{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T14:07:41Z","timestamp":1790172461546,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"RCVS Knowledge","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790121600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["VE"],"abstract":"<jats:p>PICO Question\nIn cats with traumatic brain injury, is hypertonic saline more effective than Lactated Ringer\u2019s Solution (LRS), when measuring neurological recovery?\n\u00a0\nClinical bottom line\nCategory of research\nTreatment.\nNumber and type of study designs reviewed\nZero.\nStrength of evidence\nZero.\nOutcomes reported\nBoth hypertonic saline and LRS have been successfully used in the management of traumatic brain injuries in cats. There is not enough evidence to recommend one treatment over the other and they should be chosen with consideration of the individual after assessing patient status.\nConclusion\nIn cats with traumatic brain injury, there is not enough evidence to say that hypertonic saline is more effective than LRS when measuring short-term neurological response with an improved Modified Glasgow Coma Score.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.18849\/ve.v11i3.743","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T13:43:04Z","timestamp":1790170984000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Hypertonic saline versus Lactated Ringer\u2019s Solution for neurological recovery in cats with traumatic brain injury"],"prefix":"10.18849","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-8484-9787","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aiden","family":"Pang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"8083","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"container-title":["Veterinary Evidence"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/veterinaryevidence.org\/index.php\/ve\/article\/download\/743\/1237","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/veterinaryevidence.org\/index.php\/ve\/article\/download\/743\/1237","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T13:43:05Z","timestamp":1790170985000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/veterinaryevidence.org\/index.php\/ve\/article\/view\/743"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18849\/ve.v11i3.743","relation":{},"ISSN":["2396-9776"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2396-9776","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]}}}