{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T20:07:52Z","timestamp":1790798872514,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,8]]},"abstract":"\n Historically, posterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed using a directly posterior procedure (PLIF). Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) utilizes a more lateral window in order to access the interbody space without excessive dural retraction. Theoretical advantages of TLIF include increased fusion success, more complete foraminal decompression, better correction of deformity, and more effective treatment of discogenic pain. The procedure is done with the following steps:\n \n \n 1 and 2. Preoperative planning and patient positioning are important to maximize the efficiency of the procedure. There is a wide variety of instrumentation and technique options; therefore, a systematic approach starting with setup is important.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 3. The spine is approached through a standard posterior midline incision. It is not necessary to expose the lateral gutters, but the addition of posterolateral fusion is common.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 4. Pedicle screw placement is undertaken via a standard approach.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 5. Decompression is initiated with a laminectomy in the midline, exposing the ligamentum.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 6. The ligamentum is carefully removed, and hemostasis is obtained. A facetectomy is then performed.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 7. Once the posterior bone elements are resected and the decompression is complete, the dura and neural elements are mobilized. The goal is to be able to access the posterior anulus and disc space easily without any dural tension.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 8. Distraction through the TLIF level helps facilitate interbody placement. We describe a triple distraction technique that uses the midline elements, and both contralateral and ipsilateral distraction methods.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 9. A window is formed on the disc, with care taken to protect the exiting and traversing roots. The window is enlarged using a combination of box osteotomes and Kerrison rongeurs. A window that is a minimum of 10 mm in size facilitates disc space preparation.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 10 and 11. Disc space preparation is performed using a combination of curets, pituitary rongeurs, and end-plate preparation tools. Thorough disc-space preparation is critical for both correcting the deformity and obtaining a solid fusion.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 12. The disc space is sized for an appropriate interbody cage. The anterior aspect of the disc space and the cage are both packed with bone graft. This may involve the use of iliac crest graft, local bone, or bone substitutes, depending on the specific clinical situation.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 13. Cage and screw placement is verified by biplane radiography, and lordosis is restored by compression across the screws bilaterally. Osteotomy of the contralateral facet may be necessary to achieve substantial restoration of lordosis.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 14. If the lateral gutters have been exposed, grafting in this region is undertaken as well. Care must be taken with graft placement on the TLIF side as facet and pars resection leaves the exiting route exposed.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n 15. Closure is undertaken in a standard fashion.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n <\/jats:list>\n Postoperative recovery does not differ substantially from other standard fusion procedures. Mobilization is undertaken over the first several weeks, and fusion healing is expected in the 6-month to 1-year time frame.\n <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.st.15.00003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,9]],"date-time":"2016-06-09T15:37:53Z","timestamp":1465486673000},"page":"e22","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)"],"prefix":"10.2106","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Jeffrey L.","family":"Gum","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deepak","family":"Reddy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steven","family":"Glassman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"issue":"22","key":"bib1-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S106","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000579","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care","volume":"39","author":"Asher","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib2-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E6","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.10.FOCUS12297","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description","volume":"34","author":"McGirt","year":"2013","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus."},{"issue":"22","key":"bib3-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S117","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000552","article-title":"Role of prospective registries in defining the value and effectiveness of spine care","volume":"39","author":"McGirt","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib4-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.4.SPINE10330","article-title":"Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine","volume":"15","author":"Zhou","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine."},{"issue":"21","key":"bib5-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2351","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b8a829","article-title":"Degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion method influence outcome? Four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial","volume":"34","author":"Abdu","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib6-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3180eaa202","article-title":"Comparison of posterolateral fusion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"21","author":"Ha","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech."},{"issue":"3","key":"bib7-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3182867470","article-title":"Relative benefit of TLIF versus PSF stratified by diagnostic indication","volume":"27","author":"Owens","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech."},{"issue":"8","key":"bib8-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.10.014","article-title":"Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States","volume":"15","author":"Pannell","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"12","key":"bib9-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a","article-title":"United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions","volume":"30","author":"Deyo","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"23","key":"bib10-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2707","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000248132.15231.fe","article-title":"United States\u2019 trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003","volume":"31","author":"Weinstein","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"9","key":"bib11-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2022","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2760-2","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up","volume":"22","author":"H\u00f8y","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J."},{"issue":"20","key":"bib12-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2178","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814b1bd8","article-title":"Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis","volume":"32","author":"Ekman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"25","key":"bib13-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2875","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000247793.99827.b7","article-title":"Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial","volume":"31","author":"Videbaek","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"22","key":"bib14-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2405","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181573b2d","article-title":"Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain","volume":"32","author":"Soegaard","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"11","key":"bib15-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.08.077","article-title":"Relative benefit of TLIF versus PSF at five-year follow-up stratified by diagnostic indication","volume":"14","author":"Kuo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"10","key":"bib16-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.07.014","article-title":"Benefit of TLIF versus PSF in lumbar spine disorders","volume":"15","author":"Glassman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib17-20230812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.3.SPINE10562","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"15","author":"Adogwa","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine."}],"container-title":["JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01709766-201606020-00006","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T13:30:36Z","timestamp":1787751036000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01709766-201606020-00006"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,8]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.st.15.00003","relation":{},"ISSN":["2160-2204"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2160-2204","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,8]]}}}