{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T15:48:58Z","timestamp":1754149738277,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Begell House","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Long Term Eff Med Implants"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]},"abstract":"<p>The effect of different implant macrogeometry varying in shape along with the biomechanical effect of reduced buccal cortical bone thickness has not been studied and compared in the literature. The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) is to understand the stress distribution on the surrounding cortical bone for implants specially designed for use in anterior maxillary region and compare them with the conventional tapered (CT) implants. Also to assess the advantage of these implants in compromised buccal bone conditions. Two 3D FEA bone block in the maxillary anterior region were meshed with D&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;\/sub&gt; type of bone. One block with uniform cortical bone thickness all around whereas other with reduced buccal cortical bone. Three different implant, inverted body shift (INB) (4.5*3.8*13), reverse neck collar (4.5*4.2*13) and CT implant (4.5*13). Each design was meshed into the different bone blocks creating total of six meshed models. An oblique load of 178 N from palatal side in the buccopalatal direction was applied. INB implant showed the best performance in terms of minimum stress concentration on the surrounding buccal bone specially in the reduced buccal cortical plate situation. The CT implant showed highest percentage increase in stress concentration on reducing buccal plate thickness. The new implant designs specially designed for maxillary anterior region where sufficient buccal bone is often lacking proved to be advantageous in such conditions due to the possibility of additional bone formation around the implant. With its high stability it should be preferred for use in compromised conditions.\n<\/p>","DOI":"10.1615\/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2025055404","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,7]],"date-time":"2025-03-07T14:40:07Z","timestamp":1741358407000},"page":"1-9","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative Analysis of Different Implant Macrogeometry for Improved Esthetics, Inverted Body Shift, and Reverse Neck Collar Implant with Conventional Tapered Implant: A 3D Finite Element Analysis Study"],"prefix":"10.1615","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"Vidit","family":"Chirimar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anshul","family":"Trivedi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Deepesh","family":"Saxena","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roma","family":"Goswami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"613","reference":[{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee A, Fu JH, Wang HL. Soft tissue biotype affects implant success. Implant Dent. 2011;20(3):38-47.","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0b013e3182181d3d"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Farronato D, Manfredini M, Mangano F, Goffredo G, Colombo M, Pasini P, Orsina A, Farronato M. Ratio between height and thickness of the buccal tissues: A pilot study on 32 single implants. Dent J. 2019;7(2):40-9.","DOI":"10.3390\/dj7020040"},{"key":"4","unstructured":"Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent. 2005;25(2):113-9."},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Levine RA, Dias DR, Wang P, Araujo MG. Effect of the buccal gap width following immediate implant placement on the buccal bone wall: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(4):403-13.","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.13095"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paracchini L, Barbieri C, Redaelli M, Di Croce D, Vincenzi C, Guarnieri R. Finite element analysis of a new dental implant design optimized for the desirable stress distribution in the surrounding bone region. Prosthesis. 2020;2(3):225-36.","DOI":"10.3390\/prosthesis2030019"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Geramy A, Hassan-Ahangari A. Stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants as a factor of labial bone thickness and occlusal load angles: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(1):37-41.","DOI":"10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-10-00198"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carinci F, Brunelli G, Danza M. Platform switching and bone platform switching. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(5):245-50.","DOI":"10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-09-00022.1"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chu SJ. Inverted body-shift concept in macroimplant design to enhance biologic and esthetic outcomes: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(6):720-6.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2020.09.018"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dos Santos JG, Durao AP, de Campos Felino AC, de Faria RM. Analysis of the buccal bone plate, root inclination and alveolar bone dimensions in the jawbone. A descriptive study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019;10(2):4-16.","DOI":"10.5037\/jomr.2019.10204"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(6):585-98.","DOI":"10.1067\/mpr.2001.115251"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hsu ML, Chang CL. Application of finite element analysis in dentistry. Finite Element Anal. 2010;5(1):43-6.","DOI":"10.5772\/10007"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: A cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2-to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140-51.","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2009.080435"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Januario AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1168-71.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2010.02086.x"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Farronato D, Pasini PM, Orsina AA, Manfredini M, Azzi L, Farronato M. Correlation between buccal bone thickness at implant placement in healed sites and buccal soft tissue maturation pattern: A prospective three-year study. Materials. 2020;13(3):511-22.","DOI":"10.3390\/ma13030511"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Singh V, Bhagol A, Ashwin V. Controversies in the dental implant treatment planning for anterior maxillary aesthetic zone - A review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2023;14(1):3-8.","DOI":"10.4103\/njms.NJMS_59_20"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Manjulika T, Jain S, Trivedi A, Kharat N, Sonkesriya S. Implant malpositioning: Reasons and prevention. Eur Chem Bull. 2023;12(5):2185-90.","DOI":"10.48047\/ecb\/2023.12.si5a.0100"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oliveira H, Brizuela Velasco A, Rios-Santos JV, Sanchez Lasheras F, Lemos BF, Gil FJ, Carvalho A, Herrero-Climent M. Effect of different implant designs on strain and stress distribution under non-axial loading: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4738-56.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph17134738"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patil SM, Deshpande AS, Bhalerao RR, Metkari SB, Patil PM. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of varying implant crest module designs on the stress distribution to the bone. Dent Res J. 2019;16(3):145-52.","DOI":"10.4103\/1735-3327.255750"},{"key":"20","unstructured":"Danza M, Riccardo G, Carinci F. Bone platform switching: A retrospective study on the slope of reverse conical neck. Quintessence Int. 2010;41(1):35-40."},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nevins M, Chu SJ, Jang W, Kim DM. Evaluation of an innovative hybrid macrogeometry dental implant in immediate extraction sockets: A histomorphometric pilot study in foxhound dogs. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent. 2019;39(1):29-37.","DOI":"10.11607\/prd.3848"},{"key":"22","unstructured":"Moeen F, Saeed M, Aslam A. Influence of variations in thickness of buccal cortical bone on stress distribution around immediately loaded mandibular implants: A non-linear finite element study. Int J Innov Appl Stud. 2014;6(3):376-91."},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lovatto ST, Bassani R, Sarkis-Onofre R, Dos Santos MB. Influence of different implant geometry on clinical longevity and maintenance of marginal bone: A systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):713-21.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12790"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heimes D, Becker P, Pabst A, Smeets R, Kraus A, Hartmann A, Sagheb K, Kammerer PW. How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):20-6.","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-023-00485-z"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morris GA, Steinberg MJ, Drago C. Full arch immediate occlusal loading using site specific implants: A clinical series of 10 patients (13 arches). J Prosthodont. 2023;32(3):204-13.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13620"},{"key":"26","unstructured":"Goswami R, Trivedi A, Mowar A, Phukela SS, Singh R. Psychological and functional full mouth rehabilitation of a patient by 'all-on-four' concept: A case report. Drug Cell Ther Hematol. 2021;10(3):425-30."}],"container-title":["Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.dl.begellhouse.com\/download\/article\/47f0fe50390f85d2\/JLT-55404.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,18]],"date-time":"2025-07-18T15:33:02Z","timestamp":1752852782000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.dl.begellhouse.com\/journals\/1bef42082d7a0fdf,1a2841753be9f164,47f0fe50390f85d2.html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1615\/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2025055404","relation":{},"ISSN":["1050-6934"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1050-6934"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}}}