{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,12]],"date-time":"2026-09-12T19:05:51Z","timestamp":1789239951331,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":70,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Internet Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients with breast cancer often experience health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impairments that remain difficult to predict on an individual level. Prediction models can aid in understanding individual survivorship trajectories. However, current prognostic models are based on fixed intervals, limiting their utility in clinical follow-up schedules.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aimed to develop and externally validate time-dynamic machine learning (ML) models that predict clinically relevant HRQoL impairments in nonmetastatic patients with breast cancer.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Using the pooled multicohort EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) BALANCE (big data in patients with breast cancer) dataset (n=6316) containing repeated HRQoL measurements (EORTC QLQ [Quality of Life Core Questionnaire]-C30), we constructed over 70,000 patient assessment pairs. ML algorithms were trained using the earlier HRQoL assessment and clinical data to predict dichotomized impairments in QLQ-C30 domains at the later assessment between 2 weeks and 5 years ahead, reflecting the range of follow-up intervals available in the dataset. The best performing model was determined via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the internal validation, and externally validated in an independent cohort of the BALANCE dataset, in which the calibration and predictive performance in risk groups (patients: postmenopause, with financial difficulties, with obesity, with 2 or more comorbidities, with lower educational status, and with frailty) were also evaluated.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>ML models showed good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.64\u20100.84) across most domains, especially for persistent symptoms such as fatigue, financial difficulties, or functioning scales. Gradient boosting models performed best, but tended to be overconfident, with poor calibration for low-prevalence symptoms such as diarrhea or constipation. Model performance varied by risk group (eg, lower education and frailty), though no group consistently performed poorly. Performance remained stable across time windows, with prior HRQoL being the strongest predictor at the respective scale level, while clinical variables such as the type of treatment were less important for prediction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Time-dynamic ML models can support personalized HRQoL prediction in breast cancer care. Future improvements should focus on calibration and fairness to enable equitable, clinically meaningful implementation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/81424","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T21:20:10Z","timestamp":1770240010000},"page":"e81424-e81424","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Time-Dynamic AI Models to Predict Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Development and Validation Study Using the EORTC BALANCE Cohort"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-5501-1583","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Niclas J","family":"Hubel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6693-5146","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thijs G W","family":"van der Heijden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9150-6856","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Benjamin","family":"Murauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0172-0857","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Belle H","family":"de Rooij","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9218-617X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kelly M","family":"de Ligt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9480-1623","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Helena M","family":"Verkooijen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7828-1138","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sofie AM","family":"Gernaat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6887-2882","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Meeke","family":"Hoedjes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9320-8684","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Volker","family":"Arndt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0413-6872","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lonneke V","family":"van de Poll-Franse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3389-3621","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bernhard","family":"Holzner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4670-7517","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jens","family":"Lehmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10074","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1134","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31891-8","article-title":"Breast cancer","volume":"389","author":"Harbeck","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"7","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1017\/S1355617703970019","article-title":"Neuropsychological effects of treatments for adults with cancer: a meta-analysis and review of the literature","volume":"9","author":"Anderson-Hanley","journal-title":"J Int Neuropsychol Soc"},{"issue":"1","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-020-01591-x","article-title":"Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: review of reviews from 2008 to 2018","volume":"18","author":"Mokhtari-Hessari","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"issue":"2","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.3109\/0284186X.2012.746468","article-title":"Unmet needs of women with breast cancer during and after primary treatment: a prospective study in Denmark","volume":"52","author":"von Heymann-Horan","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21558","article-title":"Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow\u2010up care in the United States: proceedings from an American Cancer Society\u2013American Society of Clinical Oncology summit","volume":"69","author":"Alfano","journal-title":"CA A Cancer J Clinicians"},{"issue":"5","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0267931","article-title":"Using machine learning to predict health-related quality of life outcomes in patients with low grade glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma","volume":"17","author":"Karri","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"2","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03820-y","article-title":"Exploring the role of health-related quality of life measures in predictive modelling for oncology: a systematic review","volume":"34","author":"van der Heijden","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2022.07.006","article-title":"Progression-free survival and quality of life in metastatic breast cancer: the patient perspective","volume":"65","author":"Mertz","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/PPA.S432821","article-title":"Understanding patient preferences regarding the important determinants of breast cancer treatment: a narrative scoping review","volume":"17","author":"Yeo","journal-title":"Patient Prefer Adherence"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m441","article-title":"Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model","volume":"368","author":"Riley","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esmorw.2025.100172","article-title":"Opportunities and challenges in pooling health-related quality-of-life data for prediction modeling in breast cancer across Europe: lessons from the EORTC BALANCE project","volume":"9","author":"van der Heijden","journal-title":"ESMO Real World Data Digit Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-024-00808-7","article-title":"Machine learning models including patient-reported outcome data in oncology: a systematic literature review and analysis of their reporting quality","volume":"8","author":"Krepper","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2021.09.009","article-title":"Machine learning to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and breast reconstruction (INSPiRED-001)","volume":"60","author":"Pfob","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"1","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-012-2174-6","article-title":"Predicting two-year quality of life after breast cancer surgery using artificial neural network and linear regression models","volume":"135","author":"Shi","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"1","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08839514.2022.2055393","article-title":"Explainable analytics to predict the quality of life in patients with prostate cancer from longitudinal data","volume":"36","author":"Sharifi","journal-title":"Appl Artif Intell"},{"issue":"1","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4209","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-07939-1","article-title":"A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape","volume":"12","author":"Castelnovo","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"6","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3457607","article-title":"A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning","volume":"54","author":"Mehrabi","journal-title":"ACM Comput Surv"},{"issue":"12","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-1990","article-title":"Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity","volume":"169","author":"Rajkomar","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.28575","article-title":"Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: Enhancing Minority Participation in Clinical Trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials","volume":"120 Suppl 7","author":"Chen","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2023-078378","article-title":"TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods","volume":"385","author":"Collins","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"12","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.5870","article-title":"Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in biomedical research: a multidisciplinary view","volume":"18","author":"Luo","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1854","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-010-0945-z","article-title":"Sentinel node identification rate and nodal involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial","volume":"17","author":"Straver","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03787-w","article-title":"Moving beyond barriers: a mixed-method study to develop evidence-based strategies to improve implementation of PROMs in clinical oncology care","volume":"34","author":"Boomstra","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-020-04745-w","article-title":"Evaluating the use of the EORTC patient-reported outcome measures for improving inter-rater reliability of CTCAE ratings in a mixed population of cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial","volume":"21","author":"Wintner","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"2","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-017-4242-4","article-title":"The Utrecht Cohort for Multiple Breast Cancer Intervention Studies and Long-Term Evaluation (UMBRELLA): objectives, design, and baseline results","volume":"164","author":"Young-Afat","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"1","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-021-01406-1","article-title":"Towards Optimal Timing and Method for Promoting Sustained Adherence to Lifestyle and Body Weight Recommendations in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors (the OPTIMUM-study): protocol for a longitudinal mixed-method study","volume":"21","author":"van Cappellen-van Maldegem","journal-title":"BMC WOMENS Health"},{"issue":"7","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1016\/s0895-4356(00)00351-6","article-title":"Socio-demographic factors, health behavior and late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in Germany: a population-based study","volume":"54","author":"Arndt","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"R28","unstructured":"R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: https:\/\/www.R-project.org\/ [Accessed 14-04-2026]"},{"issue":"5","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/85.5.365","article-title":"The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology","volume":"85","author":"Aaronson","journal-title":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute"},{"issue":"10","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2756","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.1996.14.10.2756","article-title":"The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study","volume":"14","author":"Sprangers","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"R31","unstructured":"IterativeImputer. scikit-learn. URL: https:\/\/scikit-learn.org\/stable\/modules\/generated\/sklearn.impute.IterativeImputer.html [Accessed 14-04-2026]"},{"key":"R32","unstructured":"Fayers PM Aaronson NK Bjordal K et al. The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual (3rd edition). European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels; 2001. URL: https:\/\/www.eortc.org\/app\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2018\/02\/SCmanual.pdf [Accessed 18-04-2026]"},{"key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003","article-title":"Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research","volume":"118","author":"Giesinger","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"85","key":"R34","first-page":"2825","volume":"12","author":"Pedregosa","journal-title":"J Mach Learn Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03807-9","article-title":"Development of a prediction model for clinically-relevant fatigue: a multi-cancer approach","volume":"34","author":"Adiprakoso","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/CCI.23.00264","article-title":"Using machine learning to predict unplanned hospital utilization and chemotherapy management from patient-reported outcome measures","volume":"8","author":"W\u00f3jcik","journal-title":"JCO Clin Cancer Inform"},{"issue":"7","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1016\/S0031-3203(96)00142-2","article-title":"The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms","volume":"30","author":"Bradley","journal-title":"Pattern Recognit DAGM"},{"issue":"11","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1270","DOI":"10.1038\/s41592-021-01302-4","article-title":"The class imbalance problem","volume":"18","author":"Megahed","journal-title":"Nat Methods"},{"key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steyerberg EW . Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. Springer Cham; 2019. [doi: 10.1007\/978-3-030-16399-0] ISBN: 978-3-030-16398-3","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-16399-0"},{"issue":"96","key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-12-96","article-title":"A review of the reporting and handling of missing data in cohort studies with repeated assessment of exposure measures","volume":"12","author":"Karahalios","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"4","key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwaa225","article-title":"Common methods for handling missing data in marginal structural models: what works and why","volume":"190","author":"Leyrat","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.04.005","article-title":"Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation","volume":"69","author":"Steyerberg","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-019-1466-7","article-title":"Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics","volume":"17","author":"Van Calster","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"R44","unstructured":"B\u0142asiok J Nakkiran P . Smooth ECE: principled reliability diagrams via kernel smoothing. arXiv. Preprint posted online on Sep 21, 2023. [doi: 10.48550\/ARXIV.2309.12236]"},{"issue":"1","key":"R45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1175\/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2","article-title":"Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability","volume":"78","author":"Brier","journal-title":"Mon Wea Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"R46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X06295361","article-title":"Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models","volume":"26","author":"Vickers","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"issue":"6","key":"R47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2018.08.038","article-title":"Reporting and interpreting decision curve analysis: a guide for investigators","volume":"74","author":"Van Calster","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"R48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2023.1166714","article-title":"Editorial: clinical cancer research in vulnerable populations","volume":"13","author":"Tack","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101681","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgo.2023.101681","article-title":"Patient-Reported Frailty Phenotype (PRFP) vs. International Myeloma Working Group frailty index (IMWG FI) proxy: a comparison between two approaches to measuring frailty","volume":"15","author":"Murugappan","journal-title":"J Geriatr Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"R50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2639","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-023-03408-y","article-title":"Longitudinal changes of health-related quality of life over 10 years in breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery","volume":"32","author":"Gao","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"28","key":"R51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3540","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2012.48.1903","article-title":"Quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors","volume":"31","author":"Hsu","journal-title":"JCO"},{"issue":"12","key":"R52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e853","DOI":"10.1016\/S2589-7500(22)00188-1","article-title":"Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve","volume":"4","author":"de Hond","journal-title":"Lancet Digit Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"R53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2007.14.3248","article-title":"Behavioral symptoms in patients with breast cancer and survivors","volume":"26","author":"Bower","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"R54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers13061301","article-title":"Fatigue among long-term breast cancer survivors: a controlled cross-sectional study","volume":"13","author":"Maass","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"issue":"3","key":"R55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21397","article-title":"Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment","volume":"67","author":"Greenlee","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"R56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1102351.1102430","article-title":"Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning","author":"Niculescu-Mizil","journal-title":"Assoc Comput Mach"},{"issue":"10","key":"R57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.21.01252","article-title":"Development and validation of a predictive model of severe fatigue after breast cancer diagnosis: toward a personalized framework in survivorship care","volume":"40","author":"Di Meglio","journal-title":"JCO"},{"issue":"1","key":"R58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-020-1064-9","article-title":"Development and internal validation of prediction models for colorectal cancer survivors to estimate the 1-year risk of low health-related quality of life in multiple domains","volume":"20","author":"R\u00e9v\u00e9sz","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"issue":"12","key":"R59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7046","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-023-13971-w","article-title":"Enhanced surgical decision-making tools in breast cancer: predicting 2-year postoperative physical, sexual, and psychosocial well-being following mastectomy and breast reconstruction (INSPiRED 004)","volume":"30","author":"Xu","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annonc.2019.10.027","article-title":"An international update of the EORTC questionnaire for assessing quality of life in breast cancer patients: EORTC QLQ-BR45","volume":"31","author":"Bjelic-Radisic","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-023-00858-z","article-title":"Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies","volume":"6","author":"Mittermaier","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"R62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pdig.0000651","article-title":"Bias in medical AI: implications for clinical decision-making","volume":"3","author":"Cross","journal-title":"PLOS Digit Health"},{"key":"R63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.p1893","article-title":"Making the invisible visible: what can we do about biased AI in medical devices?","volume":"382","author":"Whitehead","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"R64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annonc.2022.04.007","article-title":"The role of patient-reported outcome measures in the continuum of cancer clinical care: ESMO clinical practice guideline","volume":"33","author":"Di Maio","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/69398","article-title":"Sustainability and time trends in electronic patient-reported outcome assessment in routine cancer care: systematic scoping review and follow-up survey","volume":"27","author":"Hubel","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2019.10.031","article-title":"Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in early and metastatic breast cancer","volume":"125","author":"Mierzynska","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"8045","key":"R67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-024-08328-6","article-title":"Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model","volume":"637","author":"Hollmann","journal-title":"Nat New Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"R68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.3390\/informatics7030025","article-title":"Clinical implementation of predictive models embedded within electronic health record systems: a systematic review","volume":"7","author":"Lee","journal-title":"Informatics (MDPI)"},{"issue":"7","key":"R69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/CCI.23.00070","article-title":"Fixing the leaky pipe: how to improve the uptake of patient-reported outcomes-based prognostic and predictive models in cancer clinical practice","volume":"7","author":"Spencer","journal-title":"JCO Clin Cancer Inform"},{"key":"R70","unstructured":"BALANCE-ML. GitHub. URL: https:\/\/github.com\/NJHubel\/BALANCE-ML\/blob\/main\/README.md [Accessed 14-04-2026]"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Internet Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e81424","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T18:15:13Z","timestamp":1782843313000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e81424"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]},"references-count":70,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/81424","relation":{},"ISSN":["1438-8871"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1438-8871","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]]},"article-number":"v28i10074e81424"}}