{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,31]],"date-time":"2026-10-31T12:30:15Z","timestamp":1793449815991,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"American Association of Avian Pathologists (AAAP)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Avian Diseases"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Salmonella enterica serotypes Enteritidis (SE) and Heidelberg (SH) are consistently linked to poultry-related foodborne outbreaks and can be isolated from broiler parts in processing facilities. In order to control this pathogen's establishment in the broiler, entryways at the farm that lead to colonization must be considered. The objective of these trials was to determine if the inoculation route of either SE or SH altered its recovery in a market-age broiler's digestive tract if chicks were dosed on day of hatch. Chicks were given a 104 colony-forming units inoculation of SE or SH on day 0 via one of five inoculation routes (oral, intratracheal, subcutaneous, ocular, or cloacal) and then placed in pens (60\u2013100 chicks\/treatment). Broilers were reared for 32\u201336 days, then euthanatized, and samples of trachea, crop, liver and spleen (pooled), cecum, and a cloacal swab were collected. Samples were enriched and then analyzed on yes\/no criteria based on Salmonella growth. Data were analyzed in JMP Pro 14.1 using the GLM procedure with the Student t-test to separate serotype means and a Tukey honestly significant difference test to separate inoculation means (P \u2264 0.05). All samples collected and all inoculation routes resulted in recovery of either serotype. The intratracheal inoculation, mimicking inhaled fomites, resulted in significantly higher recovery of Salmonella serotypes than did the other inoculation routes (P &lt; 0.0001), indicating the importance of controlling respiratory contamination. When comparing serotypes, there was a significantly greater recovery of SH compared to SE based on samples collected (P = 0.001). SH also had significantly greater recovery from the cecum (P &lt; 0.001) and the cloacal swab (P = 0.02). These trials indicate the need for further investigation of the intratracheal route, as well as reinforcing that the potential of systemic infection through grow out with either serotype is highly probable preharvest.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1637\/aviandiseases-d-20-00012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,16]],"date-time":"2020-12-16T06:54:33Z","timestamp":1608101673000},"page":"467-470","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Inoculation Route and Serotype Alter Salmonella Recovery in the Broiler's Digestive Tract"],"prefix":"10.1637","volume":"64","author":[{"given":"Elle V.","family":"Chadwick","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama USA 36849"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Laci","family":"MacKay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama USA 36849"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James T.","family":"Krehling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama USA 36849"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kenneth S.","family":"Macklin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama USA 36849"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1212","reference":[{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SL Foley, R Nayak, IB Hanning, et al.  \"Appl Environ Microbiol.\"  77, \"Population dynamics of Salmonella enterica serotypes in commercial egg and poultry production.\" 4273 (2011)","DOI":"10.1128\/AEM.00598-11"},{"key":"19","unstructured":"et al.  \"Nutrient Requirements of Poultry.\"  ,  (1994)"},{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JA Crump, M Sjolund-Karlsson, MA Gordon, et al.  \"Clin Microbiol Rev.\"  28, \"Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections.\" 901 (2015)","DOI":"10.1128\/CMR.00002-15"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"PA Barrow, MA Jones, AL Smith, et al.  \"Avian Pathol.\"  41, \"The long view: Salmonella\u2014the last forty years.\" 413 (2012)","DOI":"10.1080\/03079457.2012.718071"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DE Cosby, NA Cox, MA Harrison, et al.  \"J Appl Poult Res.\"  24, \"Salmonella and antimicrobial resistance in broilers: a review.\" 408 (2015)","DOI":"10.3382\/japr\/pfv038"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DVT Nair  and A Kollanoor Johny  \"Food safety in poultry meat production.\"  , \"Salmonella in poultry meat production.\" 1 (2019)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-05011-5_1"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A Kim, YJ Lee, MS Kang, et al.  \"J Vet Sci.\"  8, \"Dissemination and tracking of Salmonella spp. in integrated broiler operation.\" 155 (2007)","DOI":"10.4142\/jvs.2007.8.2.155"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P Roy, AS Dhillon, LH Lauerman, et al.  \"Avian Dis.\"  46, \"Results of Salmonella isolation from poultry products, poultry, poultry environment, and other characteristics.\" 17 (2002)","DOI":"10.1637\/0005-2086(2002)046[0017:ROSIFP]2.0.CO;2"},{"key":"8","unstructured":"et al.  \"Progress report on Salmonella and Campylobacter testing of raw meat and poultry products, 1998\u20132014.\"  ,  (2014)"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"RH Davies  and C Wray  \"Br Poult Sci.\"  37, \"Persistence of Salmonella Enteritidis in poultry units and poultry food.\" 589 (1996)","DOI":"10.1080\/00071669608417889"},{"key":"10","unstructured":"J Monoj, S Srihari, RK Sharma, et al.  \"Res Environ Life Sci.\"  10, \"Microflora of poultry litter during rearing of broilers and post-ensiling.\" 821 (2017)"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JS Bailey, NA Cox, DE Cosby, et al.  \"J Food Prot.\"  68, \"Movement and persistence of Salmonella in broiler chickens following oral or intracloacal inoculation.\" 2698 (2005)","DOI":"10.4315\/0362-028X-68.12.2698"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"NA Cox, JS Bailey, ME Berrang,  \"J Appl Poult Res.\"  5, \"Alternative routes for Salmonella intestinal tract colonization of chicks.\" 282 (1996)","DOI":"10.1093\/japr\/5.3.282"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"PJ Fedorka-Cray, LC Kelley, TJ Stabel, et al.  \"Infect Immun.\"  63, \"Alternate routes of invasion may affect pathogenesis of Salmonella Typhimurium in swine.\" 2658 (1995)","DOI":"10.1128\/iai.63.7.2658-2664.1995"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"RK Gast, J Guard-Petter, PS Holt,  \"Avian Dis.\"  46, \"Characteristics of Salmonella Enteritidis contamination in eggs after oral, aerosol, and intravenous inoculation of laying hens.\" 629 (2002)","DOI":"10.1637\/0005-2086(2002)046[0629:COSECI]2.0.CO;2"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T Miyamoto, E Baba, T Tanaka, et al.  \"Avian Dis.\"  41, \"Salmonella Enteritidis contamination of eggs from hens inoculated by vaginal, cloacal, and intravenous routes.\" 296 (1997)","DOI":"10.2307\/1592181"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"PA Barrow, JM Simpson, MA Lovell,  \"Avian Pathol.\"  17, \"Intestinal colonisation in the chicken by food poisoning Salmonella serotypes; microbial characteristics associated with faecal excretion.\" 571 (1988)","DOI":"10.1080\/03079458808436478"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SL Foley, TJ Johnson, SC Ricke, et al.  \"Microbiol Mol Biol Rev.\"  77, \"Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars.\" 582 (2013)","DOI":"10.1128\/MMBR.00015-13"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"RK Gast, J Guard-Bouldin, PS Holt,  \"Avian Dis.\"  49, \"The relationship between the duration of fecal shedding and the production of contaminated eggs by laying hens infected with strains of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Heidelberg.\" 382 (2005)","DOI":"10.1637\/7322-010705R.1"},{"key":"20","unstructured":"et al.  \"JMP Pro, version 14.1.\"  ,  ()"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G Kallapura, MH Kogut, MJ Morgan, et al.  \"Avian Pathol.\"  43, \"Fate of Salmonella Senftenberg in broiler chickens evaluated by challenge experiments.\" 305 (2014)","DOI":"10.1080\/03079457.2014.923554"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JY D'Aoust, C Maishment, DM Burgener, et al.  \"J Food Prot.\"  43, \"Detection of Salmonella in refrigerated pre-enrichment and enrichment broth cultures.\" 343 (1980)","DOI":"10.4315\/0362-028X-43.5.343"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"NP Evans, RD Evans, J Regalado, et al.  \"J Food Prot.\"  78, \"Preharvest Salmonella detection for evaluation of fresh ground poultry product contamination.\" 1266 (2015)","DOI":"10.4315\/0362-028X.JFP-14-509"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B Malorny, C Bunge, R Helmuth,  \"J Microbiol Methods.\"  70, \"A real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in poultry meat and consumption eggs.\" 245 (2007)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mimet.2007.04.013"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L Gieraltowski, J Higa, V Peralta, et al.  \"PLOS ONE.\"  11, \"Salmonella Heidelberg Investigation. National outbreak of multidrug resistant Salmonella Heidelberg infections linked to a single poultry company.\" e0162369 (2016)","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0162369"}],"container-title":["Avian Diseases"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/bioone.org\/journals\/avian-diseases\/volume-64\/issue-4\/aviandiseases-D-20-00012\/Inoculation-Route-and-Serotype-Alter-Salmonella-Recovery-in-the-Broilers\/10.1637\/aviandiseases-D-20-00012.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,31]],"date-time":"2026-10-31T11:33:32Z","timestamp":1793446412000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bioone.org\/journals\/avian-diseases\/volume-64\/issue-4\/aviandiseases-D-20-00012\/Inoculation-Route-and-Serotype-Alter-Salmonella-Recovery-in-the-Broilers\/10.1637\/aviandiseases-D-20-00012.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,8]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1637\/aviandiseases-d-20-00012","relation":{},"ISSN":["0005-2086","1938-4351"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0005-2086","type":"print"},{"value":"1938-4351","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,8]]}}}