{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T04:08:58Z","timestamp":1793938138284,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Ment Health"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Innovative, scalable mental health tools are needed to address systemic provider shortages and accessibility barriers. Large language model\u2013based tools can provide real-time, tailored feedback to help users engage in cognitive reappraisal outside traditional therapy sessions. Socrates 2.0 (Rush University Medical Center) is a multiagent artificial intelligence tool that guides users through Socratic dialogue.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study aimed to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and potential for symptom reduction of Socrates 2.0.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 61 adult participants enrolled in a 4-week mixed methods preclinical feasibility study. The participants used Socrates 2.0 as desired and completed the self-report measures of depression, social anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, along with usability and working alliance, were assessed via validated measures. The semistructured interviews explored user experiences and perceptions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Participants engaged with Socrates 2.0 an average of 6.70 (SD 4.57) times over 4 weeks. Feasibility (mean 4.26, SD 0.67), acceptability (mean 4.16, SD 0.84), and usability ratings were high. Participants reported small-to-moderate reductions in depression (effect size\n                      <jats:italic>d<\/jats:italic>\n                      =0.30), social anxiety (\n                      <jats:italic>d<\/jats:italic>\n                      =0.25), obsessive-compulsive (\n                      <jats:italic>d<\/jats:italic>\n                      =0.33), and posttraumatic stress (\n                      <jats:italic>d<\/jats:italic>\n                      =0.28) symptoms. Working alliance scores suggested a moderately strong perceived bond with the artificial intelligence tool. Qualitative feedback indicated that the nonjudgmental, on-demand nature of Socrates 2.0 encouraged self-reflection and exploration. Some users critiqued the repeated questioning style and limited conversation depth.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Socrates 2.0 was perceived as feasible, acceptable, and moderately helpful for self-guided cognitive reappraisal, demonstrating potential as an adjunct to traditional therapy. Further research, including randomized trials, is needed to determine effectiveness across different populations, optimize personalization, and address the repetitive conversational nature.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/80461","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T13:20:25Z","timestamp":1761571225000},"page":"e80461-e80461","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["AI-Facilitated Cognitive Reappraisal via Socrates 2.0: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"12","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3974-1802","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Philip","family":"Held","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2640-8050","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah A","family":"Pridgen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6777-3636","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel R","family":"Szoke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-8357-4623","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yaozhong","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0338-6549","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zuhaib","family":"Akhtar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-7925-6190","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Darpan","family":"Amin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fdgth.2021.742196","article-title":"Accessibility and digital mental health: considerations for more accessible and equitable mental health apps","volume":"3","author":"Bunyi","journal-title":"Front Digit Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-023-00760-8","article-title":"Digital mental health care: five lessons from Act 1 and a preview of Acts 2-5","volume":"6","author":"Insel","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/17828","article-title":"Perceptions and opinions of patients about mental health chatbots: scoping review","volume":"23","author":"Abd-Alrazaq","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1038\/s44184-024-00056-z","article-title":"Large language models could change the future of behavioral healthcare: a proposal for responsible development and evaluation","volume":"3","author":"Stade","journal-title":"Npj Ment Health Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/wps.21148","article-title":"Generative artificial intelligence in mental health care: potential benefits and current challenges","volume":"23","author":"Torous","journal-title":"World Psychiatry"},{"issue":"12","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1007\/s11920-023-01477-x","article-title":"An introduction to generative artificial intelligence in mental health care: considerations and guidance","volume":"25","author":"King","journal-title":"Curr Psychiatry Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-023-00979-5","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being","volume":"6","author":"Li","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clark DA . Cognitive restructuring. In: Hofmann SG , editor. The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013:1-22. [doi: 10.1002\/9781118528563] ISBN: 978-1-118-52856-3","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118528563.wbcbt02"},{"issue":"5","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1007\/s10608-010-9297-z","article-title":"The relationship between homework compliance and therapy outcomes: an updated meta-analysis","volume":"34","author":"Mausbach","journal-title":"Cognit Ther Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/j.beth.2017.12.001","article-title":"Homework completion, patient characteristics, and symptom change in cognitive processing therapy for PTSD","volume":"49","author":"Stirman","journal-title":"Behav Ther"},{"issue":"5","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/j.beth.2016.05.002","article-title":"Quantity and quality of homework compliance: a meta-analysis of relations with outcome in cognitive behavior therapy","volume":"47","author":"Kazantzis","journal-title":"Behav Ther"},{"issue":"3","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1080\/16506073.2013.763286","article-title":"Homework compliance counts in cognitive-behavioral therapy","volume":"42","author":"Lebeau","journal-title":"Cogn Behav Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/58195","article-title":"A novel cognitive behavioral therapy\u2013based generative AI tool (Socrates 2.0) to facilitate Socratic dialogue: protocol for a mixed methods feasibility study","volume":"13","author":"Held","journal-title":"JMIR Res Protoc"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cbpra.2025.10.001","article-title":"Clinician perceptions of Socrates 2.0: A multi-agent artificial intelligence tool to facilitate Socratic dialogue","author":"Held","journal-title":"Cogn Behav Pract"},{"issue":"1-2","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jad.2009.06.019","article-title":"A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population","volume":"122","author":"L\u00f6we","journal-title":"J Affect Disord"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.paid.2015.01.043","article-title":"Designing a brief measure of social anxiety: Psychometric support for a three-item version of the Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS-3)","volume":"79","author":"Nichols","journal-title":"Pers Individ Dif"},{"issue":"9","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1002\/da.22942","article-title":"Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)","volume":"36","author":"Zuromski","journal-title":"Depress Anxiety"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.janxdis.2021.102354","article-title":"The OCI-4: An ultra-brief screening scale for obsessive-compulsive disorder","volume":"78","author":"Abramovitch","journal-title":"J Anxiety Disord"},{"issue":"7","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1757","DOI":"10.1016\/j.comppsych.2014.07.004","article-title":"The WERCAP Screen and the WERC Stress Screen: Psychometrics of self-rated instruments for assessing bipolar and psychotic disorder risk and perceived stress burden","volume":"55","author":"Mamah","journal-title":"Compr Psychiatry"},{"issue":"3","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1002\/jts.22478","article-title":"Validation of abbreviated four- and eight-item versions of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a traumatically injured sample","volume":"33","author":"Geier","journal-title":"J Trauma Stress"},{"issue":"4","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.1007\/s00737-024-01539-w","article-title":"Psychometric properties of the OCI-4: a brief screening tool for perinatal obsessive-compulsive disorder","volume":"28","author":"Abramowitz","journal-title":"Arch Womens Ment Health"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyt.2016.00149","article-title":"Utility of Washington Early Recognition Center Self-Report Screening questionnaires in the assessment of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder","volume":"7","author":"Hsieh","journal-title":"Front Psychiatry"},{"issue":"7","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2018.1455307","article-title":"The System Usability Scale: Past, present, and future","volume":"34","author":"Lewis","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Interact"},{"issue":"1","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-017-0635-3","article-title":"Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures","volume":"12","author":"Weiner","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/11500","article-title":"The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and validation study","volume":"7","author":"Zhou","journal-title":"JMIR Mhealth Uhealth"},{"issue":"3","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1002\/cpp.658","article-title":"Working Alliance Inventory\u2013Short Revised (WAI-SR): Psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients","volume":"17","author":"Munder","journal-title":"Clin Psychol Psychother"},{"issue":"2","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","author":"Braun","journal-title":"Qual Res Psychol"},{"issue":"4","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1177\/0011000097254001","article-title":"A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research","volume":"25","author":"Hill","journal-title":"Couns Psychol"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssmph.2021.100847","article-title":"Barriers to healthcare access among U.S. adults with mental health challenges: a population-based study","volume":"15","author":"Coombs","journal-title":"SSM Popul Health"},{"key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpr.2016.12.001","article-title":"Perceived barriers and facilitators of mental health service utilization in adult trauma survivors: a systematic review","volume":"52","author":"Kantor","journal-title":"Clin Psychol Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1002\/wps.21035","article-title":"The alliance in mental health care: Conceptualization, evidence and clinical applications","volume":"22","author":"Wampold","journal-title":"World Psychiatry"},{"issue":"1","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/28003","article-title":"The challenges in designing a prevention chatbot for eating disorders: observational study","volume":"6","author":"Chan","journal-title":"JMIR Form Res"}],"container-title":["JMIR Mental Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/mental.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e80461","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T18:13:58Z","timestamp":1782843238000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/mental.jmir.org\/2025\/1\/e80461"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"references-count":32,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/80461","relation":{},"ISSN":["2368-7959"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2368-7959","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"article-number":"v12i1e80461"}}