{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T03:58:25Z","timestamp":1790135905376,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,20]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Appropriate patient-reported outcome measures are paramount to determine the clinical relevance of change experienced by patients after a surgical procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of 3 patient-reported outcome measures (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS], modified Harris hip score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) in a large population of patients treated with periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients who underwent a periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia between October 2011 and October 2016 completed multiple questionnaires preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. Internal consistency for subscores was evaluated with the Cronbach alpha. Validity was assessed against the Short Form-12. Interpretability included the calculation of the distribution of scores, floor and ceiling effects, and the minimal clinically important difference. Responsiveness was assessed by correlating the score changes with the Global Perceived Effect score.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of 294 patients, 246 (84%) were female. The median age was 21 years (interquartile range, 17 to 29 years). All WOMAC and HOOS subscores demonstrated adequate internal consistency, and none of the modified Harris hip score components did. All scores except the WOMAC stiffness score exhibited adequate validity and interpretability, with no floor and ceiling effects over 15%. For the HOOS subscores, the minimal clinically important difference was 10.3 for pain, 10.2 for symptoms, 12.6 for sports and recreation, 11.2 for quality of life, and 10.8 for activities of daily living. The minimal clinically important difference for the modified Harris hip score was 7.4. For the WOMAC subscores, the minimal clinically important difference was 10.8 for pain, 12.9 for stiffness, 10.8 for physical, and 10.4 for total. All scores demonstrated adequate responsiveness.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The HOOS, WOMAC, and modified Harris hip score have adequate psychometric properties for use in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy, with minor shortcomings. Among the scores analyzed, the HOOS appears to be the most appropriate measure of patient-reported outcome in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>By establishing the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for periacetabular osteotomy, this study enables a more informed choice of measures for clinical practice and research. The estimated minimal clinically important difference values will facilitate understanding the importance of change in patient-reported outcomes after a surgical procedure in a clinical setting and sample size calculation for further studies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.18.00185","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,5]],"date-time":"2019-04-05T14:49:42Z","timestamp":1554475782000},"page":"e21","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":52,"title":["Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Periacetabular Osteotomy"],"prefix":"10.2106","volume":"101","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5475-1999","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marcin K.","family":"Wasko","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri"},{"name":"Department of Radiology and Imaging, The Medical Center for Postgraduate Education in Warsaw, Otwock, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5835-0201","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elizabeth L.","family":"Yanik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7487-4753","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cecilia","family":"Pascual-Garrido","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7828-9690","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"John C.","family":"Clohisy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"Suppl 1 Pt 2","key":"bib1-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00646","article-title":"Intermediate to long-term results following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome: surgical technique","volume":"92","author":"Matheney","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"bib2-20230811","first-page":"23","article-title":"The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: review of reported outcomes and the early experience at the University of Iowa","volume":"23","author":"McKinley","year":"2003","journal-title":"Iowa Orthop J."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib3-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2041","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-0842-6","article-title":"Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review","volume":"467","author":"Clohisy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"key":"bib4-20230811","first-page":"239","article-title":"Periacetabular osteotomy: the Bernese experience","volume":"50","author":"Siebenrock","year":"2001","journal-title":"Instr Course Lect."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib5-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1633","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0242-3","article-title":"Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy","volume":"466","author":"Steppacher","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"9","key":"bib6-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2169","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.H.00994","article-title":"Medium-term outcome of periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of conversion to total hip replacement","volume":"91","author":"Troelsen","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib7-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.01822","article-title":"Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery","volume":"94","author":"Smith","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib8-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-010-9606-8","article-title":"The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study","volume":"19","author":"Mokkink","year":"2010","journal-title":"Qual Life Res."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib9-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1053\/j.oto.2010.09.014","article-title":"Hip arthroscopy assessment tools and outcomes","volume":"20","author":"Safran","year":"2010","journal-title":"Oper Tech Orthop."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib10-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199606000-00005","article-title":"Differences between patients\u2019 and physicians\u2019 evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty","volume":"78","author":"Lieberman","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib11-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0838.2001.110506.x","article-title":"Outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction\u2014a comparison of patients\u2019 and surgeons\u2019 assessments","volume":"11","author":"Roos","year":"2001","journal-title":"Scand J Med Sci Sports."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib12-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.15.00798","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy from the prospective ANCHOR cohort study","volume":"99","author":"Clohisy","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"9","key":"bib13-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2065","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546513494173","article-title":"Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery","volume":"41","author":"Kemp","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib14-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1136\/bjsm.2010.080937","article-title":"The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist","volume":"45","author":"Thorborg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br J Sports Med."},{"issue":"23","key":"bib15-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2214","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00687","article-title":"Responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC following periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia","volume":"93","author":"Davidson","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"bib16-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.01735","article-title":"Clinical presentation of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in skeletally mature patients","volume":"93","author":"Nunley","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib17-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-196951040-00012","article-title":"Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation","volume":"51","author":"Harris","year":"1969","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"bib18-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-4-10","article-title":"Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)\u2014validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement","volume":"4","author":"Nilsdotter","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord."},{"issue":"7080","key":"bib20-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.314.7080.572","article-title":"Cronbach\u2019s alpha","volume":"314","author":"Bland","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib21-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1023499322593","article-title":"On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation","volume":"12","author":"Terwee","year":"2003","journal-title":"Qual Life Res."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib22-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(89)90005-6","article-title":"Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference","volume":"10","author":"Jaeschke","year":"1989","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib23-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.01.008","article-title":"Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods","volume":"7","author":"Copay","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib24-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1097\/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C","article-title":"Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation","volume":"41","author":"Norman","year":"2003","journal-title":"Med Care."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib25-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2013.10.012","article-title":"Statistical or clinical improvement? Determining the minimally important difference for the vascular quality of life questionnaire in patients with critical limb ischemia","volume":"47","author":"Frans","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib26-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142S","DOI":"10.1016\/S0197-2456(05)80019-4","article-title":"Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation","volume":"12","author":"Deyo","year":"1991","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib27-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S178","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-198903001-00015","article-title":"Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status","volume":"27","author":"Kazis","year":"1989","journal-title":"Med Care."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib28-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01593882","article-title":"Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?","volume":"4","author":"McHorney","year":"1995","journal-title":"Qual Life Res."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib29-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02310555","article-title":"Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests","volume":"16","author":"Cronbach","year":"1951","journal-title":"Psychometrika."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib30-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.5301\/hipint.5000420","article-title":"Complications and short-term patient outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic mild hip dysplasia","volume":"27","author":"Ricciardi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hip Int."},{"issue":"10","key":"bib31-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1322","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B10.35741","article-title":"Comparison of contemporary periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia with total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis","volume":"97-B","author":"Gray","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib32-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1154","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-016-5169-5","article-title":"One-third of hips after periacetabular osteotomy survive 30 years with good clinical results, no progression of arthritis, or conversion to THA","volume":"475","author":"Lerch","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib33-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-016-4887-z","article-title":"Survivorship of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: what factors are associated with long-term failure?","volume":"475","author":"Wells","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib34-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-007-0372-3","article-title":"Complications and patient satisfaction after periacetabular pelvic osteotomy","volume":"32","author":"Biedermann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Orthop."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib35-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.03.013","article-title":"Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. The development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33)","volume":"28","author":"Mohtadi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arthroscopy."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib36-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-011-2158-6","article-title":"Does previous reconstructive surgery influence functional improvement and deformity correction after periacetabular osteotomy?","volume":"470","author":"Polkowski","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"11","key":"bib37-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2460","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546517710011","article-title":"Early functional outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia","volume":"45","author":"Ricciardi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib38-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1093\/jhps\/hnv002","article-title":"Patient-reported outcome measures for hip preservation surgery-a systematic review of the literature","volume":"2","author":"Ramisetty","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Hip Preserv Surg."}],"container-title":["Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00004623-201903200-00010","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T13:37:47Z","timestamp":1787751467000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00004623-201903200-00010"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,20]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.18.00185","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-9355","1535-1386"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-9355","type":"print"},{"value":"1535-1386","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,20]]}}}