{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T11:04:55Z","timestamp":1788865495028,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"FapUNIFESP (SciELO)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arq. Gastroenterol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>CONTEXT: Enteral feeding is indicated for patients unable to maintain appropriate oral intake, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most adequate long-term enteral access. Peristomal infections are the most common complications of PEG, occurring in up to 8% of patients, despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics. The \"introducer\" PEG-gastropexy technique avoids PEG tube passage through the oral cavity, preventing microorganisms' dislodgment to the peristomal site. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of peristomal wound infection at 7-day post-procedure after conventional \"pull\" technique versus a new \"introducer\" PEG-gastropexy kit. Secondary outcomes included success rates, procedure time, and other complications. METHODS: Eighteen patients referred for PEG placement between June and December 2010 were randomly assigned to \"pull\" PEG with antibiotics or \"introducer\" PEG-gastropexy technique without antibiotics. RESULTS: Overall success rate for both methods was 100%, although mean procedure duration was higher in the \"introducer\" PEG-gastropexy group (12.6 versus 6.4 minutes, P = 0.0166). Infection scores were slightly higher in patients who underwent \"pull\" PEG with antibiotics compared with \"introducer\" PEG-gastropexy without antibiotics (1.33 \u00b1 0.83 versus 0.75 \u00b1 0.67, P = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Although procedure duration was longer in the \"introducer\" PEG-gastropexy, infection scores were marginally higher in the \"pull\" PEG technique.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1590\/s0004-28032011000400003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,31]],"date-time":"2017-03-31T20:33:31Z","timestamp":1490992411000},"page":"231-235","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["New \"introducer\" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study"],"prefix":"10.1590","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"Fernanda Prata","family":"Martins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maris Celia Batista de","family":"Sousa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angelo Paulo","family":"Ferrari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"530","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1005699","article-title":"Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): comparison of push and pull methods and evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis","volume":"27","author":"Akkersdijk WL","year":"1995","journal-title":"Endoscopy","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0013-726X","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"67","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2008.02.068","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy","author":"Banerjee S","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0016-5107","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.02.008","article-title":"Enteral nutrition access devices","volume":"72","author":"Kwon RS","year":"2010","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0016-5107","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"62","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2005.06.041","article-title":"Incidence of abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube placement in untreated head and neck cancer","author":"Cruz I","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0016-5107","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3468(80)80296-X","article-title":"Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique","volume":"15","author":"Gauderer MW","year":"1980","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0022-3468","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.335","article-title":"Reduced risk of peristomal infection of direct percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: comparison with the pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedure","volume":"207","author":"Hiki N","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/1072-7515","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1077490","article-title":"Prospective randomized trial comparing the direct method using a 24 Fr bumper-button-type device with the pull method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy","volume":"40","author":"Horiuchi A","year":"2008","journal-title":"Endoscopy","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0013-726X","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2007.03247.x","article-title":"Meta-analysis: antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent peristomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy","volume":"25","author":"Jafri NS","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Ther","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0269-2813","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-107-6-824","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial","volume":"107","author":"Jain NK","year":"1987","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0003-4819","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(03)70017-0","article-title":"PEG with introducer or pull method: a prospective randomized comparison","volume":"57","author":"Maetani I","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0016-5107","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(03)02147-3","article-title":"Complications of enteral access","volume":"58","author":"McClave SA","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0016-5107","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(84)90300-3","article-title":"Percutaneous gastrostomy: A new simplified and cost-effective technique","volume":"148","author":"Russell TR","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Surg","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0002-9610","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2007.10.044","article-title":"New introducer PEG gastropexy does not require prophylactic antibiotics: multicenter prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study","volume":"67","author":"Shastri YM","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0016-5107","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1898","DOI":"10.1097\/00005537-200311000-00007","article-title":"\u2019Push versus pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer","volume":"113","author":"Tucker AT","year":"2003","journal-title":"Laryngoscope","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0023-852X","issn-type":"print"}],"container-title":["Arquivos de Gastroenterologia"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.scielo.br\/pdf\/ag\/v48n4\/v48n4a03.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,27]],"date-time":"2017-05-27T02:25:56Z","timestamp":1495851956000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.scielo.br\/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032011000400003&lng=en&tlng=en"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0004-28032011000400003"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/s0004-28032011000400003","relation":{},"ISSN":["0004-2803"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0004-2803","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}}}