{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T23:28:20Z","timestamp":1783726100767,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,18]],"date-time":"2018-05-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1526601600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["openophthalmologyjournal.com","benthamopen.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["TOOPHTJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,18]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, stability and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the FS200 femtosecond laser and EX500 excimer laser platform.<\/jats:p>\n                <\/jats:sec>\n                <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The outcomes of 254 eyes of 129 consecutive patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism who underwent full correction femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK at CMU LASIK Center were assessed. Pre-operative and post-operative parameters including manifest refraction, Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA), Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BDVA), corneal topography and tomography were analyzed. The results between low to moderate myopia and high myopia were compared up to 12 months.<\/jats:p>\n                <\/jats:sec>\n                <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Mean pre-operative Spherical Equivalent (SE) was -5.15\u00b12.41 Diopters (D) (range -0.50 to -11.50 D) and -0.13\u00b10.28 D, -0.13\u00b10.27 D, -0.13\u00b10.28 D and -0.14\u00b10.30 D at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, post-operatively. At 12 months, the propor\u00action of eyes achieving UDVA \u2265 20\/20 was 90.0% and \u226520\/40 was 98.8%. The proportion of eyes achieving post-operative mean SE \u00b10.5 D, and \u00b11 D was 91.3%, and 98.5%. No eyes lost more than two lines of BDVA. The low to moderate myopic group had a statistically significant better UDVA at one (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.017) and three months (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.014) but no difference at six (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.061) and 12 months (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.091). The mean post-operative SE was better in low to moderate myopic group at every follow-up visit (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.001, 0.007, &lt;0.001 and &lt;0.001).<\/jats:p>\n                <\/jats:sec>\n                <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>One-year clinical results of LASIK with the FS200 femtosecond laser and EX500 excimer laser showed high efficacy, predictability, stability and safety.<\/jats:p>\n                <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2174\/1874364101812010063","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,18]],"date-time":"2018-05-18T08:02:53Z","timestamp":1526630573000},"page":"63-71","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Outcomes of LASIK for Myopia or Myopic Astigmatism Correction with the FS200 Femtosecond Laser and EX500 Excimer Laser Platform"],"prefix":"10.2174","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Muanploy","family":"Niparugs","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Napaporn","family":"Tananuvat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Winai","family":"Chaidaroon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chulaluck","family":"Tangmonkongvoragul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Somsanguan","family":"Ausayakhun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"965","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20120921-03","volume":"28","author":"Vega-Estrada A.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vega-Estrada A, Ali\u00f3 JL, Arba Mosquera S, Moreno LJ. \n                    Corneal higher order aberrations after LASIK for high myopia with a fast repetition rate excimer laser, optimized ablation profile, and femtosecond laser-assisted flap. \n                    J Refract Surg  \n                    2012; \n                    28\n                    (10)\n                    : 689-96.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20121116-01","volume":"28","author":"Kymionis G.D.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kymionis GD, Kankariya VP, Plaka AD, Reinstein DZ. \n                    Femtosecond laser technology in corneal refractive surgery: A review. \n                    J Refract Surg  \n                    2012; \n                    28\n                    (12)\n                    : 912-20.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0b013e3283477c9c","volume":"22","author":"Kim P.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kim P, Sutton GL, Rootman DS. \n                    Applications of the femtosecond laser in corneal refractive surgery. \n                    Curr Opin Ophthalmol  \n                    2011; \n                    22\n                    (4)\n                    : 238-44.","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1024","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.03.025","volume":"36","author":"Salom\u00e3o M.Q.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Salom\u00e3o MQ, Wilson SE. \n                    Femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis. \n                    J Cataract Refract Surg  \n                    2010; \n                    36\n                    (6)\n                    : 1024-32.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-015-0022-6","volume":"2","author":"Aristeidou A.","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aristeidou A, Taniguchi EV, Tsatsos M, et al. \n                    The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser. \n                    Eye Vis (Lond)  \n                    2015; \n                    2\n                    (12)\n                    : 12.","journal-title":"Eye Vis. (Lond.)"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1925","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.05.027","volume":"36","author":"Moshirfar M.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Moshirfar M, Gardiner JP, Schliesser JA, et al. \n                    Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: Retrospective comparison. \n                    J Cataract Refract Surg  \n                    2010; \n                    36\n                    (11)\n                    : 1925-33.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16314","DOI":"10.1021\/jp907232h","volume":"113","author":"Matsuura T.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Matsuura T, Ikeda H, Idota N, Motokawa R, Hara Y, Annaka M. \n                    Anisotropic swelling behavior of the cornea. \n                    J Phys Chem B  \n                    2009; \n                    113\n                    (51)\n                    : 16314-22.","journal-title":"J. Phys. Chem. B"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-009-1102-x","volume":"247","author":"Winkler von Mohrenfels C.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Winkler von Mohrenfels C, Khoramnia R, Lohmann CP. \n                    Comparison of different excimer laser ablation frequencies (50, 200, and 500 Hz). \n                    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol  \n                    2009; \n                    247\n                    (11)\n                    : 1539-45.","journal-title":"Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S40454","volume":"7","author":"Kanellopoulos A.J.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. \n                    Long-term bladeless LASIK outcomes with the FS200 femtosecond and EX500 excimer laser workstation: The refractive suite. \n                    Clin Ophthalmol  \n                    2013; \n                    7\n                    : 261-9.","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1366","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.03.024","volume":"39","author":"Kymionis G.D.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Grentzelos MA, et al. \n                    Thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond-laser technology. \n                    J Cataract Refract Surg  \n                    2013; \n                    39\n                    (9)\n                    : 1366-71.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.10.041","volume":"39","author":"Cummings A.B.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cummings AB, Cummings BK, Kelly GE. \n                    Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser. \n                    J Cataract Refract Surg  \n                    2013; \n                    39\n                    (3)\n                    : 378-85.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20160926-01","volume":"33","author":"Cummings A.","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cummings A, Durrie D, Gordon M, Williams R, Gow JA, Maus M. \n                    Prospective evaluation of outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for myopia using the wavelight refractive suite. \n                    J Refract Surg  \n                    2017; \n                    33\n                    (5)\n                    : 322-8.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.043","volume":"37","author":"Zhang Z.H.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Zhang ZH, Jin HY, Suo Y, et al. \n                    Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. \n                    J Cataract Refract Surg  \n                    2011; \n                    37\n                    (12)\n                    : 2151-9.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S99394","volume":"10","author":"Huhtala A.","year":"2016","unstructured":"Huhtala A, Pietil\u00e4 J, M\u00e4kinen P, Uusitalo H. \n                    Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. \n                    Clin Ophthalmol  \n                    2016; \n                    10\n                    : 393-404.","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20111228-02","volume":"28","author":"Chen S.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chen S, Feng Y, Stojanovic A, Jankov MR II, Wang Q. \n                    Intralase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. \n                    J Refract Surg  \n                    2012; \n                    28\n                    (1)\n                    : 15-24.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.2174\/1874364101206010019","volume":"6","author":"Hjortdal J.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hjortdal J, Nielsen E, Vestergaard A, S\u00f8ndergaard A. \n                    Inverse cutting of posterior lamellar corneal grafts by a femtosecond laser. \n                    Open Ophthalmol J  \n                    2012; \n                    6\n                    : 19-22.","journal-title":"Open Ophthalmol. J."},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1912","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.09.003","volume":"36","author":"Choe C.H.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Choe CH, Guss C, Musch DC, Niziol LM, Shtein RM. \n                    Incidence of diffuse lamellar keratitis after LASIK with 15 KHz, 30 KHz, and 60 KHz femtosecond laser flap creation. \n                    J Cataract Refract Surg  \n                    2010; \n                    36\n                    (11)\n                    : 1912-8.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."}],"container-title":["The Open Ophthalmology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/openophthalmologyjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V12\/TOOPHTJ-12-63\/TOOPHTJ-12-63.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/openophthalmologyjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V12\/TOOPHTJ-12-63\/TOOPHTJ-12-63.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/openophthalmologyjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V12\/TOOPHTJ-12-63\/TOOPHTJ-12-63.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,15]],"date-time":"2019-04-15T06:33:08Z","timestamp":1555309988000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/openophthalmologyjournal.com\/VOLUME\/12\/PAGE\/63\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,18]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,18]]}},"alternative-id":["TOOPHTJ-12-63"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/1874364101812010063","relation":{},"ISSN":["1874-3641"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1874-3641","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Peer Reviewed","order":0,"name":"review_status","label":"Review Status","group":{"name":"peer_review_details","label":"Peer Review Details"}},{"value":"Single blind","order":1,"name":"review_process","label":"Review Process","group":{"name":"peer_review_details","label":"Peer Review Details"}},{"value":"Checked with iThenticate","order":0,"name":"screening_status","label":"Screening Status","group":{"name":"plagiarism_screening","label":"Plagiarism Screening"}},{"value":"2018-1-21","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-3-28","order":1,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-4-25","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-5-18","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}