{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T05:55:56Z","timestamp":1747202156821,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"RCVS Knowledge","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,2]],"date-time":"2022-12-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669939200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["VE"],"abstract":"<jats:p>PICO question\r\nIn rabbits, undergoing general anaesthesia, does the placement of a v-gel\u00ae device result in less airway trauma compared to the use of other airway management devices?\r\n\u00a0\r\nClinical bottom line\r\nCategory of research question\r\nTreatment\r\nThe number and type of study designs reviewed\r\nThree papers were critically appraised, two blinded randomised experimental trial studies and one randomised crossover experimental trial study\r\nStrength of evidence\r\nWeak\r\nOutcomes reported\r\nOne blinded randomised trial study demonstrated that the trauma to the upper airways of rabbits during anaesthesia is not significantly different between the use of v-gel\u00ae and an endotracheal tube. The other blinded randomised trial study demonstrated that the trauma to the upper airway caused by endotracheal intubation is significantly more than that caused by v-gel\u00ae placement. The randomised crossover trial study demonstrated that v-gel\u00ae placement causes more significant compression to the larynx compared to a laryngeal mask or face mask\r\nConclusion\r\nThe current evidence suggests that use of the v-gel\u00ae in rabbits causes less trauma \/ injury to the airways compared to placement of an endotracheal tube but not compared to the use of a laryngeal or face mask. However, based on the low number and quality of published studies, this evidence is weak, and better-quality studies are required to support the routine use of v-gel\u00ae over other airway devices in rabbits. While v-gel\u00ae may be a safer alternative for securing airways in rabbits compared to endotracheal intubation, knowing the injuries this device can cause to the upper airways is useful for managing rabbits during post anaesthesia recovery\r\n\u00a0\r\nHow to apply this evidence in practice\r\nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient\u2019s circumstances and owners\u2019 values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.\r\nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.18849\/ve.v7i4.608","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,2]],"date-time":"2022-12-02T11:04:46Z","timestamp":1669979086000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Does the use of supraglottic device in rabbits cause less injury than other airway management devices?"],"prefix":"10.18849","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7243-6239","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jasmine","family":"Gheini","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sanaa","family":"Zaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"8083","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,2]]},"container-title":["Veterinary Evidence"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/veterinaryevidence.org\/index.php\/ve\/article\/download\/608\/782","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/veterinaryevidence.org\/index.php\/ve\/article\/download\/608\/782","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,2]],"date-time":"2022-12-02T11:04:46Z","timestamp":1669979086000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/veterinaryevidence.org\/index.php\/ve\/article\/view\/608"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,2]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18849\/ve.v7i4.608","relation":{},"ISSN":["2396-9776"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2396-9776"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,2]]}}}