{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T10:18:15Z","timestamp":1784715495938,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":5,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,27]],"date-time":"2013-02-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1361923200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":1732,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J of App Behav Analysis"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Research has not systematically assessed and validated preferences for staff in adults with developmental disabilities. Three adults with developmental disabilities (aged 32 to 43 years) identified preferred and nonpreferred staff using verbal and pictorial preference assessments. During break\u2010point analyses with progressive\u2010ratio schedules, all 3 had higher break points when working for positive social interaction with their preferred staff mamber than with their nonpreferred staff member.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.2008.41-221","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,1]],"date-time":"2008-12-01T08:00:17Z","timestamp":1228118417000},"page":"221-225","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["REINFORCING EFFICACY OF INTERACTIONS WITH PREFERRED AND NONPREFERRED STAFF UNDER PROGRESSIVE\u2010RATIO SCHEDULES"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Jared","family":"Jerome","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Sturmey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.2000.33-329"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.1992.25-491"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.1985.18-249"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.2001.34-145"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","first-page":"543","article-title":"Assessing preferences for staff: Some pilot data","volume":"30","author":"Sturmey P.","year":"2002","journal-title":"Journal of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychology"}],"container-title":["Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1901%2Fjaba.2008.41-221","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1901\/jaba.2008.41-221","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,25]],"date-time":"2023-09-25T03:11:51Z","timestamp":1695611511000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1901\/jaba.2008.41-221"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]},"references-count":5,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1901\/jaba.2008.41-221"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1901\/jaba.2008.41-221","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-8855","1938-3703"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-8855","type":"print"},{"value":"1938-3703","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-02-27","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}