{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]],"date-time":"2026-02-16T18:48:18Z","timestamp":1771267698408,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,1]]},"DOI":"10.1587\/transinf.2020sap0003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,30]],"date-time":"2020-11-30T22:21:01Z","timestamp":1606774861000},"page":"2540-2548","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Meta-Strategy Based on Multi-Armed Bandit Approach for Multi-Time Negotiation"],"prefix":"10.1587","volume":"E103.D","author":[{"given":"Ryohei","family":"KAWATA","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology"}]},{"given":"Katsuhide","family":"FUJITA","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology"}]}],"member":"532","reference":[{"key":"1","unstructured":"[1] R. Kawata and K. Fujita, \u201cMetax-strategy for multi-time negotiation: A multi-armed bandit approach,\u201d Proc. 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems(AAMAS2019), pp.2048-2050, 2019."},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[2] N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, A.R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, M.J. Wooldridge, and C. Sierra, \u201cAutomated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges,\u201d Group Decision and Negotiation, vol.10, no.2, pp.199-215, 2001. 10.1023\/a:1008746126376","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008746126376"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[3] S. Fatima, S. Kraus, and M. Wooldridge, Principles of Automated Negotiation, Cambridge University Press, 2014. 10.1017\/cbo9780511751691","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511751691"},{"key":"4","unstructured":"[4] R. Aydogan, T. Baarslag, K. Fujita, T. Ito, C. Jonker, D. de Jonge, and J. Mell, \u201cThe Nineth International Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC2018).\u201d http:\/\/web.tuat.ac.jp\/katfuji\/ANAC2018\/, 2018."},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[5] T. Baarslag, K. Fujita, E. Gerding, K. Hindriks, T. Ito, N.R.Jennings, C. Jonker, S. Kraus, R. Lin, V. Robu, and C. Williams, \u201cEvaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition,\u201d Artificial Intelligence Journal (AIJ), vol.198, pp.73-103, 2013. 10.1016\/j.artint.2012.09.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.09.004"},{"key":"6","unstructured":"[6] T. Baarslag and K.V. Hindriks, \u201cAccepting optimally in automated negotiation with incomplete information,\u201d Proc. 12th International conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems(AAMAS 2013), pp.715-722, 2013."},{"key":"7","unstructured":"[7] S. Chen, H.B. Ammar, K. Tuyls, and G. Weiss, \u201cConditional restricted boltzmann machines for negotiations in highly competitive and complex domains,\u201d Proc. 23th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013), pp.69-75, 2013."},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[8] H. Robbins, \u201cSome aspects of the sequential design of experiments,\u201d Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol.58, no.5, pp.527-535, 1952. 10.1090\/s0002-9904-1952-09620-8","DOI":"10.1090\/S0002-9904-1952-09620-8"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[9] S.S. Fatima, M. Wooldridge, and N.R. Jennings, \u201cMulti-issue negotiation with deadlines,\u201d Journal Artificial Intelligence Research, vol.27, no.1, pp.381-417, 2006. 10.1613\/jair.2056","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2056"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[10] A. Rubinstein, \u201cPerfect equilibrium in a bargaining model,\u201d Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, vol.50, no.1, pp.97-109, 1982. 10.2307\/1912531","DOI":"10.2307\/1912531"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[11] T. Baarslag, K. Hindriks, and C. Jonker, \u201cTowards a quantitative concession-based classification method of negotiation strategies,\u201d Agents in Principle, Agents in Practice, ed. D. Kinny, J.Y.j. Hsu, G. Governatori, and A.K. Ghose, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.143-158, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. 10.1007\/978-3-642-25044-6_13","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25044-6_13"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[12] J. Zhu, Y. Song, D. Jiang, and H. Song, \u201cMulti-armed bandit channel access scheme with cognitive radio technology in wireless sensor networks for the internet of things,\u201d IEEE Access, vol.4, pp.4609-4617, 2016. 10.1109\/access.2016.2600633","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2016.2600633"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[13] S.S. Villar, J. Bowden, and J. Wason, \u201cMulti-armed bandit models for the optimal design of clinical trials: benefits and challenges,\u201d Statistical science: a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, vol.30, no.2, pp.199-215, 2015. 10.1214\/14-sts504","DOI":"10.1214\/14-STS504"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[14] P. Auer, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and P. Fischer, \u201cFinite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem,\u201d Machine Learning, vol.47, no.2-3, pp.235-256, 2002. 10.1023\/a:1013689704352","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1013689704352"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[15] L. Ilany and Y. Gal, \u201cAlgorithm selection in bilateral negotiation,\u201d Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol.30, no.4, pp.697-723, July 2016. 10.1007\/s10458-015-9302-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-015-9302-8"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[16] T. Baarslag, R. Aydogan, K.V. Hindriks, K. Fujita, T. Ito, and C.M. Jonker, \u201cThe automated negotiating agents competition, 2010-2015,\u201d AI Magazine, vol.36, no.4, pp.115-118, 2015. 10.1609\/aimag.v36i4.2609","DOI":"10.1609\/aimag.v36i4.2609"},{"key":"17","unstructured":"[17] R. Aydogan, T. Baarslag, K. Fujita, K. Hindriks, T. Ito, and C. Jonker, \u201cThe Seventh International Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC2016).\u201d http:\/\/web.tuat.ac.jp\/katfuji\/ANAC2016\/, 2016."},{"key":"18","unstructured":"[18] R. Aydogan, T. Baarslag, K. Fujita, T. Ito, D. de Jonge, C. Jonker, and J. Mell, \u201cThe Eighth International Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC2017).\u201d http:\/\/web.tuat.ac.jp\/katfuji\/ANAC2017\/, 2017."},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[19] A. Mori and T. Ito, \u201cAtlas3: A negotiating agent based on expecting lower limit of concession function,\u201d in Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, pp.169-173,Springer, 2017. 10.1007\/978-3-319-51563-2_11","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-51563-2_11"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[20] R. Lin, S. Kraus, T. Baarslag, D. Tykhonov, K. Hindriks, and C.M. Jonker, \u201cGenius: An integrated environment for supporting the design of generic automated negotiators,\u201d Computational Intelligence, vol.30, no.1, pp.48-70, 2014. 10.1111\/j.1467-8640.2012.00463.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8640.2012.00463.x"},{"key":"21","unstructured":"[21] S. Chen and G. Weiss, \u201cAn efficient and adaptive approach to negotiation in complex environments,\u201d Proc. 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2012), pp.228-233, 2012."},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[22] J. Hao and H.-F. Leung, \u201cAbines: An adaptive bilateral negotiating strategy over multiple items,\u201d 2012 IEEE\/WIC\/ACM International Conferences on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2012), pp.95-102, 2012. 10.1109\/wi-iat.2012.72","DOI":"10.1109\/WI-IAT.2012.72"},{"key":"23","unstructured":"[23] C.R. Williams, V. Robu, E.H. Gerding, and N.R. Jennings, \u201cUsing gaussian processes to optimise concession in complex negotiations against unknown opponents,\u201d Proc. 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp.432-438, 2011."},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[24] S. Kawaguchi, K. Fujita, and T. Ito, \u201cCompromising strategy based on estimated maximum utility for automated negotiation agents competition (anac-10),\u201d 24th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems (IEA\/AIE 2011), pp.501-510, 2011. 10.1007\/978-3-642-21827-9_51","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-21827-9_51"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[25] K. Fujita, \u201cCompromising adjustment strategy based on TKI conflict mode for multi-times bilateral closed negotiations,\u201d Computational Intelligence, vol.34, no.1, pp.85-103, 2018. 10.1111\/coin.12107","DOI":"10.1111\/coin.12107"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[26] O. Tunal\u0131, R. Aydo\u011fan, and V. Sanchez-Anguix, \u201cRethinking frequency opponent modeling in automated negotiation,\u201d Proc. 20th Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2017), pp.263-279, Springer International Publishing, 2017. 10.1007\/978-3-319-69131-2_16","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-69131-2_16"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[27] S. Liu, A. Moustafa, and T. Ito, \u201cAgent33: An automated negotiator with heuristic method for searching bids around nash bargaining solution,\u201d Proc. 21st Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2018), pp.519-526, 2018. 10.1007\/978-3-030-03098-8_37","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-03098-8_37"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[28] R. Ros and C. Sierra, \u201cA negotiation meta strategy combining trade-off and concession moves,\u201d Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol.12, no.2, pp.163-181, 2006. 10.1007\/s10458-006-5837-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-006-5837-z"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[29] K. Mansour and R. Kowalczyk, \u201cA meta-strategy for coordinating of one-to-many negotiation over multiple issues,\u201d Foundations of Intelligent Systems, ed. Y. Wang and T. Li, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.343-353, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. 10.1007\/978-3-642-25664-6_40","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25664-6_40"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[30] F. Zafari and F.N. Mofakham, \u201cPOPPONENT: highly accurate, individually and socially efficient opponent preference model in bilateral multi issue negotiations,\u201d Proc. Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), pp.5100-5104, 2017. 10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/730","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/730"}],"container-title":["IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/transinf\/E103.D\/12\/E103.D_2020SAP0003\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]],"date-time":"2022-12-01T12:59:31Z","timestamp":1669899571000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/transinf\/E103.D\/12\/E103.D_2020SAP0003\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,1]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1587\/transinf.2020sap0003","relation":{},"ISSN":["0916-8532","1745-1361"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0916-8532","type":"print"},{"value":"1745-1361","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,1]]}}}