{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T14:36:53Z","timestamp":1787755013066,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"\n \n \n \u00bb Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) are both metrics at interpreting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n \u00bb MCID values tend to vary significantly depending on the baseline pain and function in both acute and chronic symptom states while PASS thresholds are more stable.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n \u00bb MCID values are more easily attainable than PASS thresholds.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n \u00bb Although PASS is more relevant to the patient, it should continue to be used in tandem with MCID when interpreting PROM data.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n <\/jats:list>\n <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.rvw.22.00200","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,18]],"date-time":"2023-04-18T14:03:47Z","timestamp":1681826627000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State in Orthopaedic Spine Surgery"],"prefix":"10.2106","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3416-7648","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ebubechi K.","family":"Adindu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9073-4029","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Devender","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ascension Texas Spine and Scoliosis, Austin, Texas"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3061-7127","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthew","family":"Geck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ascension Texas Spine and Scoliosis, The University of Texas Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7970-7612","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"John","family":"Stokes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ascension Texas Spine and Scoliosis, Austin, Texas"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3319-3270","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eeric","family":"Truumees","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, Ascension Texas Spine and Scoliosis, The University of Texas Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"r1-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f167","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f167","article-title":"Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare","volume":"346","author":"Black","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"r2-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001211","article-title":"Patient-reported outcome instruments in spine surgery","volume":"41","author":"Guzman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"5","key":"r3-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(03)00044-1","article-title":"Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life","volume":"56","author":"Crosby","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"r4-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-006-9109-9","article-title":"Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach","volume":"16","author":"de Vet","year":"2007","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"r5-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1586\/erp.11.9","article-title":"A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods","volume":"11","author":"King","year":"2011","journal-title":"Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"r6-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2018.10.013","article-title":"Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair","volume":"28","author":"Cvetanovich","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"r7-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(89)90005-6","article-title":"Measurement of health status","volume":"10","author":"Jaeschke","year":"1989","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"issue":"1","key":"r8-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.8.SPINE1194","article-title":"Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease","volume":"16","author":"Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"r9-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012","article-title":"Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes","volume":"61","author":"Revicki","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"r10-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.2004.023028","article-title":"Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state","volume":"64","author":"Tubach","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"issue":"11","key":"r11-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1699","DOI":"10.1002\/acr.21747","article-title":"Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: results from a prospective multina","volume":"64","author":"Tubach","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arthritis Care Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"r12-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1002\/art.23527","article-title":"ATLAS STUDY GROUP. Evaluation of the patient acceptable symptom state as an outcome measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: data from a randomized controlled trial","volume":"59","author":"Dougados","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum"},{"issue":"4","key":"r13-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.11.008","article-title":"The patient acceptable symptom state for the Oswestry Disability Index following single-level lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"21","author":"Goh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"suppl 3","key":"r14-20240731","first-page":"iii40","article-title":"Minimal clinically important improvement\/difference (MCII\/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean?","volume":"66","author":"Kvien","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"issue":"16","key":"r15-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8666","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph18168666","article-title":"Minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in patients who underwent rotator cuff tear repair","volume":"18","author":"Longo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"issue":"22","key":"r16-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2940","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200011150-00017","article-title":"The Oswestry Disability Index","volume":"25","author":"Fairbank","year":"2000","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"6","key":"r17-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"968","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.11.006","article-title":"Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales","volume":"8","author":"Copay","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"r18-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.12.SPINE10472","article-title":"Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"14","author":"Parker","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"r19-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.1.SPINE11842","article-title":"Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance","volume":"16","author":"Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"12","key":"r20-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.10.006","article-title":"Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis","volume":"12","author":"Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"r21-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.01.010","article-title":"Measuring clinically relevant improvement after lumbar spine surgery: is it time for something new?","volume":"20","author":"Asher","year":"2020","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"r22-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2009.12.027","article-title":"Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements","volume":"10","author":"Copay","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"19","key":"r23-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2139","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199410000-00001","article-title":"The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery","volume":"19","author":"Little","year":"1994","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"10","key":"r24-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.06.010","article-title":"Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a \u201csatisfactory symptom state\u201d in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine: a Spine Tango registry-based study","volume":"16","author":"van Hooff","year":"2016","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"r25-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1002\/art.22110","article-title":"Feeling good rather than feeling better matters more to patients","volume":"55","author":"Tubach","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum"},{"key":"r26-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.07.067","article-title":"Determination of patient acceptable symptom state for the Oswestry Disability Index score in patients who underwent minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 2-year follow-up data from a randomized controlled trial","volume":"167","author":"Chen","year":"2022","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"1","key":"r27-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2143084.542","article-title":"Risk factors for poor outcomes following minimally invasive discectomy: a post hoc subgroup analysis of 2-year follow-up prospective data","volume":"19","author":"Chen","year":"2022","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"issue":"4","key":"r28-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-018-5469-4","article-title":"EUROSPINE 2017 FULL PAPER AWARD: time to remove our rose-tinted spectacles: a candid appraisal of the relative success of surgery in over 4500 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, hip or knee","volume":"27","author":"Mannion","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"r29-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2028","DOI":"10.1002\/art.34347","article-title":"A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain","volume":"64","author":"Hoy","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum"},{"issue":"1","key":"r30-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101451","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rehab.2020.10.005","article-title":"Patient acceptable symptom state for patient-reported outcomes in people with non-specific chronic low back pain","volume":"65","author":"Daste","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Phys Rehabil Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"r31-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3959(01)00349-9","article-title":"Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale","volume":"94","author":"Farrar","year":"2001","journal-title":"Pain"},{"issue":"5","key":"r32-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000201293.57439.47","article-title":"Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain","volume":"31","author":"van der Roer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"8","key":"r33-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.7326\/M16-1700","article-title":"Intradiscal glucocorticoid injection for patients with chronic low back pain associated with active discopathy: a randomized trial","volume":"166","author":"Nguyen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"r34-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1340","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06365-z","article-title":"What level of symptoms are patients with adult spinal deformity prepared to live with? A cross-sectional analysis of the 12-month follow-up data from 1043 patients","volume":"29","author":"Mannion","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"4 suppl","key":"r35-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.180","article-title":"What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?","volume":"16","author":"Fekete","year":"2016","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"r36-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.1002\/art.22342","article-title":"Stability of the patient acceptable symptomatic state over time in outcome criteria in ankylosing spondylitis","volume":"55","author":"Tubach","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum"},{"issue":"1","key":"r37-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s43390-020-00171-9","article-title":"Preoperative patient-reported outcome score thresholds predict the likelihood of reaching MCID with surgical correction of adult spinal deformity","volume":"9","author":"Leyton-Mange","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine Deform"},{"issue":"6","key":"r38-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jspd.2015.04.004","article-title":"Clinical improvement through surgery for adult spinal deformity: what can be expected and who is likely to benefit most?","volume":"3","author":"Moal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine Deform"},{"issue":"3","key":"r39-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.12.SPINE14777","article-title":"Comparison of best versus worst clinical outcomes for adult spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, multicenter database with 2-year follow-up: Presented at the 2015 AANS\/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves","volume":"23","author":"Smith","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"suppl II","key":"r40-20240731","first-page":"72","article-title":"Levels of patient acceptable symptom state for disease activity and health status measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [abstract]","volume":"66","author":"Heiberg","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"issue":"1","key":"r41-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1002\/art.22469","article-title":"Evaluation and validation of the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis","volume":"57","author":"Maksymowych","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum"},{"issue":"9715","key":"r42-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61706-2","article-title":"Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects","volume":"375","author":"Finniss","year":"2010","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"12","key":"r43-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.05.027","article-title":"Effect of patients' functional status on satisfaction with outcomes 12 months after elective spine surgery for lumbar degenerative disease","volume":"17","author":"Chotai","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"r44-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2022.08.014","article-title":"Should we aim to help patients \u201cfeel better\u201d or \u201cfeel good\u201d after total hip arthroplasty? Determining factors affecting the achievement of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state","volume":"38","author":"Goh","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"}],"container-title":["JBJS Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.22.00200","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T13:36:15Z","timestamp":1787751375000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.22.00200"}},"subtitle":["A Review"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.rvw.22.00200","relation":{},"ISSN":["2329-9185"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2329-9185","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]}}}