{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T20:39:13Z","timestamp":1792787953283,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Res Protoc"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Safe vacuum-assisted vaginal birth depends on appropriate case selection, accurate cup placement, controlled traction, recognition of technical difficulty, and timely abandonment of an unsuccessful attempt. Simulation-based education can improve procedural performance, but evidence that vacuum-specific simulation changes patient-level clinical practice remains limited.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aims to estimate the change in the occurrence of cup detachment (known as \u201cpop off\u201d) following implementation of a standardized simulation-based training program for vacuum-assisted vaginal birth. Cup detachment was designated as the single primary outcome after evaluation of the preintervention cohort but before any postintervention versus preintervention comparative analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This multicenter quasi-experimental before-and-after study is being conducted in 19 Spanish maternity hospitals participating in the Registro Espa\u00f1ol de Morbimortalidad Materna y Perinatal. The implemented preintervention observation period ran from November 28, 2024, through February 28, 2026. The training and washout phase was conducted during March and April 2026, followed by postintervention data collection from May through October 2026. Preintervention clinical variables are ascertained retrospectively from medical records, whereas postintervention data collection is prospective. The intervention combines preparatory theoretical material, a 1-hour face-to-face simulation workshop using a PROMPT FLEX obstetric simulator and vacuum devices, checklist-based assessment, supervised practice, feedback, and debriefing. The primary outcome will be analyzed using modified Poisson regression to estimate risk ratios and 95% CIs, accounting for hospital and protocol-defined calendar time trends. Sequential instrumentation and conversion to cesarean birth will be analyzed separately as key secondary clinical outcomes. Ethical approval was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Girona (code 2024.070) on August 5, 2024.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study was funded in November 2024. During the preintervention phase, 1155 cases were recorded in 19 hospitals; 12 were excluded according to the selection criteria, leaving 1143 eligible cases. At the verified July 2026 project update, 144 postintervention cases had been collected. Postintervention data collection is scheduled to close in October 2026; the protocol-defined comparative analysis will be performed after database lock, with publication of the main results planned for summer 2027.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The current analysis plan was fixed before database lock and before any formal comparative postintervention versus preintervention effectiveness analysis. The protocol also defines assessment of contamination, intervention fidelity, secular trends, and the limitations inherent to a nonrandomized before-and-after evaluation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/100242","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T20:11:38Z","timestamp":1792786298000},"page":"e100242-e100242","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Impact of a Simulation-Based Training Program on Cup Detachment During Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Birth: Protocol for a Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Before-and-After Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3492-7379","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Rosa Vila","family":"Hernandez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2943-7399","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sara","family":"Tameish","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0084-1710","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ivan","family":"Hurtado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4001-2017","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Del Mar","family":"Goya Canino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6969-9276","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alicia","family":"Carrera I Boix","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1457-3446","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Oscar Martinez","family":"Perez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e70","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16092","article-title":"Assisted vaginal birth: green-top guideline no. 26","volume":"127","author":"Murphy","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.012","article-title":"Medico-legal considerations and operative vaginal delivery","volume":"56","author":"Murphy","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"9289","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)06341-3","article-title":"Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study","volume":"358","author":"Murphy","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1542\/neo.24-1-e1","article-title":"Operative vaginal birth: neonatal implications for vacuum and forceps-assisted vaginal delivery","volume":"24","author":"Lueck","journal-title":"Neoreviews"},{"issue":"11","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1941","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14236","article-title":"Ultrasound vs routine care before instrumental vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"100","author":"Mappa","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12560","article-title":"Operative vaginal birth: better training for better outcomes","volume":"121","author":"Gale","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"7451","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7451.1302","article-title":"Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice","volume":"328","author":"Patel","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100992","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gine.2024.100992","article-title":"An\u00e1lisis de pr\u00e1cticas y protocolos de formaci\u00f3n de equipos obst\u00e9tricos en distocia de hombros en hospitales espa\u00f1oles [Article in Spanish]","volume":"51","author":"Faundez-Inostroza","journal-title":"Cl\u00ednica e Investigaci\u00f3n en Ginecolog\u00eda y Obstetricia"},{"issue":"3","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.2105\/ajph.94.3.361","article-title":"Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement","volume":"94","author":"Des Jarlais","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"10","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0040296","article-title":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"4","author":"von Elm","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"R11","unstructured":"Winter C Crofts J Draycott T Muchatuta N , editors. PROMPT Course Manual. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2017. ISBN: 9781108430296"},{"key":"R12","unstructured":"Vacca A . Handbook of Vacuum Delivery in Obstetric Practice. 3rd ed. Vacca Research; 2009. ISBN: 9781920818036"},{"issue":"4","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.222","article-title":"Assessment of forceps use in obstetrics during a simulated childbirth","volume":"4","author":"Moreau","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"issue":"Suppl 4","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14760","article-title":"Pressure and traction on a model fetal head and neck associated with the use of forceps, Kiwi\u2122 ventouse and the BD Odon Device\u2122 in operative vaginal birth: a simulation study","volume":"124","author":"O\u2019Brien","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-200012000-00003","article-title":"Vacuum extraction in modern obstetric practice: a review and critique","volume":"12","author":"O\u2019Grady","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00800.x","article-title":"Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome?","volume":"113","author":"Draycott","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.2471\/BLT.14.145532","article-title":"Onsite training of doctors, midwives and nurses in obstetric emergencies, Zimbabwe","volume":"93","author":"Crofts","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"issue":"5","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00399.x","article-title":"Vacuum extraction: is there any need to improve the current training in the UK?","volume":"83","author":"Sau","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"R19","unstructured":"Ministerio de Sanidad. Atenci\u00f3n perinatal en Espa\u00f1a: an\u00e1lisis de los recursos f\u00edsicos, humanos, actividad y calidad de los servicios hospitalarios, 2010-2018 [Report in Spanish]. Ministerio de Sanidad; 2021."},{"issue":"1","key":"R20","first-page":"5","volume":"4","author":"Manzanares Gal\u00e1n","journal-title":"Evidencia Obst\u00e9trica"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g1687","article-title":"Better reporting of interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide","volume":"348","author":"Hoffmann","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Attilakos G Draycott T Gale A Siassakos D Winter C , editors. ROBuST: RCOG Operative Birth Simulation Training: Course Manual. Cambridge University Press; 2014. [doi: 10.1017\/CBO9781107445154]","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781107445154"},{"issue":"1","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.05.016","article-title":"The disappearing art of instrumental delivery: time to reverse the trend","volume":"91","author":"Bailey","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003431","article-title":"Simulation training for operative vaginal delivery among obstetrics and gynecology residents: a systematic review","volume":"134 Suppl 1","author":"Bligard","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1887","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyw341","article-title":"Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package \u201cdagitty\u201d","volume":"45","author":"Textor","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/80.1.27","article-title":"Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates","volume":"80","author":"Firth","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"issue":"1","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-03829-y","article-title":"Simulation training program for vacuum application to improve technical skills in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery","volume":"21","author":"Mannella","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06159-8","article-title":"Comparison of a practice-based versus theory-based training program for conducting vacuum-assisted deliveries: a randomized-controlled trial","volume":"305","author":"Marschalek","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15613","article-title":"Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson-Braun and Kielland forceps","volume":"167","author":"Cuerva","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.70836","article-title":"Vacuum 5-step technique versus OdonAssist: which is easier to learn for professionals without experience in assisted vaginal births? A simulation study","volume":"174","author":"Cuerva","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2015.136","article-title":"Multi-professional training for obstetric emergencies in a U.S. hospital over a 7-year interval: an observational study","volume":"36","author":"Weiner","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"13","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1710","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12767","article-title":"Impact of introducing practical obstetric multi-professional training (PROMPT) into maternity units in Victoria, Australia","volume":"121","author":"Shoushtarian","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.53292","article-title":"Obstetric outcomes by hospital volume of operative vaginal delivery","volume":"8","author":"Willy","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.4103\/joah.joah_28_26","article-title":"Effectiveness and limitations of virtual reality in laboratory skills training: a focused review","volume":"17","author":"Babker","journal-title":"J Appl Hematol"}],"container-title":["JMIR Research Protocols"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T20:11:39Z","timestamp":1792786299000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.researchprotocols.org\/2026\/1\/e100242"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]]},"references-count":34,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/100242","relation":{},"ISSN":["1929-0748"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1929-0748","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]]},"article-number":"v15i9e100242"}}