{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T14:37:44Z","timestamp":1787755064410,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"17","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Many surgeons are reluctant to use a constrained liner at the time of acetabular component revision because of concerns that doing so might result in early acetabular component loosening related to high bone-implant interface stresses transmitted from the constrained liner. We hypothesized that, with appropriate initial implant stabilization using highly porous acetabular components with robust supplemental screw fixation, constrained liners could be safely used at the time of acetabular revision.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We retrospectively identified 148 revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in which a constrained liner of 1 design was cemented into a newly placed highly porous acetabular component fixed with supplemental screws (mean, 5 screws). The mean age at the time of revision THA was 69 years, and 68% of the patients were female. The most common indications for revision were 2-stage reimplantation (33%), recurrent dislocation (30%), and aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (22%) or both the acetabular and femoral components (9%). The mean duration of follow-up was 7 years.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There were no failures at the bone-implant interface. No cases of acetabular metal shell loosening were identified on radiographic analysis. The 10-year survival rates with acetabular revision and any reoperation as the end points were 75% and 67%, respectively. Overall, 33 hips (22%) required revision or reoperation because of infection or wound complications (n = 12), dislocation or mechanical failure of the constrained liner (n = 11), periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 4), femoral loosening (n = 3), or other reasons (n = 3). The 10-year survival rate with re-revision for instability as the end point was 88% overall, which was similar to the 85% 10-year survival rate with re-revision for instability as the end point among hips that were specifically revised because of instability during index revision THA (p = 0.9).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Implanting a constrained liner at the time of acetabular revision in high-risk patients resulted in no cases of aseptic metal acetabular component loosening in this large series. This finding is likely related to the fact that a highly porous acetabular component was utilized with robust supplemental screw fixation in each case. Such information is valuable as these data favor a paradigm shift when compared with some traditionally held tenets.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Therapeutic\n                      <jats:underline>Level IV<\/jats:underline>\n                      . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.19.01332","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,26]],"date-time":"2020-05-26T00:23:06Z","timestamp":1590452586000},"page":"1521-1529","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Constrained Liners Implanted Simultaneously at the Time of Acetabular Shell Revision with a Highly Porous Implant"],"prefix":"10.2106","volume":"102","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3151-877X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nicholas A.","family":"Bedard","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5404-0433","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Timothy S.","family":"Brown","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3101-9129","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David G.","family":"Lewallen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4572-7540","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert T.","family":"Trousdale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1422-0306","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel J.","family":"Berry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2398-1724","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthew P.","family":"Abdel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"bib1-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"622","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.09.026","article-title":"Contemporary surgical indications and referral trends in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year review","volume":"31","author":"Haynes","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"7S","key":"bib2-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.01.031","article-title":"The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: why are contemporary revision total hip arthroplasties failing? An analysis of 2500 cases","volume":"34","author":"Goldman","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib3-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(03)00295-X","article-title":"Use of constrained acetabular components for hip instability: an average 10-year follow-up study","volume":"18","author":"Bremner","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"11","key":"bib4-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2419","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200411000-00009","article-title":"Salvage of a recurrently dislocating total hip prosthesis with use of a constrained acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report","volume":"86","author":"Goetz","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"bib5-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1484.R1","article-title":"Long-term results of tripolar constrained total hip arthroplasty in revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of ten years","volume":"101-B","author":"El-Husseiny","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib6-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e187","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20140124-24","article-title":"Proximal femoral reconstruction with a constrained acetabulum in oncologic patients","volume":"37","author":"Jawad","year":"2014","journal-title":"Orthopedics."},{"issue":"11","key":"bib7-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2179","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200311000-00019","article-title":"The use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthroplasty","volume":"85","author":"Shrader","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib8-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1054\/arth.2003.50090","article-title":"The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation","volume":"18","author":"Shapiro","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib9-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1553","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.00317","article-title":"Modes of failure of Osteonics constrained tripolar implants: a retrospective analysis of forty-three failed implants","volume":"90","author":"Guyen","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib10-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(03)00325-5","article-title":"Early failure mechanisms of constrained tripolar acetabular sockets used in revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"18","author":"Cooke","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"key":"bib11-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000194069.15086.1b","article-title":"Constrained acetabular components in complex revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"441","author":"McCarthy","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib12-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199804000-00006","article-title":"Salvage of a recurrently dislocating total hip prosthesis with use of a constrained acetabular component. A retrospective analysis of fifty-six cases","volume":"80","author":"Goetz","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib13-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-196951040-00012","article-title":"Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation","volume":"51","author":"Harris","year":"1969","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"key":"bib14-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-016-1106-8","article-title":"Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris hip score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty","volume":"17","author":"Singh","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib15-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.18.00607","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of constrained liners cemented into retained, well-fixed acetabular components","volume":"101","author":"Brown","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib16-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/0883-5403(94)90135-X","article-title":"Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation","volume":"9","author":"Paprosky","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib17-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4432-5","article-title":"What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position","volume":"474","author":"Abdel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib18-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.75B2.8444942","article-title":"The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation","volume":"75","author":"Murray","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"bib19-20230811","first-page":"20","article-title":"Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement","volume":"121","author":"DeLee","year":"1976","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib20-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(89)80020-8","article-title":"Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study","volume":"4","author":"Massin","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"282","key":"bib21-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1958.10501452","article-title":"Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations","volume":"53","author":"Kaplan","year":"1958","journal-title":"J Am Stat Assoc."},{"issue":"9","key":"bib22-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1963","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.02.021","article-title":"High failure rate of modular exchange with a specific design of a constrained liner in high-risk patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"31","author":"Chalmers","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib23-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.5312\/wjo.v8.i7.553","article-title":"Acetabular revisions using porous tantalum components: a retrospective study with 5-10 years follow-up","volume":"8","author":"Evola","year":"2017","journal-title":"World J Orthop."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib24-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999.0000000000000005","article-title":"Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions have good survival at 5 to 10 years: longer term followup of a previous report","volume":"476","author":"Lachiewicz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib25-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.37183","article-title":"Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum ten-year clinical, radiological and quality of life outcome study","volume":"98-B","author":"Konan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib26-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B3.BJJ-2018-0959.R1","article-title":"Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up","volume":"101-B","author":"L\u00f6chel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"issue":"11","key":"bib27-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2239","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-3082-2","article-title":"The focally constrained liner is a reasonable option for revision of unstable total hip arthroplasty","volume":"40","author":"M\u00e4kinen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Orthop."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib28-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2005.06.001","article-title":"The long-term outcome of 755 consecutive constrained acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty examining the successes and failures","volume":"20","author":"Berend","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib29-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0883-5403(94)90133-3","article-title":"Constrained acetabular components","volume":"9","author":"Anderson","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib30-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2005.05.005","article-title":"High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"20","author":"Della Valle","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib31-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200704000-00012","article-title":"Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030","volume":"89","author":"Kurtz","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib32-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B8.35170","article-title":"The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset","volume":"97-B","author":"Patel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"issue":"10","key":"bib33-20230811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2606","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-0834-6","article-title":"Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030","volume":"467","author":"Kurtz","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."}],"container-title":["Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.19.01332","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T13:36:56Z","timestamp":1787751416000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.19.01332"}},"subtitle":["Surprisingly Good Fixation at 10 Years"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"17","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.19.01332","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-9355","1535-1386"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-9355","type":"print"},{"value":"1535-1386","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]]}}}