{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T15:42:47Z","timestamp":1788968567461,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Form Res"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Rare genetic diseases pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, often leading to delayed diagnoses, misinformation, and patient isolation. Social media platforms have emerged as prominent spaces for health information dissemination and community building among patients with rare diseases.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This study aimed to evaluate the role of TikTok videos in patient education, community engagement, and information quality related to 5 rare genetic conditions: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan syndrome, cystic fibrosis, Wilson disease, and Gaucher disease.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 184 TikTok videos identified via disease-specific hashtags. Included videos were 15 seconds to 4 minutes long and directly discussed the target diseases. Advertisements, promotional content, and product marketing were excluded. Videos were categorized by creator type: physicians, medical professionals, patients, influencers, nonprofit organizations, and others. Content quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and a modified DISCERN tool (mDISCERN). Engagement metrics (views, likes, and shares) were recorded. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests evaluated differences across creator categories.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n Of the 184 TikTok videos, 88 (47.8%) were created by patients or family members; 31 (16.8%) by influencers, 24 (13.0%) by physicians, 17 (9.2%) by nonprofit organizations, 15 (8.2%) by general users, and 9 (4.9%) by others. Collectively, the videos amassed more than 123 million views. Influencer-generated content accounted for the highest cumulative view count, totaling approximately 60.9 million views. Content produced by medical professionals and physicians demonstrated higher information quality, with mean GQS scores of 3.89 (SD 0.66) and 3.62 (SD 0.71) and mDISCERN scores of 3.11 (SD 0.58) and 3.21 (SD 0.65), respectively. In contrast, videos by influencers and patients exhibited lower quality scores (influencers: GQS mean 1.48, SD 0.60; mDISCERN mean 1.42, SD 0.55; patients: GQS mean 1.57, SD 0.58; mDISCERN mean 1.38, SD 0.52). For Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (n=40 videos, 21.7%), Wilson disease (n=40 videos, 21.7%), and cystic fibrosis (n=34 videos, 18.5%), significant differences in quality scores among creator types were observed (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n <.001,\n P<\/jats:italic>\n <.001, and\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2264.04, respectively). For Marfan syndrome (n=40 videos, 21.7%) and Gaucher disease (n=30 videos, 16.3%), no significant differences were observed (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n =.43 and\n P<\/jats:italic>\n =.07, respectively). Chi-square analysis indicated no association between creator type and inclusion of peer-reviewed references (\n \u03c7<\/jats:italic>\n 2<\/jats:sup>\n 5<\/jats:sub>\n =10.6;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n =.07). Overall, only 7 (3.8%) videos cited scientific literature.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n TikTok serves as a key platform for rare disease awareness and community engagement, although the quality and accuracy of health information vary widely. Although medical professionals produced higher-quality content, it tended to receive less visibility. Increasing the presence of health care professionals and improving visibility of evidence-based content could enhance patient education and safer health information sharing.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/79978","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T16:45:09Z","timestamp":1762965909000},"page":"e79978-e79978","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["TikTok as a Platform for Patient Education and Health Information in Rare Genetic Diseases: Cross-Sectional Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8887-1366","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jackson Montgomery","family":"Wahman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2365-036X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rhoda Mariam","family":"Hijazi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6653-3705","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hosam Gharib","family":"Abdelhady","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/children9070933","article-title":"Psychosocial considerations for the child with rare disease: a review with recommendations and calls to action","volume":"9","author":"Belzer","journal-title":"Children (Basel)"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/51211","article-title":"Evaluating the disease-related experiences of TikTok users with lupus erythematosus: qualitative and content analysis","volume":"4","author":"Wanberg","journal-title":"JMIR Infodemiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13023-024-03332-5","article-title":"A scoping review of health literacy in rare disorders: key issues and research directions","volume":"19","author":"Stenberg","journal-title":"Orphanet J Rare Dis"},{"issue":"12","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2250","DOI":"10.1038\/s41436-021-01273-z","article-title":"Opportunities and pitfalls of social media research in rare genetic diseases: a systematic review","volume":"23","author":"Miller","journal-title":"Genet Med"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/57833","article-title":"Improving social media-based support groups for the rare disease community: interview study with patients and parents of children with rare and undiagnosed diseases","volume":"11","author":"Doyle","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/54663","article-title":"TikTok as a source of health information and misinformation for young women in the United States: survey study","volume":"4","author":"Kirkpatrick","journal-title":"JMIR Infodemiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1177\/03400352241286175","article-title":"TikTok and digital health literacy: a systematic review","volume":"51","author":"Merga","journal-title":"IFLA J"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gimo.2025.102844","article-title":"Rare disease narratives on social media: a content analysis","volume":"3","author":"Park","journal-title":"Genet Med Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1089\/aut.2023.0019","article-title":"Building community and identity online: a content analysis of highly viewed #Autism TikTok videos","volume":"6","author":"Gilmore","journal-title":"Autism Adulthood"},{"issue":"1","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-93986-3","article-title":"Evaluating the quality of TikTok videos on coronary artery disease using various scales to examine correlations with video characteristics and high-quality content","volume":"15","author":"Hao","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.64704","article-title":"Assessing the quality and reliability of videos related to fibromyalgia on TikTok: a comprehensive analysis","volume":"16","author":"Canatan","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"9","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/30409","article-title":"TikTok as a health information source: assessment of the quality of information in diabetes-related videos","volume":"23","author":"Kong","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1456","DOI":"10.1002\/ohn.688","article-title":"A social media quality review of popular sinusitis videos on TikTok","volume":"170","author":"Dimitroyannis","journal-title":"Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15403","article-title":"TikTok and prostate cancer: misinformation and quality of information using validated questionnaires","volume":"128","author":"Xu","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0319335","article-title":"A double-edged hashtag: evaluation of #ADHD-related TikTok content and its associations with perceptions of ADHD","volume":"20","author":"Karasavva","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.8897","article-title":"Assessment of accuracy, user engagement, and themes of eating disorder content in social media short videos","volume":"6","author":"Lookingbill","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/39162","article-title":"Quality of information in gallstone disease videos on TikTok: cross-sectional study","volume":"25","author":"Sun","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/55403","article-title":"Quality assessment of TikTok as a source of information about mitral valve regurgitation in China: cross-sectional study","volume":"26","author":"Cui","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-024-20375-2","article-title":"Evaluation of the information quality related to osteoporosis on TikTok","volume":"24","author":"Li","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"9","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2070","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x","article-title":"A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web","volume":"102","author":"Bernard","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.53.2.105","article-title":"DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices","volume":"53","author":"Charnock","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jgc4.1908","article-title":"Exploring the role of digital tools in rare disease management: an interview-based study","volume":"34","author":"Chang","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"},{"issue":"4","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1080\/02667363.2024.2409451","article-title":"TikTok-inspired self-diagnosis and its implications for educational psychology practice","volume":"40","author":"Foster","journal-title":"Educ Psychol Pract"},{"key":"R24","volume":"2023","author":"Zehrung","journal-title":"AMIA Annu Symp Proc"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/52924","article-title":"A SIMBA CoMICs initiative to cocreating and disseminating evidence-based, peer-reviewed short videos on social media: mixed methods prospective study","volume":"10","author":"Elhariry","journal-title":"JMIR Med Educ"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sharevski F Vander Loop J Jachim P Devine A Das S . \u201cDebunk-it-yourself\u201d: health professionals strategies for responding to misinformation on TikTok. Presented at: Proceedings of the New Security Paradigms Workshop (NSPW \u201924); Sep 16-19, 2024:35-55; Bedford, PA. Sep 16, 2024.URL: https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/proceedings\/10.1145\/3703465 [doi: 10.1145\/3703465.3703469]","DOI":"10.1145\/3703465.3703469"},{"issue":"5","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1177\/1075547017731776","article-title":"Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media","volume":"39","author":"Vraga","journal-title":"Sci Commun"},{"issue":"9","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1080\/10410236.2017.1331312","article-title":"See something, say something: correction of global health misinformation on social media","volume":"33","author":"Bode","journal-title":"Health Commun"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426","article-title":"Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: a scoping review","volume":"186","author":"Li","journal-title":"Int J Med Inform"}],"container-title":["JMIR Formative Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/formative.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e79978","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T18:13:15Z","timestamp":1782843195000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/formative.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e79978"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,24]]},"references-count":29,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/79978","relation":{},"ISSN":["2561-326X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2561-326X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,24]]},"article-number":"v10i7e79978"}}