{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T18:02:23Z","timestamp":1789581743780,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Public Health Surveill"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Abortion is a common and safe medical intervention with a long history of practice in the United States. Despite this, inaccurate and misleading information persists, including falsehoods about the accessibility, legality, safety, and lived experience of abortion-related health care. Further, the prevalence and circulation of abortion myths online and offline have intensified following the overturning of Roe vs Wade in May 2022. While myths surrounding abortion have been widely documented, limited research has examined how these myths shape the everyday work of abortion health care providers and advocates, particularly in relation to patient\u2013practitioner shared decision-making (SDM).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study examines how abortion myths affect abortion health care professionals\u2014including practitioners in states where abortion access is legal, and advocates connecting patients with care in states with limited abortion health care. Through interviews with advocates and professionals, we document the nature of circulating myths, the common information sources where myths are being spread, and the routes professionals take to debunk myths when they arise, or, similarly, the barriers that limit their ability or desire to debunk abortion myths.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with abortion health care professionals across the WWAMI (Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho) medical region. Interviews explored the types of abortion myths encountered in clinical settings, how providers respond to misinformation during patient interactions, and the perceived impact of myths on care delivery and SDM processes. Data were analyzed using an iterative constant comparative thematic analysis of the interview transcripts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Participants reported encountering a wide range of abortion-related myths from predominantly online (social media) and some offline sources, including misinformation about safety, legality, fertility impacts, and procedural experiences. Providers described dedicating substantial time to correcting misinformation, addressing fear and confusion, and rebuilding trust within clinical encounters. Myths were found to complicate SDM by shaping patients\u2019 expectations, emotional responses, and perceived options for care, in addition to taking up time and resources for providers of care to counter damaging myths.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Abortion myths have tangible effects on clinical practice and SDM, placing additional communicative and emotional labor on providers and potentially undermining patient autonomy. Addressing misinformation is therefore critical not only for public understanding but also for supporting equitable, patient-centered abortion care in a post-Roe landscape.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/77050","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,19]],"date-time":"2026-05-19T14:50:07Z","timestamp":1779202207000},"page":"e77050-e77050","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Investigating the Impact of Online Abortion Myths on Health Care Providers and Advocates: Interview Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"12","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8865-2991","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rachel E","family":"Moran","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-7320-3754","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Julia","family":"Simoes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Taylor","family":"Agajanian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Izzi","family":"Grasso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Beers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amanda Lock","family":"Swarr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emma","family":"Spiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0162-1688","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna","family":"Swan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1","unstructured":"Facts are important: abortion is healthcare. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. URL: https:\/\/www.acog.org\/advocacy\/facts-are-important\/abortion-is-healthcare [Accessed 14-07-2026]"},{"issue":"3","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1080\/13691058.2019.1706001","article-title":"Towards a better understanding of abortion misinformation in the USA: a review of the literature","volume":"23","author":"Patev","journal-title":"Cult Health Sex"},{"issue":"1","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1177\/00221465211044413","article-title":"Selecting an abortion clinic: the role of social myths and risk perception in seeking abortion care","volume":"63","author":"Heymann","journal-title":"J Health Soc Behav"},{"key":"R4","unstructured":"Pleasants E . Challenging abortion disinformation online. UWIRE Text. Feb 9, 2021. URL: https:\/\/link.gale.com\/apps\/doc\/A651561104\/AONE?u=wash_main&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=7f024776 [Accessed 14-07-2026]"},{"issue":"3","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.58875\/CXGL5395","article-title":"Rumors have rules","volume":"29","author":"Spiro","journal-title":"Issues Sci Technol"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/42582","article-title":"The next infodemic: abortion misinformation","volume":"25","author":"Pagoto","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/17187","article-title":"Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review","volume":"23","author":"Suarez-Lledo","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1177\/00027162221095431","article-title":"Threats to science: politicization, misinformation, and inequalities","volume":"700","author":"Druckman","journal-title":"Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci"},{"issue":"38","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.adh1933","article-title":"Selective and deceptive citation in the construction of dueling consensuses","volume":"9","author":"Beers","journal-title":"Sci Adv"},{"issue":"12","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1093\/abm\/kaaa088","article-title":"Science communication in the age of misinformation","volume":"54","author":"Goldstein","journal-title":"Ann Behav Med"},{"key":"R11","unstructured":"Godoy M . Doctors and advocates tackle a spike of abortion misinformation \u2013 in Spanish. NPR. Nov 3, 2022. URL: https:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health- shots\/2022\/11\/03\/1133743997\/doctors-and-advocates-tackle-a-spike-of-abortion- misinformation-in-spanish [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"issue":"9","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000002180","article-title":"Perceived health misinformation on social media and public trust in health care","volume":"63","author":"Stimpson","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"6","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1177\/10901981221125430","article-title":"Dobbs: navigating the new quagmire and its impacts on abortion and reproductive health care","volume":"49","author":"Kulczycki","journal-title":"Health Educ Behav"},{"issue":"4","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.5195\/jmla.2023.1724","article-title":"Decoding the misinformation-legislation pipeline: an analysis of Florida Medicaid and the current state of transgender healthcare","volume":"111","author":"Lockmiller","journal-title":"J Med Libr Assoc"},{"issue":"2","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1177\/0002764219878223","article-title":"Misinformation about health: a review of health communication and misinformation scholarship","volume":"65","author":"Krishna","journal-title":"Am Behav Sci"},{"issue":"8","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1823","DOI":"10.1007\/s10389-022-01694-3","article-title":"Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication","volume":"30","author":"Kessler","journal-title":"J Public Health (Berl)"},{"key":"R17","unstructured":"Sharevski F Loop JV Jachim P Devine A Pieroni E . Abortion misinformation on TikTok: rampant content, lax moderation, and vivid user experiences. arXiv. Preprint posted online on Jan 12, 2023. URL: https:\/\/arxiv.org\/pdf\/2301.05128 [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"issue":"6","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.07.003","article-title":"Crisis pregnancy center websites: information, misinformation and disinformation","volume":"90","author":"Bryant","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.001","article-title":"Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina","volume":"86","author":"Bryant","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fcomm.2020.501276","article-title":"\u201cThey just went after us:\u201d reproductive justice advocacy at an abortion fund","volume":"5","author":"Gantt-Shafer","journal-title":"Front Commun"},{"issue":"1","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.52109","article-title":"US obstetrician-gynecologists\u2019 perceived impacts of post-Dobbs v Jackson state abortion bans","volume":"7","author":"Sabbath","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"R22","unstructured":"Luchetta J . Report shows dramatic exodus of Idaho obgyns since repeal of Roe v. Wade. Oregon Public Broadcasting. Feb 23, 2024. URL: https:\/\/www.opb.org\/article\/2024\/02\/22\/report-shows-fewer-idaho-obgyns-since-repeal-of-roe-v-wade\/ [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"issue":"17","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1537","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp2209737","article-title":"Abortion access as a racial justice issue","volume":"387","author":"Kozhimannil","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"13","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp2119364","article-title":"Restrictive state abortion bans - a reproductive injustice","volume":"386","author":"Wilkinson","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000833","article-title":"Physicians and healthcare professionals as advocates for abortion care and reproductive choice","volume":"34","author":"Carroll","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2014.06.014","article-title":"Twelve myths about shared decision making","volume":"96","author":"L\u00e9gar\u00e9","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"6","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X211058068","article-title":"Shared decision making in health care: theoretical perspectives for why it works and for whom","volume":"42","author":"Resnicow","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deci EL Ryan RM . Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer New York; 1985. [doi: 10.1007\/978-1-4899-2271-7]","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-2271-7"},{"issue":"1","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2016.303526","article-title":"Efficient allocation of public health and behavior change resources: the \u201cdifficulty by motivation\u201d matrix","volume":"107","author":"Resnicow","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjoq-2019-000740","article-title":"Closing the gap: actualising shared decision-making through effective medication abortion patient follow-up care","volume":"9","author":"Fagot","journal-title":"BMJ Open Qual"},{"issue":"2","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph15020329","article-title":"Factors influencing abortion decision-making processes among young women","volume":"15","author":"Frederico","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"R32","unstructured":"Hooper MW . From distrust to confidence: can science and health care gain what\u2019s missing? Pew Research. Oct 17, 2024. URL: https:\/\/www.pew.org\/en\/trend\/archive\/fall-2024\/from-distrust-to-confidence-can-science-and-health-care-gain-whats-missing [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"issue":"4","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1080\/13645570701401305","article-title":"Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research","volume":"11","author":"Noy","journal-title":"Int J Soc Res Methodol"},{"issue":"9","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1408","DOI":"10.46743\/2160-3715\/2015.2281","article-title":"Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research","volume":"20","author":"Fusch","journal-title":"Qual Rep"},{"key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sandelowski M . Theoretical saturation. In: Given LM , editor. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications, Inc; 2008:875-876. [doi: 10.4135\/9781412963909.n456]","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412963909.n456"},{"issue":"1","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/26895269.2022.2129597","article-title":"Toward good practice in thematic analysis: avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher","volume":"24","author":"Braun","journal-title":"Int J Transgend Health"},{"key":"R37","unstructured":"Bans on specific abortion methods used after the first trimester. Guttmacher Institute. URL: https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/state-policy\/explore\/bans-specific-abortion-methods-used-after-first-trimester [Accessed 14-07-2026]"},{"key":"R38","unstructured":"Partial-birth abortion. Legal Information Institute. URL: https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/definitions\/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=18-USC-1932217061-836166418&term_occur=999 [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"issue":"4","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-021-03367-1","article-title":"\u201cIgnored and invisible\u201d: perspectives from Black women, clinicians, and community-based organizations for reducing preterm birth","volume":"26","author":"Smith","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"key":"R40","unstructured":"Mitchell E . Black women\u2019s reproductive health and legacies of distrust. Black Perspectives. Aug 3, 2022. URL: https:\/\/www.aaihs.org\/black-womens-reproductive-health-and-legacies-of-distrust\/ [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2022.107611","article-title":"Fear of procedure and pain in individuals considering abortion: a qualitative study","volume":"108","author":"Nguyen","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2015.12.007","article-title":"Psychosocial factors and pre-abortion psychological health: the significance of stigma","volume":"150","author":"Steinberg","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.12853","article-title":"Reconciling the theory and reality of shared decision-making: a \u201cmatching\u201d approach to practitioner leadership","volume":"22","author":"Brown","journal-title":"Health Expectations"},{"issue":"5","key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(96)00221-3","article-title":"Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)","volume":"44","author":"Charles","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4172\/2472-1654.100146","article-title":"Trust and communication in a doctor- patient relationship: a literature review","volume":"03","author":"Chandra","journal-title":"J Healthcare Commun"},{"key":"R46","unstructured":"Winny A . How abortion trigger laws impact mental health. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Feb 6, 2024. URL: https:\/\/publichealth.jhu.edu\/2024\/abortion-bans-impact-on-mental-health#:~:text=Immediately%20following%20the%20Dobbs%20decision,the%20event%20Roe%20was%20overturned [Accessed 14-07-2026]"},{"key":"R47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krafft PM Spiro ES . Keeping rumors in proportion: managing uncertainty in rumor systems. Presented at: CHI \u201919: Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; May 4-9, 2019:1-11; Glasgow, Scotland. [doi: 10.1145\/3290605.3300876]","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300876"}],"container-title":["JMIR Public Health and Surveillance"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T17:12:48Z","timestamp":1789578768000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/publichealth.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e77050"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"references-count":47,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/77050","relation":{},"ISSN":["2369-2960"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2369-2960","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"article-number":"v12i3e77050"}}