{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,28]],"date-time":"2023-08-28T09:27:53Z","timestamp":1693214873019},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"MRE Press","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Objectives: The current investigation evaluated parameters leading to the utilization of pulpectomy versus extraction for treatment of nonvital primary second molars. Study design: This retrospective chart review identified patients up to 8-years of age with primary second molars treated by pulpectomy or extraction. Patients in the extraction group were age and gender-matched to the pulpectomy group. Demographic, clinical, radiographic and behavioral data were extracted for comparison. Chi-square, Fisher and T-test were performed for statistical analysis. Results: There were 23 patients in each group, with a mean age of 5 years (ranging 3\u20138 years, \u00b11.5 for pulpectomy and \u00b11.3 for extraction). Significantly more pulpectomies were performed in the mandible (p=0.002), specifically on the left side (p=0.0035). Internal and external root resorption were significantly higher in the extraction group (p=0.033 and p=0.007 respectively). Restorability was significantly lower in the extraction group (p&amp;lt;0.0001). Pre-procedural pain was reported by 76.5 percent of all patients, but pharmacologically treated in 15.2 percent. Nitrous oxide was administered to 73.9 percent of patients for behavior guidance. Conclusion: Pathologic root resorption and non-restorability were significantly higher in the extraction group. Behavior and pathologic bone resorption did not influence treatment choice. A higher proportion of children reported pre-treatment pain and needed adjunctive behavior guidance than children who did not have pre-treatment pain or did not need adjunctive behavior guidance.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.17796\/1053-4625-44.5.3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,12]],"date-time":"2020-11-12T18:37:57Z","timestamp":1605206277000},"page":"302-306","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Pulpectomy versus Extraction for the Treatment of Nonvital Primary Second Molars: A Retrospective Chart Review"],"prefix":"10.22514","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"S","family":"Sebourn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Q","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Ritwik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"26027","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,12]]},"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/meridian.allenpress.com\/jcpd\/article-pdf\/44\/5\/302\/2645505\/i1053-4628-44-5-302.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/meridian.allenpress.com\/jcpd\/article-pdf\/44\/5\/302\/2645505\/i1053-4628-44-5-302.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,22]],"date-time":"2022-07-22T11:46:27Z","timestamp":1658490387000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/meridian.allenpress.com\/jcpd\/article\/44\/5\/302\/447338\/Pulpectomy-versus-Extraction-for-the-Treatment-of"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,12]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17796\/1053-4625-44.5.3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1053-4628"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1053-4628","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]]}}}