{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T19:45:45Z","timestamp":1792093545776,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Internet Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Socially assistive robots (SARs) have the potential to support pediatric care; yet, routine clinical adoption remains limited. Because SARs interact directly with children, health care professionals (HCPs) may consider not only clinical utility and usability but also child-robot interaction, trust, and implementation concerns that may not be fully represented by conventional technology acceptance frameworks.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aimed to examine factors associated with pediatric HCPs\u2019 behavioral intention (BI) to adopt SARs and explored how clinical perspectives contextualized conventional technology acceptance constructs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A convergent parallel mixed methods study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan between June and December 2025. In the quantitative strand, 125 pediatric HCPs viewed a standardized video of a SAR interacting with a child and completed a Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2)-based questionnaire incorporating trust. Multiple linear regression examined associations with BI. In the qualitative strand, 17 HCPs with direct clinical SAR exposure, recruited primarily from 2 pilot units, participated in semistructured interviews. The strands involved partially overlapping but nonequivalent samples with different levels of SAR exposure. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically, and findings were integrated using a joint display.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The quantitative model accounted for 72.7% of the variance in BI. Social influence (SI: \u03b2=0.348;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001), hedonic motivation (HM:\n                      <jats:underline>\u03b2<\/jats:underline>\n                      =0.307;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001), and performance expectancy (PE: \u03b2=0.238;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      =.001) had the largest standardized coefficients; the association for trust was small and sensitive to model specification, whereas effort expectancy (EE) and facilitating conditions (FC) were not significantly associated with BI. Limited discriminant validity and potential common method variance warranted caution in construct-specific interpretation. Qualitative analysis generated 6 themes concerning children\u2019s emotional and stress-related challenges, SAR functions and clinical positioning, HCP attitudes, child-centered design, and implementation and institutional considerations. Integration showed convergence for clinical usefulness and complementarity for trust-related concerns. Children\u2019s engagement and relational interaction were conceptually distinct from UTAUT2-defined HM, reflecting HCPs\u2019 own enjoyment. SI was prominent quantitatively but was not articulated as a salient consideration in participants\u2019 accounts, whereas operational concerns were elaborated in detail in participants\u2019 accounts despite the nonsignificant association for EE.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Pediatric HCPs\u2019 intentions to adopt SARs were associated with SI, HM, and PE, but measurement limitations and the predominantly video-based evaluation context preclude interpreting these associations as distinct determinants or predictors of actual use. Qualitative findings highlighted child-centered relational value and context-specific implementation concerns. Child-centered relational value was conceptually distinct from HCP-centered HM, suggesting that evaluations of patient-facing socially interactive technologies may involve considerations not fully represented by conventional user-centered acceptance constructs. Multisite longitudinal studies using validated measures and real-world SAR exposure are needed to examine actual uptake and sustained use.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/105501","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,14]],"date-time":"2026-09-14T15:40:08Z","timestamp":1789400408000},"page":"e105501-e105501","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Factors Associated With Pediatric Health Care Professionals\u2019 Intention to Adopt Socially Assistive Robots: Mixed Methods Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-2926-1370","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yun-Hsuan","family":"Lee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-9379-4170","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fang-Yu","family":"Hsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6995-860X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sue-hsien","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4065-6544","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shih-Ming","family":"Chu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8989-501X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chih-Yuan","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9164-452X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Feng-Hsuan","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5711-8072","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Angela Shin-Yu","family":"Lien","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/76427","article-title":"Socially assistive robots for pain management and emotional responses in pediatric hospital care: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"Hsu","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.3390\/mti9020014","article-title":"Social robot interactions in a pediatric hospital setting: perspectives of children, parents, and healthcare providers","volume":"9","author":"Kabaci\u0144ska","journal-title":"Multimodal Technol Interact"},{"issue":"1","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-025-02117-9","article-title":"A randomized pilot study evaluating socially assistive robot effects on patient engagement and care quality","volume":"8","author":"Mlakar","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/79634","article-title":"Health care professionals\u2019 perspectives of socially assistive robots in health care settings: systematic review","volume":"27","author":"Lee","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/70305","article-title":"Evaluating social assistive robots in clinical nursing care: mixed method pilot study on health care workers\u2019 perceptions and adoption","volume":"8","author":"Leoste","journal-title":"JMIR Nurs"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2024.1398140","article-title":"A systematic review of collaborative robots for nurses: where are we now, and where is the evidence?","volume":"11","author":"Babalola","journal-title":"Front Robot AI"},{"issue":"9","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/children10091511","article-title":"Perspectives of healthcare providers to inform the design of an AI-enhanced social robot in the pediatric emergency department","volume":"10","author":"Hudson","journal-title":"Children (Basel)"},{"issue":"3","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.2307\/30036540","article-title":"User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view","volume":"27","author":"Venkatesh","journal-title":"MIS Q"},{"issue":"1","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.2307\/41410412","article-title":"Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology","volume":"36","author":"Venkatesh","journal-title":"MIS Q"},{"issue":"1","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12912-024-02336-7","article-title":"Are nurses and patients willing to work with service robots in healthcare? A mixed-methods study","volume":"23","author":"El-Gazar","journal-title":"BMC Nurs"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/65567","article-title":"Trust and acceptance challenges in the adoption of AI applications in health care: quantitative survey analysis","volume":"27","author":"Kauttonen","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2059799117703118","article-title":"Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies","volume":"10","author":"Moseholm","journal-title":"Methodol Innov"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/96800","article-title":"Effectiveness of socially assistive robots in promoting positive emotional responses and alleviating postoperative pain among children: quantitative study","volume":"28","author":"Hsu","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cannavacciuolo L Rippa P Caputo S . User acceptance of healthcare robots through extended UTAUT2: a mixed method approach. Res Sq. Preprint posted online on Dec 6, 2022. [doi: 10.21203\/rs.3.rs-2326113\/v1]","DOI":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-2326113\/v1"},{"issue":"21","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4651","DOI":"10.3390\/app9214651","article-title":"Expectation vs. reality: attitudes towards a socially assistive robot in cardiac rehabilitation","volume":"9","author":"Casas","journal-title":"Appl Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/brainsci11060738","article-title":"A survey on socially assistive robotics: clinicians\u2019 and patients\u2019 perception of a social robot within gait rehabilitation therapies","volume":"11","author":"Raigoso","journal-title":"Brain Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1007\/s00038-012-0416-3","article-title":"The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?","volume":"58","author":"Eisinga","journal-title":"Int J Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s11747-014-0403-8","article-title":"A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling","volume":"43","author":"Henseler","journal-title":"J of the Acad Mark Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1177\/1094428104263675","article-title":"Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: a tutorial on parallel analysis","volume":"7","author":"Hayton","journal-title":"Organ Res Methods"},{"issue":"2","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.3758\/bf03193146","article-title":"G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences","volume":"39","author":"Faul","journal-title":"Behav Res Methods"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen J . Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1988. [doi: 10.4324\/9780203771587]","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203771587"},{"issue":"2","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","author":"Braun","journal-title":"Qual Res Psychol"},{"key":"R23","unstructured":"Lincoln YS Guba EG . Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications; 1985. URL: https:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/title\/naturalistic-inquiry\/oclc\/11399879 [Accessed 06-10-2026]"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pedn.2025.01.032","article-title":"Effectiveness of social robots in improving psychological well-being of hospitalised children: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"82","author":"Or","journal-title":"J Pediatr Nurs"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2019.07.014","article-title":"Trust in socially assistive robots: considerations for use in rehabilitation","volume":"104","author":"Langer","journal-title":"Neurosci Biobehav Rev"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/20556683241284765","article-title":"Implementation of socially assistive robots in geriatric care institutions: Healthcare professionals\u2019 perspectives and identification of facilitating factors and barriers","volume":"11","author":"Rigaud","journal-title":"J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng"},{"key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269","article-title":"The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): a systematic literature review and theory evaluation","volume":"57","author":"Tamilmani","journal-title":"Int J Inf Manage"},{"key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/64524","article-title":"Determinants of health care technology adoption using an integrated Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and task technology fit model: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"Thanthrige","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/CIN.0000000000001499","article-title":"Views of pediatric nurses on the use of artificial intelligence-supported social robots in pediatric clinics: a qualitative study","author":"Din\u00e7","journal-title":"Comput Inform Nurs"},{"issue":"6","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/15154","article-title":"Artificial intelligence and human trust in healthcare: focus on clinicians","volume":"22","author":"Asan","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocab238","article-title":"Trust in AI: why we should be designing for appropriate reliance","volume":"29","author":"Benda","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"11","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.8775","article-title":"Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies","volume":"19","author":"Greenhalgh","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/14792772143000003","article-title":"Intention\u2014behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review","volume":"12","author":"Sheeran","journal-title":"Eur Rev Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"5","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.88.5.879","article-title":"Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies","volume":"88","author":"Podsakoff","journal-title":"J Appl Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1177\/1094428109351241","article-title":"Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects","volume":"13","author":"Siemsen","journal-title":"Organ Res Methods"},{"key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Willis GB . Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications; 2005. [doi: 10.4135\/9781412983655]","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412983655"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Internet Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T18:56:38Z","timestamp":1792090598000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e105501"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]]},"references-count":36,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/105501","relation":{},"ISSN":["1438-8871"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1438-8871","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]]},"article-number":"v28i2e105501"}}