; 318: H1008-H1017.","DOI":"10.1152\/ajpheart.00109.2020"},{"key":"ref91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)91833-5","article-title":"Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile","volume":"170","author":"92 Nageotte","year":"1994","unstructured":"92 Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, et al. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170: 1672-1676.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70114-6","article-title":"Fetal death after normal biophysical profile score: an eighteen-year experience","volume":"181","author":"93 Dayal","year":"1999","unstructured":"93 Dayal AK, Manning FA, Berck DJ, et al. Fetal death after normal biophysical profile score: an eighteen-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 1231-1236.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref93","unstructured":"94 G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ. Bed rest in hospital for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 1996: CD000034."},{"key":"ref94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"95 Deter RL, Lee W, Yeo L, et al. Individualized growth assessment: conceptual framework and practical implementation for the evaluation of fetal growth and neonatal growth outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S656-S678.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.210"},{"key":"ref95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"980","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903443459","article-title":"Heparin for patients with growth restricted fetus: a prospective randomized controlled trial","volume":"23","author":"YH","year":"2010","unstructured":"96 Yu YH, Shen LY, Zou H, et al. Heparin for patients with growth restricted fetus: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23: 980-987.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"97 Ferreira RD, Negrini R, Bernardo WM, et al. The effects of sildenafil in maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2019; 14: e0219732. Retraction: PLOS ONE 2024; 19: e0310291.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0219732"},{"key":"ref97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318197bf4d","article-title":"Predicting perinatal outcome through changes in umbilical artery Doppler studies after antenatal corticosteroids in the growth-restricted fetus","volume":"113","author":"98 Robertson","year":"2009","unstructured":"98 Robertson MC, Murila F, Tong S, et al. Predicting perinatal outcome through changes in umbilical artery Doppler studies after antenatal corticosteroids in the growth-restricted fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 636-640.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.011","article-title":"The fetal cardiovascular response to antenatal steroids in severe early-onset intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"190","author":"99 Simchen","year":"2004","unstructured":"99 Simchen MJ, Alkazaleh F, Adamson SL, et al. The fetal cardiovascular response to antenatal steroids in severe early-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 296-304.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340902730334","article-title":"Fetal hemodynamic changes following maternal betamethasone administration in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction and absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery","volume":"88","author":"100 Nozaki","year":"2009","unstructured":"100 Nozaki AM, Francisco RP, Fonseca ES, et al. Fetal hemodynamic changes following maternal betamethasone administration in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction and absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88: 350-354.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0b013e328357659b","article-title":"Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery of growth-restricted foetuses: a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush","volume":"30","author":"101 Habib","year":"2013","unstructured":"101 Habib AS. Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery of growth-restricted foetuses: a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013; 30: 5-6.","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"ref101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0b013e3283564698","article-title":"A randomised comparison of the effects of low-dose spinal or general anaesthesia on umbilical cord blood gases during caesarean delivery of growth-restricted foetuses with impaired Doppler flow","volume":"30","author":"102 Jain","year":"2013","unstructured":"102 Jain K, Bhardwaj N, Sharma A, et al. A randomised comparison of the effects of low-dose spinal or general anaesthesia on umbilical cord blood gases during caesarean delivery of growth-restricted foetuses with impaired Doppler flow. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013; 30: 9-15.","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"ref102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009","article-title":"Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus","volume":"49","author":"103 Baschat","year":"2018","unstructured":"103 Baschat AA. Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 49: 53-65.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"}],"container-title":["Orvosi Hetilap"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/view\/journals\/650\/166\/9\/article-p331.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/650\/166\/9\/article-p331.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/650\/166\/9\/article-p331.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,15]],"date-time":"2025-10-15T07:59:42Z","timestamp":1760515182000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/view\/journals\/650\/166\/9\/article-p331.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,2]]},"references-count":103,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/650.2025.33254","relation":{},"ISSN":["0030-6002","1788-6120"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0030-6002","type":"print"},{"value":"1788-6120","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,2]]}}}