{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,16]],"date-time":"2026-03-16T14:58:45Z","timestamp":1773673125559,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,1]],"date-time":"2007-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1183248000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Periodontology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Background:<\/jats:bold> Human fibroblast\u2010derived dermal substitute (HFDDS) is a tissue\u2010engineered material that consists of polyglactin mesh seeded with cultured fibroblasts. Cultured fibroblasts are not as differentiated as tissue fibroblasts and retain the ability to differentiate into other cells types. HFDDS also is capable of stimulating angiogenesis and wound healing. The purpose of this study was to attempt to evaluate the effects of HFDDS on guided bone regeneration at sites with 1.5\u2010mm peri\u2010implant defects in the canine mandible.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:<\/jats:bold> Fifty sand\u2010blasted acid\u2010etched test implants were placed into the edentulous areas of mandibular ridges of five American foxhounds. Each site had a standardized 1.5\u2010mm circumferential peri\u2010implant defect in the coronal half of the implant, created by a specialized drill at the time of osteotomy. In each canine two implants received no treatment of the defects, four implants were treated with polyglactin mesh (carrier only) wrapped around the circumference of the defect wall, and four implants were treated with HFDDS placed in a similar fashion to the mesh. Implant sites healed submerged for 10 weeks, at which time sacrifice took place and sections were prepared, processed, and analyzed histomorphometrically.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> The mean distance from the top of the fixture to the first point of bone\u2013implant contact was 2.20 mm, 2.25 mm, and 2.60 mm for the HFDDS, carrier, and control sites, respectively (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.202). Overall mean percentage of bone\u2010to\u2010implant contact (BIC) in the defects was 32.8%, 31.0%, and 22.8% for the HFDDS, carrier, and control groups, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant, but approached statistical significance for the control group compared to HFDDS and carrier (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.057). Overall mean bone fill in the defects calculated histometrically was 36.0%, 35.8%, and 33.9% for the HFDDS, carrier, and control groups, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. Sites with dehiscence at the time of implant placement had significantly greater distance to first bone\u2013implant contact (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.002), a smaller percentage of BIC (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.006), and significantly less bone fill (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.006) in the defects. It was consistently found that when dehiscence occurred on the buccal side of the implant, the outcomes for all parameters measured were significantly inferior on the lingual side as well. Factorial analysis, which grouped outcomes by dehiscence categories (none, partial, or full dehiscence), revealed that with intact defects without dehiscence, HFDDS had less bone fill compared to the carrier. However, in defects with partial or full dehiscence, HFDDS had more bone fill compared to carrier sites. These differences were statistically significant (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.034).<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions:<\/jats:bold> In intact sites without dehiscence, the presence of cultured fibroblasts in 1.5\u2010mm\u2013wide peri\u2010implant defects did not significantly enhance bone regeneration compared to the carrier, polyglactin mesh. However, sites with partial or full dehiscence treated with HFDDS had significantly greater bone fill compared to the carrier (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.034). When dehiscence occurs during immediate implant placement on narrow ridges without the use of membranes, bone regeneration tends to be inferior on the side of the dehiscence as well as the opposite side of the implant.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2007.060056","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,3]],"date-time":"2007-07-03T08:26:29Z","timestamp":1183451189000},"page":"1276-1287","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Bone Regeneration Around Implants in the Canine Mandible With Cultured Fibroblasts in Polyglactin Mesh"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"78","author":[{"given":"Michael S.","family":"Sparks","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David G.","family":"Kerns","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas G.","family":"Wilson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"William W.","family":"Hallmon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Spears","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nasser","family":"Haghighat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","first-page":"348","article-title":"The T\u00fcbingen immediate implant in clinical studies (in German)","volume":"33","author":"Schulte W","year":"1978","journal-title":"Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","first-page":"332","article-title":"Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages","volume":"9","author":"Lazzara RJ","year":"1989","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","first-page":"451","article-title":"Classification of and therapy for areas of deficient bony housing prior to dental implant placement","volume":"13","author":"Wilson T","year":"1993","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","first-page":"333","article-title":"Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: A report of histologic and histometric analyses of human biopsies","volume":"13","author":"Wilson T","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","first-page":"364","article-title":"Histologic evaluation of dental endosseous implants placed in surgically created extraction defects","volume":"11","author":"Knox R","year":"1991","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1997.68.10.933"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1999.70.2.139"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.8493529"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0757.2000.2240113.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0906-6713.2003.03304.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-4154-6_7"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","first-page":"236","volume-title":"Molecular Cell Biology","author":"Lodish H","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1517\/13543784.7.5.803"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/ten.1998.4.403"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","first-page":"203","article-title":"Enhancement of wound tissue expansion and angiogenesis by matrix\u2010embedded fibroblast (dermagraft), a role of hepatocyte growth factor\/scatter factor","volume":"2","author":"Jiang WG","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int J Mol Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00232.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","first-page":"31","article-title":"An improved method for preparing histological sections of metallic implants","volume":"1","author":"Maniatopoulos C","year":"1986","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","first-page":"19","article-title":"Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: An experimental study in rabbits","volume":"4","author":"Dahlin C","year":"1989","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2001.72.11.1560"}],"container-title":["Journal of Periodontology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1902\/jop.2007.060056","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T10:41:43Z","timestamp":1760870503000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1902\/jop.2007.060056"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1902\/jop.2007.060056"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1902\/jop.2007.060056","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3492","1943-3670"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3492","type":"print"},{"value":"1943-3670","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]}}}