{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,11]],"date-time":"2026-11-11T21:16:28Z","timestamp":1794431788341,"version":"4.9.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Begell House","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Long Term Eff Med Implants"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]},"abstract":"

Implant dentistry is a widely utilized treatment approach for fully or partially edentulous patients. To enhance the success rates of dental implants, various surface modifications have been developed. This study aimed to compare clinical and radiographic parameters in patients with sandblasted acid-etched versus anodized surface dental implants. In this prospective clinical study, 78 patients who had undergone implant placement for missing single posterior tooth in mandible using sandblasted acid-etched and anodized surface dental implants during August 2019-December 2019 were enrolled according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and were categorized into Group 1: SLA (<i>n<\/i> &#61; 27), Group 2: SLActive (<i>n<\/i> &#61; 26), Group 3: TiUnite (<i>n<\/i> &#61; 25) based on the surface modification of the implants. Peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and crestal bone loss (CBL) measurements were carried out at 3 months and 1-year intervals. For intergroup comparison, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD <i>post hoc<\/i> test were used. For intragroup comparison, paired t test was used. PPD and CBL in Group 3 implants was significantly higher than Groups 1 and 2 (<i>P<\/i> &le; 0.05). On pairwise comparison, there was a statistically significant difference in PPD and CBL between the groups at baseline (<i>P<\/i> &le; 0.05) and 1-year follow-up (<i>P<\/i> &le; 0.05) except for Group 1 vs. Group 2 at 1-year follow-up (<i>P<\/i> &#62; 0.05). Intragroup comparison of PPD and CBL showed that there was a statistically significant difference from baseline in all the three groups in terms of PPD (<i>P<\/i> &le; 0.05) and CBL (<i>P<\/i> &le; 0.05). Patients with anodized dental implants exhibited greater PPD and CBL compared with those with sandblasted acid-etched implants.\n<\/p>","DOI":"10.1615\/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2024051955","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,7]],"date-time":"2024-11-07T16:43:14Z","timestamp":1730997794000},"page":"7-14","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Unveiling the Impact of Surface Treatments: A Prospective Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Dental Implant Patients"],"prefix":"10.1615","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"Arvina","family":"Rajasekar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"613","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mombelli A, Muller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:67-76.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02541.x"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:286-91.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2008.01274.x"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Venugopalan S, Subhasree R, Thiyaneswaran N, Maiti S. An analysis of implant prosthesis and its dynamic occlusal contacts. J Long-Term Effects Med Implants. 2023;33(1):1-7.","DOI":"10.1615\/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022038732"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Iannello G, Santonocito D, Risitano G, Cicciu M. Sandblasted and acid etched titanium dental implant surfaces systematic review and confocal microscopy evaluation. Materials. 2019;12(11):1763.","DOI":"10.3390\/ma12111763"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res. 2004;83(7):529-33.","DOI":"10.1177\/154405910408300704"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sul YT, Johansson CB, Roser K, Albrektsson T. Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. Biomaterials. 2002;23(8): 1809-17.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0142-9612(01)00307-6"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coli P, Christiaens V, Sennerby L, Bruyn HD. Reliability of periodontal diagnostic tools for monitoring peri-implant health and disease. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):203-17.","DOI":"10.1111\/prd.12162"},{"key":"8","unstructured":"Salvi GE, Lang NP. Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:116-27."},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Devarakonda S, Subramanian AK, Sivashanmugam P. Surface characterization of strontium phosphate coating on magnesium for bioimplant applications: A preliminary in vitro study. World J Dent. 2024;15(3):208-13.","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10015-2385"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Duraisamy R, Ganapathy D, Shanmugam R, Thangavelu, L. Systematic review on hydroxyapatite and chitosan combination-coated titanium Implants on osseointegration. World J Dent 2024;15(1):79-86.","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10015-2358"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gallego L, Sicilia A, Sicilia P, Mallo C, Cuesta S, Sanz M. A retrospective study on the crestal bone loss associated with different implant surfaces in chronic periodontitis patients under maintenance. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(6):557-67.","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13153"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Loe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38(6):610-6.","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1967.38.6.610"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science? J Periodontol. 2002;73(3):322-33.","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2002.73.3.322"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F. Titanium dental implants with different collar design and surface modifications: A systematic review on survival rates and marginal bone levels. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(1):20-48.","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13389"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rajasekar A, Varghese SS. Microbiological profile in periodontitis and peri-implantitis: A systematic review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;32(4):83-94.","DOI":"10.1615\/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022043121"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Piattelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: A retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol. 2003;74(3):346-52.","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2003.74.3.346"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997;68(11):1117-30.","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1997.68.11.1117"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A. Evaluation of implant collar surfaces for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4987526.","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/4987526"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"den Hartog L, Raghoebar GM, Slater JJ, Stellingsma K, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: A randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(3):311-21.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00372.x"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Schlegel KA, Nkenke E, Eitner S. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(6):550-4.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01684.x"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Penarrocha-Diago M, Flichy-Fernandez AJ, Alonso-Gonzalez R, Pe\u00c3\u00b1arrocha-Oltra D, Balaguer-Martinez J, Penarrocha-Diago M. Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(11):1192-200.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02562.x"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guerra F, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Rocha S, Moergel M, Behrens E, Nicolau P. Platform switch versus platform match in the posterior mandible-1-year results of a multicentre randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(5):521-9.","DOI":"10.1111\/jcpe.12244"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sicilia A, Gallego L, Sicilia P, Mallo C, Cuesta S, Sanz M. Crestal bone loss associated with different implant surfaces in the posterior mandible in patients with a history of periodontitis. A retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(1):88-99.","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13682"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahdad S, Bosshardt D, Patel M, Razaghi N, Patankar A, Roccuzzo M. Benchmark performance of anodized vs. sandblasted implant surfaces in an acute dehiscence type defect animal model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(11):1135-46.","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13996"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(6): S59-68.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(07)60009-2"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Albouy JP, Abrahamsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T. Spontaneous progression of peri-implantitis at different types of implants. An experimental study in dogs. I: Clinical and radiographic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:997-1002.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01589.x"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fickl S, Kebschull M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Hurzeler M, Zuhr O. Experimental peri-implantitis around different types of implants-A clinical and radiographic study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:e661-9.","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12303"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Albouy JP, Abrahamsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T. Implant surface characteristics influence the outcome of treatment of peri-implantitis: An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:58-64.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2010.01631.x"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sener-Yamaner ID, Yamaner G, Sertgoz A, Canakci CF, Ozcan M. Marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive implants: Radiological follow-up evaluation up to 6.5 years. Implant Dent. 2017;26(4):592-9.","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0000000000000625"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ganeles J, Zollner A, Jackowski J, Ten Bruggenkate C, Beagle J, Guerra F. Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the poserior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(11):1119-28.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01626.x"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heberer S, Kilic S, Hossamo J, Raguse JD, Nelson K. Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted2 acid-etched implants: Preliminary results of a split-mouth study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(5):546-51.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2010.02050.x"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yuan Y, Hays MP, Hardwidge PR, Kim J. Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. RSC Adv. 2017;7(23):14254-61.","DOI":"10.1039\/C7RA01571B"}],"container-title":["Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.dl.begellhouse.com\/download\/article\/2623732176be9d5b\/JLT(2)-51955 (7-14) Rajasekar-new final file.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]],"date-time":"2025-05-08T16:11:54Z","timestamp":1746720714000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.dl.begellhouse.com\/journals\/1bef42082d7a0fdf,410626e27f6fdfa9,2623732176be9d5b.html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1615\/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2024051955","relation":{},"ISSN":["1050-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1050-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}}}