{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T03:51:56Z","timestamp":1778125916601,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"American Public Health Association","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Public Health"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1999,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the impact of price on condom use. METHODS: A program based on distribution of condoms at no charge was replaced with one providing low-cost condoms (25 cents). Pretest and posttest surveys asked about condom use among persons reporting 2 or more sex partners. RESULTS: At pretest, 57% of respondents had obtained free condoms, and 77% had used a condom during their most recent sexual encounter. When the price was raised to 25 cents, the respective percentages decreased to 30% and 64%. CONCLUSIONS: Cost is a barrier to condom use. Free condoms should be distributed to encourage their use by persons at risk for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2105\/ajph.89.4.567","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,29]],"date-time":"2008-11-29T13:33:29Z","timestamp":1227965609000},"page":"567-568","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":56,"title":["Cost as a barrier to condom use: the evidence for condom subsidies in the United States."],"prefix":"10.2105","volume":"89","author":[{"given":"D","family":"Cohen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R","family":"Scribner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R","family":"Bedimo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T A","family":"Farley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"844","reference":[{"key":"p_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00002030-199410000-00002"},{"key":"p_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.89.2.204"},{"key":"p_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tanner WM, Pollack RH. The effect of condom use and erotic instructions on attitudes toward condoms.JSexRes. 1988;25:537-541.","DOI":"10.1080\/00224498809551481"},{"key":"p_4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.79.4.499"},{"key":"p_5","first-page":"247","volume":"8","author":"Kusseling FS","year":"1996","journal-title":"AIDS Educ Prev."},{"key":"p_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guinan ME, Famham PG, Holtgrave DR. Estimating the value of preventing a human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Prev Med. 1994;lO:1-4.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-3797(18)30638-X"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Public Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/ajph.aphapublications.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.2105\/AJPH.89.4.567","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,9]],"date-time":"2022-05-09T20:31:27Z","timestamp":1652128287000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ajph.aphapublications.org\/doi\/full\/10.2105\/AJPH.89.4.567"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1999,4]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1999,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.2105\/AJPH.89.4.567"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2105\/ajph.89.4.567","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-0036","1541-0048"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0090-0036","type":"print"},{"value":"1541-0048","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1999,4]]}}}