{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,28]],"date-time":"2025-09-28T04:10:06Z","timestamp":1759032606886},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)","issue":"11","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,1]]},"DOI":"10.1587\/transinf.2018edp7163","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,31]],"date-time":"2018-10-31T18:47:21Z","timestamp":1541011641000},"page":"2744-2753","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Studying the Cost and Effectiveness of OSS Quality Assessment Models: An Experience Report of Fujitsu QNET"],"prefix":"10.1587","volume":"E101.D","author":[{"given":"Yasutaka","family":"KAMEI","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Kyushu University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takahiro","family":"MATSUMOTO","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kyushu University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kazuhiro","family":"YAMASHITA","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kyushu University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Naoyasu","family":"UBAYASHI","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kyushu University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takashi","family":"IWASAKI","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fujitsu Kyushu Network Technologies Limited"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shuichi","family":"TAKAYAMA","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fujitsu Kyushu Network Technologies Limited"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"532","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[1] \u00d8. Hauge, C.F. S\u00f8rensen, and R. Conradi, \u201cAdoption of open source in the software industry,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. on Open Source Systems (OSS), pp.211-221, 2008. 10.1007\/978-0-387-09684-1_17","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-09684-1_17"},{"key":"2","unstructured":"[2] B. Duck, \u201cThe tenth annual future of open source survey,\u201d 2016. https:\/\/www.blackducksoftware.com\/future-of-open-source"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[3] R. Ferenc, I. Siket, and T. Gyimothy, \u201cExtracting facts from open source software,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp.60-69, Sept. 2004. 10.1109\/icsm.2004.1357790","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSM.2004.1357790"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[4] U. Raja and M. Tretter, \u201cDefining and evaluating a measure of open source project survivability,\u201d IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol.38, no.1, pp.163-174, 2012. 10.1109\/tse.2011.39","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2011.39"},{"key":"5","unstructured":"[5] O. Northeast Asia, \u201cRepOSS: A flexible OSS assessment repository,\u201d 2012."},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[6] E. Petrinja, A. Sillitti, and G. Succi, \u201cComparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM assessment models,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Open Source Systems (OSS), vol.319, pp.224-238, 2010. 10.1007\/978-3-642-13244-5_18","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-13244-5_18"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[7] T.L. Alves, C. Ypma, and J. Visser, \u201cDeriving metric thresholds from benchmark data,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp.1-10, 2010. 10.1109\/icsm.2010.5609747","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSM.2010.5609747"},{"key":"8","unstructured":"[8] T. Matsumoto, K. Yamashita, Y. Kamei, N. Ubayashi, T. Iwasaki, and S. Takayama, \u201cA survey for establishing preliminary evaluation technique for open source software (in japanese),\u201d Proc. Japanese Domestic Workshop on Foundation of Software Engineering (FOSE), pp.3-12, 2016."},{"key":"9","unstructured":"[9] F.W. Duijnhouwer and C. Widdows, \u201cOpen source maturity model,\u201d in Capgemini Expert Letter, 2003. https:\/\/jose-manuel.me\/thesis\/references\/GB_Expert_Letter_Open_Source_Maturity_Model_1.5.3.pdf"},{"key":"10","unstructured":"[10] T. Wasserman and A. Das, \u201cUsing flossmole data in determining business readiness ratings,\u201d Proc. Workshop on Public Data about Software Development (WoPDaSD), pp.1-6, 2007."},{"key":"11","unstructured":"[11] Atos, \u201cQualification and selection of open source software (QSOS), version 2.0,\u201d 2013. http:\/\/backend.qsos.org\/download\/qsos-2.0_en.pdf"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[12] D. Taibi, L. Lavazza, and S. Morasca, \u201cOpenBQR: a framework for the assessment of OSS,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Open Source Systems (OSS), pp.173-186, 2007. 10.1007\/978-0-387-72486-7_14","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-72486-7_14"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[13] E. Petrinja, R. Nambakam, and A. Sillitti, \u201cIntroducing the opensource maturity model,\u201d Proc. Int'l Workshop on Emerging Trends in Free\/Libre\/Open Source Software Research and Development, pp.37-41, 2009. 10.1109\/floss.2009.5071358","DOI":"10.1109\/FLOSS.2009.5071358"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[14] J.C. Deprez and S. Alexandre, \u201cComparing assessment methodologies for free\/open source software: OpenBRR and QSOS,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES), pp.189-203, 2008. 10.1007\/978-3-540-69566-0_17","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-69566-0_17"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[15] E. Petrinja and G. Succi, \u201cAssessing the open source development processes using OMM,\u201d Advances in Software Engineering, vol.2012, pp.1-17, 2012. 10.1155\/2012\/235392","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/235392"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[16] J. Shimagaki, Y. Kamei, S. McIntosh, A.E. Hassan, and N. Ubayashi, \u201cA study of the quality-impacting practices of modern code review at sony mobile,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Engineering, SEIP Track, ICSE '16, New York, NY, USA, pp.212-221, ACM, 2016. 10.1145\/2889160.2889243","DOI":"10.1145\/2889160.2889243"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[17] C.B. Seaman, \u201cQualitative methods,\u201d Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, pp.35-62, 2008. 10.1007\/978-1-84800-044-5_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-84800-044-5_2"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[18] F. Ricca, A. Marchetto, and M. Torchiano, \u201cOn the difficulty of computing the truck factor,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES), vol.6759, pp.337-351, 2011. 10.1007\/978-3-642-21843-9_26","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-21843-9_26"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[19] M. Torchiano, F. Ricca, and A. Marchetto, \u201cIs my project's truck factor low?: Theoretical and empirical considerations about the truck factor threshold,\u201d Proc. Int'l Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics (WETSoM), pp.12-18, 2011. 10.1145\/1985374.1985379","DOI":"10.1145\/1985374.1985379"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[20] G. Avelino, M.T. Valente, and A. Hora, \u201cWhat is the truck factor of popular github applications? a first assessment,\u201d 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7287\/peerj.preprints.1233v2","DOI":"10.7287\/peerj.preprints.1233v2"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[21] J.W. Paulson, G. Succi, and A. Eberlein, \u201cAn empirical study of open-source and closed-source software products,\u201d IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol.30, no.4, pp.246-256, 2004. 10.1109\/tse.2004.1274044","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2004.1274044"},{"key":"22","unstructured":"[22] M. Goeminne and T. Mens, \u201cEvidence for the pareto principle in open source software activity,\u201d Joint Proc. 1st Int'l Workshop on Model Driven Software Maintenance and 5th Int'l Workshop on Software Quality and Maintainability, pp.74-82, 2011."},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[23] A. Mockus, R.T. Fielding, and J.D. Herbsleb, \u201cTwo case studies of open source software development: Apache and mozilla,\u201d ACM Trans. Software Engineering and Methodology, vol.11, no.3, pp.309-346, 2002. 10.1145\/567793.567795","DOI":"10.1145\/567793.567795"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[24] K. Yamashita, S. McIntosh, Y. Kamei, A.E. Hassan, and N. Ubayashi, \u201cRevisiting the applicability of the pareto principle to core development teams in open source software projects,\u201d Proc. Int'l Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE), pp.46-55, 2015. 10.1145\/2804360.2804366","DOI":"10.1145\/2804360.2804366"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[25] D. Spinellis, G. Gousios, V. Karakoidas, P. Louridas, P.J. Adams, I. Samoladas, and I. Stamelos, \u201cEvaluating the quality of open source software,\u201d Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol.233, pp.5-28, 2009. 10.1016\/j.entcs.2009.02.058","DOI":"10.1016\/j.entcs.2009.02.058"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[26] S. McIntosh, Y. Kamei, B. Adams, and A.E. Hassan, \u201cAn empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality,\u201d Empirical Software Engineering, vol.21, no.5, pp.2146-2189, 2016. 10.1007\/s10664-015-9381-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-015-9381-9"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[27] M. Sarrab and O.M.H. Rehman, \u201cEmpirical study of open source software selection for adoption, based on software quality characteristics,\u201d Advances in Engineering Software, vol.69, pp.1-11, 2014. 10.1016\/j.advengsoft.2013.12.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.advengsoft.2013.12.001"},{"key":"28","unstructured":"[28] M. Michlmayr, \u201cSoftware process maturity and the success of free software projects,\u201d Proc. Conf. Software Engineering: Evolution and Emerging Technologies, pp.3-14, 2005."},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[29] S. Krishnamurthy, \u201cCave or community? an empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects,\u201d First Monday, vol.7, no.6, 2002. 10.5210\/fm.v7i6.960","DOI":"10.5210\/fm.v7i6.960"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[30] R. English and C.M. Schweik, \u201cIdentifying success and tragedy of floss commons: A preliminary classification of sourceforge.net projects,\u201d Proc. Int'l Workshop on Emerging Trends in FLOSS Research and Development (FLOSS), pp.54-59, 2007. 10.1109\/floss.2007.9","DOI":"10.1109\/FLOSS.2007.9"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[31] J. Khondhu, A. Capiluppi, and K.-J. Stol, \u201cIs it all lost? a study of inactive open source projects,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Open Source Systems (OSS), vol.404, pp.61-79, 2013. 10.1007\/978-3-642-38928-3_5","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-38928-3_5"},{"key":"32","unstructured":"[32] E.S. Raymond, The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, 1999."},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[33] A. Senyard and M. Michlmayr, \u201cHow to have a successful free software project,\u201d Proc. Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), pp.84-91, 2004. 10.1109\/apsec.2004.58","DOI":"10.1109\/APSEC.2004.58"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[34] G. Robles, S. Koch, J.M. Gonz\u00e1lez-Barahona, and J. Carlos, \u201cRemote analysis and measurement of libre software systems by means of the cvsanaly tool,\u201d Proc. Int'l Workshop on Remote Analysis and Measurement of Software Systems (RAMSS), pp.51-55, 2004. 10.1049\/ic:20040351","DOI":"10.1049\/ic:20040351"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[35] M.W. Godfrey and Q. Tu, \u201cEvolution in open source software: A case study,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp.131-142, 2000. 10.1109\/icsm.2000.883030","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSM.2000.883030"},{"key":"36","unstructured":"[36] G. Robles, J.M. Gonzalez-barahona, G.D.S.Y. Comunicaciones, and M. Michlmayr, \u201cEvolution of volunteer participation in libre software projects: evidence from debian,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Open Source Systems (OSS), pp.100-107, 2005."},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[37] K. Yamashita, C. Huang, M. Nagappan, Y. Kamei, A. Mockus, A.E. Hassan, and N. Ubayashi, \u201cThresholds for size and complexity metrics: A case study from the perspective of defect density,\u201d Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS), pp.191-201, 2016. 10.1109\/qrs.2016.31","DOI":"10.1109\/QRS.2016.31"}],"container-title":["IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/transinf\/E101.D\/11\/E101.D_2018EDP7163\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,30]],"date-time":"2019-10-30T04:55:26Z","timestamp":1572411326000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/transinf\/E101.D\/11\/E101.D_2018EDP7163\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,1]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1587\/transinf.2018edp7163","relation":{},"ISSN":["0916-8532","1745-1361"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0916-8532","type":"print"},{"value":"1745-1361","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,1]]}}}