{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T03:12:57Z","timestamp":1792293177730,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,1]],"date-time":"2007-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1183248000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Periodontology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Background:<\/jats:bold> The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of dental implants in periodontally susceptible patients using immediate loading\/restoration (ILR) protocols and the factors that modulate this response.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:<\/jats:bold> Systemically healthy patients who were treated previously for chronic periodontitis and who required implant therapy were recruited. Following data collection, \u201csurgical templates\u201d and provisional fixed restorations were fabricated. Transgingival implants were inserted, and surgical measurements were performed. After abutment connection, the crown\/bridge was relined and cemented. Patients were monitored for 12 months, at which time final measurements were performed.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> Twenty patients (49 implants) completed this study; five implants failed and were removed (90% survival rate). All implants were removed during the first 6 months. At 12 months, the mean implants' probing depth was 2.87 \u00b1 0.9 mm. The mean electronic mobility testing device value (\u22121.3 \u00b1 0.7) was slightly higher than at baseline (\u22123.53 \u00b1 10.7). Radiographic bone loss ranged between \u22121.24 and 2.77 mm (mean \u00b1 SD: 0.91 \u00b1 0.2 mm). All of the implants (16) that were inserted in the premolar region were successful, whereas three of nine implants in the molar region and two of 24 implants in the canine\/incisor region failed (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.0278). Survival in the immediately loaded group (83%) was slightly lower than in the immediately restored group (96%); however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. None of the other variables (smoking, arch, stability, implant length and diameter, and bone width) affected the outcome of this procedure.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions:<\/jats:bold> ILR protocols are predictable alternatives in periodontally susceptible patients. Results in the molar regions suggested that careful consideration should be given to implants placed in these sites. Long\u2010term success in these patients has not been addressed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2007.060418","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,3]],"date-time":"2007-07-03T08:26:29Z","timestamp":1183451189000},"page":"1188-1194","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Dental Implants for Immediate Fixed Restoration of Partially Edentulous Patients: A 1\u2010Year Prospective Pilot Clinical Trial in Periodontally Susceptible Patients"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"78","author":[{"given":"Eli E.","family":"Machtei","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shai","family":"Frankenthal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Israel","family":"Blumenfeld","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zvi","family":"Gutmacher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacob","family":"Horwitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","first-page":"67","article-title":"A prospective study on immediate loading of implants with mandibular overdentures: Patient\u2010mediated and economic outcomes","volume":"19","author":"Attard NJ","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2004.01069.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2004.01013.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","first-page":"253","article-title":"Changes in crestal bone levels for immediately loaded implants","volume":"21","author":"Yoo RH","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00180.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","first-page":"584","article-title":"A resonance frequency analysis assessment of maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implants","volume":"20","author":"Balshi SF","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","first-page":"39","article-title":"Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs: Follow\u2010up of implant stability and implant failures","volume":"20","author":"Nkenke E","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","first-page":"99","article-title":"Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow\u2010up of up to 24 months","volume":"20","author":"Degidi M","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","first-page":"360","article-title":"Immediate and early loading of SLA ITI single\u2010tooth implants: An in vivo study","volume":"20","author":"Quinlan P","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2004.00568.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.000.00934.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2005.04.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2005.00708.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2002.130507.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2001.72.8.977"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00706.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","first-page":"391","article-title":"Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs: A histomorphometric study of bone\u2010implant contact","volume":"18","author":"Novaes AB","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","first-page":"812","article-title":"Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs. Part 2: A fluorescence microscopy study","volume":"18","author":"Marcaccini AM","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2006.02.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","first-page":"319","article-title":"Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite and Osseotite implant surfaces","volume":"19","author":"Sul YT","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2006.050325"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/154405910608500603"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2006.060220"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00142.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/jhev.1997.0180"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2842.1999.00473.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","first-page":"880","article-title":"A 3\u2010arm study of early loading of rough\u2010surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: Results after 1 year of loading","volume":"19","author":"Nordin T","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2005.76.11.1972"}],"container-title":["Journal of Periodontology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1902\/jop.2007.060418","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T10:41:34Z","timestamp":1760870494000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1902\/jop.2007.060418"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1902\/jop.2007.060418"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1902\/jop.2007.060418","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3492","1943-3670"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3492","type":"print"},{"value":"1943-3670","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]}}}