{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T12:40:11Z","timestamp":1791204011601,"version":"4.2.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,31]],"date-time":"2015-08-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1440979200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["openorthopaedicsjournal.com","benthamopen.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["TOORTHJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,31]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction :<\/jats:title><jats:p>Metal implants placed during fracture surgery are often removed for various reasons (i.e. pain, prominent material, patients request). The removal of implants is considered a \u2018clean\u2019 procedure and as low risk surgery. The incidence of wound infections following implant removal has received little attention in the literature. The aim of the current study was to assess the incidence and risk factors of postoperative wound infections (POWIs) following implant removal.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and Methods :<\/jats:title><jats:p>All consecutive adult patients in a Level 1 and Level 2 Trauma Center who had their implants removed during a 6.5 years period were included. Exclusion criteria were removal of implants because of an ongoing infection or fistula and removal followed by placement of new implants. Primary outcome measure was a POWI as defined by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Patient characteristics and peri-operative characteristics were collected from the medical charts.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results :<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 452 patients were included (512 procedures). The overall POWI rate was 11.6% (10% superficial, 1.6% deep). A total of 403 procedures (78.7%) comprised of implant removal below the knee joint with a 12.2% POWI rate. A POWI following initial fracture treatment was associated with a higher rate of POWI following implant removal (p=0.012). A POWI occurred more often in younger patients (median age 36<jats:italic>versus<\/jats:italic>43 years; p=0.004).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion :<\/jats:title><jats:p>The overall incidence of postoperative wound infection was 11.6% with 10% superficial and 1.6% of deep infections in patients with elective implant removal. A risk factor for POWI following implant removal was a previous wound infection.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2174\/1874325001509010418","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,16]],"date-time":"2015-09-16T11:03:18Z","timestamp":1442401398000},"page":"418-421","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["High Rates of Postoperative Wound Infection Following Elective Implant Removal"],"prefix":"10.2174","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"M","family":"Backes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N.W.L","family":"Schep","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.S.K","family":"Luitse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.C","family":"Goslings","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T","family":"Schepers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"965","reference":[{"key":"refR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vos DI, Verhofstad MH, Vroemen JP, et al. Clinical outcome of implant removal after fracture healing In: 2013.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12506-013-0043-5"},{"key":"refR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.01756","volume":"94","author":"Williams A.A.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Williams AA, Witten DM, Duester R, Chou LB. The benefits of implant removal from the foot and ankle J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (14) : 1316-20.","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. Am"},{"key":"refR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.01536","volume":"89","author":"Minkowitz R.B.","year":"2007","unstructured":"Minkowitz RB, Bhadsavle S, Walsh M, Egol KA. Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (9) : 1906-12.","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. Am"},{"key":"refR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"846","DOI":"10.1097\/00005373-199611000-00013","volume":"41","author":"B\u00f6stman O.","year":"1996","unstructured":"B\u00f6stman O, Pihlajam\u00e4ki H. Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units J Trauma 1996; 41 (5) : 846-9.","journal-title":"J. Trauma"},{"key":"refR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(96)90606-6","volume":"347","author":"Boxma H.","year":"1996","unstructured":"Boxma H, Broekhuizen T, Patka P, Oosting H. Randomised controlled trial of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical treatment of closed fractures: the Dutch Trauma Trial Lancet 1996; 347 (9009) : 1133-7.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"refR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1086\/501620","volume":"20","author":"Mangram A.J.","year":"1999","unstructured":"Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20 (4) : 250-78.","journal-title":"Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol"},{"key":"refR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.3109\/17453677608998968","volume":"47","author":"Raahave D.","year":"1976","unstructured":"Raahave D. Postoperative wound infection after implant and removal of osteosynthetic material Acta Orthop Scand 1976; 47 (1) : 28-35.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop. Scand"},{"key":"refR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-1383(92)90120-H","volume":"23","author":"Richards R.H.","year":"1992","unstructured":"Richards RH, Palmer JD, Clarke NM. Observations on removal of metal implants Injury 1992; 23 (1) : 25-8.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"refR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-1383(92)90121-8","volume":"23","author":"Sanderson P.L.","year":"1992","unstructured":"Sanderson PL, Ryan W, Turner PG. Complications of metalwork removal Injury 1992; 23 (1) : 29-30.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"refR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.01536","volume":"89","author":"Minkowitz R.B.","year":"2007","unstructured":"Minkowitz RB, Bhadsavle S, Walsh M, Egol KA. Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (9) : 1906-12.","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. Am"},{"key":"refR11","first-page":"1","volume":"4","author":"Pot J.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pot J, Van Wensen R, Olsman J. Hardware related pain and hardware removal after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures Foot Ankle Online 2011; 4 (5) : 1-6.","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Online"},{"key":"refR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foot.2011.11.010","volume":"22","author":"Wadia F.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wadia F, Sundar M. Metalwork removal in elective foot and ankle practice: does it make any difference to the patient? Foot 2012; 22 (2) : 74-6.","journal-title":"Foot"},{"key":"refR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-13-147","volume":"13","author":"Vos D.I.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vos DI, Verhofstad MH, Hanson B, van der Graaf Y, van der Werken C. Clinical outcome of implant removal after fracture healing. Design of a prospective multicentre clinical cohort study BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13 : 147.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet. Disord"},{"key":"refR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1521","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100713502466","volume":"34","author":"Backes M.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Backes M, Schep NW, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Schepers T. Indications for implant removal following intra-articular calcaneal fractures and subsequent complications Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34 (11) : 1521-5.","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"refR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1040","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2011.1040","volume":"32","author":"Schepers T.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, de Vries MR, Van der Elst M. Complications of syndesmotic screw removal Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32 (11) : 1040-4.","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"refR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070102201102","volume":"22","author":"Harvey E.J.","year":"2001","unstructured":"Harvey EJ, Grujic L, Early JS, Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ. Morbidity associated with ORIF of intra-articular calcaneus fractures using a lateral approach Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22 (11) : 868-73.","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"refR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2012.11.009","volume":"52","author":"Schepers T.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Schepers T, Den Hartog D, Vogels LM, Van Lieshout EM. Extended lateral approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures: an inverse relationship between surgeon experience and wound complications J Foot Ankle Surg 2013; 52 (2) : 167-71.","journal-title":"J. Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"refR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2011.01.009","volume":"42","author":"Schepers T.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, De Vries MR, Van der Elst M. Increased rates of wound complications with locking plates in distal fibular fractures Injury 2011; 42 (10) : 1125-9.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"refR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-197710001-00015","volume":"70","author":"Pavel A.","year":"1977","unstructured":"Pavel A, Smith RL, Ballard A, Larson IJ. Prophylactic antibiotics in elective orthopedic surgery: a prospective study of 1,591 cases South Med J 1977; 70 (Suppl. 1) : 50-5.","journal-title":"South. Med. J"},{"key":"refR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1177\/107110078300400211","volume":"4","author":"Miller W.A.","year":"1983","unstructured":"Miller WA. Postoperative wound infection in foot and ankle surgery Foot Ankle 1983; 4 (2) : 102-4.","journal-title":"Foot Ankle"},{"key":"refR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/S1067-2516(97)80012-9","volume":"36","author":"Reyes C.","year":"1997","unstructured":"Reyes C, Barnauskas S, Hetherington V. Retrospective assessment of antibiotic and tourniquet use in an ambulatory surgery center J Foot Ankle Surg 1997; 36 (1) : 55-62.","journal-title":"J. Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"refR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/S1067-2516(98)80064-1","volume":"37","author":"Sticha R.S.","year":"1998","unstructured":"Sticha RS, Swiriduk D, Wertheimer SJ. Prospective analysis of postoperative wound infections using an early exposure method of wound care J Foot Ankle Surg 1998; 37 (4) : 286-91.","journal-title":"J. Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"refR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2004.01.003","volume":"43","author":"Zgonis T.","year":"2004","unstructured":"Zgonis T, Jolly GP, Garbalosa JC. The efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in elective foot and ankle surgery J Foot Ankle Surg 2004; 43 (2) : 97-103.","journal-title":"J. Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"refR24","unstructured":"Dickemore C, Green R, Jolley W, Green D. Prophylactic antibiotics in clean forefoot surgery: Are they necessary?. USA: The Podiatry Institute 2005."},{"key":"refR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foot.2009.02.003","volume":"19","author":"Cichero M.J.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cichero MJ. Elective foot and ankle surgery; activity and perioperative complications in Queensland public hospitals, Australia Foot 2009; 19 (3) : 139-44.","journal-title":"Foot"},{"key":"refR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foot.2009.01.002","volume":"19","author":"Maher A.J.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Maher AJ, Metcalfe SA. A report of UK experience in 917 cases of day care foot surgery using a validated outcome tool Foot 2009; 19 (2) : 101-6.","journal-title":"Foot"},{"key":"refR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1071\/AH08687","volume":"34","author":"Butterworth P.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Butterworth P, Gilheany MF, Tinley P. Postoperative infection rates in foot and ankle surgery: a clinical audit of Australian podiatric surgeons, January to December 2007 Aust Health Rev 2010; 34 (2) : 180-5.","journal-title":"Aust. Health Rev"},{"key":"refR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.I.00080","volume":"92","author":"Wukich D.K.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wukich DK, Lowery NJ, McMillen RL, Frykberg RG. Postoperative infection rates in foot and ankle surgery: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (2) : 287-95.","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg. Am"},{"key":"refR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2009.0666","volume":"30","author":"Thomas G.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Thomas G, Whalley H, Modi C. Early mobilization of operatively fixed ankle fractures: a systematic review Foot Ankle Int 2009; 30 (7) : 666-74.","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"}],"container-title":["The Open Orthopaedics Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/openorthopaedicsjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V9\/TOORTHJ-9-418\/TOORTHJ-9-418.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/openorthopaedicsjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V9\/TOORTHJ-9-418\/TOORTHJ-9-418.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/openorthopaedicsjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V9\/TOORTHJ-9-418\/TOORTHJ-9-418.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,30]],"date-time":"2019-08-30T16:48:39Z","timestamp":1567183719000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/openorthopaedicsjournal.com\/VOLUME\/9\/PAGE\/418\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,31]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,31]]}},"alternative-id":["TOORTHJ-9-418"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/1874325001509010418","relation":{},"ISSN":["1874-3250"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1874-3250","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Peer Reviewed","order":0,"name":"review_status","label":"Review Status","group":{"name":"peer_review_details","label":"Peer Review Details"}},{"value":"Single blind","order":1,"name":"review_process","label":"Review Process","group":{"name":"peer_review_details","label":"Peer Review Details"}},{"value":"Checked with iThenticate","order":0,"name":"screening_status","label":"Screening Status","group":{"name":"plagiarism_screening","label":"Plagiarism Screening"}},{"value":"2014-11-19","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-6-24","order":1,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-8-5","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-8-31","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}