{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T18:58:06Z","timestamp":1782845886193,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Serious Games"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The traditional self-report instruments (eg, scales) used to measure antisocial personality traits are characterized by social desirability bias and fail to capture multidimensional behaviors (eg, manipulation and deception).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aimed to develop and validate an evidence-based design for a gamified assessment tool (Antisocial Personality Traits Evidence-Centered Design Gamified assessment tool; ASP-ECD-G) to measure 7 antisocial personality traits (manipulative, callous, deceptive, hostile, risk taking, impulsive, and irresponsible) as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This research featured a 3-phase evidence-centered design framework. Ontology development (study 1): semistructured interviews were conducted with 9 workplace professionals to translate the DSM-5 criteria into 24 observable workplace behaviors, which were integrated into a text-based game featuring 10 subscenarios, 34 interactive questions, and logic rooted in logical jumps to simulate real-world decision-making. Model construction (study 2): 6 machine learning models were trained by reference to a set of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form scores (n=286). The gated recurrent unit model, which uses 1-hot encoding to address nominal response data, was evaluated in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error, criterion correlation (r), and test-retest reliability. Retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients based on 10 participants (1-month interval). Empirical validation (study 3): a 2\u00d72 mixed design (n=148) was used to compare the gamified assessment with questionnaires under conditions involving incentives (ie, situations in which \u201crational results\u201d led to increased payments).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>For model performance, the gated recurrent unit outperformed the alternatives, as indicated by the highest criterion correlation (r=0.850) and the lowest test RMSE (0.273); in particular, it excelled in moderate score ranges (1.5-3, RMSE\u22640.377) and in resisting extreme value distortions (3.5-4, RMSE 0.854). Retest reliability was moderate to strong (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.776, P=.02). For validation findings, the gamified assessment was associated with higher levels of immersion (mean 7.628 vs 7.216; F147=14.259, P&lt;.001) and interest (mean 7.095 vs 6.155; F147=47.940, P&lt;.001), although it also elicited stronger negative emotions (mean 4.365 vs 2.473; F147=151.109, P&lt;.001). Incentives reduced questionnaire scores (incentivized: 2.066 vs control: 2.201; F1=5.740, P=.02) but had no effect on gamified scores (P=.71), confirming resistance to manipulation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>By integrating evidence-centered design with gamified workplace simulations, ASP-ECD-G can provide more objective and ecologically valid measurements of antisocial personality traits, thereby supporting both research and organizational practice.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Trial Registration<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries tvg6x; https:\/\/osf.io\/tvg6x<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/70453","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,2]],"date-time":"2025-07-02T07:30:08Z","timestamp":1751441408000},"page":"e70453","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["A Gamified Assessment Tool for Antisocial Personality Traits (Antisocial Personality Traits Evidence-Centered Design Gamified): Randomized Controlled Trial"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-1070-5449","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yaobin","family":"Tang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1013-6684","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yongze","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-4709-924X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Qunli","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5498-6464","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ran","family":"Bian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-2389.00162"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psychres.2003.12.001"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/256963"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0272-7358(94)90046-9"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/pas0000120"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000183"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-2389.00222"},{"key":"ref8","unstructured":"HareRDPsychopathy checklist\u2014revisedAPA PsycTests19912025-07-22https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ft01167-000"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0191-8869(80)90028-8"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ab.21536"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/cgames.2011.6000342"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/a0025741"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2181037.2181040"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref15","first-page":"17","volume":"17","author":"DiCerbo, KE","year":"2013","journal-title":"Educ Technol Soc"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/cpb.2007.0064"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/s15366359mea0101_04"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pse.2014.11.003"},{"key":"ref19","first-page":"503","author":"Shute, VJ","year":"2011","journal-title":"Computer Games and Instruction"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/iccmc51019.2021.9418384"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0003-066x.55.1.68"},{"key":"ref22","author":"Csikszent, M","year":"1991","journal-title":"Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1278738"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7554\/eLife.82954"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/NMD.0b013e3182a2168a"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40473-018-0142-0"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327957pspr0303_3"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0749-5978(02)00517-4"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.3554751"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/a0031311"}],"container-title":["JMIR Serious Games"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/games.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e70453","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T17:59:11Z","timestamp":1782842351000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/games.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e70453"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]]},"references-count":30,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/70453","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.2196\/preprints.70453","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2291-9279"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2291-9279","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]]}}}