{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,31]],"date-time":"2026-10-31T02:36:33Z","timestamp":1793414193275,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"7","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"\n Background:<\/jats:title>\n The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate various outcomes of humeral shaft fractures treated with different treatment methods, which included functional bracing, open reduction and internal fixation, intramedullary nailing, and locked compression plate.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods:<\/jats:title>\n A systematic review was performed using research databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Keywords relating to treatment of humeral shaft fractures were used, and comparison studies that reported patient characteristics and outcomes, including nonunion, malunion, function scores, and complications, were included. One hundred fourteen records were screened, with 18 studies ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Treatment groups were consolidated into brace or surgery and then further categorized into subgroups based on surgical technique used. Postoperative events, complications, and functional scores were compared among the treatment groups. Statistical analysis for this study was conducted using Review Manager 5.3, with a standard p-value of \u22640.05 for statistical significance.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n Eighteen studies were included in this review with a total of 706 patients. Z-tests showed that risks of revision, nonunion, and malunion were higher in the brace treatment group compared with the surgical treatment group (p < 0.0001, <0.0001, 0.004, respectively). Risk of infection was expectedly higher in the surgical group compared with the brace group (p = 0.04). Radial nerve injury rates were also higher in the unspecified surgical group compared with the brace group (p = 0.01). In the surgical group, the mean Constant shoulder score was also significantly higher than that in the brace group (p = 0.004). When comparing the nail and plate groups, Z-tests revealed higher risks of delayed unions and other complications in the nail group (p = 0.04 and 0.001, respectively) but higher risk of infection in the plate group (p = 0.05).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n The conservative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with functional braces may be associated with a lower incidence of infection and nerve injury when compared with operative treatment methods. However, nonoperative treatment may also come with higher risks of revision, nonunion, and malunion than the many available surgical modalities. Operative management with either intramedullary nail or plate has shown to be a reliable method of management with reasonable outcomes for humeral shaft fractures. While the nail group had higher risk of delayed unions and other complications, the plate group had higher risk of infections. Both nail and plate surgical treatments have shown to result in high union rates and should be considered by the surgeon on a case-by-case basis when treating humeral shaft fractures.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n \n Level I<\/jats:underline>\n . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.rvw.23.00037","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,17]],"date-time":"2023-07-17T14:03:37Z","timestamp":1689602617000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Evaluation of Humeral Shaft Fracture Outcomes by Treatment Method"],"prefix":"10.2106","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6143-5583","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Julia","family":"Beyer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2286-6951","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Brian","family":"Rao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5895-8276","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jiayong","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-3417-0887","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Martin","family":"Skie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"r1-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1007\/s10195-017-0459-6","article-title":"Humeral shaft fractures: national trends in management","volume":"18","author":"Schoch","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"r2-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2010.11.030","article-title":"Humeral shaft fractures: a review","volume":"20","author":"Walker","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"r3-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e599","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000000599","article-title":"Intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses","volume":"94","author":"Zhao","year":"2015","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"7","key":"r4-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-20-07-423","article-title":"Management of humeral shaft fractures","volume":"20","author":"Carroll","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"r5-20240731","first-page":"e7077","article-title":"Evaluation of clinical and radiological results of humeral diaphyseal fractures with treated Sarmiento brace","volume":"12","author":"Basa","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"3","key":"r6-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.18203\/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20171537","article-title":"Comparison between operative and non operative treatment of fracture shaft of humerus: an outcome analysis","volume":"3","author":"Kumar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Res Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"r7-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-009-0813-2","article-title":"Nailing versus plating in humerus shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study","volume":"34","author":"Singisetti","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"7","key":"r8-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2020.01.072","article-title":"Conservative vs. operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies","volume":"29","author":"van de Wall","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"r9-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-011-0099-0","article-title":"Outcomes following operative and non-operative management of humeral midshaft fractures: a prospective, observational cohort study of 47 patients","volume":"37","author":"van Middendorp","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"r10-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1007\/s11751-014-0204-0","article-title":"Internal fixation of shaft humerus fractures by dynamic compression plate or interlocking intramedullary nail: a prospective, randomised study","volume":"9","author":"Wali","year":"2014","journal-title":"Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr"},{"issue":"18","key":"r11-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1792","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.3182","article-title":"Effect of surgery vs functional bracing on functional outcome among patients with closed displaced humeral shaft fractures: the FISH randomized clinical trial","volume":"323","author":"R\u00e4m\u00f6","year":"2020","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"5","key":"r12-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197759050-00004","article-title":"Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus","volume":"59","author":"Sarmiento","year":"1977","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"r13-20240731","first-page":"141","article-title":"Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation)","volume":"11","author":"Hosseini Khameneh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Orthop Res Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"r14-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2010.12.016","article-title":"Postoperative malrotation of humeral shaft fracture after plating compared with intramedullary nailing","volume":"20","author":"Li","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"r15-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e825","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20150902-62","article-title":"Management of humeral shaft fractures with intramedullary interlocking nail versus locking compression plate","volume":"38","author":"Fan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"issue":"6","key":"r16-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2014.02.010","article-title":"Shoulder function after surgical treatment of displaced fractures of the humeral shaft: a randomized trial comparing antegrade intramedullary nailing with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis","volume":"23","author":"Benegas","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"r17-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1177\/230949900901700202","article-title":"Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures","volume":"17","author":"Putti","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)"},{"issue":"4","key":"r18-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000768","article-title":"Management of closed diaphyseal humerus fractures in patients with injury severity score \u226517","volume":"31","author":"Dielwart","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"11","key":"r19-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2343","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.00334","article-title":"Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation","volume":"88","author":"Jawa","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"7","key":"r20-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.16.00628","article-title":"Minimally invasive osteosynthesis with a bridge plate versus a functional brace for humeral shaft fractures: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"99","author":"Matsunaga","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"2","key":"r21-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-016-3210-7","article-title":"Humeral shaft fractures: results of operative and non-operative treatment","volume":"41","author":"Westrick","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"r22-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.82B3.0820336","article-title":"Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial","volume":"82","author":"McCormack","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"3","key":"r23-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-200003000-00002","article-title":"Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates","volume":"14","author":"Chapman","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"10","key":"r24-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2113","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-020-04696-6","article-title":"Locking compression plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: which one is better? A single-centre prospective randomized study","volume":"44","author":"Akal\u0131n","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"r25-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-006-0200-1","article-title":"Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study","volume":"31","author":"Changulani","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"r26-20240731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["JBJS Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.23.00037","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T13:43:12Z","timestamp":1787751792000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.23.00037"}},"subtitle":["A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Based on Comparison Studies"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.rvw.23.00037","relation":{},"ISSN":["2329-9185"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2329-9185","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]}}}