{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T19:07:32Z","timestamp":1782846452316,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Hum Factors"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Previous studies indicate that 37% to 92% of patients presenting to hospital emergency eye clinics (EECs) could be seen in commissioned community optometrist enhanced service schemes (ESSs), reducing pressure on hospital services and moving eye care into the community. Digital triage tools may have the potential to support effective triage and use of ESSs.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a recently developed online symptom triage tool in real-world EEC practice and assess its usability and acceptance by patients.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n This was a prospective, real-world study comparing automated dispositions suggested by the eye+dot online triage tool with nursing triage, using ophthalmologist dispositions and subsequent clinical findings as the reference standard. Patients aged 13 years and older were sent an SMS text message invitation to use eye+dot prior to their scheduled EEC appointment. Age, time required to complete the symptom questionnaire, and acceptability (using an in-application visual Likert scale) were also recorded. The accuracy of the different triage methods at assigning patients to eye assessments within 24 hours, 48 to 72 hours, or a week based on symptom urgency was compared. Eye+dot\u2019s accuracy in identifying patient suitability for ESSs was analyzed.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n A total of 282 eligible patients with a mean age of 53.14 (SD 19.8; range 13-92) years were included. The mean eye+dot test duration was 5.6 (SD 2.4) minutes, with 80.4% (168\/209) of patients rating the test as good or excellent. For high-acuity symptomatology (defined via retrospective ophthalmologist recommendation for assessment within 24 hours), sensitivity was similar between eye+dot and nurse triage (58\/76, 76.3%; 95% CI 65.2%-85.3% and 65\/76, 85.5%; 95% CI 75.6%-92.5%, respectively;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n =.19). However, eye+dot specificity was significantly higher (132\/206, 64.1%; 95% CI 57.1%-70.6% vs 47\/206, 22.8%; 95% CI 17.3%-29.2%;\n P<\/jats:italic>\n <.001). Of 224 urgent nursing dispositions, 203 (90.6%) patients were downrated (considered suitable for nonurgent assessment) by ophthalmologist assignment, and 93 (41.5%) were downrated by eye+dot. In total, 90.8% (256\/282) of the patients were considered suitable for ESS assessment through eye+dot triage. A total of 56.6% (145\/256) of these patients subsequently received only medical advice without specialist investigations or management at their EEC visit, suggesting suitability for community eye care.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n Eye+dot\u2013automated triage has similar sensitivity but superior specificity to nursing triage for identifying high-acuity symptomatology. This small study suggests its potential to improve patient scheduling in EECs throughout the working week and improve the use of community services. A larger study is planned to establish the utility of the triage tool and develop an implementation model to scale up and spread the technology.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/81343","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]],"date-time":"2026-02-21T17:15:06Z","timestamp":1771694106000},"page":"e81343-e81343","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Real-World Performance of a New Online Eye Symptom Triage Tool (Eye+Dot) in an Emergency Eye Clinic: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2175-8884","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Louise","family":"Allen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9669-4187","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jen O","family":"Lim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-0597-5498","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fengyi","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-4762-4468","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nimesha","family":"Alex","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1","unstructured":"Emergency eye care in hospital eye units and secondary care. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. 2024. URL: https:\/\/www.rcophth.ac.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Emergency-eye-care-in-hospital-eye-units-and-secondary-care-Copy.pdf [Accessed 15-03-2026]"},{"issue":"11","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1136\/emj.2007.057604","article-title":"Patterns of ophthalmological complaints presenting to a dedicated ophthalmic Accident & Emergency department: inappropriate use and patients\u2019 perspective","volume":"25","author":"Hau","journal-title":"Emerg Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1080\/08164622.2021.1937949","article-title":"Analysis of UK eye casualty presentations","volume":"105","author":"MacIsaac","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"issue":"6","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.1111\/cxo.13050","article-title":"Ophthalmic emergencies presenting to the emergency department at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK","volume":"103","author":"Rehan","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"issue":"4","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1177\/014107688307600408","article-title":"Analysis of all new cases seen in a busy regional centre ophthalmic casualty department during 24-week period","volume":"76","author":"Vernon","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"key":"R6","unstructured":"The NHS Long Term Plan. National Health Service. 2019. URL: https:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/ukgwa\/20230418155402\/https:\/www.longtermplan.nhs.uk\/publication\/nhs-long-term-plan\/ [Accessed 30-03-2026]"},{"key":"R7","unstructured":"Emergency eye care commissioning guidance. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. 2020. URL: https:\/\/www.rcophth.ac.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Emergency-Eye-Care-Commissioning-Guidance.pdf [Accessed 15-03-2026]"},{"key":"R8","unstructured":"10 year health plan for England: fit for the future. United Kingdom Government, Department of Health and Social Care. 2025. URL: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/10-year-health-plan-for-england-fit-for-the-future [Accessed 15-03-2026]"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/77278","article-title":"Real-world evaluation of the eye+dot online triage support tool in community optometry practices: mixed methods evaluation study","volume":"13","author":"Lim","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"key":"R10","unstructured":"UK Policy Framework for health and social care research. National Health Service Health Research Authority. URL: https:\/\/www.hra.nhs.uk\/planning-and-improving-research\/policies-standards-legislation\/uk-policy-framework-health-social-care-research\/uk-policy-framework-health-and-social-care-research\/ [Accessed 30-03-2026]"},{"key":"R11","unstructured":"The Medical Devices Regulations 2002. Legislation.gov.uk. 2002. URL: https:\/\/www.legislation.gov.uk\/uksi\/2002\/618\/contents [Accessed 30-03-2026]"},{"key":"R12","unstructured":"Medical devices: software applications. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, United Kingdom Government. 2014. URL: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/medical-devices-software-applications-apps [Accessed 30-03-2026]"},{"issue":"3","key":"R13","first-page":"276","volume":"22","author":"McHugh","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ienj.2025.101639","article-title":"Strategies to improve the quality of nurse triage in emergency departments: a systematic review","volume":"81","author":"Ouellet","journal-title":"Int Emerg Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12912-024-02334-9","article-title":"Factors influencing the classification accuracy of triage nurses in emergency department: analysis of triage nurses\u2019 characteristics","volume":"23","author":"Seo","journal-title":"BMC Nurs"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2023.102331","article-title":"A machine learning system to optimise triage in an adult ophthalmic emergency department: a model development and validation study","volume":"66","author":"Brandao-de-Resende","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2065-4613","article-title":"Validation of an automated symptom-based triage tool in ophthalmology","volume":"14","author":"Meer","journal-title":"Appl Clin Inform"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/20552076251320298","article-title":"Performance analysis of an emergency triage system in ophthalmology using a customized chatbot","volume":"11","author":"Schumacher","journal-title":"Digit Health"},{"issue":"17","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3692","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-023-02556-2","article-title":"Appropriateness of ophthalmic symptoms triage by a popular online artificial intelligence chatbot","volume":"37","author":"Tsui","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"issue":"18","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3874","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-023-02595-9","article-title":"GPT-4 for triaging ophthalmic symptoms","volume":"37","author":"Waisberg","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"issue":"3","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajoint.2025.100159","article-title":"Pilot study of ASSORT (AI-based Symptom Stratification in Ophthalmology for Rapid Triage): a triage tool for ophthalmic emergencies","volume":"2","author":"Xompero","journal-title":"AJO Int"},{"issue":"8","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-011832","article-title":"Evaluation of a minor eye conditions scheme delivered by community optometrists","volume":"6","author":"Konstantakopoulou","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"9","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2291","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-020-01413-5","article-title":"Validation of a new system for triage of ophthalmic emergencies: the alphabetical triage score for ophthalmology (ATSO)","volume":"40","author":"D\u2019Oria","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1177\/112067210701700324","article-title":"Triaging and coding ophthalmic emergency: the Rome Eye Scoring System for Urgency and Emergency (RESCUE): a pilot study of 1,000 eye-dedicated emergency room patients","volume":"17","author":"Rossi","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roberts C George J Jenkins J . Patient experiences of UK primary care online triage and consultation platforms during COVID-19: a systematic review. medRxiv. Preprint posted online on Jan 10, 2024. [doi: 10.1101\/2024.01.09.24301062]","DOI":"10.1101\/2024.01.09.24301062"},{"issue":"1","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-022-00667-w","article-title":"The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review","volume":"5","author":"Wallace","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"key":"R27","unstructured":"Allen L . Eye+dot use in emergency eye clinic. Open Science Framework. URL: https:\/\/osf.io\/q2387\/overview [Accessed 08-04-2026]"}],"container-title":["JMIR Human Factors"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/humanfactors.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e81343","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T18:15:07Z","timestamp":1782843307000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/humanfactors.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e81343"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,14]]},"references-count":27,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/81343","relation":{},"ISSN":["2292-9495"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2292-9495","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,14]]},"article-number":"v13i11e81343"}}