{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,15]],"date-time":"2026-08-15T05:26:32Z","timestamp":1786771592526,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":78,"publisher":"Japan Poultry Science Association","issue":"0","funder":[{"name":"Fundaci\u00f3n CajaCanarias and Obra Social La Caixa","award":["Proyecto-2018-Patri31"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Proyecto-2018-Patri31"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Poult. Sci.","Jpn. Poult. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"DOI":"10.2141\/jpsa.2026020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,10]],"date-time":"2026-08-10T22:11:42Z","timestamp":1786399902000},"page":"n\/a","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative Performance of Three Hen Genotypes for Dual-Purpose Egg and Meat          Production in Free-Range Systems"],"prefix":"10.2141","volume":"63","author":[{"given":"Serezade","family":"Sigut","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4, Animal Production and Biotechnology Group, Institute of              Animal Health and Food Safety, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus              Monta\u00f1a Cardones, 35413 Arucas, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria","family":"Fresno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Canary Islands Institute for Agricultural Research (ICIA), 38260 Tejina,              Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sergio","family":"\u00c1lvarez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Canary Islands Institute for Agricultural Research (ICIA), 38260 Tejina,              Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eva","family":"Dorta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Canary Islands Institute for Agricultural Research (ICIA), 38260 Tejina,              Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Noemi","family":"Castro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4, Animal Production and Biotechnology Group, Institute of              Animal Health and Food Safety, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus              Monta\u00f1a Cardones, 35413 Arucas, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandr","family":"Torres","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Canary Islands Institute for Agricultural Research (ICIA), 38260 Tejina,              Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"908","reference":[{"key":"1","unstructured":"[1] Dohlman E, Hansen J andBoussios D. USDA Agricultural          Projections to 2031. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.          OCE-2022-01. 2022."},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[2] Castro FLS, Chai L, Arango J, Owens CM, Smith PA,          Reichelt S, DuBois C andMenconi A. Poultry industry paradigms: connecting the dots. J Appl          Poult Res, 32: 100310. 2023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.japr.2022.100310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.japr.2022.100310"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[3] Semwogerere F, Neethling J, Muchenje V andHoffman          LC. Meat quality, fatty acid profile, and sensory attributes of spent laying hens fed          expeller press canola meal or a conventional diet. Poult Sci, 98: 3557\u20133570. 2019.          PMID:30839084, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps\/pez092","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/pez092"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[4] Franco D, Rois D, Arias A, Justo JR, Marti-Quijal          FJ, Khubber S, Barba FJ, L\u00f3pez-Pedrouso M andManuel Lorenzo J. Effect of breed and diet          type on the freshness and quality of the eggs: A comparison between Mos (indigenous          Galician breed) and Isa brown hens. Foods, 9: 342. 2020. PMID:32188038,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/foods9030342","DOI":"10.3390\/foods9030342"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[5] Magdelaine P, Spiess MP andValceschini E. Poultry          meat consumption trends in Europe. Worlds Poult Sci J, 64: 53\u201364. 2008.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0043933907001717","DOI":"10.1017\/S0043933907001717"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[6] Gonz\u00e1lez Ariza A, Navas Gonz\u00e1lez FJ, Arando          Arbulu A, Delgado Bermejo JV andCamacho Vallejo ME. Hen breed and variety factors as a          source of variability for the chemical composition of eggs. J Food Compos Anal, 95:          103673. 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jfca.2020.103673","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfca.2020.103673"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[7] Saxena VK andKolluri G. Selection methods in          poultry breeding: From genetics to genomics. In: Application of genetics and genomics in          poultry science (Liu X ed.), IntechOpen, London, pp. 19-32. 2018","DOI":"10.5772\/intechopen.77966"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[8] Buzala M andJanicki B. Review: effects of          different growth rates in broiler breeder and layer hens on some productive traits. Poult          Sci, 95: 2151\u20132159. 2016. PMID:27194733,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps\/pew173","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/pew173"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[9] Sirri F, Zampiga M, Soglia F, Meluzzi A, Cavani C          andPetracci M. Quality characterization of eggs from Romagnola hens, an Italian local          breed. Poult Sci, 97: 4131\u20134136. 2018. PMID:30007345,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps\/pey275","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/pey275"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[10] Castillo A, Gariglio M, Franzoni A, Soglia D,          Sartore S, Buccioni A, Mannelli F, Cassandro M, Cendron F, Castellini C, Mancinelli AC,          Iaffaldano N, Iorio MD, Marzoni M, Salvucci S, Cerolini S, Zaniboni L andSchiavone A.          Overview of native chicken breeds in Italy: Conservation status and rearing systems in          use. Animals, 11: 490. 2021. PMID:33673395,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani11020490","DOI":"10.3390\/ani11020490"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[11] Hoffmann I. Livestock biodiversity and          sustainability. Livest Sci, 139: 69\u201379. 2011.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.livsci.2011.03.016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.livsci.2011.03.016"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[12] Canales Vergara AM, Krupij AT, Fresno Baquero MR,          Macr\u00ec M, Delgado Bermejo JV andMart\u00ednez AM. Genetic diversity and population structure of          Canarian chicken using microsatellite DNA markers. Ital J Anim Sci, 23: 678\u2013692. 2024.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1828051X.2024.2328631","DOI":"10.1080\/1828051X.2024.2328631"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[13] Hammersh\u00f8j M, Kristiansen G andSteenfeldt S.          Dual-purpose poultry in organic egg production and effects on egg quality parameters.          Foods, 10: 897. 2021. PMID:33921822,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/foods10040897","DOI":"10.3390\/foods10040897"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[14] Gangnat IDM, Mueller S, Kreuzer M, Messikommer          RE, Siegrist M andVisschers VHM. Swiss consumers\u2019 willingness to pay and attitudes          regarding dual-purpose poultry and eggs. Poult Sci, 97: 1089\u20131098. 2018. PMID:29351665,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps\/pex397","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/pex397"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[15] Torres A, Muth PC, Capote J, Rodr\u00edguez C, Fresno          M andValle Z\u00e1rate A. Suitability of dual-purpose cockerels of 3 different genetic origins          for fattening under free-range conditions. Poult Sci, 98: 6564\u20136571. 2019. PMID:31376357,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps\/pez429","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/pez429"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[16] Tiemann I, Hillemacher S andWittmann M. Are          dual-purpose chickens twice as good? Measuring performance and animal welfare throughout          the fattening period. Animals (Basel), 10: 1980. 2020. PMID:33126643,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani10111980","DOI":"10.3390\/ani10111980"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[17] Pucha\u0142a M, Krawczyk J andCalik J. Influence of          origin of laying hens on the quality of their carcasses and meat after the first laying          period. Ann Anim Sci, 14: 685\u2013696. 2014.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/aoas-2014-0028","DOI":"10.2478\/aoas-2014-0028"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[18] Vargas-Ramella M, Pateiro M, Rois D, Arias A,          Justo JR, L\u00f3pez-Pedrouso M, Lorenzo JM andFranco D. Effect of breed and diet on carcass          parameters and meat quality of spent hens. Ann Anim Sci, 22: 477\u2013500. 2022.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/aoas-2021-0036","DOI":"10.2478\/aoas-2021-0036"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[19] Kokoszy\u0144ski D, Bernacki Z, St\u0119czny K, Saleh M,          Wasilewski PD, Kotowicz M, Wasilewski R, Biegniewska M andGrzonkowska K. Comparison of          carcass composition, physicochemical and sensory traits of meat from spent broiler          breeders with broilers. Arch Geflugelkd, 80: 1\u201311. 2016.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1399\/eps.2016.131","DOI":"10.1399\/eps.2016.131"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[20] Wegner M, Kokoszy\u0144ski D, Kotowicz M,          \u017bochowska-Kujawska J, N\u0119dzarek A andW\u0142odarczyk K. Influence of genotype on meat quality in          laying hens after the egg production season. Agriculture, 14: 19. 2023.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/agriculture14010019","DOI":"10.3390\/agriculture14010019"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[21] Jaturasitha S, Srikanchai T, Kreuzer M andWicke          M. Differences in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indigenous to northern          Thailand (Black-boned and Thai native) and imported extensive breeds (Bresse and Rhode          Island red). Poult Sci, 87: 160\u2013169. 2008. PMID:18079466,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps.2006-00398","DOI":"10.3382\/ps.2006-00398"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[22] Sigut S, \u00c1lvarez S, Fresno M, M\u00e9ndez P, Castro N          andTorres A. Effects of the utilization of a local cereals and forage -based diet on          productive performance and egg quality in three free-range hen genotypes. J Appl Poult          Res, 34: 100524. 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.japr.2025.100524","DOI":"10.1016\/j.japr.2025.100524"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[23] Gervais O, Nirasawa K, Vincenot CE, Nagamine Y          andMoriya K. Effect of long-term selection for non-destructive deformation on egg shape in          White Leghorns. J Poult Sci, 53: 249\u2013256. 2016. PMID:32908391,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2141\/jpsa.0160014","DOI":"10.2141\/jpsa.0160014"},{"key":"24","unstructured":"[24] ISO 17025. General requirements for the          competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for          Standardization Publications, Geneva, Switzerland. 2017."},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[25] Dom\u00ednguez D\u00edaz L, Dorta E, Maher S, Morales P,          Fern\u00e1ndez-Ruiz V, C\u00e1mara M andS\u00e1nchez-Mata MC. Potential nutrition and health claims in          deastringed persimmon fruits (Diospyros kaki L.), variety \u2018Rojo Brillante\u2019, PDO \u2018Ribera          del X\u00faquer\u2019. Nutrients, 12: 1397. 2020. PMID:32414031,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/nu12051397","DOI":"10.3390\/nu12051397"},{"key":"26","unstructured":"[26] ISO 11136. Sensory analysis. General guidance for          conducting hedonic tests with consumers in a controlled area. International Organization          for Standardization Publications, Geneva, Switzerland. 2020."},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[27] Williams SK andDamron BL. Sensory and fatty acid          profile of eggs from commercial hens fed rendered spent hen meal. Poult Sci, 78: 614\u2013617.          1999. PMID:10230919, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ps\/78.4.614","DOI":"10.1093\/ps\/78.4.614"},{"key":"28","unstructured":"[28]Council of the European Union. Council          Regulation (EC) No. 1099\/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing.          Official Journal, L 303, 18\/11\/2009, pp 1\u201330. 2009."},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[29] D\u00edaz O, Rodr\u00edguez L, Torres A andCobos A.          Chemical composition and physico-chemical properties of meat from capons as affected by          breed and age. Span J Agric Res, 8: 91\u201399. 2010.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5424\/sjar\/2010081-1147","DOI":"10.5424\/sjar\/2010081-1147"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[30] L\u00f3pez S, France J, Gerrits WJ, Dhanoa MS,          Humphries DJ andDijkstra J. A generalized Michaelis-Menten equation for the analysis of          growth. J Anim Sci, 78: 1816\u20131828. 2000. PMID:10907823,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2527\/2000.7871816x","DOI":"10.2527\/2000.7871816x"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[31] Porter T, Kebreab E, Darmani Kuhi H, L\u00f3pez S,          Strathe AB andFrance J. Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing          growth with age in turkey hens. Poult Sci, 89: 371\u2013378. 2010. PMID:20075293,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps.2009-00141","DOI":"10.3382\/ps.2009-00141"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[32] Narin\u00e7 D, Narin\u00e7 N\u00d6 andAyg\u00fcn A. Growth curve          analyses in poultry science. Worlds Poult Sci J, 73: 395\u2013408. 2017.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0043933916001082","DOI":"10.1017\/S0043933916001082"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[33] Moula N, Michaux C, Philippe FX,          Antoine-Moussiaux N andLeroy P. Egg and meat production performances of two varieties of          the local Ardennaise poultry breed: silver black and golden black. Anim Genet Resour, 53:          57\u201367. 2013. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S2078633613000350","DOI":"10.1017\/S2078633613000350"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[34] Akinsola OM, Sonaiya EB, Bamidele O, Hassan WA,          Yakubu A, Ajayi FO, Ogundu U, Alabi OO andAdebambo OA. Comparison of five mathematical          models that describe growth in tropically adapted dual-purpose breeds of chicken. J Appl          Anim Res, 49: 158\u2013166. 2021.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09712119.2021.1915792","DOI":"10.1080\/09712119.2021.1915792"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[35] Soares LC, Lopes JC, Brito NV andCarvalheira J.          Growth and carcass traits of three Portuguese autochthonous chicken breeds: Amarela, Preta          Lusit\u00e2nica and Pedr\u00eas Portuguesa. Ital J Anim Sci, 14: 3566. 2015.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4081\/ijas.2015.3566","DOI":"10.4081\/ijas.2015.3566"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[36] Soglia D, Sartore S, Maione S, Schiavone A,          Dabbou S, Nery J, Zaniboni L, Marelli S, Sacchi P andRasero R. Growth performance analysis          of two Italian slow-growing chicken breeds: Bianca di Saluzzo and Bionda Piemontese.          Animals, 10: 969. 2020. PMID:32503231,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani10060969","DOI":"10.3390\/ani10060969"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[37] Schreiter R, Born T, Herzog M andFreick M.          Free-range rearing characteristics of two German dual-purpose chicken breeds: dresden          chickens and Dresden bantams. J Appl Poult Res, 34: 100530. 2025.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.japr.2025.100530","DOI":"10.1016\/j.japr.2025.100530"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[38] Gonz\u00e1lez Ariza A, Nogales Baena S, Lupi TM,          Arando Arbulu A, Navas Gonz\u00e1lez FJ, Le\u00f3n Jurado JM, Delgado Bermejo JV andCamacho Vallejo          ME. Characterisation of biological growth curves of different varieties of an endangered          native hen breed kept under free range conditions. Ital J Anim Sci, 20: 806\u2013813. 2021.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1828051X.2021.1915190","DOI":"10.1080\/1828051X.2021.1915190"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[39] Rizzi C, Contiero B andCassandro M. Growth          patterns of Italian local chicken populations. Poult Sci, 92: 2226\u20132235. 2013.          PMID:23873574, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps.2012-02825","DOI":"10.3382\/ps.2012-02825"},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[40] van der Klein SAS, Kwakkel RP, Ducro BJ          andZuidhof MJ. Multiphasic nonlinear mixed growth models for laying hens. Poult Sci, 99:          5615\u20135624. 2020. PMID:33142479, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psj.2020.08.054","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psj.2020.08.054"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[41] G\u00f6rg\u00fcl\u00fc O andAkilli A. Egg production curve          fitting using least square support vector machines and nonlinear regression analysis. Arch          Geflugelkd, 82: 1\u201314. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1399\/eps.2018.235","DOI":"10.1399\/eps.2018.235"},{"key":"42","unstructured":"[42] Torres A andCapote J. Traditional breed of Canarian          hen. Instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias. Gobierno de Canarias, La Laguna,          Tenerife, Spain. 2018."},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[43] Gangnat IDM, Mueller S, Messikommer RE andKreuzer          M. Performance, egg quality and resilience to nutritional challenges of Lohmann Dual hens          as opposed to layer and traditional dual-purpose types: a preliminary study. Arch          Geflugelkd, 84: 1\u201316. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1399\/eps.2020.301","DOI":"10.1399\/eps.2020.301"},{"key":"44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[44] Rizzi C andChiericato GM. Chemical composition of          meat and egg yolk of hybrid and Italian breed hens reared using an organic production          system. Poult Sci, 89: 1239\u20131251. 2010. PMID:20460671,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps.2008-00045","DOI":"10.3382\/ps.2008-00045"},{"key":"45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[45] M\u00fcller S, Messikommer RE, Kreuzer M andGangnat          IDM. Response of dual-purpose and layer hybrid hens in yield and quality of eggs, carcass          and meat to a diet composed of food industry by-products and grain legumes \u2013 a pilot          study. Arch Geflugelkd, 87: 1\u201317. 2023.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1399\/eps.2023.389","DOI":"10.1399\/eps.2023.389"},{"key":"46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[46] Jiang RS, Chen XY andGeng ZY. Broodiness, egg          production, and correlations between broody traits in an indigenous chicken breed. Poult          Sci, 89: 1094\u20131096. 2010. PMID:20460653,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps.2009-00621","DOI":"10.3382\/ps.2009-00621"},{"key":"47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[47] Kumar Sarkar P. Broodiness and broody hen          management during egg incubation. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 10: 337\u2013343. 2022.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7831\/ras.10.0_337","DOI":"10.7831\/ras.10.0_337"},{"key":"48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[48] Alemu S andTerfa S. A review on the effects of          broodiness characteristics on egg productivity, hatchability, and chick quality of          indigenous chicken in Ethiopia. American Journal of Biological and Environmental          Statistics, 10: 131\u2013138. 2024.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11648\/j.ajbes.20241004.15","DOI":"10.11648\/j.ajbes.20241004.15"},{"key":"49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[49] He S, Lin J, Jin Q, Ma X, Liu Z, Chen H, Ma J,          Zhang H, Descovich K, Phillips CJC, Hartcher K andWu Z. The relationship between animal          welfare and farm profitability in cage and free-range housing systems for laying hens in          China. Animals (Basel), 12: 2090. 2022. PMID:36009680,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani12162090","DOI":"10.3390\/ani12162090"},{"key":"50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[50] Clark CEF, Akter Y, Hungerford A, Thomson P,          Islam MR, Groves PJ andO\u2019Shea CJ. The intake pattern and feed preference of layer hens          selected for high or low feed conversion ratio. PLoS One, 14: e0222304. 2019.          PMID:31513689, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0222304","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0222304"},{"key":"51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[51] Zhou Q, Lan F, Gu S, Li G, Wu G, Yan Y, Li X, Jin          J, Wen C, Sun C andYang N. Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying          hens. Poult Sci, 102: 102393. 2023. PMID:36805401,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psj.2022.102393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psj.2022.102393"},{"key":"52","unstructured":"[52] Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/2465.          Supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1308\/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council          as regards marketing standards for eggs, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No          589\/2008. Off J Eur Union L, 2023\/2465: 1\u201317. 2023.          http:\/\/data.europa.eu\/eli\/reg_del\/2023\/2465\/oj"},{"key":"53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[53] Rondoni A, Asioli D andMillan E. Consumer          behaviour, perceptions, and preferences towards eggs: A review of the literature and          discussion of industry implications. Trends Food Sci Technol, 106: 391\u2013401. 2020.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tifs.2020.10.038","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tifs.2020.10.038"},{"key":"54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[54] Gonz\u00e1lez-Redondo P, Garc\u00eda-Arias Y, Ariza          S\u00e1nchez-Ramade C andHorcada A. Effect of laying month on egg quality in the Utrerana          chicken breed (Partridge variety) during the first laying period. Cogent Food Agric, 10:          2307666. 2024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23311932.2024.2307666","DOI":"10.1080\/23311932.2024.2307666"},{"key":"55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[55] Di Rosa AR, Chiofalo B, Lo Presti V, Chiofalo V          andLiotta L. Egg quality from Siciliana and Livorno Italian autochthonous chicken breeds          reared in organic system. Animals, 10: 864. 2020. PMID:32429459,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani10050864","DOI":"10.3390\/ani10050864"},{"key":"56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[56] Moula N, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Farnir F andLeroy          P. Evaluation of the production performances of an endangered local poultry breed, the          Famennoise. Int J Poult Sci, 8: 389\u2013396. 2009.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3923\/ijps.2009.389.396","DOI":"10.3923\/ijps.2009.389.396"},{"key":"57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[57] Lordelo M, Fernandes E, Bessa RJB andAlves SP.          Quality of eggs from different laying hen production systems, from indigenous breeds and          specialty eggs. Poult Sci, 96: 1485\u20131491. 2017. PMID:27811323,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps\/pew409","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/pew409"},{"key":"58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[58] Lordelo M, Cid J, Cordovil CMDS, Alves SP, Bessa          RJB andCarolino I. A comparison between the quality of eggs from indigenous chicken breeds          and that from commercial layers. Poult Sci, 99: 1768\u20131776. 2020. PMID:32111337,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psj.2019.11.023","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psj.2019.11.023"},{"key":"59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[59] Lambertz C, Wuthijaree K andGauly M. Performance,          behavior, and health of male broilers and laying hens of 2 dual-purpose chicken genotypes.          Poult Sci, 97: 3564\u20133576. 2018. PMID:29955832,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps\/pey223","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/pey223"},{"key":"60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[60] Duman M, \u0130ekero\u011flu A, Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m A, Elero\u011flu H          andCamc\u0131 \u00d6. Relation between egg shape index and egg quality characteristics. Arch          Geflugelkd, 80: 1\u20139. 2016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1399\/eps.2016.117","DOI":"10.1399\/eps.2016.117"},{"key":"61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[61] Altunta\u015f E and\u015eekero\u011flu A. Effect of egg shape          index on mechanical properties of chicken eggs. J Food Eng, 85: 606\u2013612. 2008.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jfoodeng.2007.08.022","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfoodeng.2007.08.022"},{"key":"62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[62] Hejdysz M, Nowaczewski S, Perz K, Szablewski T,          Stuper-Szablewska K, Cegielska-Radziejewska R, Tomczyk \u0141, Przybylska-Balcerek A, Bu\u015bko M,          Kaczmarek SA and\u015al\u00f3sarz P. Influence of the genotype of the hen (Gallus gallus domesticus)          on main parameters of egg quality, chemical composition of the eggs under uniform          environmental conditions. Poult Sci, 103: 103165. 2024. PMID:37931396,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psj.2023.103165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psj.2023.103165"},{"key":"63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[63] Calik J andObrzut J. Influence of genotype on          productivity and egg quality of three hen strains included in a biodiversity program.          Animals, 13: 1848. 2023. PMID:37889805,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani13111848","DOI":"10.3390\/ani13111848"},{"key":"64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[64] Drabik K, Karwowska M, Wengerska K, Pr\u00f3chniak T,          Adamczuk A andBatkowska J. The variability of quality traits of table eggs and eggshell          mineral composition depending on hens\u2019 breed and eggshell color. Animals, 11: 1204. 2021.          PMID:33922160, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani11051204","DOI":"10.3390\/ani11051204"},{"key":"65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[65] Berkhoff J, Alvarado-Gilis C, Keim JP, Alcalde          JA, Vargas-Bello-P\u00e9rez E andGandarillas M. Consumer preferences and sensory          characteristics of eggs from family farms. Poult Sci, 99: 6239\u20136246. 2020. PMID:33142542,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psj.2020.06.064","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psj.2020.06.064"},{"key":"66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[66] Philippe FX, Mahmoudi Y, Cinq-Mars D, Lefran\u00e7ois          M, Moula N, Palacios J, Pelletier F andGodbout S. Comparison of egg production, quality          and composition in three production systems for laying hens. Livest Sci, 232: 103917.          2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.livsci.2020.103917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.livsci.2020.103917"},{"key":"67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[67] Grashorn M. Feed additives for influencing          chicken meat and egg yolk color. In: Handbook on Natural Pigments in Food and Beverages          (Carle R, Schweiggert R, eds.), Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 283\u2013302.          2016","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-08-100371-8.00014-2"},{"key":"68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[68] Bunea A, Copaciu FM, Pa\u015fcal\u0103u S, Dulf F, Rugin\u0103          D, Chira R andPintea A. Chromatographic analysis of lypophilic compounds in eggs from          organically fed hens. J Appl Poult Res, 26: 498\u2013508. 2017.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/japr\/pfx022","DOI":"10.3382\/japr\/pfx022"},{"key":"69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[69] Kojima S, Koizumi S, Kawami Y, Shigeta Y andOsawa          A. Effect of dietary carotenoid on egg yolk color and singlet oxygen quenching activity of          laying hens. J Poult Sci, 59: 137\u2013142. 2022. PMID:35615052,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2141\/jpsa.0210032","DOI":"10.2141\/jpsa.0210032"},{"key":"70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[70] Rizzi C, Marangon A andChiericato GM. Effect of          genotype on slaughtering performance and meat physical and sensory characteristics of          organic laying hens. Poult Sci, 86: 128\u2013135. 2007. PMID:17179427,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ps\/86.1.128","DOI":"10.1093\/ps\/86.1.128"},{"key":"71","unstructured":"[71] Damme K, Urselmans S andSchmidt E. Economics of          dual-purpose breeds \u2013 a comparison of meat and egg production using dual purpose breeds          versus conventional broiler and layer strains. Lohmann Information, 50: 4-9. 2015.          http:\/\/www.ltz.de\/en\/news\/lohmann-information\/Damme-et-al.php"},{"key":"72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[72] Ba\u00e9za E, Chartrin P, Le Bihan-Duval E, Lessire M,          Besnard J andBerri C. Does the chicken genotype \u2018G\u00e9line de Touraine\u2019 have specific carcass          and meat characteristics? Animal, 3: 764\u2013771. 2009. PMID:22444456,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1751731109004029","DOI":"10.1017\/S1751731109004029"},{"key":"73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[73] Choe J andKim HY. Physicochemical characteristics          of breast and thigh meats from old broiler breeder hen and old laying hen and their          effects on quality properties of pressed ham. Poult Sci, 99: 2230\u20132235. 2020.          PMID:32241508, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psj.2019.10.076","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psj.2019.10.076"},{"key":"74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[74] Castellini C, Berri C, Le Bihan-Duval E          andMartino G. Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and free-range          poultry meat. Worlds Poult Sci J, 64: 500\u2013512. 2008.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0043933908000172","DOI":"10.1017\/S0043933908000172"},{"key":"75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[75] Muth PC, Ghaziani S, Klaiber I andValle Z\u00e1rate A.          Are carcass and meat quality of male dual-purpose chickens competitive compared to          slow-growing broilers reared under a welfare-enhanced organic system? Org Agric, 8: 57\u201368.          2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13165-016-0173-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s13165-016-0173-3"},{"key":"76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[76] Petracci M, Sirri F, Mazzoni M andMeluzzi A.          Comparison of breast muscle traits and meat quality characteristics in 2 commercial          chicken hybrids. Poult Sci, 92: 2438\u20132447. 2013. PMID:23960128,          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3382\/ps.2013-03087","DOI":"10.3382\/ps.2013-03087"},{"key":"77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[77] Choi YM andKim BC. Muscle fiber characteristics,          myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality. Livest Sci, 122: 105\u2013118. 2009.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.livsci.2008.08.015","DOI":"10.1016\/j.livsci.2008.08.015"},{"key":"78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[78] P\u00e9rez JA, Castro A, Rolo C, Torres A,          Dorta-Guerra R, Acosta NG andRodr\u00edguez C. Fatty acid profiles and omega-3 long-chain          polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) biosynthesis capacity of three dual purpose chicken          breeds. J Food Compos Anal, 102: 104005. 2021.          https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jfca.2021.104005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfca.2021.104005"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Poultry Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/jpsa\/63\/0\/63_2026020\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,15]],"date-time":"2026-08-15T04:32:54Z","timestamp":1786768374000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/jpsa\/63\/0\/63_2026020\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":78,"journal-issue":{"issue":"0","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2141\/jpsa.2026020","relation":{},"ISSN":["1346-7395","1349-0486"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1346-7395","type":"print"},{"value":"1349-0486","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"article-number":"2026020"}}