{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T03:48:15Z","timestamp":1787024895061,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,31]],"date-time":"2018-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1527724800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["openophthalmologyjournal.com","benthamopen.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["TOOPHTJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,31]]},"abstract":"\n Background:<\/jats:title>\n \n Laser-Assisted\n in situ<\/jats:italic>\n Keratomileusis (LASIK) can induce corneal aberrations that can impact vision and patient satisfaction. Recent developments in laser technologies have helped minimise these aberrations.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective:<\/jats:title>\n To assess the quality of vision and change in Higher-Order Aberrations (HOAs) following wavefront-optimized LASIK in low-myopic astigmatic patients.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods:<\/jats:title>\n LASIK was performed on a total of 76 eyes in patients with myopia <4.0 D and cylinder <2.0 D using the WaveLight\u00ae EX500 excimer and FS200 femtosecond laser platform. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and HOAs were measured at 1 and 3 months postoperatively and compared to preoperative values. Subjective quality of vision was assessed pre- and postoperatively using a VF14 questionnaire.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n Mean postoperative Spherical Equivalent (SE) was -0.09 \u00b1 0.26 \u00b5m with 95% of patients within \u00b1 0.5 D of attempted SE. Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20\/20 or better for 96% of patients. Contrast sensitivity increased against horizontal and vertical gratings at all spatial frequencies except for vertical gratings at 18 cycles\/degree. Spherical aberration and total HOA increased by 0.085 \u00b5m and 0.13 \u00b5m respectively. The mean VF14 score increased from 89.2 \u00b1 16.7% to 99 \u00b1 1.4% postoperatively.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n LASIK performed using the WaveLight\u00ae EX500 excimer and WaveLight\u00ae FS200 laser platform provided improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity with minimal introduction of HOAs, making it a suitable platform for low myopic astigmatic patients.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2174\/1874364101812010084","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,10]],"date-time":"2018-06-10T23:53:31Z","timestamp":1528674811000},"page":"84-93","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"title":["Visual Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following LASIK on Eyes with Low Myopia and Astigmatism"],"prefix":"10.2174","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Smita","family":"Agarwal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erin","family":"Thornell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chris","family":"Hodge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gerard","family":"Sutton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Hughes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"965","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1699","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1991.01080120083031","volume":"109","author":"Pallikaris I.G.","year":"1991","unstructured":"Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Siganos DS, Tsilimbaris MK. \n A corneal flap technique for laser in situ keratomileusis. Human studies. \n Arch Ophthalmol \n 1991; \n 109\n (12)\n : 1699-702.","journal-title":"Arch. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2014.28.4.285","volume":"28","author":"Jung H.H.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jung HH, Ji YS, Oh HJ, Yoon KC. \n Higher order aberrations of the corneal surface after laser subepithelial keratomileusis. \n Korean J Ophthalmol \n 2014; \n 28\n (4)\n : 285-91.","journal-title":"Korean J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(00)00806-3","volume":"27","author":"Mrochen M.","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Seiler T. \n Increased higher-order optical aberrations after laser refractive surgery: A problem of subclinical decentration. \n J Cataract Refract Surg \n 2001; \n 27\n (3)\n : 362-9.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1076\/soph.18.1.41.14071","volume":"18","author":"Mihashi T.","year":"2003","unstructured":"Mihashi T. \n Higher-order wavefront aberrations induced by small ablation area and sub-clinical decentration in simulated corneal refractive surgery using a perturbed schematic eye model. \n Semin Ophthalmol \n 2003; \n 18\n (1)\n : 41-7.","journal-title":"Semin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.4103\/0301-4738.64139","volume":"58","author":"Padmanabhan P.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Padmanabhan P, Basuthkar SS, Joseph R. \n Ocular aberrations after wavefront optimized LASIK for myopia. \n Indian J Ophthalmol \n 2010; \n 58\n (4)\n : 307-12.","journal-title":"Indian J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2003.06.022","volume":"111","author":"Chalita M.R.","year":"2004","unstructured":"Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, Krueger RR. \n Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. \n Ophthalmology \n 2004; \n 111\n (3)\n : 447-53.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20140320-03","volume":"30","author":"Lin F.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. \n Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. \n J Refract Surg \n 2014; \n 30\n (4)\n : 248-54.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1631\/jzus.2007.B0177","volume":"8","author":"Du C.X.","year":"2007","unstructured":"Du CX, Shen Y, Wang Y. \n Comparison of high order aberration after conventional and customized ablation in myopic LASIK in different eyes of the same patient. \n J Zhejiang Univ Sci B \n 2007; \n 8\n (3)\n : 177-80.","journal-title":"J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2008.07.014","volume":"147","author":"Kirwan C.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kirwan C, O\u2019Keefe M. \n Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform. \n Am J Ophthalmol \n 2009; \n 147\n (1)\n : 77-83.","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(98)00288-8","volume":"127","author":"Oshika T.","year":"1999","unstructured":"Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, Howland HC, El Danasoury MA. \n Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. \n Am J Ophthalmol \n 1999; \n 127\n (1)\n : 1-7.","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1561","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-010-1583-7","volume":"249","author":"Cervi\u00f1o A.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cervi\u00f1o A, Villa-Collar C, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Ferrer-Blasco T, Garc\u00eda-L\u00e1zaro S. \n Retinal straylight and light distortion phenomena in normal and post-LASIK eyes. \n Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol \n 2011; \n 249\n (10)\n : 1561-6.","journal-title":"Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7028","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.13-11893","volume":"54","author":"Yuan Y.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yuan Y, Shao Y, Tao A, et al. \n Ocular anterior segment biometry and high-order wavefront aberrations during accommodation. \n Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci \n 2013; \n 54\n (10)\n : 7028-37.","journal-title":"Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1170","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2014.02.037","volume":"157","author":"He L.","year":"2014","unstructured":"He L, Liu A, Manche EE. \n Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: A prospective randomized contralateral eye study. \n Am J Ophthalmol \n 2014; \n 157\n (6)\n : 1170-1178.e1.","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref14","first-page":"498","volume":"6","author":"Zhang J.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zhang J, Zhou YH, Li R, Tian L. \n Visual performance after conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration: Results at 1 year. \n Int J Ophthalmol \n 2013; \n 6\n (4)\n : 498-504.","journal-title":"Int. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.03.040","volume":"33","author":"Binder P.S.","year":"2007","unstructured":"Binder PS, Rosenshein J. \n Retrospective comparison of 3 laser platforms to correct myopic spheres and spherocylinders using conventional and wavefront-guided treatments. \n J Cataract Refract Surg \n 2007; \n 33\n (7)\n : 1158-76.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1249","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2008.04.010","volume":"115","author":"Schallhorn S.C.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Schallhorn SC, Farjo AA, Huang D, et al. \n Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. \n Ophthalmology \n 2008; \n 115\n (7)\n : 1249-61.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S424","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20080401-20","volume":"24","author":"Stonecipher K.G.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Stonecipher KG, Kezirian GM. \n Wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE: three-month results of a prospective FDA trial. \n J Refract Surg \n 2008; \n 24\n (4)\n : S424-30.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.05.010","volume":"120","author":"S\u00e1les C.S.","year":"2013","unstructured":"S\u00e1les CS, Manche EE. \n One-year outcomes from a prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in myopes. \n Ophthalmology \n 2013; \n 120\n (12)\n : 2396-402.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S24316","volume":"5","author":"Moshirfar M.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Moshirfar M, Betts BS, Churgin DS, et al. \n A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight\u00ae Allegretto Wave \u00ae Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue\u2122 STAR S4 IR\u2122 in laser in situ\t keratomileusis (LASIK): Analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations. \n Clin Ophthalmol \n 2011; \n 5\n : 1339-47.","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.09.031","volume":"36","author":"Perez-Straziota C.E.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Perez-Straziota CE, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. \n Visual acuity and higher-order aberrations with wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis. \n J Cataract Refract Surg \n 2010; \n 36\n (3)\n : 437-41.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2415-14-1","volume":"14","author":"Katz T.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Katz T, Frings A, Linke SJ, Richard G, Druchkiv V, Steinberg J. \n Laser in situ keratomileusis for astigmatism \u2264 0.75 diopter combined with low myopia: A retrospective data analysis. \n BMC Ophthalmol \n 2014; \n 14\n : 1-9.","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S821","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20121005-02","volume":"28","author":"Au J.D.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Au JD, Krueger RR. \n Optimized femto-LASIK maintains preexisting spherical aberration independent of refractive error. \n J Refract Surg \n 2012; \n 28\n (11)\n (Suppl.)\n : S821-5.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20140814-02","volume":"30","author":"Ganesh S.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ganesh S, Gupta R. \n Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. \n J Refract Surg \n 2014; \n 30\n (9)\n : 590-6.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20100812-02","volume":"27","author":"Miraftab M.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Miraftab M, Seyedian MA, Hashemi H. \n Wavefront-guided vs wavefront-optimized LASIK: A randomized clinical trial comparing contralateral eyes. \n J Refract Surg \n 2011; \n 27\n (4)\n : 245-50.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-016-0205-5","volume":"16","author":"Al-Zeraid F.M.","year":"2016","unstructured":"Al-Zeraid FM, Osuagwu UL. \n Induced higher-order aberrations after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed with wave-front guided IntraLase femtosecond laser in moderate to high astigmatism. \n BMC Ophthalmol \n 2016; \n 16\n : 29-39.","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1789","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.05.035","volume":"35","author":"Arbelaez M.C.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Arbelaez MC, Vidal C, Arba-Mosquera S. \n Excimer laser correction of moderate to high astigmatism with a non-wavefront-guided aberration-free ablation profile: Six-month results. \n J Cataract Refract Surg \n 2009; \n 35\n (10)\n : 1789-98.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref27","first-page":"784","volume":"8","author":"Xia L.K.","year":"2015","unstructured":"Xia LK, Yu J, Chai GR, Wang D, Li Y. \n Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap cutting in LASIK. \n Int J Ophthalmol \n 2015; \n 8\n (4)\n : 784-90.","journal-title":"Int. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3986","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.04-0629","volume":"45","author":"Yamane N.","year":"2004","unstructured":"Yamane N, Miyata K, Samejima T, et al. \n Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis. \n Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci \n 2004; \n 45\n (11)\n : 3986-90.","journal-title":"Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1864","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(00)00355-9","volume":"107","author":"Mutyala S.","year":"2000","unstructured":"Mutyala S, McDonald MB, Scheinblum KA, Ostrick MD, Brint SF, Thompson H. \n Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. \n Ophthalmology \n 2000; \n 107\n (10)\n : 1864-7.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref30","first-page":"520","volume":"51","author":"Fahim A.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fahim A, Rezvan B, Hashemi H. \n Assessment of contrast sensitivity and aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy in patients with myopia greater than 5 diopters. \n Acta Med Iran \n 2013; \n 51\n (8)\n : 520-4.","journal-title":"Acta Med. Iran."},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2003.06.017","volume":"111","author":"Kaiserman I.","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov R, Varssano D, Grinbaum A. \n Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK. \n Ophthalmology \n 2004; \n 111\n (3)\n : 454-7.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20090512-06","volume":"25","author":"Keir N.J.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Keir NJ, Simpson T, Jones LW, Fonn D. \n Wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia: effect on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations. \n J Refract Surg \n 2009; \n 25\n (6)\n : 524-33.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1774","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(02)01499-2","volume":"28","author":"Chan J.W.W.","year":"2002","unstructured":"Chan JWW, Edwards MH, Woo GC, Woo VCP. \n Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. one-year follow-up. \n J Cataract Refract Surg \n 2002; \n 28\n (10)\n : 1774-9.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.2011.151","volume":"25","author":"Lazon de la Jara P.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lazon de la Jara P, Erickson D, Erickson P, Stapleton F. \n Visual and non-visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK. \n Eye (Lond) \n 2011; \n 25\n (9)\n : 1194-201.","journal-title":"Eye (Lond.)"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-9233.148359","volume":"22","author":"Bamashmus M.A.","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bamashmus MA, Hubaish K, Alawad M, Alakhlee H. \n Functional outcome and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. \n Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol \n 2015; \n 22\n (1)\n : 108-14.","journal-title":"Middle East Afr. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.07.053","volume":"40","author":"Vestergaard A.H.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal J\u00d8. \n Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. \n J Cataract Refract Surg \n 2014; \n 40\n (3)\n : 403-11.","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0158176","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0158176","volume":"11","author":"Shen Z.","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shen Z, Shi K, Yu Y, Yu X, Lin Y, Yao K. \n Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. \n PLoS One \n 2016; \n 11\n (7)\n : e0158176.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-017-0431-5","volume":"17","author":"Chen X.","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chen X, Wang Y, Zhang J, Yang SN, Li X, Zhang L. \n Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations after SMILE and Wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK for myopia. \n BMC Ophthalmol \n 2017; \n 17\n (1)\n : 42.","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20140320-02","volume":"30","author":"Ivarsen A.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. \n Correction of myopic astigmatism with small incision lenticule extraction. \n J Refract Surg \n 2014; \n 30\n (4)\n : 240-7.","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1679","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-014-2776-2","volume":"252","author":"Bohac M.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bohac M, Biscevic A, Koncarevic M, Anticic M, Gabric N, Patel S. \n Comparison of Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q and Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser in treatment of high astigmatism. \n Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol \n 2014; \n 252\n (10)\n : 1679-86.","journal-title":"Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol."}],"container-title":["The Open Ophthalmology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/openophthalmologyjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V12\/TOOPHTJ-12-84\/TOOPHTJ-12-84.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/openophthalmologyjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V12\/TOOPHTJ-12-84\/TOOPHTJ-12-84.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/openophthalmologyjournal.com\/contents\/volumes\/V12\/TOOPHTJ-12-84\/TOOPHTJ-12-84.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,15]],"date-time":"2019-04-15T02:33:14Z","timestamp":1555295594000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/openophthalmologyjournal.com\/VOLUME\/12\/PAGE\/84\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,31]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,31]]}},"alternative-id":["TOOPHTJ-12-84"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/1874364101812010084","relation":{},"ISSN":["1874-3641"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1874-3641","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Peer Reviewed","order":0,"name":"review_status","label":"Review Status","group":{"name":"peer_review_details","label":"Peer Review Details"}},{"value":"Single blind","order":1,"name":"review_process","label":"Review Process","group":{"name":"peer_review_details","label":"Peer Review Details"}},{"value":"Checked with iThenticate","order":0,"name":"screening_status","label":"Screening Status","group":{"name":"plagiarism_screening","label":"Plagiarism Screening"}},{"value":"2018-01-30","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-03-18","order":1,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-05-14","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-05-31","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}