{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,18]],"date-time":"2026-07-18T15:35:56Z","timestamp":1784388956108,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,1]],"date-time":"2009-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1233446400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Periodontology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Background:<\/jats:bold> Reduction of alveolar height and width after tooth extraction may present problems for implant placement, especially in the anterior maxilla where bone volume is important for biologic and esthetic reasons. Different graft materials have been proposed to minimize the reduction in ridge volume. The aim of this study was to compare radiographic and histomorphometric results of magnesium\u2010enriched hydroxyapatite (MHA) and calcium sulfate (CS) grafts in fresh sockets after tooth extractions.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:<\/jats:bold> Forty\u2010five fresh extraction sockets with three bone walls were selected in 15 patients. A split\u2010mouth design was used: 15 sockets on the right side of the jaw received MHA, 15 sockets on the left side received CS, and 15 random unfilled sockets were considered the control (C) group. Intraoral digital radiographs were taken at baseline and at 3 months after graft material placement. At 3 months, cylinder bone samples were obtained for histology and histomorphometry analysis.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> The difference in mean radiographic vertical bone level from baseline to 3 months was \u22122.48 \u00b1 0.65 mm in the CS group, \u22120.48 \u00b1 0.21 mm in the MHA group, and \u22123.75 \u00b1 0.63 mm in the unfilled C group. Statistically significant differences (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt;0.05) were found between CS and MHA groups and between MHA and C groups. Histologic examination revealed bone formation in all treated sites; trabecular bone assessment did not differ among apical, mesial, and coronal portions of the specimens. Mean vital bone measurements for CS, MHA, and C groups were 45.0% \u00b1 6.5%, 40.0% \u00b1 2.7%, and 32.8% \u00b1 5.8%, respectively. Statistically significant differences (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt;0.05) were found among all groups. Connective tissue percentages averaged 41.5% \u00b1 6.7% for the CS group, 41.3% \u00b1 1.3% for the MHA group, and 64.6% \u00b1 6.8% for the C group. Statistically significant differences (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt;0.05) were found between CS and C groups and between MHA and C groups. The CS\u2010grafted sockets showed 13.9% \u00b1 3.4% residual implant material, whereas the MHA\u2010treated sockets showed 20.2% \u00b1 3.2% residual material. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt;0.05).<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions:<\/jats:bold> Radiographs revealed a greater reduction of alveolar ridge in the CS group than in the MHA group. Histologic examination showed more bone formation and faster resorption in the CS group and more residual implant material in the MHA group.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2009.080400","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,2]],"date-time":"2009-02-02T10:22:40Z","timestamp":1233570160000},"page":"210-218","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":69,"title":["Magnesium\u2010Enriched Hydroxyapatite Compared to Calcium Sulfate in the Healing of Human Extraction Sockets: Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation at 3 Months"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"80","author":[{"given":"Roberto","family":"Crespi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paolo","family":"Cappar\u00e8","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Enrico","family":"Gherlone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2003.74.7.965"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0901-5027(05)80623-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2334\/josnusd1959.25.202"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2004.06.041"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","first-page":"31","article-title":"The use of e\u2010PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: A prospective multicenter study","volume":"9","author":"Becker W","year":"1994","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","first-page":"96","article-title":"Enhancement of damaged edentulous ridge to receive dental implants: A combination of allograft and the Gore\u2010Tex membrane","volume":"12","author":"Nevins M","year":"1992","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","first-page":"231","article-title":"Histologic evaluation of mineralized and demineralized freeze\u2010dried bone allograft for ridge and sinus augmentations","volume":"25","author":"Cammack GV","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2000.71.6.1015"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","first-page":"271","article-title":"Histological study of the biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite crystals in periodontal surgery (in French)","volume":"13","author":"Benqu\u00e9 EP","year":"1985","journal-title":"J Biol Buccale"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173050-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","first-page":"408","volume-title":"A study of porous block HA ceramics and its osteogenesis","author":"Zhang XD","year":"1991"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","first-page":"274","article-title":"An investigation on the osteoinduction of synthetic porous phase\u2010pure hydroxyapatite ceramics","volume":"9","author":"Yuan H","year":"1997","journal-title":"Biomed Eng Appl Basis Com"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4636(199710)37:1<122::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-I"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0267-6605(94)90016-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2000.71.6.940"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000069893.31220.6f"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2004.75.6.902"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/10520299209110067"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1997.68.6.563"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1998.69.9.1044"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","first-page":"491","article-title":"Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine\u2010derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: A clinical and histologic study in humans","volume":"19","author":"Vance GS","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2008.070038"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","first-page":"681","article-title":"Autogenous bone versus \u03b2\u2010tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevations (2\u2010 and 3\u2010dimensional computed tomographic, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations): Preliminary results","volume":"16","author":"Szab\u00f2 G","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","first-page":"18","article-title":"Retrospective study of dental implantation with sinus lift and Cerasorb augmentation","volume":"4","author":"Reinhardt C","year":"2000","journal-title":"Implant Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","first-page":"432","article-title":"Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a \u03b2\u2010tricalcium phosphate (cerasorb) alone compared to autogenous bone grafts","volume":"20","author":"Zijderveld SA","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2004.01055.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2002.73.1.94"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2002.130412.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01416.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Periodontology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1902\/jop.2009.080400","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T11:54:49Z","timestamp":1760874889000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1902\/jop.2009.080400"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,2]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1902\/jop.2009.080400"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1902\/jop.2009.080400","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3492","1943-3670"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3492","type":"print"},{"value":"1943-3670","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,2]]}}}