{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T23:52:12Z","timestamp":1788479532380,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Serious Games"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are safe and effective long-acting reversible contraceptive therapies that are also used as minimally invasive treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, and early-stage endometrial cancer. Despite many advantages, IUDs are underused predominantly due to patient discomfort. Although many techniques have been explored previously in the literature, there is currently little consensus on effective analgesic strategies. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated moderate benefits in acute pain management and has been explored for outpatient hysteroscopy.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This study aims to explore the effectiveness of VR in improving patient pain and anxiety during outpatient IUD insertion.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n This randomized controlled trial compared the use of a VR headset to standard care during IUD insertion in the outpatient clinic setting. VR content was delivered via smartphone and headset, providing patients with a relaxing 3D video environment. Outcomes measured were patient-reported pain and anxiety, as well as satisfaction reported using a questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included clinician-reported ease of insertion and time required to complete the procedure.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n A total of 70 patients were recruited, with 34 randomized to the control group and 36 randomized to VR headset use. Patients with VR headsets reported a mean pain score of 5.5 (SD 3.2) during IUD insertion, which was not significantly different to 4.3 (SD 3.2) for the control group (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n =.15). Mean anxiety scores during the procedure were 4 (SD 3) in the VR group, compared to 4.8 (SD 3.5) in the control group, which was also not significantly different (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n =.37). Anxiety was the most significant predictor of pain, and this, in turn, significantly increased insertion time (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n <.001). Among patients who responded to and benefitted from VR use, baseline anxiety was significantly lower than in those who did not (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n <.001). Satisfaction with the use of VR headsets was overall high, and recommendation scores for the use of VR headsets were also high. There were no significant adverse effects experienced with the use of the intervention, with only 1 patient reporting nausea after IUD insertion.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n The use of VR headsets did not significantly alter the pain or anxiety experienced by patients during IUD insertion; however, satisfaction and recommendation that others use VR were high, which may suggest other benefits to their use. In addition, preprocedural anxiety appears to have a significant adverse impact on pain scores and the ability of patients to benefit from the VR headsets. This is an important contribution to the previously ambiguous data regarding VR use for gynecological procedures and highlights a new avenue for improving the patient experience.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/72917","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T09:40:06Z","timestamp":1748684406000},"page":"e72917-e72917","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Virtual Reality for Analgesia During Intrauterine Device Insertion: Randomized Controlled Trial"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3005-0984","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chloe","family":"Higgins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7996-3867","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Claudia","family":"Zecena Morales","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-2496-0367","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Judi","family":"Hocking","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2443-9045","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kate","family":"Tyson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-9495-5167","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cheryl","family":"Leung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7146-5978","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luke","family":"Larmour","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7409-9328","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paul","family":"Leong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8756-3994","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Beverley","family":"Vollenhoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2014.903238","article-title":"Analgesic options for placement of an intrauterine contraceptive: a meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Pergialiotis","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"13","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s40834-019-0094-0","article-title":"Intrauterine lidocaine and naproxen for analgesia during intrauterine device insertion: randomized controlled trial","volume":"4","author":"Miles","journal-title":"Contracept Reprod Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.01.005","article-title":"Intracervical lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"86","author":"Maguire","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6 Suppl","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.12.024","article-title":"Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception","volume":"75","author":"d\u2019Arcangues","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.07.018","article-title":"Fertility-preserving treatment for stage IA endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"231","author":"Suzuki","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.012","article-title":"Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial","volume":"91","author":"Bednarek","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16377","article-title":"Virtual reality for acute pain in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"128","author":"Deo","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2018.05.008","article-title":"Pain perception during levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a systematic review","volume":"31","author":"Anthoulakis","journal-title":"J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002242","article-title":"Reducing pain during intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial in adolescents and young women","volume":"130","author":"Akers","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"The UK medical eligibility for criteria for contraceptive use (UKMEC). The College of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. 2016. URL: https:\/\/www.fsrh.org\/Public\/Public\/Standards-and-Guidance\/uk-medical-eligibility-criteria-for-contraceptive-use-ukmec.aspx [Accessed 02-09-2025]","DOI":"10.12968\/indn.2016.13.16"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.09.019","article-title":"Verbal analgesia is as good as oral tramadol prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, among nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"258","author":"Daykan","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1177\/074880680502200104","article-title":"A study of time-dependent operating room fees and how to save $100 000 by using time-saving products","volume":"22","author":"Shippert","journal-title":"Am J Cosmet Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007373.pub3","article-title":"Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion","volume":"2015","author":"Lopez","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"11","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/17980","article-title":"The effectiveness of virtual reality in managing acute pain and anxiety for medical inpatients: systematic review","volume":"22","author":"Smith","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/JPR.S200498","article-title":"Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"12","author":"Mallari","journal-title":"J Pain Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102706","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2023.102706","article-title":"Effects of virtual reality on pain during intrauterine device insertions: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"53","author":"Benazzouz","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1177\/00369330241234688","article-title":"The effect of virtual reality glasses applied during intrauterine device insertion on pain, anxiety and satisfaction: randomized controlled study","volume":"69","author":"\u00d6z","journal-title":"Scott Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07319-8","article-title":"The effect of virtual reality on pain and anxiety management during outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"309","author":"Baradwan","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07261-9","article-title":"Pain and anxiety management with virtual reality for office hysteroscopy: systemic review and meta-analysis","volume":"309","author":"Cohen","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"7","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x","article-title":"Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales","volume":"14","author":"Williamson","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"issue":"3","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1002\/jcph.250","article-title":"Assessing pain intensity with the visual analog scale: a plea for uniformity","volume":"54","author":"Reed","journal-title":"J Clin Pharmacol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.2018.0068","article-title":"Chronic postoperative pain after robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer","volume":"35","author":"Lunde","journal-title":"J Gynecol Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2017.6546","article-title":"Impact of pelvic pain and endometriosis on patient-reported outcomes and experiences of benign hysterectomy: a study from the Swedish national register for gynecological surgery","volume":"27","author":"Grundstr\u00f6m","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"issue":"3","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.31083\/j.ceog.2020.03.2073","article-title":"A psychological factor associated with pain during intrauterine device insertion: emotional reactivity","volume":"47","author":"Akdemir","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["JMIR Serious Games"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/games.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e72917","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T18:03:22Z","timestamp":1782842602000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/games.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e72917"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,8]]},"references-count":24,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/72917","relation":{},"ISSN":["2291-9279"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2291-9279","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,8]]},"article-number":"v13i3e72917"}}