{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]],"date-time":"2026-08-24T20:23:12Z","timestamp":1787602992746,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":88,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Med Inform"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Public reporting systems (PRSs) in health care are defined as digital platforms that make comparative health care performance data available to the public (eg, Hospital Compare in the United States, NHS Choices in the United Kingdom, national quality registries in Europe, and MyHospital in Australia). These systems aim to improve transparency, accountability, and patient choice. While these systems have been widely studied from policy and clinical perspectives, the information system (IS) foundations that enable their operation, including architecture, interoperability, data governance, APIs, usability, and technical performance, remain underexplored.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This study aims to map the extent and nature of the published literature addressing the technological foundations of PRSs in health care and to identify persistent gaps in IS scholarship.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and was reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews). Seven databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), AIS (Association for Information Systems) eLibrary, and Cochrane. The search covered articles published between 2000 and 2026. Eligible articles included peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers on PRSs in health care. Data were charted according to study characteristics, including 6 IS-specific coding dimensions: architecture, interoperability, data governance, APIs, usability, and technical performance. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings, and a narrative synthesis was conducted to identify thematic trends and research gaps.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n A total of 1882 records were identified across 7 databases. After deduplication, 1127 records were screened, and 233 studies were included in the review. Most of the included studies originated from the United States (n=157, 67.4%), followed by Europe (n=43, 18.4%). Of the 233 included studies analyzed, 60.5% (n=141) used quantitative methods, whereas 24.0% (n=56) used qualitative methods and 15.5% (n=36) used mixed methods. Applying a structured IS coding framework to all 233 studies revealed that the technical substrate of PRSs remains underexplored.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n Despite the centrality of IS infrastructure to public reporting, existing scholarship predominantly frames these systems as policy or social tools while neglecting their technical underpinnings. This oversight has practical implications, including poor system usability, weak interoperability, and noncompliance with data regulations, which can undermine patient trust and system effectiveness. Addressing this gap requires interdisciplinary approaches that integrate IS frameworks, sociotechnical analysis, and usability evaluation to ensure that PRSs are effective, equitable, and technically robust.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/84820","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T13:50:06Z","timestamp":1784728206000},"page":"e84820-e84820","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Public Reporting Systems in Health Care and the Underconceptualized Technical Substrate, a Core Information Systems Dimension: Scoping Review"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5695-3415","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elorm","family":"Damalie","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2169-7997","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Reima","family":"Suomi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-5195-9421","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Moustafa","family":"Mahmoud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2024.105222","article-title":"Public reporting in five health care areas: a comparative content analysis across nine countries","volume":"152","author":"Sapin","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"issue":"3","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.22.3.134","article-title":"Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom","volume":"22","author":"Marshall","journal-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)"},{"issue":"6","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"972","DOI":"10.1093\/eurpub\/ckx145","article-title":"Does public reporting influence quality, patient and provider\u2019s perspective, market share and disparities? A review","volume":"27","author":"Vukovic","journal-title":"Eur J Public Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzr056","article-title":"The perceived impact of public reporting hospital performance data: interviews with hospital staff","volume":"23","author":"Hafner","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"issue":"suppl_3","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1093\/eurpub\/ckx187.751","article-title":"Public reporting as a quality strategy","volume":"27","author":"Cacace","journal-title":"Eur J Public Health"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Friedberg MW Pronovost PJ Shahian DM et al. A methodological critique of the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard. May 4, 2016;5:1. [doi: 10.7249\/PE170] [Medline: 28083411]","DOI":"10.7249\/rhq-05-04-01"},{"issue":"5","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.2280","article-title":"Patients\u2019 ratings of family physician practices on the internet: usage and associations with conventional measures of quality in the English National Health Service","volume":"14","author":"Greaves","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.34172\/ijhpm.2023.7648","article-title":"Quality and utility of European cardiovascular and orthopaedic registries for the regulatory evaluation of medical device safety and performance across the implant lifecycle: a systematic review","volume":"12","author":"Hoogervorst","journal-title":"Int J Health Policy Manag"},{"issue":"1","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.3109\/17453671003635918","article-title":"The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (www.shpr.se)","volume":"81","author":"K\u00e4rrholm","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"6","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.4.180084","article-title":"Orthopaedic registries\u2014the UK view (National Joint Registry): impact on practice","volume":"4","author":"Porter","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev"},{"issue":"22","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2694","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.296.22.2694","article-title":"Relationship between Medicare\u2019s hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates","volume":"296","author":"Werner","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R12","unstructured":"Chen J . Public reporting of health system performance: a rapid review of evidence on impact on patients, providers and healthcare organisations. Sax Institute; URL: https:\/\/www.saxinstitute.org.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/17_Public-reporting-of-health-system-performance....pdf [Accessed 05-08-2026]"},{"issue":"3","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1111\/rssa.12026","article-title":"Florence Nightingale, statistics and the Crimean War","volume":"177","author":"McDonald","journal-title":"J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc"},{"issue":"1","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1513\/AnnalsATS.201407-342OC","article-title":"Effect of public reporting on intensive care unit discharge destination and outcomes","volume":"12","author":"Reineck","journal-title":"Ann Am Thorac Soc"},{"issue":"5","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04373.x","article-title":"Public reporting of comparative information about quality of healthcare","volume":"176","author":"Marshall","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"issue":"9","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1792","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21096","article-title":"Consumer empowerment through metadata\u2010based information quality reporting: the Breast Cancer Knowledge Online Portal","volume":"60","author":"McKemmish","journal-title":"J Am Soc Inf Sci"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/RMHP.S337596","article-title":"Disparate impacts of two public reporting initiatives on clinical and perceived quality in healthcare","volume":"14","author":"Han","journal-title":"Risk Manag Healthc Policy"},{"key":"R18","unstructured":"Totten AM Wagner J Tiwari A O\u2019Haire C Griffin J Walker M . Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol 5: public reporting as a quality improvement strategy). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012. 12-E011-EF. URL: https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK99879\/ [Accessed 10-08-2026]"},{"issue":"1","key":"R19","volume":"1","author":"Cacace","journal-title":"Rand Health Q"},{"issue":"1 Suppl","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"I30","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-200301001-00004","article-title":"Connections between quality measurement and improvement","volume":"41","author":"Berwick","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"10","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1239","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.293.10.1239","article-title":"The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information","volume":"293","author":"Werner","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-016-1543-y","article-title":"The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"Campanella","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1177\/1077558717699311","article-title":"Hospital Compare and Hospital Choice: public reporting and hospital choice by hip replacement patients in Texas","volume":"76","author":"Blake","journal-title":"Med Care Res Rev"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-12-272","article-title":"Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review","volume":"12","author":"Victoor","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.21315\/mjms2017.24.6.11","article-title":"Evaluating the concept of choice in healthcare","volume":"24","author":"Zolkefli","journal-title":"Malays J Med Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1086\/651242","article-title":"Does choice mean freedom and well-being?","volume":"37","author":"Markus","journal-title":"J Consum Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2009.08.008","article-title":"The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts","volume":"79","author":"Holmstr\u00f6m","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.matpr.2021.07.210","article-title":"Cloud computing approaches in health care","volume":"51","author":"Faridi","journal-title":"Mater Today"},{"issue":"4","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00530-020-00736-8","article-title":"Leveraging big data analytics in healthcare enhancement: trends, challenges and opportunities","volume":"28","author":"Rehman","journal-title":"Multimedia Systems"},{"issue":"188","key":"R30","first-page":"1","author":"Gibbons","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S660","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-013-2455-8","article-title":"Bringing big data to personalized healthcare: a patient-centered framework","volume":"28 Suppl 3","author":"Chawla","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S42","DOI":"10.15265\/IYS-2016-s005","article-title":"Consumer health informatics: past, present, and future of a rapidly evolving domain","volume":"Suppl 1","author":"Demiris","journal-title":"Yearb Med Inform"},{"issue":"2","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00006","article-title":"Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care","volume":"148","author":"Fung","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1080\/1364557032000119616","article-title":"Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework","volume":"8","author":"Arksey","journal-title":"Int J Soc Res Methodol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-5-69","article-title":"Scoping studies: advancing the methodology","volume":"5","author":"Levac","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-0850","article-title":"PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation","volume":"169","author":"Tricco","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/26189","article-title":"The impact of digital patient portals on health outcomes, system efficiency, and patient attitudes: updated systematic literature review","volume":"23","author":"Carini","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/15038","article-title":"Using patient portals to improve patient outcomes: systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Han","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"issue":"3","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/34894","article-title":"Dashboards in health care settings: protocol for a scoping review","volume":"11","author":"Helminski","journal-title":"JMIR Res Protoc"},{"issue":"9","key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0183667","article-title":"Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: a systematic review","volume":"12","author":"Hoque","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jamiaopen\/ooac085","article-title":"A systematic review of the effectiveness of patient education through patient portals","volume":"6","author":"Johnson","journal-title":"JAMIA Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/cmaf036","article-title":"Effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimize prescribing in general practice: a systematic review","volume":"42","author":"McCarthy","journal-title":"Fam Pract"},{"issue":"1","key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-022-02037-8","article-title":"Requirements and challenges of hospital dashboards: a systematic literature review","volume":"22","author":"Rabiei","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"issue":"5","key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1000","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocad033","article-title":"Enhancing the nation\u2019s public health information infrastructure: a report from the ACMI symposium","volume":"30","author":"Dixon","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"7","key":"R45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/21929","article-title":"The Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Standard: Systematic Literature Review of Implementations, Applications, Challenges and Opportunities","volume":"9","author":"Ayaz","journal-title":"JMIR Med Inform"},{"issue":"5","key":"R46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocv189","article-title":"SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records","volume":"23","author":"Mandel","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"R47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12961-024-01193-9","article-title":"A framework for health information governance: a scoping review","volume":"22","author":"Ghaffari Heshajin","journal-title":"Health Res Policy Syst"},{"issue":"7","key":"R48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000001536","article-title":"Electronic health record usability: associations with nurse and patient outcomes in hospitals","volume":"59","author":"Kutney-Lee","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"R49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/mhealth.8851","article-title":"Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) for usability assessment of mobile health technology: validation study","volume":"6","author":"Schnall","journal-title":"JMIR mHealth uHealth"},{"issue":"6","key":"R50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1403","DOI":"10.1111\/jep.13582","article-title":"Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems: metrics and Evaluation Methods for eHealth Systems","volume":"27","author":"Wronikowska","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"},{"issue":"4","key":"R51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"950","DOI":"10.11124\/JBIES-21-00483","article-title":"What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis","volume":"20","author":"Munn","journal-title":"JBI Evid Synth"},{"issue":"1","key":"R52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-018-0611-x","article-title":"Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach","volume":"18","author":"Munn","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"10","key":"R53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2119","DOI":"10.11124\/JBIES-20-00167","article-title":"Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews","volume":"18","author":"Peters","journal-title":"JBI Evid Synth"},{"issue":"1","key":"R54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/hir.12020","article-title":"From NHS Choices to the integrated customer service platform","volume":"30","author":"Gann","journal-title":"Health Info Libr J"},{"issue":"6","key":"R55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.5694\/mja11.11246","article-title":"The comparability of emergency department waiting time performance data","volume":"197","author":"Greene","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"issue":"3","key":"R56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa051249","article-title":"Care in U.S. hospitals\u2014the Hospital Quality Alliance program","volume":"353","author":"Jha","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"65-75","key":"R57","first-page":"65","volume":"119","author":"Cebul","journal-title":"Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc"},{"issue":"4","key":"R58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"772","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2012.06.002","article-title":"The impact of emerging standards adoption on automated quality reporting","volume":"45","author":"Fu","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"issue":"1","key":"R59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10916-024-02068-w","article-title":"Web-based dashboard on ECMO utilization in Germany: an interactive visualization, analyses, and prediction based on real-life data","volume":"48","author":"Friedrichson","journal-title":"J Med Syst"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"R60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00004","article-title":"Comparison of hospital risk-standardized mortality rates calculated by using in-hospital and 30-day models: an observational study with implications for hospital profiling","volume":"156","author":"Drye","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"R61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000000482","article-title":"The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care","volume":"260","author":"Talsma","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"R62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5334\/dsj-2021-012","article-title":"Versioning data is about more than revisions: a conceptual framework and proposed principles","volume":"20","author":"Klump","journal-title":"Data Sci J"},{"issue":"2233","key":"R63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.2021.0300","article-title":"FAIR data pipeline: provenance-driven data management for traceable scientific workflows","volume":"380","author":"Mitchell","journal-title":"Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"R64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm13060991","article-title":"Provenance data management in health information systems: a systematic literature review","volume":"13","author":"Sembay","journal-title":"J Pers Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1089\/wound.2017.0743","article-title":"Publicly reported wound healing rates: the fantasy and the reality","volume":"7","author":"Fife","journal-title":"Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)"},{"issue":"4","key":"R66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.2003.11045748","article-title":"The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update","volume":"19","author":"DeLone","journal-title":"J Manag Inf Syst"},{"issue":"2","key":"R67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.12.2.121.9700","article-title":"Research commentary: desperately seeking the \u201cIT\u201d in IT research\u2014a call to theorizing the IT artifact","volume":"12","author":"Orlikowski","journal-title":"Information Systems Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"R68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.1100.0318","article-title":"Research commentary\u2014digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda","volume":"21","author":"Tilson","journal-title":"Inf Syst Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.13063\/2327-9214.1244","article-title":"A harmonized data quality assessment terminology and framework for the secondary use of electronic health record data","volume":"4","author":"Kahn","journal-title":"EGEMS (Wash DC)"},{"issue":"5 Pt 2","key":"R70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1442","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-6773.2010.01140.x","article-title":"Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access","volume":"45","author":"Rosenbaum","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1136\/amiajnl-2011-000681","article-title":"Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research","volume":"20","author":"Weiskopf","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"7393","key":"R72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.326.7393.816","article-title":"Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care","volume":"326","author":"Campbell","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"R73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzg081","article-title":"Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement","volume":"15","author":"Mainz","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"R74","unstructured":"Regulation (EU) 2016\/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95\/46\/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (text with EEA relevance). European Union; 2016. URL: https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/reg\/2016\/679\/oj\/eng [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"key":"R75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008","article-title":"Data governance: a conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda","volume":"49","author":"Abraham","journal-title":"Int J Inf Manage"},{"issue":"1","key":"R76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1145\/1629175.1629210","article-title":"Designing data governance","volume":"53","author":"Khatri","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"issue":"18","key":"R77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2164","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.298.18.2164","article-title":"Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on health research","volume":"298","author":"Ness","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i50","DOI":"10.1136\/qshc.2005.015842","article-title":"Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model","volume":"15 Suppl 1","author":"Carayon","journal-title":"Qual Saf Health Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"R79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2004.01.003","article-title":"Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems","volume":"37","author":"Kushniruk","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"R80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i68","DOI":"10.1136\/qshc.2010.042085","article-title":"A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems","volume":"19 Suppl 3","author":"Sittig","journal-title":"Qual Saf Health Care"},{"key":"R81","unstructured":"Public law 114-255\u201421st century Cures Act. United States Government Publishing Office (GPO); 2016. URL: https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/PLAW-114publ255\/pdf\/PLAW-114publ255.pdf [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"key":"R82","unstructured":"Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Interoperability and Patient Access for Medicare Advantage Organizations and Medicaid Managed Care Plans, State Medicaid Agencies, CHIP Agencies and CHIP Managed Care Entities, Issuers of Qualified Health Plans on the Federally Facilitated Exchanges, and Health Care Providers. United States Government Publishing Office (GPO); 2020. URL: https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/FR-2020-05-01\/pdf\/2020-05050.pdf#page=1 [Accessed 06-08-2026]"},{"key":"R83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2018.02.019","article-title":"\u201cWhat is meant by public?\u201d: Stakeholder views on strengthening impacts of public reporting of hospital performance data","volume":"202","author":"Canaway","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2018.10.003","article-title":"The impact of public performance reporting on health plan selection and switching: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"123","author":"Kelaher","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"R85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-020644","article-title":"Public performance reporting and hospital choice: a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing cancer surgery in the Australian private healthcare sector","volume":"8","author":"Prang","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"R86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0247297","article-title":"Mechanisms and impact of public reporting on physicians and hospitals\u2019 performance: a systematic review (2000-2020)","volume":"16","author":"Prang","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"2","key":"R87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2015.11.001","article-title":"The National Cardiovascular Data Registry voluntary public reporting program: an interim report from the NCDR Public Reporting Advisory Group","volume":"67","author":"Dehmer","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"R88","unstructured":"Extraction table for scoping review. Zenodo. URL: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.20005465 [Accessed 06-08-2026]"}],"container-title":["JMIR Medical Informatics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]],"date-time":"2026-08-24T19:52:23Z","timestamp":1787601143000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/medinform.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e84820"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]]},"references-count":88,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/84820","relation":{},"ISSN":["2291-9694"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2291-9694","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]]},"article-number":"v14i3e84820"}}