{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T17:45:41Z","timestamp":1792086341654,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"13","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Modular fluted tapered (MFT) stems have advanced treatment of Vancouver B\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      and B\n                      <jats:sub>3<\/jats:sub>\n                      periprosthetic femoral fractures, but series to date have been limited with respect to cohort size and follow-up duration. The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship, radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      and B\n                      <jats:sub>3<\/jats:sub>\n                      periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems in a large series of patients.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We identified 171 Vancouver B\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      (109) and B\n                      <jats:sub>3<\/jats:sub>\n                      (62) periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with an MFT stem between 2000 and 2018 using our institutional total joint registry. The mean age was 75 years, 50% were female, and the mean body mass index was 29 kg\/m\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      . The median stem diameter was 18 mm and median stem length was 210 mm. The cumulative incidences of revision and reoperation with death as the competing risk were calculated, radiographs were reviewed, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean follow-up was 5 years.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The 10-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 10%. There were 17 revisions, of which only 3 were for the distal fluted portion of the MFT stem. Revision indications included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 6) and dislocation (n = 11). The 10-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 15%. In addition to the above 17 revisions, there were 7 reoperations for superficial wound complications (n = 4), Vancouver B\n                      <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n                      periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 1), vascular occlusion (n = 1), and acetabular cartilage degeneration requiring an acetabular component (n = 1). Radiographically, there was 1 fracture nonunion. All unrevised MFT stems were radiographically well fixed. Subsidence of \u22655 mm occurred in 11%, but all implants were stable at the most recent follow-up. The mean HHS was 75 at 2 years (n = 71).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In this large series of 171 Vancouver B\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      and B\n                      <jats:sub>3<\/jats:sub>\n                      periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems, we found that such constructs were associated with a high rate of fracture healing and provided extremely reliable and durable implant fixation, with no revisions for aseptic loosening. Dislocation and PJI were the most common complications.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Therapeutic\n                      <jats:underline>Level IV<\/jats:underline>\n                      . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.21.01168","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,6]],"date-time":"2022-07-06T11:02:20Z","timestamp":1657105340000},"page":"1188-1196","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures"],"prefix":"10.2106","volume":"104","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1579-4953","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Charles P.","family":"Hannon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9778-3747","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kevin P.","family":"Sheehan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9001-0880","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stephanie Q.","family":"Duong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0175-1095","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Brandon J.","family":"Yuan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3101-9129","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David G.","family":"Lewallen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1422-0306","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel J.","family":"Berry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2398-1724","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthew P.","family":"Abdel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"17","key":"bib1-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1386","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01141","article-title":"Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States","volume":"97","author":"Maradit Kremers","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib2-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200704000-00012","article-title":"Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030","volume":"89","author":"Kurtz","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib3-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-22-08-482","article-title":"Periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral components","volume":"22","author":"Shah","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib4-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B4.37201","article-title":"Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience","volume":"98-B","author":"Abdel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"issue":"24","key":"bib5-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00842","article-title":"What Are the Contemporary Etiologies for Revision Surgery and Revision After Primary, Noncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty?","volume":"27","author":"Ledford","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib6-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00457","article-title":"Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures","volume":"88","author":"Lindahl","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"12","key":"bib7-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3863","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-2935-5","article-title":"What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in France?","volume":"471","author":"Delaunay","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"7","key":"bib8-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2005.02.001","article-title":"Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register","volume":"20","author":"Lindahl","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"369","key":"bib9-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199912000-00027","article-title":"Total hip arthroplasty in patients with proximal femoral deformity","author":"Berry","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib10-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.11.039","article-title":"Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures","volume":"35","author":"Otero","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"9","key":"bib11-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2967","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.05.006","article-title":"Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures","volume":"33","author":"Parry","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib12-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-2936-4","article-title":"Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems","volume":"472","author":"Abdel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib13-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2004.11.020","article-title":"Management of types B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures by a tapered, fluted, and distally fixed stem","volume":"20","author":"Mulay","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib14-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2009.07.013","article-title":"Management of periprosthetic femur fractures treated with distal fixation using a modular femoral stem using an anterolateral approach","volume":"24","author":"Park","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib15-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-3087-3","article-title":"Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures","volume":"472","author":"Munro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"2_suppl","key":"bib16-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1177\/1120700020971313","article-title":"Femoral revision in periprosthetic fractures using a titanium modular fluted tapered stem: mortality and clinical and radiological outcomes","volume":"30","author":"Munegato","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hip Int."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib17-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1177\/1120700020904933","article-title":"Tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stems in Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fractures: an analysis of 87 consecutive revisions","volume":"31","author":"van Laarhoven","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hip Int."},{"key":"bib18-20250430","first-page":"293","article-title":"Fractures of the femur after hip replacement","volume":"44","author":"Duncan","year":"1995","journal-title":"Instr Course Lect."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib19-20250430","first-page":"77","article-title":"Anatomic Porous Replacement hip arthroplasty: first 100 consecutive cases","volume":"1","author":"Dorr","year":"1990","journal-title":"Semin Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib20-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-196951040-00012","article-title":"Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation","volume":"51","author":"Harris","year":"1969","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"417","key":"bib21-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000096821.67494.f6","article-title":"Treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femur fractures with a fluted tapered stem","volume":"1","author":"Berry","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"10","key":"bib22-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3362","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2021.04.015","article-title":"Competing Risk Analysis: What Does It Mean and When Do We Need It in Orthopedics Research?","volume":"36","author":"Kremers","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Arthroplast."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib23-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<695::AID-SIM60>3.0.CO;2-O","article-title":"Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators","volume":"18","author":"Gooley","year":"1999","journal-title":"Stat Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib24-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.09.078","article-title":"Impact of Frailty on Outcomes After Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty","volume":"34","author":"Johnson","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib25-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0006-341X.2001.00114.x","article-title":"A solution to the problem of monotone likelihood in Cox regression","volume":"57","author":"Heinze","year":"2001","journal-title":"Biometrics."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib26-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/80.1.27","article-title":"Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates","volume":"80","author":"Firth","year":"1993","journal-title":"Biometrika."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib27-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-011-1371-y","article-title":"Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting","volume":"36","author":"Neumann","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Orthop."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib28-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0b013e318220a94f","article-title":"Hip revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of Vancouver type B2 and B3","volume":"26","author":"Fink","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib29-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B8.34431","article-title":"Revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fracture using an uncemented modular tapered conical stem","volume":"97-B","author":"da Assun\u00e7\u00e3o","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Joint J."},{"issue":"10","key":"bib30-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1933","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2958-5","article-title":"Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with modular stems","volume":"39","author":"Hernandez-Vaquero","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Orthop."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib31-20250430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.02.036","article-title":"Cementless, Fluted, Long-Stem Hemiarthroplasty for Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Hemiarthroplasty","volume":"34","author":"Lizaur-Utrilla","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty."}],"container-title":["Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.21.01168","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T13:45:29Z","timestamp":1787751929000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.21.01168"}},"subtitle":["Excellent Results in 171 Cases"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,23]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"13","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.21.01168","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-9355","1535-1386"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-9355","type":"print"},{"value":"1535-1386","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,23]]}}}