{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T00:37:56Z","timestamp":1760920676709,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,1]],"date-time":"2012-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1346457600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Periodontology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Background:<\/jats:bold> The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around implants with two different types of tapered internal implant\u2013abutment interface (IAI): tapped\u2010in (TI) tapered internal IAI and screwed\u2010in (SI) tapered internal IAI in dogs.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:<\/jats:bold> The second, third, and fourth premolars and the first molar in mandibles of six beagle dogs were extracted. After 8 weeks, two SI implants and two TI implants were placed in one side of the mandible. There were four experimental groups: 1) SI placed crestally (SIC); 2) TI placed crestally (TIC); 3) SI placed 1.5 mm subcrestally (SIS); and 4) TI placed 1.5 mm subcrestally (TIS). Healing abutments were connected 12 weeks after implant surgery. Implants and teeth were brushed every second day during the healing period. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at 4, 10, and 16 weeks after second\u2010stage surgery.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> Differences between SI and TI implants inserted in the same vertical position were not significant for peri\u2010implant probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), or bone resorption (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &gt;0.05). Subcrestal placement of both implants had greater PD and CAL compared to crestal groups. However, distance from IAI to the first bone\u2013implant contact was lower in subcrestal groups compared to crestal groups (1.27 \u00b1 0.42 mm for SIC versus 0.46 \u00b1 0.26 mm for SIS, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt;0.05; 1.36 \u00b1 0.31 mm for TIC versus 0.78 \u00b1 0.42 mm for TIS, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt;0.05).<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions:<\/jats:bold> Tapered internal IAI configuration had no significant effect on crestal bone resorption. Moreover, subcrestal placement of tapered internal IAI had a positive impact on crestal bone preservation around the cervix of the implant.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2012.110617","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,6]],"date-time":"2012-01-06T06:31:40Z","timestamp":1325831500000},"page":"1164-1171","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Influence of Placement Depth on Bone Remodeling Around Tapered Internal Connection Implant: A Clinical and Radiographic Study in Dogs"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"83","author":[{"given":"Baoxin","family":"Huang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Huanxin","family":"Meng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Muzi","family":"Piao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Li","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Li","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Weidong","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1083.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1563\/1548-1336-35.1.18"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(10)60142-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","first-page":"527","article-title":"Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant\u2010abutment interface","volume":"12","author":"Jansen VK","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","first-page":"94","article-title":"Microleakage at the abutment\u2010implant interface of osseointegrated implants: A comparative study","volume":"14","author":"Gross M","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2842.2008.01886.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","first-page":"732","article-title":"In vitro evaluation of the implant\u2010abutment bacterial seal: The locking taper system","volume":"20","author":"Dibart S","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01837.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2005.76.1.115"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1997.68.11.1117"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/154405910308200316"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/154405910608500515"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"BoynuegriAD YalimM NemliSK ErguderBI GokalpP. Effect of different localizations of microgap on clinical parameters and inflammatory cytokines in peri\u2010implant crevicular fluid: A prospective comparative study.Clin Oral Investig2012;16:353\u2010361.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-010-0497-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","first-page":"467","article-title":"Influence of the microgap in the peri\u2010implant hard and soft tissues: A histomorphometric study in dogs","volume":"17","author":"Todescan FF","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2008.070145"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2008.070132"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01637.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01860.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2009.090317"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01564.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","first-page":"540","article-title":"Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri\u2010implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: An experimental study in dogs","volume":"25","author":"Weng D","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14219\/jada.archive.1998.0384"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2009.12.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-302X.1987.tb00298.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.1981.tb02031.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","first-page":"475","article-title":"Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: A methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements","volume":"16","author":"Hermann JS","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2003.74.12.1736"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.1996.070204.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","first-page":"335","article-title":"Crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged implants (Camlog) with different machined collar lengths: A histomorphometric pilot study in dogs","volume":"23","author":"Schwarz F","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","first-page":"9","article-title":"Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels","volume":"26","author":"Lazzara RJ","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_1","first-page":"609","article-title":"Evaluation of peri\u2010implant marginal bone loss using modified abutment connections at various crestal level placements","volume":"30","author":"Veis A","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-051X.1999.260907.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00520.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2002.73.3.322"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2005.00747.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Periodontology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1902\/jop.2012.110617","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T12:38:03Z","timestamp":1760877483000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1902\/jop.2012.110617"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1902\/jop.2012.110617"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1902\/jop.2012.110617","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3492","1943-3670"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0022-3492"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1943-3670"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]}}}