{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T16:03:08Z","timestamp":1787068988526,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Hum Factors"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Many patients attending hospital emergency services with recent-onset eye symptoms could have been managed in the community. This may reflect a lack of specialist experience or triage capacity among primary care providers. Online triage tools collect patient symptomatology and relevant ophthalmic and medical history virtually, compile a report, and suggest an outcome decision which can support the streaming and direction of patients to a suitable service within an appropriate timeframe.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n Our objectives were to implement and analyze the real-world use of a novel online triage tool in a community optometry setting.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n This was a real-world mixed methods evaluation of a web app \u201ceye+dot\u201d (Cambridge Medical Innovation Ltd), which uses a conditional logic multiple-choice questionnaire to produce a symptom report and automated triage recommendation. A preimplementation survey was used to gather views regarding current triage practices and interest in trialing an online triage tool among community optometrists. The app was then implemented in participating practices, with optometrists receiving the symptom report but not the automated triage disposition. The sensitivity and specificity of optometrists and the app at identifying urgent cases (those requiring specialist examination within 24 h) were compared to a gold standard, generated by retrospective review of the symptom reports by hospital specialists. Metadata including patient age, test duration, and usability feedback from patients and optometry staff were analyzed.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n Seven optometry practices trialed the app over 5 months. Records of 209 patients with a mean age of 53.5 (SD 17.5; range 13\u201090) years were analyzed. Three patients with potentially sight- or life-threatening symptoms (as defined by Royal College of Ophthalmologists guidelines) received appropriate urgent hospital dispositions by both optometrists and eye+dot. The app\u2019s automated disposition had similar sensitivity to optometry triage (75.5% vs 77.3% respectively;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n =.99) but significantly better specificity (82.7% vs 54.4%;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n <.001) for identification of the 53 cases categorized as requiring either hospital or community specialist examination within 24 hours by gold-standard review. A total of 147 patients gave acceptability feedback, with 121 (82%) of them giving a rating in the top 2 points of a 5-point visual Likert scale. Optometrists in 5 of the 7 practices found the app helpful and were interested in continuing its use.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n This real-world study demonstrates the triage tool\u2019s accuracy for identifying high-risk symptomatology and its acceptability among patients and optometry services. The significantly lower optometric triage specificity may reflect risk-averse decision-making following direct communication with patients and appointment availability in primary care. In addition, the relatively low mean age of patients suggests possible barriers to uptake among older patients. This and other symptom-based triage tools can provide useful support to eye care providers in the community where access to specialist triage may be limited.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/77278","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,9]],"date-time":"2026-02-09T22:40:09Z","timestamp":1770676809000},"page":"e77278-e77278","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Real-World Evaluation of the Eye+Dot Online Triage Support Tool in Community Optometry Practices: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9669-4187","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jen O","family":"Lim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5957-3282","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah","family":"Farrell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2971-1204","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samuel J","family":"Newlands","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2175-8884","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Louise","family":"Allen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1136\/emj.2007.057604","article-title":"Patterns of ophthalmological complaints presenting to a dedicated ophthalmic accident & emergency department: inappropriate use and patients\u2019 perspective","volume":"25","author":"Hau","journal-title":"Emerg Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1080\/08164622.2021.1937949","article-title":"Analysis of UK eye casualty presentations","volume":"105","author":"MacIsaac","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"issue":"6","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.1111\/cxo.13050","article-title":"Ophthalmic emergencies presenting to the emergency department at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK","volume":"103","author":"Rehan","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"issue":"4","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1177\/014107688307600408","article-title":"Analysis of all new cases seen in a busy regional centre ophthalmic casualty department during 24-week period","volume":"76","author":"Vernon","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.13183","article-title":"Assessment of optometrists\u2019 referral accuracy and contributing factors: a review","volume":"43","author":"Carmichael","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"R6","unstructured":"The NHS long term plan. National Health Service; 2019. URL: https:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/ukgwa\/20230418155402\/https:\/www.longtermplan.nhs.uk\/publication\/nhs-long-term-plan\/ [Accessed 03-03-2026]"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compbiomed.2015.09.014","article-title":"From pen-and-paper questionnaire to a computer-assisted instrument for self-triage in the ophthalmic emergency department: process and validation","volume":"66","author":"Eijk","journal-title":"Comput Biol Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.003","article-title":"Criterion validity of a computer-assisted instrument of self-triage (ca-ISET) compared to the validity of regular triage in an ophthalmic emergency department","volume":"85","author":"Eijk","journal-title":"Int J Med Inform"},{"issue":"3","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2065-4613","article-title":"Validation of an automated symptom-based triage tool in ophthalmology","volume":"14","author":"Meer","journal-title":"Appl Clin Inform"},{"key":"R10","unstructured":"Self-help guides. NHS Inform. URL: https:\/\/www.nhsinform.scot\/symptoms-and-self-help\/self-help-guides [Accessed 18-02-2025]"},{"key":"R11","unstructured":"Check your symptoms. National Health Service. URL: https:\/\/111.wales.nhs.uk\/SelfAssessments [Accessed 18-02-2025]"},{"issue":"8","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027743","article-title":"Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment\/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review","volume":"9","author":"Chambers","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/19713","article-title":"Patients\u2019 utilization and perception of an artificial intelligence-based symptom assessment and advice technology in a British primary care waiting room: exploratory pilot study","volume":"7","author":"Miller","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"issue":"5","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-094068","article-title":"Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review","volume":"15","author":"Paule","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"R15","unstructured":"Health Research Authority. UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research. URL: https:\/\/www.hra.nhs.uk\/planning-and-improving-research\/policies-standards-legislation\/uk-policy-framework-health-social-care-research\/uk-policy-framework-health-and-social-care-research\/ [Accessed 10-03-2026]"},{"key":"R16","unstructured":"Commissioning guidance emergency eye care. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists; 2020. URL: https:\/\/www.rcophth.ac.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Emergency-Eye-Care-Commissioning-Guidance.pdf [Accessed 18-02-2026]"},{"issue":"9","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-047246","article-title":"Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists","volume":"11","author":"Khou","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2010.00797.x","article-title":"Assessment of referrals to the hospital eye service by optometrists and GPs in Bradford and Airedale","volume":"31","author":"Davey","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"issue":"1","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-018-0591-x","article-title":"Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2\u2014validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)","volume":"18","author":"Finch","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-8-43","article-title":"Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol","volume":"8","author":"Finch","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"issue":"12","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-040269","article-title":"How accurate are digital symptom assessment apps for suggesting conditions and urgency advice? A clinical vignettes comparison to GPs","volume":"10","author":"Gilbert","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"R22","unstructured":"Real world evidence. National Health Service. URL: https:\/\/innovation.nhs.uk\/innovation-guides\/evidence\/real-world-evidence [Accessed 18-02-2026]"},{"issue":"2","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/geroni\/igac002","article-title":"A systematic review of smartphone and tablet use by older adults with and without cognitive impairment","volume":"6","author":"Wilson","journal-title":"Innov Aging"},{"issue":"1","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12875-024-02518-x","article-title":"Telemedicine in primary care of older adults: a qualitative study","volume":"25","author":"Khanassov","journal-title":"BMC Prim Care"},{"issue":"12","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0260696","article-title":"Performance of a new symptom checker in patient triage: Canadian cohort study","volume":"16","author":"Chan","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"issue":"3","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.12809\/hkmj133900","article-title":"Validation of the Hong Kong accident and emergency triage guidelines","volume":"19","author":"Fan","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jemermed.2015.09.008","article-title":"Performance of the Manchester triage system in adult medical emergency patients: a prospective cohort study","volume":"50","author":"Steiner","journal-title":"J Emerg Med"},{"key":"R28","unstructured":"Excel Spreadsheet of Study Data. OSF Registries. URL: https:\/\/osf.io\/3r4we\/overview [Accessed 10-03-2026]"}],"container-title":["JMIR Human Factors"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/humanfactors.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e77278","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T18:09:24Z","timestamp":1782842964000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/humanfactors.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e77278"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,16]]},"references-count":28,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/77278","relation":{},"ISSN":["2292-9495"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2292-9495","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,16]]},"article-number":"v13i11e77278"}}