{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,13]],"date-time":"2023-09-13T20:22:50Z","timestamp":1694636570393},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"American Public Health Association","issue":"8","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Public Health"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1983,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> In South Carolina, 1974-1980, only two matches were found between 536 Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) cases and 965 individuals who submitted ticks that tested rickettsial antigen positive. In neither case did the positive test prevent RMSF. Tick rickettsial positivity rates varied inversely with human RMSF attack rates in different geographic areas. A physician survey established it as unlikely that RMSF occurred in positive tick submitters (PTS), and that although not recommended, 34 per cent of asymptomatic PTS received prophylactic treatment. Only 18 per cent of positive ticks were engorged. Tick testing appears ineffective in preventing RMSF. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2105\/ajph.73.8.903","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,27]],"date-time":"2008-11-27T05:16:35Z","timestamp":1227762995000},"page":"903-906","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Tick testing as a method of controlling Rocky Mountain spotted fever."],"prefix":"10.2105","volume":"73","author":[{"given":"J J","family":"Sacks","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T A","family":"Pinner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R L","family":"Parker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"844","reference":[{"key":"p_1","unstructured":"Center for Disease Control: Rickettsial disease surveillance report No. 1, 1975-1978. Atlanta: CDC, September 1979."},{"key":"p_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4269\/ajtmh.1975.24.866"},{"key":"p_3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4269\/ajtmh.1978.27.1255"},{"key":"p_4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jmedent\/12.3.269"},{"key":"p_5","unstructured":"Wisseman CL: Rocky Mountain spotted fever: what to do with the afebrile patient with an attached tick. Baltimore: State of Maryland Communicable Disease Letter, February 1981."},{"key":"p_6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-197307000-00006"},{"key":"p_7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-84-6-732"},{"key":"p_8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.1973.03650090022005"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Public Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/ajph.aphapublications.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.2105\/AJPH.73.8.903","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,9]],"date-time":"2022-05-09T18:28:44Z","timestamp":1652120924000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ajph.aphapublications.org\/doi\/full\/10.2105\/AJPH.73.8.903"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1983,8]]},"references-count":8,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1983,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.2105\/AJPH.73.8.903"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2105\/ajph.73.8.903","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-0036","1541-0048"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0090-0036","type":"print"},{"value":"1541-0048","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1983,8]]}}}