{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T19:07:16Z","timestamp":1782846436506,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Form Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Lately, big data studies have shown promise in using patient characteristics to rank the likelihood of retention of antiseizure medications (ASMs), a measure indicating tolerability as well as effect. How such results can be integrated into clinical practice has yet to be studied. We developed EPstat, a noncommercial tool that provides physicians with real-world treatment retention data from 33,998 patients with epilepsy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study investigated the user experience of EPstat after its pilot launch.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>EPstat was developed in an iterative process with first a prototype and then a final version accessible on the health care region intranet. EPstat was launched in 2022 through emails and information meetings at neurology departments. After 1 year, an online questionnaire was distributed to physicians in our health service region\u2019s neurology clinics (5 hospitals). Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to summarize responses. To supplement the survey, 3 semistructured workshops or group interviews with neurologists and residents were used to gather further feedback.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of the 27 survey respondents, 19 (70%) were aware of EPstat and 10 (37%) had used it. Users rated EPstat highly for ease of use (median 5, IQR 4\u20105) and applicability in clinical practice (median 4, IQR 4\u20104). Two of the 10 respondents who had used it indicated that the platform had influenced their choice of ASM. Workshop participants advocated for expanding the platform to include retention data on newer ASMs and general information relevant to epilepsy management.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The notion of using big data to improve ASM selection was well received. However, there were barriers to the initial use, and users requested a more comprehensive resource that also incorporated other information related to epilepsy. EPstat is now being updated with more recent ASM statistics, including information on newer ASMs. Mobile access, more information for physicians, and mentioning the tool in regional guidelines are some possible measures to increase use. Linking multinational statistics could also increase the precision of the presented data and, thus, increase usefulness. Study of EPstat will continue and should include thematic analysis of representative and rigorously sampled workshop participants. Such studies are also likely to provide information on how physicians and health services receive web-based tools, which are likely to soon be driven by artificial intelligence. In similar projects, we recommend greater participatory involvement of both health care providers and patients already at the design stage.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/82958","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T19:50:57Z","timestamp":1770839457000},"page":"e82958-e82958","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Physician Perspectives on Web-Based Real-World Statistics for Better-Informed Drug Selection in Epilepsy: Mixed Methods Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8334-951X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David","family":"Larsson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-9200-023X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andr\u00e9","family":"Ideg\u00e5rd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8681-0113","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samuel","family":"H\u00e5kansson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9445-4545","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Johan","family":"Zelano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2617","DOI":"10.1111\/epi.17711","article-title":"Antiseizure medication selection and retention for adult onset focal epilepsy in a Swedish health service region: a population-based cohort study","volume":"64","author":"Larsson","journal-title":"Epilepsia"},{"issue":"2","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.0000000000209500","article-title":"Trends in antiseizure medication initiation, switch, or termination in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a nationwide study","volume":"103","author":"Bolin","journal-title":"Neurology (ECronicon)"},{"issue":"10282","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1363","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00247-6","article-title":"The SANAD II study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam, zonisamide, or lamotrigine for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, phase 4, randomised controlled trial","volume":"397","author":"Marson","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1111\/epi.12926","article-title":"A randomized, double-blind comparison of antiepileptic drug treatment in the elderly with new-onset focal epilepsy","volume":"56","author":"Werhahn","journal-title":"Epilepsia"},{"issue":"9","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2123","DOI":"10.1111\/epi.16987","article-title":"Potential for improved retention rate by personalized antiseizure medication selection: a register-based analysis","volume":"62","author":"H\u00e5kansson","journal-title":"Epilepsia"},{"issue":"6","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1571","DOI":"10.1111\/epi.17226","article-title":"Antiseizure medication treatment pathways for US Medicare beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy","volume":"63","author":"Terman","journal-title":"Epilepsia"},{"issue":"1-2","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yebeh.2010.04.001","article-title":"Measuring outcomes of treatment with antiepileptic drugs in clinical trials","volume":"18","author":"Ben-Menachem","journal-title":"Epilepsy Behav"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.seizure.2018.11.013","article-title":"Retention rate of first antiepileptic drug in poststroke epilepsy: a nationwide study","volume":"64","author":"Larsson","journal-title":"Seizure"},{"issue":"4","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1097\/WNF.0b013e3180333069","article-title":"Monotherapy of lamotrigine versus carbamazepine in patients with poststroke seizure","volume":"30","author":"Gilad","journal-title":"Clin Neuropharmacol"},{"issue":"4","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1159\/000342669","article-title":"Levetiracetam versus carbamazepine in patients with late poststroke seizures: a multicenter prospective randomized open-label study (EpIC Project)","volume":"34","author":"Consoli","journal-title":"Cerebrovasc Dis"},{"issue":"9566","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1000","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)60460-7","article-title":"The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial","volume":"369","author":"Marson","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1553","DOI":"10.1111\/epi.17235","article-title":"Big data analysis of ASM retention rates and expert ASM algorithm: a comparative study","volume":"63","author":"H\u00e5kansson","journal-title":"Epilepsia"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yebeh.2015.12.039","article-title":"Changing the approach to treatment choice in epilepsy using big data","volume":"56","author":"Devinsky","journal-title":"Epilepsy Behav"},{"issue":"6","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1177\/1062860615605176","article-title":"SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process","volume":"30","author":"Ogrinc","journal-title":"Am J Med Qual"},{"key":"R15","unstructured":"L\u00e4kemedelsbehandling av epilepsi \u2013 behandlingsrekommendation. Swedish Medical Products Agency. URL: https:\/\/snpf.barnlakarforeningen.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2020\/01\/tjugoepilepsirek.pdf [Accessed 25-05-2025]"},{"issue":"11","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4235","DOI":"10.1111\/epi.18541","article-title":"Real-world retention of newer ASMs, including lacosamide and brivaracetam as first or second therapies in adult-onset epilepsy","volume":"66","author":"Ideg\u00e5rd","journal-title":"Epilepsia"},{"issue":"4","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1080\/01944366908977225","article-title":"A ladder of citizen participation","volume":"35","author":"Arnstein","journal-title":"J Am Inst Plann"}],"container-title":["JMIR Formative Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/formative.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e82958","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T18:17:02Z","timestamp":1782843422000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/formative.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e82958"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]]},"references-count":17,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/82958","relation":{},"ISSN":["2561-326X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2561-326X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]]},"article-number":"v10i10e82958"}}