{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T03:20:02Z","timestamp":1787023202904,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"FapUNIFESP (SciELO)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Soc. Bras. Fonoaudiol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>PURPOSE: Auditory-perceptual evaluation of dysphonia may be influenced by the type of speech\/voice task used to render judgements during the clinical evaluation, i.e., sustained vowels versus continuous speech. This study explored (a) differences in listener dysphonia severity ratings on the basis of speech\/voice tasks, (b) the influence of speech\/voice task on dysphonia severity ratings of stimuli that combined sustained vowels and continuous speech, and (c) the differences in inter-rater reliability of dysphonia severity ratings between both speech tasks. METHODS: Five experienced listeners rated overall dysphonia severity in sustained vowels, continuous speech and concatenated speech samples elicited by 39 subjects with various voice disorders and degrees of hoarseness. RESULTS: Data confirmed that sustained vowels are rated significantly more dysphonic than continuous speech. Furthermore, dysphonia severity in concatenated speech samples is least determined by the sustained vowel. Finally, no significant difference was found in inter-rater reliability between dysphonia severity ratings of sustained vowels versus continuous speech. CONCLUSION: Based upon the results, both types of speech\/voice tasks (i.e., sustained vowel and continuous speech) should be elicited and judged by clinicians in the auditory-perceptual rating of dysphonia severity.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1590\/s2179-64912012000200003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,16]],"date-time":"2012-08-16T13:21:26Z","timestamp":1345123286000},"page":"107-112","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":105,"title":["Sustained vowels and continuous speech in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of dysphonia severity"],"prefix":"10.1590","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Youri","family":"Maryn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Sint-Jan General Hospital,  Belgium; University College Ghent,  Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nelson","family":"Roy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Utah,  USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"530","reference":[{"key":"ref1","series-title":"Principles of voice production","author":"Titze IR","year":"1994"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1598","DOI":"10.1121\/1.424372","article-title":"Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality","volume":"104","author":"Kreiman J","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0001-4966","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref3","first-page":"81","article-title":"Disorders of human communication 5: clinical examination of voice. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1981","author":"Hirano M","journal-title":"Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice"},{"key":"ref4","series-title":"Voice quality measurement","first-page":"73","volume-title":"Measuring vocal quality","author":"Kreiman J","year":"2000"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1067\/S0892-1997(03)00077-8","article-title":"The use of an auditory model in predicting perceptual ratings of breathy voice quality","volume":"17","author":"Shrivastav R","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Voice","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0892-1997","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1044\/1058-0360(2008\/08-0017)","article-title":"Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol","volume":"18","author":"Kempster GB","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Speech Lang Pathol"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1044\/1058-0360(2010\/09-0105)","article-title":"Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)","volume":"20","author":"Zraick RI","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Speech Lang Pathol."},{"issue":"3","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/S0892-1997(05)80237-1","article-title":"Sentence\/vowel correlation in the evaluation of dysphonia","volume":"9","author":"Wolfe V","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Voice","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0892-1997","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref9","series-title":"A framework for voice assessment: the relation between subjective and objective parameters in the judgement of normal and pathological voice","author":"De Bodt M","year":"2008"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2004.08.009","article-title":"The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice","volume":"19","author":"Zraick RI","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Voice","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0892-1997","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1044\/jshr.2901.50","article-title":"Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures","volume":"29","author":"Askenfelt AG","year":"1986","journal-title":"J Speech Hear Res","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0022-4685","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1044\/1092-4388(2001\/027)","article-title":"Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech","volume":"44","author":"Parsa V","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Speech Lang Hear Res","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/1092-4388","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2008.12.014","article-title":"Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels","volume":"24","author":"Maryn Y","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Voice","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0892-1997","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004","article-title":"The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders","volume":"43","author":"Maryn Y","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Commun Disord","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0021-9924","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1044\/jshr.3705.985","article-title":"Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments","volume":"37","author":"de Krom G","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Speech Hear Res","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0022-4685","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1159\/000021485","article-title":"Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis","volume":"51","author":"Revis J","year":"1999","journal-title":"Folia Phoniatr Logop","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/1021-7762","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2004.08.008","article-title":"Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality","volume":"19","author":"Bele IV","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Voice","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/0892-1997","issn-type":"print"},{"key":"ref18","series-title":"Leidraad over niet-interventionele studies","year":"2007"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref19","first-page":"97","article-title":"Nasaliteitsmeting met de nasometer","volume":"63","author":"Van de Weijer JC","year":"1991","journal-title":"Logop Foniatr"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1044\/1092-4388(2002\/009)","article-title":"The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation","volume":"45","author":"Chan KM","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Speech Lang Hear Res","ISSN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/issn\/1092-4388","issn-type":"print"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1080\/02699200050023994","article-title":"Analysing vocal quality of connected speech using Kay's computerized speech lab: a preliminary finding","volume":"14","author":"Yiu E","year":"2000","journal-title":"Clin Linguist Phon"}],"container-title":["Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.scielo.br\/pdf\/jsbf\/v24n2\/03.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,27]],"date-time":"2017-05-27T04:17:01Z","timestamp":1495858621000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.scielo.br\/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-64912012000200003&lng=en&tlng=en"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}},"alternative-id":["S2179-64912012000200003"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/s2179-64912012000200003","relation":{},"ISSN":["2179-6491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2179-6491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}}}