{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,11]],"date-time":"2024-01-11T00:09:31Z","timestamp":1704931771241},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IEICE Trans. Commun."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,1]]},"DOI":"10.1587\/transcom.2017ebp3390","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,13]],"date-time":"2018-03-13T22:20:12Z","timestamp":1520979612000},"page":"1967-1981","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Inserting Layer-5 to Provide Applications with Richer Functions through Common API"],"prefix":"10.23919","volume":"E101.B","author":[{"given":"Hiroki","family":"WATANABE","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takao","family":"KONDO","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kunitake","family":"KANEKO","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fumio","family":"TERAOKA","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"263","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[1] R. Stewart, Q. Xie, K. Morneault, C. Sharp, H. Schwarzbauer, T. Taylor, I. Rytina, M. Kalla, L. Zhang, and V. Paxson, \u201cStream control transmission protocol,\u201d RFC 2960, Oct. 2000. 10.17487\/rfc2960","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc2960"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[2] A. Ford, C. Raiciu, M. Handley, and O. Bonaventure, \u201cTCP extensions for multipath operation with multiple addresses,\u201d RFC 6824, Jan. 2013. 10.17487\/rfc6824","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc6824"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[3] C. Caini, P. Cornice, R. Firrincieli, and D. Lacamera, \u201cA DTN approach to satellite communications,\u201d IEEE IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol.26, no.5, pp.820-827, June 2008. 10.1109\/jsac.2008.080608","DOI":"10.1109\/JSAC.2008.080608"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[4] H. Watanabe, T. Kondo, K. Kaneko, and F. Teraoka, \u201cSeparating communication policies and mechanisms to make protocol layering clearer,\u201d Proc. 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN 2017), pp.1-9, July-Aug. 2017. 10.1109\/icccn.2017.8038409","DOI":"10.1109\/ICCCN.2017.8038409"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[5] D. Mitake, K. Kaneko, and F. Teraoka, \u201cLayer-5 temporally-spliced path for efficient disruption tolerant networking,\u201d Proc. 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN 2017), pp.1-6, June 2017. 10.1109\/lanman.2017.7972170","DOI":"10.1109\/LANMAN.2017.7972170"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[6] A. Habib, N. Christin, and J. Chuang, \u201cTaking advantage of multihoming with session layer striping,\u201d Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2006, pp.1-6, April 2006. 10.1109\/infocom.2006.54","DOI":"10.1109\/INFOCOM.2006.54"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[7] R. Ekwall, P. Urban, and A. Schiper, \u201cRobust TCP connections for fault tolerant computing,\u201d Proc. Ninth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2002., pp.501-508, Dec. 2002. 10.1109\/icpads.2002.1183448","DOI":"10.1109\/ICPADS.2002.1183448"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[8] F. Teraoka, S. Kanemaru, K. Yonemura, M. Ide, S. Kawaguchi, and K. Kaneko, \u201cZNA: A six-layer network architecture for new generation networks \u2014 Focusing on the session layer, the network layer, and cross-layer cooperation \u2014 ,\u201d IEICE Trans. Commun., vol.E97-B, no.12, pp.2583-2595, Dec. 2014. 10.1587\/transcom.e97.b.2583","DOI":"10.1587\/transcom.E97.B.2583"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[9] M. Ide, K. Kaneko, and F. Teraoka, \u201cValidation of session layer protocols and API in ZNA,\u201d Proc. 8th Asian Internet Engineering Conference (AINTEC'12), pp.77-84, Nov. 2012. 10.1145\/2402599.2402610","DOI":"10.1145\/2402599.2402610"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[10] J.R. Iyengar, R.D. Amer, and R. Stewart, \u201cConcurrent multipath transfer using SCTP multihoming over independent end-to-end paths,\u201d IEEE\/ACM Trans. Netw., vol.14, no.5, pp.951-964, Oct. 2006. 10.1109\/tnet.2006.882843","DOI":"10.1109\/TNET.2006.882843"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[11] H.Y. Hsieh and R. Sivakumar, \u201cA transport layer approach for achieving aggregate bandwidths on multi-homed mobile hosts,\u201d Proc. 8th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MobiCom'02, New York, NY, USA, pp.83-94, 2002. 10.1145\/570654.570656","DOI":"10.1145\/570654.570656"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[12] Y. Dong, D. Wang, N. Pissinou, and J. Wang, \u201cMulti-path load balancing in transport layer,\u201d 2007 Next Generation Internet Networks, pp.135-142, May 2007. 10.1109\/ngi.2007.371208","DOI":"10.1109\/NGI.2007.371208"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[13] P. Srisuresh and K. Egevang, \u201cTraditional IP network address translator (traditional NAT),\u201d RFC 3022, Jan. 2001. 10.17487\/rfc3022","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc3022"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[14] P. Srisuresh and M. Holdrege, \u201cIP network address translator (NAT) terminology and considerations,\u201d RFC 2663, Aug. 1999. 10.17487\/rfc2663","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc2663"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[15] S. Ladiwala, R. Ramaswamy, and T. Wolf, \u201cTransparent TCP acceleration,\u201d Comput. Commun., vol.32, no.4, pp.691-702, 2009. 10.1016\/j.comcom.2008.11.036","DOI":"10.1016\/j.comcom.2008.11.036"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[16] B. Carpenter and S. Brim, \u201cMiddleboxes: Taxonomy and issues,\u201d RFC 3234, Feb. 2002. 10.17487\/rfc3234","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc3234"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[17] J. Halpern and C. Pignataro, \u201cService function chaining (SFC) architecture,\u201d RFC 7665, Oct. 2015. 10.17487\/rfc7665","DOI":"10.17487\/RFC7665"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[18] P. Quinn, U. Elzur, and C. Pignataro, \u201cNetwork service header (NSH),\u201d Internet-Draft draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-20, Sept. 2017.","DOI":"10.17487\/RFC8300"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[19] S. Peter, U. Javed, Q. Zhang, D. Woos, T. Anderson, and A. Krishnamurthy, \u201cOne tunnel is (often) enough,\u201d Proc. SIGCOMM'14, pp.99-110, 2014. 10.1145\/2740070.2626318","DOI":"10.1145\/2740070.2626318"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[20] C. Filsfils, N.K. Nainar, C. Pignataro, J.C. Cardona, and P. Francois, \u201cThe segment routing architecture,\u201d Proc. 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2015), pp.1-6, Dec. 2015. 10.1109\/glocom.2015.7417124","DOI":"10.1109\/GLOCOM.2015.7417124"},{"key":"21","unstructured":"[21] C. Filsfils, S. Previdi, A. Bashandy, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, and R. Shakir, \u201cSegment routing with MPLS data plane,\u201d Internet-Draft draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-10, June 2017."},{"key":"22","unstructured":"[22] S. Previdi, C. Filsfils, K. Raza, J. Leddy, B. Field, S. Matsushima, I. Leung, J. Linkova, E. Aries, T. Kosugi, E. Vyncke, D. Lebrun, D. Steinberg, and R. Raszuk, \u201cIPv6 segment routing header (SRH),\u201d Internet-Draft draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-07, July 2017."},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[23] C. Caini, R. Firrincieli, and D. Lacamera, \u201cPEPsal: A performance enhancing proxy designed for TCP satellite connections,\u201d 2006 IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference, pp.2607-2611, May 2006. 10.1109\/vetecs.2006.1683339","DOI":"10.1109\/VETECS.2006.1683339"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[24] J.P. Rohrer, R. Naidu, and J.P.G. Sterbenz, \u201cMultipath at the transport layer: An end-to-end resilience mechanism,\u201d 2009 International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications Workshops, pp.1-7, Oct. 2009. 10.1109\/icumt.2009.5345602","DOI":"10.1109\/ICUMT.2009.5345602"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[25] R. Ohshima, S. Kawaguchi, O. Kamatani, O. Akashi, K. Kaneko, and F. Teraoka, \u201cConstruction of routing information knowledge base towards wide area network management,\u201d Proc. 10th International Conference on Future Internet (CFI'15), pp.76-83, June 2015. 10.1145\/2775088.2775097","DOI":"10.1145\/2775088.2775097"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[26] S. Kanemaru, K. Yonemura, and F. Teraoka, \u201cZNP: A new generation network layer protocol based on ID\/locator split considering practical operation,\u201d IEICE Trans. Commun., vol.E96-B, no.3, pp.764-777, March 2013. 10.1587\/transcom.e96.b.764","DOI":"10.1587\/transcom.E96.B.764"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[27] J. Pan, R. Jain, S. Paul, and C. So-in, \u201cMILSA: A new evolutionary architecture for scalability, mobility, and multihoming in the future Internet,\u201d IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol.28, no.8, pp.1344-1362, Oct. 2010. 10.1109\/jsac.2010.101012","DOI":"10.1109\/JSAC.2010.101012"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[28] V.P. Kafle, Y. Fukushima, K. Fujikawa, and H. Harai, \u201cID-based communication framework in future networks,\u201d Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol.86, no.4, pp.1735-1750, Feb. 2016. 10.1007\/s11277-015-3106-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s11277-015-3106-7"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[29] J. Abley, P. Savola, and G. Neville-Neil, \u201cDeprecation of type 0 routing headers in IPv6,\u201d RFC 5095, Dec. 2007. 10.17487\/rfc5095","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc5095"}],"container-title":["IEICE Transactions on Communications"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/transcom\/E101.B\/9\/E101.B_2017EBP3390\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,10]],"date-time":"2024-01-10T15:01:39Z","timestamp":1704898899000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/transcom\/E101.B\/9\/E101.B_2017EBP3390\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,1]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1587\/transcom.2017ebp3390","relation":{},"ISSN":["0916-8516","1745-1345"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0916-8516","type":"print"},{"value":"1745-1345","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,1]]}}}