{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T18:18:20Z","timestamp":1760984300534},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"FapUNIFESP (SciELO)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Acta Cir. Bras."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>PURPOSE: To evaluate the nutritional status of patients in the late postoperative period of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and compare the long-term outcome according to pylorus-preserving (PPPD) or the standard technique (SPD) in which the pylorus is resected. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted twelve months prior or more in patients who had underwent PD (PD Group, n=15) and health volunteers (Control Group, n=15). At a post hoc analysis, the PD Group was divided in PPPD Subgroup (n=9) and SPD Subgroup (n=6), according to the PD techniques. Gastrointestinal complaints and nutritional status were evaluated, apart from a biochemical assessment; Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test were used. RESULTS: The patients recovered their body weight and the gastrointestinal complaints were uncommon. The PD Group showed higher energy and protein intake even though BMI was lower than in Control Group. There were no differences in laboratorial data, except for higher glycemia, serum alkaline phosfatase and C-reactive protein in PD Group. There was no difference in the various parameters evaluated when the Subgroups (PPPD and SPD) were compared. CONCLUSION: For long-term pancreaticoduodenectomy, the gastrointestinal symptoms are minimal and the patients had the clinical and nutritional status preserved, regardless of pylorus preservation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1590\/s0102-86502012000200005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,29]],"date-time":"2012-02-29T00:48:15Z","timestamp":1330476495000},"page":"123-130","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Clinical and nutritional status in the late postoperative of pancreaticoduodenectomy: influence of pylorus preservation procedure"],"prefix":"10.1590","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Cinara Knychala","family":"Muniz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine,  Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Camila Bitu Moreno","family":"Braga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine,  Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rafael","family":"Kemp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine,  Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jos\u00e9 Sebasti\u00e3o dos","family":"Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine,  Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Selma Freire de Carvalho da","family":"Cunha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine,  Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"530","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10\u00ad5","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea","article-title":"One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies","volume":"244","author":"Cameron JL","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ann Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94\u00ad102","DOI":"10.1007\/s00534-010-0317-x","article-title":"Duodenum-preserving versus pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection for benign and premalignant lesions","volume":"18","author":"Pedrazzoli S","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci."},{"issue":"7","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"975","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800820738","article-title":"Comparison between pylorus-preserving and Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"82","author":"Zerbi A","year":"1995","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/S1091-255X(98)80106-6","article-title":"Outcome analysis of long-term survivors following pancreaticoduodenectomy","volume":"2","author":"Melvin WS","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg."},{"issue":"7","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.1998.00745.x","article-title":"Postoperative weight gain after standard Whipple's procedure versus pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: the influence of tumour status","volume":"85","author":"van Berge Henegouwen MI","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.1999.01033.x","article-title":"Dietary intake after pancreatectomy","volume":"86","author":"Maskell C","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Surg."},{"issue":"6","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1241","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1015306110913","article-title":"Effect of gastrointestinal reconstruction on quality of life and nutritional status after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy","volume":"47","author":"Ohtsuka T","year":"2002","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci."},{"issue":"3","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-005-0015-3","article-title":"Early and enduring nutritional and functional results of pylorus preservation vs classic Whipple procedure for pancreatic cancer","volume":"391","author":"Niedergethmann M","year":"2006","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2009.09.003","article-title":"Toward improving uniformity and standardization in the reporting of pancreatic anastomoses: a new classification system by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)","volume":"147","author":"Shukla PJ","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surgery."},{"issue":"2","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000242711.74502.a9","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of pyloruspreserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma","volume":"245","author":"Diener MK","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1177\/014860718701100108","article-title":"What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status?","volume":"11","author":"Detsky AS","year":"1987","journal-title":"JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr."},{"issue":"3","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1440-1622.2000.01786.x","article-title":"Pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: Assessment of patients' nutritional status, quality of life and pancreatic exocrine function","volume":"70","author":"Ong HS","year":"2000","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Surg."},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/10.suppl_4.S281","article-title":"Quality of life, nutritional status and gastrointestinal hormone profile following the Whipple procedure","volume":"10","author":"McLeod RS","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ann Oncol."},{"issue":"3","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-001-0234-x","article-title":"Comparison of the functional outcome after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy","volume":"26","author":"Jang JY","year":"2002","journal-title":"World J Surg."},{"issue":"2","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.026","article-title":"Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is preferable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for long-term outcomes of pancreatic exocrine function","volume":"201","author":"Rault A","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg."},{"issue":"6","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1159\/000066095","article-title":"Deficiencies of micronutrients, altered bowel function, and quality of life during late follow-up after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy","volume":"2","author":"Armstrong T","year":"2002","journal-title":"Pancreatology."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1159\/000101876","article-title":"Pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasia leads to specific micronutrient deficiencies","volume":"7","author":"Armstrong T","year":"2007","journal-title":"Pancreatology."},{"issue":"11","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2059\u00ad67","DOI":"10.1590\/S0102-311X2010001100007","article-title":"Assessing the validity of a food frequency questionnaire among low-income women in S\u00e3o Paulo, southeastern Brazil","volume":"26","author":"Cardoso MA","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cad Sa\u00fade P\u00fablica."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(69)90283-9","article-title":"Digestive function after radical pancreaticoduodenectomy","volume":"117","author":"Fish JC","year":"1969","journal-title":"Am J Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-198009000-00005","article-title":"Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a follow-up evaluation","volume":"192","author":"Traverso WL","year":"1980","journal-title":"Ann Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1080\/07315724.1996.10718567","article-title":"Nutritional status and function in patients following Whipple procedure compared with controls","volume":"15","author":"Royall D","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Am Coll Nutr."},{"issue":"61","key":"ref22","first-page":"45","article-title":"Effect of preoperative endoscopic decompression on malignant biliary obstruction and postoperative infection","volume":"52","author":"Santos JS","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hepatogastroenterology."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(01)00661-4","article-title":"A new biliodigestive anastomosis technique to prevent reflux and stasis","volume":"182","author":"Klaus A","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1138","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-007-9955-5","article-title":"Evaluation of hepatobiliary excretion and enterobiliary reflux in rats with biliary obstruction submitted to bilioduodenal or biliojenunal anastomosis","volume":"53","author":"Dutra RA","year":"2008","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci."},{"issue":"35","key":"ref25","first-page":"1210","article-title":"Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy after biliary reconstruction - A comparative study on Roux-Y and ESCD","volume":"47","author":"Hashimoto N","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hepatogastroenterology."},{"issue":"11","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1092","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1872-034X.2010.00707.x","article-title":"Clinical features of liver dysfunction in collagen diseases","volume":"40","author":"Takahashi A","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hepatol Res."}],"container-title":["Acta Cirurgica Brasileira"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.scielo.br\/pdf\/acb\/v27n2\/a05v27n2.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,27]],"date-time":"2017-05-27T00:28:44Z","timestamp":1495844924000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.scielo.br\/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502012000200005&lng=en&tlng=en"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0102-86502012000200005"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/s0102-86502012000200005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0102-8650"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0102-8650","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]}}}