{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T14:36:31Z","timestamp":1787754991889,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a relatively new procedure. It was established as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open interbody fusion. LLIF allows the surgeon to access the disc space via a retroperitoneal transpsoas muscle approach. Theoretical advantages of the LLIF technique include preservation of the longitudinal ligaments, augmentation of disc height with indirect decompression of neural elements, and insertion of large footprint cages spanning the dense apophyseal ring bilaterally\n                      <jats:sup>1,2<\/jats:sup>\n                      . The original 2-incision LLIF technique described by Ozgur et al., in 2006, had some inherent limitations\n                      <jats:sup>3<\/jats:sup>\n                      . First, it substantially limited direct visualization of the surgical field and may have endangered nerve and vascular structures. Additionally, it often required multiple separated incisions for multilevel pathologies. Finally, for surgeons with experience in traditional open retroperitoneal surgery, utilization of their previously acquired skills may have been difficult with this approach. To overcome these limitations, we adopted the mini-open lateral approach, which allows for visualization, palpation, and electrophysiologic neurologic confirmation during the procedure\n                      <jats:sup>4<\/jats:sup>\n                      .\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Description:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      As detailed below, the patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position and a single incision is carried out centered between the target discs. For single-level LLIF, the incision spans approximately 3 cm and can be lengthened in small increments for multilevel procedures. After blunt dissection, the retroperitoneal space is entered. The psoas muscle is split under direct visualization, carefully avoiding the traversing nerves with neurosurveillance\n                      <jats:sup>5<\/jats:sup>\n                      . A self-retaining retractor is used, and after thorough discectomy, the disc space is sized with trial components. The implant is filled with bone graft materials and is introduced using intraoperative fluoroscopy.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Alternatives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The 2-incision LLIF technique or traditional anterior or posterior lumbar spine interbody fusion techniques might be used instead.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Rationale:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      LLIF offers the reported advantages of minimally invasive surgery, such as reduced tissue trauma during the approach, low blood loss, shorter length of stay, decreased recovery time, and less postoperative pain. LLIF allows for the placement of a relatively larger interbody cage spanning the dense apophyseal ring bilaterally. The lateral approach preserves the anterior longitudinal ligament and posterior longitudinal ligament. These structures allow for powerful ligamentotaxis and provide extra stability for the construct. Compared with other approaches, LLIF has a reduced risk of visceral and vascular injuries, incidental dural tears, and perioperative infections. Although associated with approach-related complications such as motor and sensory deficits, LLIF can be a safe and versatile procedure\n                      <jats:sup>1,2<\/jats:sup>\n                      .\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.st.19.00013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,6]],"date-time":"2019-11-06T14:12:53Z","timestamp":1573049573000},"page":"e37","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Mini-Open Access for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion"],"prefix":"10.2106","volume":"9","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9576-186X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stephan N.","family":"Salzmann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine and Scoliosis Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4721-6880","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gary A.","family":"Fantini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine and Scoliosis Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1741-5176","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ichiro","family":"Okano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine and Scoliosis Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3014-7287","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrew A.","family":"Sama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine and Scoliosis Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7293-9672","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexander P.","family":"Hughes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine and Scoliosis Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3269-7602","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Federico P.","family":"Girardi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine and Scoliosis Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"bib1-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-14-00208","article-title":"Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: indications, outcomes, and complications","volume":"24","author":"Kwon","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib2-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-017-9444-1","article-title":"Lateral lumbar interbody fusion-outcomes and complications","volume":"10","author":"Salzmann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib3-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2005.08.012","article-title":"Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"6","author":"Ozgur","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib4-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3796-2","article-title":"Incidence of vascular complications during lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an examination of the mini-open access technique","volume":"24","author":"Kueper","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib5-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.SPINE09766","article-title":"Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study","volume":"13","author":"Uribe","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine."},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"bib6-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3807-3","article-title":"Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study","volume":"24","author":"Malham","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib7-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.1.SPINE13153","article-title":"The rising psoas sign: an analysis of preoperative imaging characteristics of aborted minimally invasive lateral interbody fusions at L4-5","volume":"20","author":"Voyadzis","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine."},{"issue":"6","key":"bib8-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2015.9.6.978","article-title":"Lateral lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"9","author":"Pawar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib9-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E90","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3182aa4c94","article-title":"Maintenance of segmental lordosis and disk height in stand-alone and instrumented extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)","volume":"30","author":"Malham","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib10-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E326","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000141","article-title":"Rate of revision surgery after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"39","author":"Nemani","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"4","key":"bib11-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3182706ce7","article-title":"Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcome at a minimum 2-year follow-up","volume":"28","author":"Kotwal","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib12-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.06.066","article-title":"Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors","volume":"14","author":"Lykissas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"23","key":"bib13-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1483","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a3d1b4","article-title":"An institutional six-year trend analysis of the neurological outcome after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year trend analysis of a single institution","volume":"38","author":"Aichmair","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib15-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.5312\/wjo.v4.i1.19","article-title":"Access related complications during anterior exposure of the lumbar spine","volume":"4","author":"Fantini","year":"2013","journal-title":"World J Orthop."},{"issue":"22","key":"bib16-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1959","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a463a9","article-title":"Contralateral motor deficits after lateral lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"38","author":"Taher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib17-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.11.052","article-title":"Contralateral psoas seroma after transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein-2 implantation","volume":"13","author":"Taher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"1","key":"bib18-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.4.SPINE151040","article-title":"Contralateral psoas hematoma after minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter review of 3950 lumbar levels","volume":"26","author":"Beckman","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine."},{"issue":"2","key":"bib19-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000067","article-title":"Aortic perforation during lateral lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"28","author":"Aichmair","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech."},{"issue":"5","key":"bib20-20230808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.7.SPINE131146","article-title":"First report of major vascular injury due to lateral transpsoas approach leading to fatality","volume":"21","author":"Assina","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine."}],"container-title":["JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.ST.19.00013","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T13:35:57Z","timestamp":1787751357000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.2106\/JBJS.ST.19.00013"}},"subtitle":["Indications, Technique, and Outcomes"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.st.19.00013","relation":{},"ISSN":["2160-2204"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2160-2204","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]}}}