{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T00:44:39Z","timestamp":1785545079657,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Form Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent problem causing substantial personal and societal burden. Although there are specific types of LBP, each with evidence-based treatment recommendations, most patients receive a nonspecific diagnosis that does not facilitate evidence-based and individualized care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objectives\">\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We designed, developed, and initially tested the usability of a LBP diagnosis and treatment decision support tool based on the available evidence for use by clinicians who treat LBP, with an initial focus on chiropractic care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our 3-step user-centered design approach consisted of identifying clinical requirements through the analysis of evidence reviews, iteratively identifying task-based user requirements and developing a working web-based prototype, and evaluating usability through scenario-based interviews and the System Usability Scale.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The 5 participating users had an average of 18.5 years of practicing chiropractic medicine. Clinical requirements included 44 patient interview and examination items. Of these, 13 interview items were enabled for all patients and 13 were enabled conditional on other input items. One examination item was enabled for all patients and 16 were enabled conditional on other items. One item was a synthesis of interview and examination items. These items provided evidence of 12 possible working diagnoses of which 3 were macrodiagnoses and 9 were microdiagnoses. Each diagnosis had relevant treatment recommendations and corresponding patient educational materials. User requirements focused on tasks related to inputting data, and reviewing and selecting working diagnoses, treatments, and patient education. User input led to key refinements in the design, such as organizing the input questions by microdiagnosis, adding a patient summary screen that persists during data input and when reviewing output, adding more information buttons and graphics to input questions, and providing traceability by highlighting the input items used by the clinical logic to suggest a working diagnosis. Users believed that it would be important to have the tool accessible from within an electronic health record for adoption within their workflows. The System Usability Scale score for the prototype was 84.75 (range: 67.5\u201095), considered as the top 10th percentile. Users believed that the tool was easy to use although it would require training and practice on the clinical content to use it effectively. With such training and practice, users believed that it would improve care and shed light on the \u201cblack hole\u201d of LBP diagnosis and treatment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our systematic process of defining clinical requirements and eliciting user requirements to inform a clinician-facing decision support tool produced a prototype application that was viewed positively and with enthusiasm by clinical users. With further planned development, this tool has the potential to guide clinical evaluation, inform more specific diagnosis, and encourage patient education and individualized treatment planning for patients with LBP through the application of evidence at the point of care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/66666","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,3]],"date-time":"2024-12-03T04:06:16Z","timestamp":1733198776000},"page":"e66666-e66666","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Addressing the \u201cBlack Hole\u201d of Low Back Pain Care With Clinical Decision Support: User-Centered Design and Initial Usability Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"9","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9172-5506","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert S","family":"Rudin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5579-5654","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Patricia M","family":"Herman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4672-4613","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Vining","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10137","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2356","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)30480-X","article-title":"What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention","volume":"391","author":"Hartvigsen","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2018.07.006","article-title":"Prevalence and profile of high-impact chronic pain in the United States","volume":"20","author":"Pitcher","journal-title":"J Pain"},{"issue":"24","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1443","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003174","article-title":"Personal and societal impact of low back pain: the Groningen spine cohort","volume":"44","author":"Dutmer","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"6","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.21037\/atm.2020.02.175","article-title":"Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017","volume":"8","author":"Wu","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2020.04.001","article-title":"A systematic review of the incidence, prevalence, costs, and activity and work limitations of amputation, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, back pain, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, stroke, and traumatic brain injury in the United States: a 2019 update","volume":"102","author":"Lo","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"9","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.0734","article-title":"US health care spending by payer and health condition, 1996-2016","volume":"323","author":"Dieleman","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"10070","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)30970-9","article-title":"Non-specific low back pain","volume":"389","author":"Maher","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"16","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4677","DOI":"10.3390\/JCM13164677\/S1","article-title":"Sensory profiles predict symptoms of central sensitization in low back pain: a predictive model research study","volume":"13","author":"Gr\u00e4per","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmpt.2019.08.002","article-title":"Current evidence for diagnosis of common conditions causing low back pain: systematic review and standardized terminology recommendations","volume":"42","author":"Vining","journal-title":"J Manipulative Physiol Ther"},{"issue":"12","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2749","DOI":"10.1097\/j.pain.0000000000002975","article-title":"\u201cI felt uncertain about my whole future\u201d-a qualitative investigation of people\u2019s experiences of navigating uncertainty when seeking care for their low back pain","volume":"164","author":"Costa","journal-title":"Pain"},{"issue":"3","key":"R11","first-page":"189","volume":"57","author":"Vining","journal-title":"J Can Chiropr Assoc"},{"issue":"9","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmpt.2019.08.003","article-title":"Development of an evidence-based practical diagnostic checklist and corresponding clinical exam for low back pain","volume":"42","author":"Vining","journal-title":"J Manipulative Physiol Ther"},{"issue":"9","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmpt.2019.03.009","article-title":"Development of a clinical decision aid for chiropractic management of common conditions causing low back pain in veterans: results of a consensus process","volume":"42","author":"Vining","journal-title":"J Manipulative Physiol Ther"},{"key":"R14","unstructured":"ISO. ISO 9241-210:2019 \u2014Ergonomics of human-system interaction \u2014 part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. 2019. URL: https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/77520.html [Accessed 25-06-2024]"},{"issue":"7494","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38398.500764.8F","article-title":"Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success","volume":"330","author":"Kawamoto","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732305276687","article-title":"Three approaches to qualitative content analysis","volume":"15","author":"Hsieh","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-13-117","article-title":"Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research","volume":"13","author":"Gale","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"6","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1080\/10447310802205776","article-title":"An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale","volume":"24","author":"Bangor","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Interact"},{"key":"R19","unstructured":"Measuring U. Measuring usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS). 2011. URL: https:\/\/measuringu.com\/sus\/ [Accessed 13-08-2024]"},{"issue":"5","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/17203","article-title":"An electronic clinical decision support system for the management of low back pain in community pharmacy: development and mixed methods feasibility study","volume":"8","author":"Downie","journal-title":"JMIR Med Inform"},{"key":"R21","unstructured":"ScreenLC. Lung cancer screening risk calculator. URL: https:\/\/screenlc.com\/dpp-vue\/index.html [Accessed 03-09-2024]"},{"key":"R22","unstructured":"FRAX. Fracture risk assessment tool. URL: https:\/\/frax.shef.ac.uk\/FRAX\/tool.aspx [Accessed 03-09-2024]"},{"issue":"4","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.14180","article-title":"Identifying facilitators and inhibitors of shared understanding: an ethnography of diagnosis communication in acute medical settings","volume":"27","author":"Cox","journal-title":"Health Expect"},{"issue":"4","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1111\/tct.12444","article-title":"Heuristic errors in clinical reasoning","volume":"13","author":"Rylander","journal-title":"Clin Teach"},{"key":"R25","unstructured":"Nielsen Norman Group. Why you only need to test with 5 users. Mar18, 2000. URL: https:\/\/www.nngroup.com\/articles\/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users\/ [Accessed 19-11-2024]"},{"issue":"4","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1177\/001872089203400407","article-title":"Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough?","volume":"34","author":"Virzi","journal-title":"Hum Factors"},{"issue":"1","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/47718","article-title":"Developing an audit and feedback dashboard for family physicians: user-centered design process","volume":"10","author":"Shuldiner","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"key":"R28","unstructured":"NBCE. Practice analysis of chiropractic 2020\u2014NBCE survey analysis. 2020. URL: https:\/\/www.nbce.org\/practice-analysis-of-chiropractic-2020\/ [Accessed 03-09-2024]"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"King D . Diagnosis. Oxford University Press; 2015. [doi: 10.1093\/ACREFORE\/9780199381135.013.2138]","DOI":"10.1093\/acrefore\/9780199381135.013.2138"},{"issue":"5","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0303669","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of ultrasound-based artificial intelligence for predicting key molecular markers in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Fu","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"8","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2024.04.009","article-title":"Artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy in fracture detection from plain radiographs and comparing it with clinicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"79","author":"Nowroozi","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"}],"container-title":["JMIR Formative Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/formative.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e66666","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T22:28:36Z","timestamp":1785536916000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/formative.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e66666"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]]},"references-count":31,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/66666","relation":{},"ISSN":["2561-326X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2561-326X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]]},"article-number":"v9i10137e66666"}}