{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T14:55:09Z","timestamp":1791903309275,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Form Res"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Discharge summaries (DSs) are key clinical documents at the interface between inpatient and outpatient care. Their quality affects continuity of care, coordination, and patient safety, yet information transfer at discharge is often incomplete, delayed, or unclear. Standardized instruments for assessing DS quality remain scarce.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This study aimed to develop a structured, recipient-oriented quality assessment instrument (QAI) for physician DS as a pragmatic measure of discharge communication quality and to conduct an initial evaluation of its applicability and interrater reliability.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n We conducted a formative instrument development study using a structured, iterative author panel consensus process informed by Delphi principles, condensing 43 recipient-oriented DS criteria into 12 items across 3 domains: medical content, structure and organization, and language and clarity. It was applied in a pragmatic pilot reliability evaluation to 20 anonymized internal medicine DSs, independently assessed by 5 physician raters with heterogeneous clinical backgrounds who were not involved in QAI development. Interrater reliability was evaluated using Krippendorff alpha and quadratically weighted Gwet agreement coefficient 2 (AC2). Reporting followed the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n The median overall quality score was 78.5% (IQR 75.3%-82.5%), and the mean was 79.1% (SD 5.0%). Scores were highest for language and clarity and lowest for medical content. Overall interrater reliability differed by coefficient: Krippendorff \u03b1 was 0.45 (95% CI 0.34-0.55) whereas Gwet AC2 was 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.80). The largest discrepancy was observed for language and clarity, with an \u03b1 of 0.02 (95% CI \u22120.06 to 0.10) and an AC2 of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n The QAI provides preliminary evidence for a clinically applicable approach to assessing key quality dimensions of physician DS. Interrater reliability varied across domains and reliability coefficients, with a marked discrepancy between AC2 and Krippendorff alpha for language and clarity. These findings support its use for exploratory quality improvement and future validation.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/105705","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T14:42:28Z","timestamp":1791902548000},"page":"e105705-e105705","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Quality Assessment of Physician Discharge Summaries: Instrument Development and Reliability Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-2812-8684","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Leopold","family":"Bentheim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3322-3724","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Leonard","family":"Fehring","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9671-5235","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hendrik","family":"Friederichs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9592-3881","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samer","family":"Zawy Alsofy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2841-9076","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Markus","family":"Unnewehr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"8","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.297.8.831","article-title":"Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care","volume":"297","author":"Kripalani","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e25","DOI":"10.1097\/PTS.0000000000000248","article-title":"Information transfer at hospital discharge: a systematic review","volume":"16","author":"Kattel","journal-title":"J Patient Saf"},{"issue":"1","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2011.01772.x","article-title":"Timeliness in discharge summary dissemination is associated with patients\u2019 clinical outcomes","volume":"19","author":"Li","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"},{"issue":"1","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-06345-z","article-title":"What makes a \u201csuccessful\u201d or \u201cunsuccessful\u201d discharge letter? Hospital clinician and general practitioner assessments of the quality of discharge letters","volume":"21","author":"Weetman","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1002\/jhm.2021","article-title":"Comprehensive quality of discharge summaries at an academic medical center","volume":"8","author":"Horwitz","journal-title":"J Hosp Med"},{"key":"R6","unstructured":"Kind AJ Smith MA . Documentation of mandated discharge summary components in transitions from acute to subacute care. In: Henriksen K Battles JB Keyes MA Grady ML , editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008."},{"issue":"6","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1387","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-025-09395-9","article-title":"Diagnosis documentation done right: cross-specialty standard for the diagnosis section in German discharge summaries - a mixed-methods study","volume":"40","author":"Frings","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-010-1465-z","article-title":"The effect of workload reduction on the quality of residents\u2019 discharge summaries","volume":"26","author":"Coit","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1097\/PTS.0000000000000809","article-title":"Optimizing discharge summaries: a multispecialty, multicenter survey of primary care clinicians","volume":"18","author":"Silver","journal-title":"J Patient Saf"},{"issue":"1","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13690-025-01582-8","article-title":"What do readers need? Qualitative requirements of medical discharge summaries from the recipients\u2019 perspective","volume":"83","author":"Unnewehr","journal-title":"Arch Public Health"},{"issue":"8","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1438","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-023-08541-5","article-title":"Primary care physicians\u2019 perspectives on high-quality discharge summaries","volume":"39","author":"Chatterton","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1002\/jhm.425","article-title":"Creating a better discharge summary: improvement in quality and timeliness using an electronic discharge summary","volume":"4","author":"O\u2019Leary","journal-title":"J Hosp Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1177\/1062860605281078","article-title":"Assessing quality and efficiency of discharge summaries","volume":"20","author":"Rao","journal-title":"Am J Med Qual"},{"issue":"2","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.4338\/aci-2011-11-ra-0070","article-title":"Assessing electronic note quality using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9)","volume":"3","author":"Stetson","journal-title":"Appl Clin Inform"},{"issue":"4","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0000000000001450","article-title":"The development and evaluation of a novel instrument assessing residents\u2019 discharge summaries","volume":"92","author":"Hommos","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R16","first-page":"57","volume":"46","author":"Mahfouz","journal-title":"Aust Fam Physician"},{"issue":"2","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.4103\/jfmpc.jfmpc_407_16","article-title":"Development of a quality scoring tool to assess quality of discharge summaries","volume":"7","author":"Savvopoulos","journal-title":"J Family Med Prim Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002","article-title":"Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed","volume":"64","author":"Kottner","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.7275\/svg4-e671","article-title":"A practical guide to instrument development and score validation in the social sciences: the MEASURE approach","volume":"26","author":"Kalkbrenner","journal-title":"Pract Assess Res Eval"},{"issue":"1","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41155-016-0057-1","article-title":"Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices","volume":"30","author":"Morgado","journal-title":"Psicol Reflex Crit"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1891\/JNM-D-19-00020","article-title":"A practical guide for item generation in measure development: insights from the development of a patient-reported experience measure of compassion","author":"Sinclair","journal-title":"J Nurs Meas"},{"issue":"5","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s10459-010-9222-y","article-title":"Likert scales, levels of measurement and the \u201claws\u201d of statistics","volume":"15","author":"Norman","journal-title":"Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract"},{"issue":"Pt 1","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1348\/000711006X126600","article-title":"Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement","volume":"61","author":"Gwet","journal-title":"Br J Math Stat Psychol"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krippendorff K . Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2019. [doi: 10.4135\/9781071878781]","DOI":"10.4135\/9781071878781"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-10-22","article-title":"The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content","volume":"10","author":"Mokkink","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"5","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-1829-0","article-title":"COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study","volume":"27","author":"Terwee","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-020-01179-5","article-title":"COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study","volume":"20","author":"Mokkink","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"6","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(90)90158-l","article-title":"High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes","volume":"43","author":"Feinstein","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"8","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00008","article-title":"Interventions to reduce 30-day rehospitalization: a systematic review","volume":"155","author":"Hansen","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2002.10741.x","article-title":"Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission","volume":"17","author":"van Walraven","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"}],"container-title":["JMIR Formative Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T14:42:29Z","timestamp":1791902549000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/formative.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e105705"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]]},"references-count":30,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/105705","relation":{},"ISSN":["2561-326X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2561-326X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]]},"article-number":"v10i8e105705"}}