{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T16:33:47Z","timestamp":1789576427133,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Cancer"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The relationship between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and childhood cancer risk has been widely debated. Previous meta-analyses did not adequately account for the impact of infertility, and this study addresses this gap.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our primary objective was to assess the relative risk (RR) of childhood cancer in infertile populations using ART versus non-ART offspring, with a secondary focus on comparing frozen embryo transfer (FET) and fresh embryo transfer (fresh-ET).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A literature review was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with a cutoff date of July 10, 2024. The study was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY 202470119). Inclusion criteria were based on the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Design) framework: infertile or subfertile couples (population), ART interventions (in vitro fertilization [IVF], intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI], FET, and fresh-ET), non-ART comparison, and childhood cancer risk outcomes. Data abstraction focused on the primary exposures (ART vs non-ART and FET vs fresh-ET) and outcomes (childhood cancer risk). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and the evidence quality was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Pooled estimates and 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 18 studies were included, published between 2000 and 2024, consisting of 14 (78%) cohort studies and 4 (22%) case-control studies, all of which were of moderate to high quality. The cohort studies had follow-up periods ranging from 3 to 18 years. Compared with non-ART conception, ART conception was not significantly associated with an increased risk of childhood overall cancer (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71\u20101.27; GRADE quality: low to moderate). Subgroup analyses of IVF (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.59\u20101.25), ICSI (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.26\u20102.2), FET (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.54\u20101.76), and fresh-ET (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49\u20101.15) showed similar findings. No significant differences were found for specific childhood cancers, including leukemia (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79\u20101.24), lymphoma (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.64\u20102.34), brain cancer (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.73\u20102.05), embryonal tumors (RR 1, 95% CI 0.63\u20101.58), retinoblastoma (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.73\u20102.31), and neuroblastoma (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.48\u20102.16). Additionally, no significant difference was observed in a head-to-head comparison of FET versus fresh-ET (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86\u20101.14; GRADE quality: moderate).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In conclusion, this study found no significant difference in the risk of childhood cancer between offspring conceived through ART and those conceived through non-ART treatments (such as fertility drugs or intrauterine insemination) in infertile populations. While infertility treatments may elevate baseline risks, our findings suggest that whether individuals with infertility conceive using ART or non-ART methods, their offspring do not face a significantly higher risk of childhood cancer. Further research, especially comparing infertile populations who conceive naturally, is needed to better understand potential long-term health outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/65820","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,27]],"date-time":"2025-01-27T13:38:39Z","timestamp":1737985119000},"page":"e65820-e65820","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Assisted Reproductive Technology and Risk of Childhood Cancer Among the Offspring of Parents With Infertility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0998-8791","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gao","family":"Song","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-5871-4681","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cai-qiong","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-8751-5204","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zhong-ping","family":"Bai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-9290-2402","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rong","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8612-8106","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Meng-qun","family":"Cheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-023-01339-0","article-title":"The long-term outcome of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology","volume":"31","author":"Ono","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/rmb2.12358","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2018 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"20","author":"Ishihara","journal-title":"Reprod Med Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.4788","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of infertility: a review","volume":"326","author":"Carson","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.04.022","article-title":"Long-term outcomes for children conceived by assisted reproductive technology","volume":"120","author":"Pinborg","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmz001","article-title":"The health of children conceived by ART: \u201cthe chicken or the egg?\u201d","volume":"25","author":"Berntsen","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"1","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1111\/dmcn.15332","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology: short\u2010 and long\u2010term outcomes","volume":"65","author":"Graham","journal-title":"Develop Med Child Neuro"},{"issue":"4","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xfnr.2022.06.003","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology or infertility: what underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology","volume":"3","author":"Stern","journal-title":"F S Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-023-02988-5","article-title":"Long-term health risk of offspring born from assisted reproductive technologies","volume":"41","author":"Zhang","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"9","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6602838","article-title":"Meta-analysis of cancer incidence in children born after assisted reproductive technologies","volume":"93","author":"Raimondi","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.03.017","article-title":"Fertility treatment and childhood cancer risk: a systematic meta-analysis","volume":"100","author":"Hargreave","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.canep.2019.101613","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pediatric cancer: a population based study and a systematic review and meta analysis","volume":"63","author":"Gilboa","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3001","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.32062","article-title":"Cancer risk among children conceived by fertility treatment","volume":"144","author":"Wang","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2020.08.001","article-title":"The association between fertility treatments and the incidence of paediatric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"138","author":"Zhang","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.3390\/j2040028","article-title":"Cancer risk in children and young adults (offspring) born after medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"2","author":"Chiavarini","journal-title":"J"},{"issue":"11","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2672","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac196","article-title":"The risks of birth defects and childhood cancer with conception by assisted reproductive technology","volume":"37","author":"Luke","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.9429","article-title":"Medically assisted reproduction and risk of cancer among offspring","volume":"7","author":"Rios","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad027","article-title":"Cancer risk in children, adolescents, and young adults conceived by ART in 1983\u20132011","volume":"2023","author":"Spaan","journal-title":"Human Reproduction Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.015","article-title":"Fertility treatments and pediatric neoplasms of the offspring: results of a population-based cohort with a median follow-up of 10 years","volume":"216","author":"Wainstock","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2022.30157","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology and risk of childhood cancers","volume":"5","author":"Weng","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"22","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2203","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2019.18037","article-title":"Association between fertility treatment and cancer risk in children","volume":"322","author":"Hargreave","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"9","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004078","article-title":"Cancer in children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a cohort study","volume":"19","author":"Sargisian","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2899","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac211","article-title":"Health of singletons born after frozen embryo transfer until early adulthood: a Finnish register study","volume":"37","author":"Terho","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arr.2022.101762","article-title":"Association of kidney function and brain health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies","volume":"82","author":"Tang","journal-title":"Ageing Res Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"issue":"7","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003","article-title":"GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation\u2014determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength","volume":"66","author":"Andrews","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.3.604","article-title":"Incidence of cancer in children born after in-vitro fertilization","volume":"15","author":"Bruinsma","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.12.013","article-title":"Possible association between in vitro fertilization technologies and offspring neoplasm","volume":"116","author":"Bal","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.05.091","article-title":"Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995-2006","volume":"94","author":"Pinborg","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2019.0392","article-title":"Association of in vitro fertilization with childhood cancer in the United States","volume":"173","author":"Spector","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"issue":"9","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2050","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu143","article-title":"Cancer in children and young adults born after assisted reproductive technology: a Nordic cohort study from the Committee of Nordic ART and Safety (CoNARTaS)","volume":"29","author":"Sundh","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"19","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1819","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1301675","article-title":"Cancer risk among children born after assisted conception","volume":"369","author":"Williams","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2186","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des149","article-title":"Are children born after infertility treatment at increased risk of retinoblastoma?","volume":"27","author":"Foix-L\u2019H\u00e9lias","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1002\/pbc.24192","article-title":"Fertility treatments, congenital malformations, fetal loss, and childhood acute leukemia: the ESCALE study (SFCE)","volume":"60","author":"Rudant","journal-title":"Pediatr Blood Cancer"},{"issue":"10","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1283","DOI":"10.1007\/s10552-014-0429-8","article-title":"Maternal reproductive history, fertility treatments and folic acid supplementation in the risk of childhood acute leukemia: the ESTELLE study","volume":"25","author":"Ajrouche","journal-title":"Cancer Causes Control"},{"issue":"10","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2315","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.23301","article-title":"Birth-related characteristics, congenital malformation, maternal reproductive history and neuroblastoma: the ESCALE study (SFCE)","volume":"122","author":"Munzer","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"issue":"8","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5748","DOI":"10.3390\/curroncol29080453","article-title":"The use of assisted reproductive technology by European childhood cancer survivors","volume":"29","author":"Borgmann-Staudt","journal-title":"Curr Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.11.012","article-title":"Hospitalizations up to 8 years following delivery in assisted reproductive technology-treated and subfertile women","volume":"117","author":"Farland","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1017\/S2040174417000228","article-title":"The health outcomes of human offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART)","volume":"8","author":"Chen","journal-title":"J Dev Orig Health Dis"},{"issue":"9","key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2476","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem172","article-title":"Infertility, assisted reproduction technologies and imprinting disturbances: a Dutch study","volume":"22","author":"Doornbos","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1136\/jmg.2004.026930","article-title":"Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples","volume":"42","author":"Ludwig","journal-title":"J Med Genet"},{"issue":"4","key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1086\/382897","article-title":"Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation","volume":"74","author":"Niemitz","journal-title":"Am J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"7","key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1588","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew082","article-title":"International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010","volume":"31","author":"Dyer","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1957","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex264","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE","volume":"32","author":"Calhaz-Jorge","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"3","key":"R45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa032","article-title":"ART in Europe, 2016: results generated from European registries by ESHRE","volume":"2020","author":"European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"R46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"914","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep477","article-title":"Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995-2006","volume":"25","author":"Pelkonen","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"R47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx031","article-title":"Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?","volume":"24","author":"Maheshwari","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"2","key":"R48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.10.019","article-title":"Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis","volume":"109","author":"Sha","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"R49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1083","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa304","article-title":"High birth weight and large-for-gestational-age in singletons born after frozen compared to fresh embryo transfer, by gestational week: a Nordic register study from the CoNARTaS group","volume":"36","author":"Terho","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"R50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"302","author":"Elias","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"R51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2015-2061","article-title":"Risk of cancer in children conceived by assisted reproductive technology","volume":"137","author":"Reigstad","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"R52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoab026","article-title":"ART in Europe, 2017: results generated from European registries by ESHRE","volume":"2021","author":"European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"R53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0080398","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes by mode of assisted conception and sub-fertility in an Australian data linkage cohort","volume":"9","author":"Marino","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"4","key":"R54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/pbc.26292","article-title":"Possible risk for cancer among children born following assisted reproductive technology in Israel","volume":"64","author":"Lerner-Geva","journal-title":"Pediatr Blood Cancer"},{"key":"R55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jare.2022.06.001","article-title":"Global, regional, and national childhood cancer burden, 1990\u20132019: an analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019","volume":"40","author":"Wu","journal-title":"J Adv Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"R56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.1002\/pbc.23194","article-title":"In vitro fertilization and risk of childhood leukemia in Greece and Sweden","volume":"58","author":"Petridou","journal-title":"Pediatr Blood Cancer"},{"issue":"9304","key":"R57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)07605-5","article-title":"Case-control studies: research in reverse","volume":"359","author":"Schulz","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["JMIR Cancer"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/cancer.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e65820","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T22:29:20Z","timestamp":1785536960000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/cancer.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e65820"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,12]]},"references-count":57,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/65820","relation":{},"ISSN":["2369-1999"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2369-1999","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,12]]},"article-number":"v11i3e65820"}}