{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,5]],"date-time":"2022-04-05T01:55:11Z","timestamp":1649123711113},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Akademiai Kiado Zrt.","issue":"18","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Orvosi Hetilap"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Introduction: Liquid-based cervical cytology has been developed as an alternative for conventional Papanicolaou cervical cytology. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the quality assurance of liquid-based cervical cytology. Method: 4573 cervical cytology smears were classified according to the Bethesda (2001) system. Human papilloma virus infection was detected and subtyped from reflex test using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: 4573 smears were classified according to the Bethesda (2001) system. Negative diagnosis was made in 2323 cases (50.8%), non neoplastic in 2017 cases (44.1%), and positive for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy in 233 cases (5.1%). Unsatisfactory smear for diagnosis was found in 43 cases (0.9%), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in 87 cases (1.9%), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in 24 cases (0.5%), and carcinoma in 23 cases (0.5%). Fifty-nine of the cases were histologically verified and 4 falsely negative cases were detected. The sensitivity, specificity and the positive predictive value were 93.2%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Compared to an identical time periods of the previous three years, the low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion increased from 0.82% to 2.51%. Eighty one human papilloma virus tests were performed with a positive predictive value of 99%. Conclusions: The auditing values of the liquid-bases cervical cytology results meet the proposed threshold values. Liquid-bases cervical cytology is an alternative cervical cytology and it seems to be significantly better than conventional Papanicolaou cervical cytology in all parameters. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(18), 708\u2013714.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1556\/oh.2014.29875","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,29]],"date-time":"2014-04-29T01:05:46Z","timestamp":1398733546000},"page":"708-714","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Liquid-based cervical cytology ThinPrep screening in Hungary"],"prefix":"10.1556","volume":"155","author":[{"given":"Mih\u00e1ly","family":"Bak","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Orsz\u00e1gos Onkol\u00f3giai Int\u00e9zet Budapest R\u00e1th Gy\u00f6rgy u. 7\u20139. 1122"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M\u00e1ria","family":"S\u00e9bern\u00e9 \u00c9ll","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orsz\u00e1gos Onkol\u00f3giai Int\u00e9zet Budapest R\u00e1th Gy\u00f6rgy u. 7\u20139. 1122"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Melinda","family":"B\u00f3ka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orsz\u00e1gos Onkol\u00f3giai Int\u00e9zet Budapest R\u00e1th Gy\u00f6rgy u. 7\u20139. 1122"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zsuzsanna","family":"Veleczki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orsz\u00e1gos Onkol\u00f3giai Int\u00e9zet Budapest R\u00e1th Gy\u00f6rgy u. 7\u20139. 1122"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tibor","family":"Ny\u00e1ri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Szegedi Tudom\u00e1nyegyetem, \u00c1ltal\u00e1nos Orvostudom\u00e1nyi Kar Orvosi, Fizikai \u00e9s Orvosi Informatikai Int\u00e9zet Szeged"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Imre","family":"Pete","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orsz\u00e1gos Onkol\u00f3giai Int\u00e9zet Budapest R\u00e1th Gy\u00f6rgy u. 7\u20139. 1122"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zolt\u00e1n","family":"Szentirmay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orsz\u00e1gos Onkol\u00f3giai Int\u00e9zet Budapest R\u00e1th Gy\u00f6rgy u. 7\u20139. 1122"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"425","reference":[{"key":"1","unstructured":"<i>Bod\u00f3, M., Sug\u00e1r, J., D\u00f6br\u0151ssy, L.:<\/i> Results of gynecogical cancer screening supplemented with cytology. [Cytol\u00f3giai vizsg\u00e1lattal kieg\u00e9sz\u00edtett n\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szati r\u00e1ksz\u0171r\u00e9s eredm\u00e9nyei.] Orv. Hetil., 1981, <i>122<\/i>(9), 509\u2013512. [Hungarian]"},{"key":"2","unstructured":"<i>Hakam, M.:<\/i> Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer in the Nordic countries. In: Magnus, K. (ed.): Trend in Cancer Incidence, Causes and Practical Implications. Hemisphere, Washington, 1988."},{"key":"3","unstructured":"<i>S\u00f3lyom, O.:<\/i> National Cancer Registry. [Nemzeti R\u00e1kregiszter.] Orsz\u00e1gos Onkol\u00f3giai Int\u00e9zet, Budapest, 2012. [Hungarian]"},{"key":"4","unstructured":"Demographic yearbook. [Demogr\u00e1fiai \u00e9vk\u00f6nyv.] K\u00f6zponti Statisztikai Hivatal, Budapest, 2012. [Hungarian]"},{"key":"5","unstructured":"<i>Bak, M., Thurz\u00f3, L.:<\/i> Conventional Papanicolaou cervical smear versus liquid-based cytology. [Hagyom\u00e1nyos Papanicolaou cervicalis kenet \u2013 versus folyad\u00e9kalap\u00fa (liquid-based) cytologia.] Magy. N\u0151orv. L., 2012, <i>75<\/i>(3), 35\u201337. [Hungarian]"},{"key":"6","unstructured":"<i>Bak, M., S\u00e9bern\u00e9, \u00c9. M., B\u00f3ka, M., et al.:<\/i> Results of liquid-based cervical cytology in Hungary. [Folyad\u00e9kalap\u00fa (liquid-based) cervix cytologia eredm\u00e9nyei Magyarorsz\u00e1gon.] Magy. N\u0151orv. L., 2013, <i>76<\/i>(4), 20\u201324. [Hungarian]"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Solomon, D., Davey, D., Kurman, R., et al.:<\/i> The 2001 Bethesda System. Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology. JAMA, 2002, <i>287<\/i>(16), 2114\u20132119.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.16.2114"},{"key":"8","unstructured":"<i>Papanicolaou, G. N., Traut, H. F.:<\/i> Diagnosis of Uterine Cancer by Vaginal Smears. The Common Wealth Fund, New York, 1943."},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Szentirmay, Z., P\u00f3lus, K., Tam\u00e1s, L., et al.:<\/i> Human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer: molecular biology and clinicopathological correlations. Cancer Metastasis Rev., 2005, <i>24<\/i>(1), 19\u201334.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10555-005-5045-3"},{"key":"10","unstructured":"<i>Woodward, M.:<\/i> Epidemiology: Study design and data analysis. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall\/CRC, 2005."},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Herbert, A., Johnson, J.:<\/i> Personal view. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears? Cytopathology, 2001, <i>12<\/i>(6), 383\u2013389.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2001.00375.x"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Imrie, J. E., Gardiner, D. S., Wilson, A.:<\/i> Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears? Cytopathology, 2002, <i>13<\/i>(2), 133\u2013134.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2002.t01-1-00409.x"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Linder, J.:<\/i> Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears? Cytopathology, 2002, <i>13<\/i>(1), 66.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2002.0362c.x"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Moseley, R.:<\/i> Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears? Cytopathology, 2002, <i>13<\/i>(2), 135\u2013136.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2002.t01-3-00409.x"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Kitchener, H. C.:<\/i> Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears? Cytopathology, 2002, <i>13<\/i>(1), 64\u201365.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2002.0362b.x"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Imrie, J., Colquhoun, C.:<\/i> Liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology. Lancet, 2006, <i>367<\/i>(9521), 1481.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68637-6"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Biro, C., Hyne, S., Roberts, J., et al.:<\/i> Liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology. Lancet, 2006, <i>367<\/i>(9521), 1481\u20131482.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68638-8"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Boon, M. E.:<\/i> Liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology. Lancet, 2006, <i>367<\/i>(9521), 1482.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68639-X"},{"key":"19","unstructured":"<i>Gibb, R. K., Martens, M. G.:<\/i> The impact of liquid-based cytology in decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer. Rev. Obstet Gynecol., 2011, <i>4<\/i>(Suppl. 1), S2\u2013S11."},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<i>Koss, L. G.:<\/i> The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and tragedy. JAMA, 1989, <i>261<\/i>(5), 737\u2013743.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.261.5.737"}],"container-title":["Orvosi Hetilap"],"original-title":[],"language":"hu","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.akademiai.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1556\/OH.2014.29875","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,22]],"date-time":"2020-05-22T09:55:25Z","timestamp":1590141325000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/doi\/10.1556\/oh.2014.29875"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"18","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1556\/OH.2014.29875"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/oh.2014.29875","relation":{},"ISSN":["0030-6002","1788-6120"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0030-6002","type":"print"},{"value":"1788-6120","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]}}}