{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T19:06:03Z","timestamp":1792263963834,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"18","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,20]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The 3-dimensional nature of adult acquired flatfoot deformity can be challenging to characterize using radiographs. We tested the hypothesis that measurements on weight-bearing (WB) cone-beam computed tomography (CT) images were more useful for demonstrating the severity of the deformity than non-weight-bearing (NWB) measurements.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We prospectively enrolled 12 men and 8 women (mean age, 52 years; range, 20 to 88 years) with flexible adult acquired flatfoot deformity. The subjects underwent cone-beam CT while standing (WB) and seated (NWB), and images were assessed in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes by 3 independent observers who performed multiple measurements. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were assessed with the Pearson or Spearman correlation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Measurements were compared using paired Student t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. P &lt; 0.05 was considered significant.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We found that overall the measurements had substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability on both the NWB images (mean ICC, 0.80; range, 0.49 to 0.99) and the WB images (mean ICC, 0.81; range, 0.39 to 0.99). Eighteen of 19 measurements differed between WB and NWB cone-beam CT images, with more pronounced deformities on the WB images. The most reliable measurements, based on intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities and the difference between WB and NWB images, were the medial cuneiform-to-floor distance, which averaged 29 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] = 28 to 31 mm) on the NWB images and 18 mm (95% CI = 17 to 19 mm) on the WB images, and the forefoot arch angle (mean, 13\u00b0 [95% CI = 12\u00b0 to 15\u00b0] and 3.0\u00b0 [95% CI = 1.4\u00b0 to 4.6\u00b0], respectively) in the coronal view and the cuboid-to-floor distance (mean, 22 mm [95% CI = 21 to 23 mm] and 17 mm [95% CI = 16 to 18 mm], respectively) and the navicular-to-floor distance (mean, 38 mm [95% CI = 36 to 40 mm] and 23 mm [95% CI = 22 to 25 mm], respectively) in the sagittal view.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Measurements analogous to traditional radiographic parameters of adult acquired flatfoot deformity are obtainable using high-resolution cone-beam CT. Compared with NWB images, WB images better demonstrated the severity of osseous derangement in patients with flexible adult acquired flatfoot deformity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Diagnostic\n                      <jats:underline>Level II<\/jats:underline>\n                      . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.16.01366","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,20]],"date-time":"2017-09-20T20:01:25Z","timestamp":1505937685000},"page":"e98","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":146,"title":["Flexible Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity"],"prefix":"10.2106","volume":"99","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6037-0685","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cesar","family":"de Cesar Netto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland"},{"name":"Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lew C.","family":"Schon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gaurav K.","family":"Thawait","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lucas Furtado","family":"da Fonseca","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Apisan","family":"Chinanuvathana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland"},{"name":"Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wojciech B.","family":"Zbijewski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey H.","family":"Siewerdsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shadpour","family":"Demehri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"bib1-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198307000-00021","article-title":"Tibialis posterior tendon rupture","volume":"177","author":"Johnson","year":"1983","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib2-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198567040-00009","article-title":"Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon causing flat foot. Surgical treatment","volume":"67","author":"Mann","year":"1985","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"bib3-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198902000-00022","article-title":"Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction","volume":"239","author":"Johnson","year":"1989","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib4-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199705000-00006","article-title":"Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. Evaluation of injury of the spring ligament and clinical assessment of tendon transfer and ligament repair","volume":"79","author":"Gazdag","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib5-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200807000-00005","article-title":"Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity","volume":"16","author":"Deland","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib6-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070102200404","article-title":"The effect of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction on hindfoot kinematics","volume":"22","author":"Niki","year":"2001","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib7-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2008.08.010","article-title":"Association of tibialis posterior tendon pathology with other radiographic findings in the foot: a case-control study","volume":"47","author":"Shibuya","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib8-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070502600601","article-title":"Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: which ligaments are involved?","volume":"26","author":"Deland","year":"2005","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"key":"bib9-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199908000-00003","article-title":"Pathoanatomy and etiology of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction","volume":"365","author":"Mosier","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib10-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/s11420-006-9017-0","article-title":"Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency results at different stages","volume":"2","author":"Deland","year":"2006","journal-title":"HSS J."},{"key":"bib11-20230810","first-page":"393","article-title":"Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon","volume":"46","author":"Myerson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Instr Course Lect."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib12-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1726","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00045","article-title":"Correction of moderate and severe acquired flexible flatfoot with medializing calcaneal osteotomy and flexor digitorum longus transfer","volume":"88","author":"Vora","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"9","key":"bib15-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1177\/107110079201300902","article-title":"The validity of measurements made on standard foot orthoroentgenograms","volume":"13","author":"Perry","year":"1992","journal-title":"Foot Ankle."},{"issue":"10","key":"bib16-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070502601006","article-title":"Radiographic assessment of adult flatfoot","volume":"26","author":"Younger","year":"2005","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib17-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1147","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199908000-00010","article-title":"Subluxation of the talocalcaneal joint in adults who have symptomatic flatfoot","volume":"81","author":"Ananthakrisnan","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"11","key":"bib18-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100714546549","article-title":"Subtalar joint axis in patients with symptomatic peritalar subluxation compared to normal controls","volume":"35","author":"Apostle","year":"2014","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib19-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2012.0444","article-title":"Peritalar Symposium: determining the talus orientation and deformity of planovalgus feet using weightbearing multiplanar axial imaging","volume":"33","author":"Ellis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib20-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2010.0361","article-title":"Assessment of lateral hindfoot pain in acquired flatfoot deformity using weightbearing multiplanar imaging","volume":"31","author":"Ellis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib21-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2008.0199","article-title":"Weightbearing CT scan of severe flexible pes planus deformities","volume":"29","author":"Ferri","year":"2008","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib22-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e63","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.01205","article-title":"Comparison of deformity with respect to the talus in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and controls using multiplanar weight-bearing imaging or conventional radiography","volume":"96","author":"Haleem","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib23-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2013.04.004","article-title":"Load response of the medial longitudinal arch in patients with flatfoot deformity: in vivo 3D study","volume":"28","author":"Kido","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib24-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100714557861","article-title":"Assessment of coronal plane subtalar joint alignment in peritalar subluxation via weight-bearing multiplanar imaging","volume":"36","author":"Probasco","year":"2015","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib25-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13130225","article-title":"Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging","volume":"270","author":"Carrino","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiology."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib26-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1742","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3546-6","article-title":"Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system","volume":"25","author":"Demehri","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Radiol."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib27-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1177\/107110079301400305","article-title":"Effect of calcaneal lengthening on relationships among the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot","volume":"14","author":"Sangeorzan","year":"1993","journal-title":"Foot Ankle."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib28-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100716646629","article-title":"Correlation of talar anatomy and subtalar joint alignment on weightbearing computed tomography with radiographic flatfoot parameters","volume":"37","author":"Cody","year":"2016","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"10","key":"bib29-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100714540890","article-title":"Subtalar joint configuration on weightbearing CT scan","volume":"35","author":"Colin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib30-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070602700813","article-title":"Radiographic comparison of standing medial cuneiform arch height in adults with and without acquired flatfoot deformity","volume":"27","author":"Arangio","year":"2006","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"9","key":"bib31-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1177\/107110079701800915","article-title":"Radiologic signs of unilateral pes planus","volume":"18","author":"Chadha","year":"1997","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib32-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100713475432","article-title":"Short-term radiographic analysis of operative correction of adult acquired flatfoot deformity","volume":"34","author":"Iossi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib33-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2009.0604","article-title":"Correlation of Harris mats, physical exam, pictures, and radiographic measurements in adult flatfoot deformity","volume":"30","author":"Coughlin","year":"2009","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib34-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","article-title":"The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data","volume":"33","author":"Landis","year":"1977","journal-title":"Biometrics."},{"issue":"12","key":"bib36-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1177\/107110079401501206","article-title":"Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements","volume":"15","author":"Saltzman","year":"1994","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib37-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070302400704","article-title":"Deformity and degeneration in the hindfoot and midfoot joints of the adult acquired flatfoot","volume":"24","author":"Greisberg","year":"2003","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"11","key":"bib38-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2011.1017","article-title":"Load response of the tarsal bones in patients with flatfoot deformity: in vivo 3D study","volume":"32","author":"Kido","year":"2011","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"11","key":"bib39-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2005","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200211000-00015","article-title":"Talocalcaneal and subfibular impingement in symptomatic flatfoot in adults","volume":"84","author":"Malicky","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib40-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/S1083-7515(03)00078-0","article-title":"Tenosynovitis of the posterior tibial tendon","volume":"6","author":"Bare","year":"2001","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Clin."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib41-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2008.08.003","article-title":"The prevalence of symptomatic posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction in women over the age of 40 in England","volume":"15","author":"Kohls-Gatzoulis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg."},{"issue":"10","key":"bib42-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1411","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100713488761","article-title":"Tripod index: a new radiographic parameter assessing foot alignment","volume":"34","author":"Arunakul","year":"2013","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib43-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2010.0141","article-title":"Inter- and intraobserver reliability in the radiographic evaluation of adult flatfoot deformity","volume":"31","author":"Sensiba","year":"2010","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib44-20230810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2303030297","article-title":"Sample size estimation: a glimpse beyond simple formulas","volume":"230","author":"Eng","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology."}],"container-title":["Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00004623-201709200-00015","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T13:41:06Z","timestamp":1787751666000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00004623-201709200-00015"}},"subtitle":["Comparison Between Weight-Bearing and Non-Weight-Bearing Measurements Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,20]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"18","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.16.01366","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-9355","1535-1386"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-9355","type":"print"},{"value":"1535-1386","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,20]]}}}