{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T00:45:35Z","timestamp":1785545135612,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Med Educ"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Mentoring, advising, and coaching are essential components of resident education and professional development. Despite their importance, there is limited literature exploring how anesthesiology faculty perceive these practices and their role in supporting residents.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aims to investigate anesthesiology faculty perspectives on the significance, implantation strategies, and challenges associated with mentorship, advising, and coaching in resident education.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A comprehensive survey was administrated to 93 anesthesiology faculty members at Washington University School of Medicine. The survey incorporated quantitative Likert-scale questions and qualitative short-answer responses to assess faculty perceptions of the value, preferred formats, essential skills, and capacity for fulfilling multiple roles in these support practices. Additional areas of focus included the impact of staffing shortages, training requirements, and the potential of these practices to enhance faculty recruitment and retention.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The response rate was 44% (n=41). Mentoring was identified as the most important aspect, with 88% (n=36) of faculty respondents indicating its significance, followed by coaching, which was highlighted by 78% (n=32) of respondents. The majority felt 1 faculty member can effectively hold multiple roles for a given trainee. The respondents desired additional training for roles and found roles to be rewarding. All roles were seen as facilitating recruitment and retention. Barriers included faculty burnout; confusion between roles; time constraints; and desire for specialized training, especially in coaching skills.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Implementing structured mentoring, advising, and coaching can profoundly impact resident education but requires role clarity, protected time, culture change, leadership buy-in, and faculty development. Targeted training and operational investments could enable programs to actualize immense benefits from high-quality resident support modalities. Respondents emphasized that resident needs evolve over time, necessitating flexibility in appropriate faculty guidance. While coaching demands unique skills, advising hinges on expertise and mentoring depends on relationship-building. Systematic frameworks of coaching, mentoring, and advising programs could unlock immense potential. However, realizing this vision demands surmounting barriers such as burnout, productivity pressures, confusion about logistics, and culture change. Ultimately, prioritizing resident support through high-quality personalized guidance can recenter graduate medical education.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/60255","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,3]],"date-time":"2024-12-03T10:52:39Z","timestamp":1733223159000},"page":"e60255-e60255","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Faculty Perceptions on the Roles of Mentoring, Advising, and Coaching in an Anesthesiology Residency Program: Mixed Methods Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-8273-2068","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sydney","family":"Nykiel-Bailey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8172-4606","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kathryn","family":"Burrows","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-3550-5813","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bianca E","family":"Szafarowicz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-4196-1770","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rachel","family":"Moquin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"18","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare11182533","article-title":"Factors associated with burnout in medical staff: a look back at the role of the COVID-19 pandemic","volume":"11","author":"\u021a\u0103ranu","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"key":"R2","unstructured":"GlobalData Plc. The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2019 to 2034. AAMC; 2024."},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2382120519884325","article-title":"Several ways generation Z may shape the medical school landscape","volume":"6","author":"Plochocki","journal-title":"J Med Educ Curric Dev"},{"issue":"11","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2602","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-019-05256-4","article-title":"Mentorship of US medical students: a systematic review","volume":"34","author":"Farkas","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.4300\/JGME-D-18-00111.1","article-title":"Choosing when to advise, coach, or mentor","volume":"10","author":"Marcdante","journal-title":"J Grad Med Educ"},{"key":"R6","unstructured":"Deiorio NM Hammoud MM . Coaching in medical education: accelerating change in medical education consortium. AMA; 2024."},{"issue":"7","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-016-0649-3","article-title":"A qualitative study exploring mentorship in anesthesiology: perspectives from both sides of the relationship","volume":"63","author":"Alisic","journal-title":"Can J Anesth\/J Can Anesth"},{"issue":"7","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.27356","article-title":"Defining advising, coaching, and mentoring for student development in medical education","volume":"14","author":"Santiesteban","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"10","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1080\/0142159X.2021.1947479","article-title":"Beyond advising and mentoring: competencies for coaching in medical education","volume":"43","author":"Wolff","journal-title":"Med Teach"},{"issue":"1","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-011-1892-5","article-title":"Mentorship, productivity, and promotion among academic hospitalists","volume":"27","author":"Reid","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1098","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-019-04937-4","article-title":"Perceptions of junior faculty in general internal medicine regarding mentoring medical students and residents in scholarly projects","volume":"34","author":"Jha","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.7275\/ryr5-k983","article-title":"A beginner\u2019s guide to applied educational research using thematic analysis","volume":"25","author":"Peel","journal-title":"Pract Assess Res Eval"},{"key":"R13","unstructured":"Patton M . Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage; 2015."}],"container-title":["JMIR Medical Education"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/mededu.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e60255","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T22:31:57Z","timestamp":1785537117000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/mededu.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e60255"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,21]]},"references-count":13,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/60255","relation":{},"ISSN":["2369-3762"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2369-3762","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,21]]},"article-number":"v11i18e60255"}}